Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Ashford, J.H.; Matkin, D.I.: Studies in the application of free text package systems for information storage and retrieval in libraries and related information centres (1982) 0.12
    0.12099257 = product of:
      0.32264686 = sum of:
        0.06614802 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06614802 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
        0.11847561 = weight(_text_:case in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11847561 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.68003565 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
        0.13802324 = weight(_text_:studies in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13802324 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.87287253 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Series
    Case studies in library automation; no.1
  2. Muddamalle, M.R.: Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval : a case study in soil mechanics (1998) 0.02
    0.023150655 = product of:
      0.09260262 = sum of:
        0.05077526 = weight(_text_:case in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05077526 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.04182736 = weight(_text_:studies in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04182736 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The effectiveness ot two information retrieval tools, namely, thesaurus and natural language, in an information retrieval system has been studies. A database SOILSC was created using a HP3000/58 series minicomputer and MINISIS software. Records of articles totalling 17.918 published in various journals, received in the Central Water and Power Research Station (CWPRS) library (Pune, India) since 1988, have been stored. The information needs of a soil mechanics group have been formulated using thesaurus and natural language into 81 search strategies. In consultation with the user, relevance of the retrieved documents was assessed and, recall (R) and precision (P) values were calculated. Since both thesaurus and natural language have shown identical performance in information retrieval, a combination of these two have been suggested for making searches and providing relevant information
  3. Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access - free text and controlled : the case of Papua New Guinea (1985) 0.01
    0.008462544 = product of:
      0.06770035 = sum of:
        0.06770035 = weight(_text_:case in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06770035 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  4. Tenopir, C.; Ro, J.S.: Full text databases (1990) 0.01
    0.008268503 = product of:
      0.06614802 = sum of:
        0.06614802 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06614802 = score(doc=1916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information technology and libraries. 10(1991) S.156-157 (E. Kanter)
  5. Hildreth, C.R.: ¬The use and understanding of keyword searching in a university online catalog (1997) 0.01
    0.008268503 = product of:
      0.06614802 = sum of:
        0.06614802 = weight(_text_:libraries in 7377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06614802 = score(doc=7377,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 7377, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7377)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 16(1997) no.x, S.52-62
  6. Shewale, N.G.: Information delivery of full-text databases in academic and research libraries using hypermedia (1998) 0.01
    0.008268503 = product of:
      0.06614802 = sum of:
        0.06614802 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06614802 = score(doc=3566,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.50813097 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 5th National Convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), at Bhubaneswar, 4-5 March 1998
    Source
    Information management in academic and research libraries: Proceedings of the 5th National convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), Bhubaneswar, India, 4-5 March 1998. Ed. by M. Mahapatra et al
  7. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.01
    0.0061617517 = product of:
      0.049294014 = sum of:
        0.049294014 = weight(_text_:studies in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049294014 = score(doc=4214,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.3117402 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
  8. Voorbij, H.: Title keywords and subject descriptors : a comparison of subject search entries of books in the humanities and social sciences (1998) 0.01
    0.0061617517 = product of:
      0.049294014 = sum of:
        0.049294014 = weight(_text_:studies in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049294014 = score(doc=4721,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.3117402 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In order to compare the value of subject descriptors and title keywords as entries to subject searches, two studies were carried out. Both studies concentrated on monographs in the humanities and social sciences, held by the online public access catalogue of the National Library of the Netherlands. In the first study, a comparison was made by subject librarians between the subject descriptors and the title keywords of 475 records. They could express their opinion on a scale from 1 (descriptor is exactly or almost the same as word in title) to 7 (descriptor does not appear in title at all). It was concluded that 37 per cent of the records are considerably enhanced by a subject descriptor, and 49 per cent slightly or considerably enhanced. In the second study, subject librarians performed subject searches using title keywords and subject descriptors on the same topic. The relative recall amounted to 48 per cent and 86 per cent respectively. Failure analysis revealed the reasons why so many records that were found by subject descriptors were not found by title keywords. First, although completely meaningless titles hardly ever appear, the title of a publication does not always offer sufficient clues for title keyword searching. In those cases, descriptors may enhance the record of a publication. A second and even more important task of subject descriptors is controlling the vocabulary. Many relevant titles cannot be retrieved by title keyword searching because of the wide diversity of ways of expressing a topic. Descriptors take away the burden of vocabulary control from the user.
  9. Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015) 0.01
    0.006099823 = product of:
      0.048798583 = sum of:
        0.048798583 = weight(_text_:studies in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048798583 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In their 2005 study, Gross and Taylor found that more than a third of records retrieved by keyword searches would be lost without subject headings. A review of the literature since then shows that numerous studies, in various disciplines, have found that a quarter to a third of records returned in a keyword search would be lost without controlled vocabulary. Other writers, though, have continued to suggest that controlled vocabulary be discontinued. Addressing criticisms of the Gross/Taylor study, this study replicates the search process in the same online catalog, but after the addition of automated enriched metadata such as tables of contents and summaries. The proportion of results that would be lost remains high.
  10. Marcus, J.: Full text year in review : 1996 (1996) 0.01
    0.00531474 = product of:
      0.04251792 = sum of:
        0.04251792 = product of:
          0.08503584 = sum of:
            0.08503584 = weight(_text_:area in 7737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08503584 = score(doc=7737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.43551105 = fieldWeight in 7737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments in full text databases in 1996. Online services are differentiated through quantity rather than niche specializations of content. Full text databases are appearing on the WWW. Examines examples of trade magazine on the WWW from the networking and data communications area. Covers: Networks World Fusion; Data Communications on the Web; Communications Week Interactive; Network Computing Online; LAN Times Online and LAN on the Web
  11. Perez, E.: Text enhancement : Controlled vocabulary vs. free text (1982) 0.00
    0.0047248583 = product of:
      0.037798867 = sum of:
        0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037798867 = score(doc=1355,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 1355, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1355)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Special libraries. 73(1982) no.3, S.183-192
  12. Dow Jones unveils knowledge indexing system (1997) 0.00
    0.0047248583 = product of:
      0.037798867 = sum of:
        0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037798867 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Advanced technology libraries. 26(1997) no.5, S.2-3
  13. Witt, M.: Au sujet des mots-clés (1997) 0.00
    0.0047248583 = product of:
      0.037798867 = sum of:
        0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037798867 = score(doc=1666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Information research using keywords is largely ignored by readers but in medium sized libraries such as that of the City of Science and Industry (Paris), with a multimedia collection of some 200.000 documents, it is the most effective tool. The reader, however, needs guidance in using this technique, and in refining searches to reduce noise. Examples are given demonstrating how keyword searches can identify non-indexed material, documents in other languages, and collective authors
  14. Pritchard-Schoch, T.: Comparing natural language retrieval : Win & Freestyle (1995) 0.00
    0.0047248583 = product of:
      0.037798867 = sum of:
        0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037798867 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a comparison of 2 natural language interfaces to full text legal databases: WIN for access to WESTLAW databases and FREESTYLE for access to the LEXIS database. 30 legal issues in natural langugae queries were presented to identical libraries in both systems. The top 20 ranked documents from each search were analyzed and reviewed for relevance to the legal issue
  15. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017) 0.00
    0.0043570166 = product of:
      0.034856133 = sum of:
        0.034856133 = weight(_text_:studies in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034856133 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.
  16. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.00
    0.0026845017 = product of:
      0.021476014 = sum of:
        0.021476014 = product of:
          0.042952027 = sum of:
            0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042952027 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  17. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.00
    0.0026845017 = product of:
      0.021476014 = sum of:
        0.021476014 = product of:
          0.042952027 = sum of:
            0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042952027 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
  18. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.00
    0.0026845017 = product of:
      0.021476014 = sum of:
        0.021476014 = product of:
          0.042952027 = sum of:
            0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042952027 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
  19. Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.00
    0.0026845017 = product of:
      0.021476014 = sum of:
        0.021476014 = product of:
          0.042952027 = sum of:
            0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042952027 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197
  20. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.00
    0.0020133762 = product of:
      0.01610701 = sum of:
        0.01610701 = product of:
          0.03221402 = sum of:
            0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03221402 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31