-
Bailey, C.W. Jr.: Scholarly electronic publishing bibliography (2003)
0.06
0.059740886 = product of:
0.15930903 = sum of:
0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02834915 = score(doc=1656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
0.071807064 = weight(_text_:case in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071807064 = score(doc=1656,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.41216385 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
0.05915282 = weight(_text_:studies in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05915282 = score(doc=1656,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Content
- Table of Contents 1 Economic Issues* 2 Electronic Books and Texts 2.1 Case Studies and History 2.2 General Works* 2.3 Library Issues* 3 Electronic Serials 3.1 Case Studies and History 3.2 Critiques 3.3 Electronic Distribution of Printed Journals 3.4 General Works* 3.5 Library Issues* 3.6 Research* 4 General Works* 5 Legal Issues 5.1 Intellectual Property Rights* 5.2 License Agreements 5.3 Other Legal Issues 6 Library Issues 6.1 Cataloging, Identifiers, Linking, and Metadata* 6.2 Digital Libraries* 6.3 General Works* 6.4 Information Integrity and Preservation* 7 New Publishing Models* 8 Publisher Issues 8.1 Digital Rights Management* 9 Repositories and E-Prints* Appendix A. Related Bibliographies by the Same Author Appendix B. About the Author
-
Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009)
0.04
0.03774904 = product of:
0.10066411 = sum of:
0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307401 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
0.048798583 = weight(_text_:studies in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048798583 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Evaluative and comparative studies of catalog data have tended to focus on methods that are labor intensive, demand expertise, and can examine only a limited number of records. This study explores an alternative approach to gathering and analyzing catalog data, focusing on the currency and consistency of controlled headings. The resulting data provide insight into libraries' use of changed headings and their success in maintaining currency and consistency, and the systems needed to support the current pace of heading changes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Adkins, S.L.: CD-ROM 1993 : a guide to the literature (1994)
0.03
0.032968502 = product of:
0.13187401 = sum of:
0.047248583 = weight(_text_:libraries in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047248583 = score(doc=768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
0.08462543 = weight(_text_:case in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08462543 = score(doc=768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.48573974 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Reprints a bibliography which appeared in the Sep 1994 issue of 'Computers in libraries. Vol.4, no.8', in this case minus the literature review section. Contains 400 items, in author sequence, together with a subject index
-
Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005)
0.02
0.024072628 = product of:
0.096290514 = sum of:
0.080183506 = weight(_text_:libraries in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080183506 = score(doc=125,freq=16.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.6159477 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005)
0.02
0.021736393 = product of:
0.08694557 = sum of:
0.065469556 = weight(_text_:libraries in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065469556 = score(doc=43,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.5029192 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.02
0.019874409 = product of:
0.079497635 = sum of:
0.06339063 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06339063 = score(doc=2548,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4869494 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005)
0.02
0.019019343 = product of:
0.07607737 = sum of:
0.057285864 = weight(_text_:libraries in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057285864 = score(doc=128,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.4400543 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006)
0.02
0.016897524 = product of:
0.067590095 = sum of:
0.048798583 = weight(_text_:studies in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048798583 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Rockman, I.F.: Strengthening connections between information literacy, general education, and assessment efforts (2002)
0.02
0.015059397 = product of:
0.060237586 = sum of:
0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 45) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02834915 = score(doc=45,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 45, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=45)
0.031888437 = product of:
0.06377687 = sum of:
0.06377687 = weight(_text_:area in 45) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06377687 = score(doc=45,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1952553 = queryWeight, product of:
4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.32663327 = fieldWeight in 45, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.927245 = idf(docFreq=870, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=45)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Academic librarians have a long and rich tradition of collaborating with discipline-based faculty members to advance the mission and goals of the library. Included in this tradition is the area of information literacy, a foundation skill for academic success and a key component of independent, lifelong learning. With the rise of the general education reform movement on many campuses resurfacing in the last decade, libraries have been able to move beyond course-integrated library instruction into a formal planning role for general education programmatic offerings. This article shows the value of 1. strategic alliances, developed over time, to establish information literacy as a foundation for student learning; 2. strong partnerships within a multicampus higher education system to promote and advance information literacy efforts; and 3. assessment as a key component of outcomes-based information literacy activities.
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.01
0.0148187205 = product of:
0.059274882 = sum of:
0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037798867 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.021476014 = product of:
0.042952027 = sum of:
0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042952027 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009)
0.01
0.014483592 = product of:
0.057934366 = sum of:
0.04182736 = weight(_text_:studies in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04182736 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005)
0.01
0.01404969 = product of:
0.05619876 = sum of:
0.040091753 = weight(_text_:libraries in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040091753 = score(doc=121,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bowen, J.: FRBR : coming soon to your library? (2005)
0.01
0.01404969 = product of:
0.05619876 = sum of:
0.040091753 = weight(_text_:libraries in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040091753 = score(doc=122,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model holds great potential for improving access to library resources, but may not affect all libraries in the same way. The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules), assisted by the work of its Format Variation Working Group, is exploring ways to incorporate FRBR into the next edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules to facilitate collocation at the level of the FRBR entity expression. Several library system vendors are also adding FRBR-based functionality to their systems. A combination of these two approaches to FRBR can provide significant benefits to users. Most FRBR entities and attributes are already present in library catalog records, and the influence of FRBR can also be seen in existing library activities. FRBR is thus not something totally foreign, but a fresh, more rigorous way of thinking about what libraries already do that provides a basis for designing new ways to improve users' access to library resources.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Weese, L.C. de: ¬A bibliography of library user studies (1967)
0.01
0.013942453 = product of:
0.111539625 = sum of:
0.111539625 = weight(_text_:studies in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111539625 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.70538753 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006)
0.01
0.013933806 = product of:
0.055735223 = sum of:
0.042312715 = weight(_text_:case in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042312715 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.013422508 = product of:
0.026845016 = sum of:
0.026845016 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026845016 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006)
0.01
0.01296638 = product of:
0.05186552 = sum of:
0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03307401 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.018791512 = product of:
0.037583023 = sum of:
0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037583023 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Campe, P.: Case, semantic roles, and grammatical relations : a comprehensive bibliography (1994)
0.01
0.012693815 = product of:
0.10155052 = sum of:
0.10155052 = weight(_text_:case in 8663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10155052 = score(doc=8663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.5828877 = fieldWeight in 8663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8663)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Leonard, L.E.: Inter-indexer consistency studies, 1954-1975 : a review of the literature and summary of study results (1977)
0.01
0.012199646 = product of:
0.09759717 = sum of:
0.09759717 = weight(_text_:studies in 7494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09759717 = score(doc=7494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.6172141 = fieldWeight in 7494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7494)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
-
Lundy, M.W.: Evidence of application of the DCRB core standard in WorldCat and RLIN (2006)
0.01
0.01111404 = product of:
0.04445616 = sum of:
0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02834915 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The Core Standard for Rare Books, known as the DCRB Core standard, was approved by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging for use beginning in January 1999. Comparable to the core standards for other types of materials, the DCRB Core standard provides requirements for an intermediate level of bibliographic description for the cataloging of rare books. While the Core Standard for Books seems to have found a place in general cataloging practice, the DCRB Core standard appears to have met with resistance among rare book cataloging practitioners. This study investigates the extent to which such resistance exists by examining all of the DCRB Core records in the OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) Online Union Catalog (WorldCat) and the Research Libraries Croup Union Catalog (RLIN) databases that were created during the standard's first five years. The study analyzes the content of the records for adherence to the standard and investigates the ways in which the flexibility of the standard and cataloger's judgment augmented many records with more than the mandatory elements of description and access.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.01
0.01111404 = product of:
0.04445616 = sum of:
0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02834915 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.01610701 = product of:
0.03221402 = sum of:
0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03221402 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03962768 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The web site LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
