Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.01

0.0148187205 = product of:
  0.059274882 = sum of:
    0.037798867 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037798867 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
    0.021476014 = product of:
      0.042952027 = sum of:
        0.042952027 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042952027 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract: Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Describes how changes are effected in MARC and the role of the various groups in the library community that are involved in the implementing these changes. Discusses the expansion of the formats to accomodate cataloguing and retrieval for visual materials. Expanded capabilities for coding visual materials offer greater opportunity for user access.
Date: 4.12.1995 22:40:20

Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989) 0.01

0.01296638 = product of:
  0.05186552 = sum of:
    0.03307401 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03307401 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
    0.018791512 = product of:
      0.037583023 = sum of:
        0.037583023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037583023 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract: Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
Date: 4.12.1995 22:51:36

Simmons, P.: Converting UNIMARC records to CCF (1989) 0.01
```
0.006137771 = product of:
  0.04910217 = sum of:
    0.04910217 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04910217 = score(doc=2515,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.3771894 = fieldWeight in 2515, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2515)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
```
Abstract

One of the primary goals of Unesco's Common Communication Format (CCF) has been to maintain compatibility between two major information communities: libraries; and abstracting and indexing organisations. While abstracting and indexing organisations do not follow any single standard for description or the structure and encoding of machine records, libraries have clearly defined standards and practices. Among CCF-using organisations are some that wish to incorporate records produced by national bibliographic agencies, especially national libraries, into their own data bases. They need the ability to convert UNIMARC records to CCF. To accomplish this they require a source of records, a computer to process them, a computer programm designed for record conversion and a table or instructions laying out the specific way in which each UNIMARC data element is to be processed in the course of conversion to CCF. Examines the factors to be considered in planning a table that would be sufficiently detailed to accomplish record conversion, and outlines problems that might be encountered.

Hagler, R.; Simmons, P.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1982) 0.01

0.005906073 = product of:
  0.047248583 = sum of:
    0.047248583 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047248583 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Footnote: Rez. in: College and research libraries 53(1992) S.86-88 (E.A. Franco)

Conklin, C.E.: Australia: The ABN, ANB, AUSMARC and the National Library (1988) 0.01
```
0.0058467137 = product of:
  0.04677371 = sum of:
    0.04677371 = weight(_text_:libraries in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04677371 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
```
Abstract

Australian libraries have kept up with the latest technology and innovation in cataloging. The Australian Bibliographic Network is a shared cataloging-based national bibliographic utility. This essay delves into the relationships of the ABN, the Australian National Bibliography, AUSMARC, and the role of the Australian National Library in the creation of these elements of computerized cataloging in that country. It also discusses some of the policies and procedures utilized by Australian libraries in their automated cataloging environment, as well as looking at some of the environmental attitudes arising from the change to automated cataloging. Finally, the essay concludes with an outline of some of the similarities and differences between the AUSMARC and USMARC formats.

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Types