Search (212 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × language_ss:"d"
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.33 
    0.3304311 = product of:
  0.8811496 = sum of:
    0.12587851 = product of:
      0.37763554 = sum of:
        0.37763554 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37763554 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.37763554 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37763554 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.37763554 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37763554 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.22 
    0.2238737 = product of:
  0.59699655 = sum of:
    0.06293926 = product of:
      0.18881777 = sum of:
        0.18881777 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18881777 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.26702866 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26702866 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.26702866 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26702866 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  3. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.19 
    0.1927515 = product of:
  0.514004 = sum of:
    0.07342914 = product of:
      0.22028741 = sum of:
        0.22028741 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22028741 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22028741 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22028741 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.22028741 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22028741 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  4. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.14 
    0.13767964 = product of:
  0.36714572 = sum of:
    0.052449387 = product of:
      0.15734816 = sum of:
        0.15734816 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15734816 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15734816 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15734816 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.15734816 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15734816 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  5. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.13 
    0.12587851 = product of:
  0.50351405 = sum of:
    0.25175703 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25175703 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.25175703 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25175703 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3359639 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  6. Franke, F.: ¬Das Framework for Information Literacy : neue Impulse für die Förderung von Informationskompetenz in Deutschland?! (2017) 0.01 
    0.01111404 = product of:
  0.04445616 = sum of:
    0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02834915 = score(doc=2248,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
    0.01610701 = product of:
      0.03221402 = sum of:
        0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03221402 = score(doc=2248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Das Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education wurde im Januar 2016 vom Vorstand der Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) beschlossen. Es beruht auf der Idee von "Threshold Concepts" und sieht Informationskompetenz in einem engen Zusammenhang mit Wissenschaft und Forschung. Dadurch legt es bei der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz eine starke Betonung auf das "Warum", nicht nur auf das "Was". Der Ansatz des Framework wird vielfach kontrovers diskutiert. Bietet er tatsächlich eine neue Sichtweise auf die Förderung von Informationskompetenz oder ist er überwiegend alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen? Kann das Framework neue Impulse für die Aktivitäten an den Bibliotheken in Deutschland setzen oder beschreibt es etwas, was wir längst machen? Der Beitrag versucht, Anregungen zu geben, welche Konsequenzen das Framework für unsere Kurse haben kann und welche veränderten Lernziele mit ihm verbunden sein können. Dabei plädiert er für ein umfassendes Verständnis von Informationskompetenz, das sich nicht auf Einzelaspekte wie Recherchekompetenz beschränkt.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.4, S.22-29
  7. Lewandowski, D.; Spree, U.: ¬Die Forschungsgruppe Search Studies an der HAW Hamburg (2019) 0.01 
    0.01045684 = product of:
  0.08365472 = sum of:
    0.08365472 = weight(_text_:studies in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08365472 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
  8. Information und Wissen : global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011 (2010) 0.01 
    0.010432938 = product of:
  0.041731752 = sum of:
    0.011812146 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011812146 = score(doc=5190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.09073767 = fieldWeight in 5190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5190)
    0.029919608 = weight(_text_:case in 5190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029919608 = score(doc=5190,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.17173493 = fieldWeight in 5190, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5190)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Content
    - Information Domains & Concepts Michal Golinski: Use, but verify Mohammad Nazim, Bhaskar Mukherjee: Problems and prospects of implementing knowledge management in university libraries: A case study of Banaras Hindu University Library System Daniela Becks, Julia Maria Schulz: Domänenübergreifende Phrasenextraktion mithilfe einer lexikonunabhängigen Analysekomponente Wolfram Sperber, Bernd Wegner: Content Analysis in der Mathematik: Erschließung und Retrieval mathematischer Publikationen Jürgen Reischer: Das Konzept der Informativität - Information Society Joseph Adjei, Peter Tobbin: Identification Systems Adoption in Africa; The Case of Ghana Alexander Botte, Marc Rittberger, Christoph Schindler: Virtuelle Forschungsumgebungen Rainer Kuhlen: Der Streit um die Regelung des Zweitveröffentlichungsrechts im Urheberrecht - E-Learning / Social Media Marketing Tobias Fries, Sebastian Boosz, Andreas Henrich: Integrating industrial partners into e-teaching efforts Christopher Stehr, Melanie Hiller: E-Learningkurs Globalisierung Manuel Burghardt, Markus Heckner, Tim Schneidermeier, Christian Wolff: Social-Media-Marketing im Hochschulbereich
  9. Brenner, S.: LibraryThing for Libraries in Deutschland : Community-generierte Anreicherung deutschsprachiger Bibliothekskatalog mit LibraryThing for Libraries (2011) 0.01 
    0.010022938 = product of:
  0.080183506 = sum of:
    0.080183506 = weight(_text_:libraries in 149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.080183506 = score(doc=149,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.6159477 = fieldWeight in 149, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=149)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
  10. Sauer, C.S.: Analyse von Webcommunities und Extraktion von Wissen aus Communitydaten für Case-Based Reasoning Systeme (2010) 0.01 
    0.009160972 = product of:
  0.07328778 = sum of:
    0.07328778 = weight(_text_:case in 2231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07328778 = score(doc=2231,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.420663 = fieldWeight in 2231, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2231)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Die vorliegende Arbeit befasst sich mit den Möglichkeiten der Informationsextraktion aus den Daten von Webcommunities und der Verwendung der extrahierten Informationen in Case-Based Reasoning- (CBR) Systemen. Im Rahmen der Arbeit wird auf die Entwicklung der Webcommunities im Zeitraum der letzten 30 Jahre eingegangen. Es wird eine Klassifikation der derzeitig anzutreffenden Webcommunities in verschiedene Kategorien von Webcommunities vorgenommen. Diese Klassifikation erfolgt hinsichtlich der Struktur, der technischen Mittel sowie der Interessen der Nutzer dieser Webcommunities. Aufbauend auf die vorgenommene Klassifikation von Webcommunities erfolgt eine Untersuchung der Eignung dieser Kategorien von Webcommunities zur Informationsextraktion im Kontext der Verwendung der extrahierten Informationen in CBR-Systemen. Im selben Kontext werden verschiedene Ansätze und Techniken der Informationsextraktion auf ihre Eignung zur Extraktion von Wissen speziell für die Wissenscontainer von CBR -Systeme geprüft. Aufbauend auf den dadurch gewonnenen Erkenntnissen wird, angelehnt an den Prozess der Knowledge Discovery in Databases, ein eigenes Prozessmodell der Wissensextraktion aus Webcommunities für CBR-Systeme entworfen. Im Zuge der näheren Betrachtung dieses Prozessmodells wird auf verschiedene, durch die beabsichtigte Verwendung der extrahierten Informationen in den vier Wissenscontainern des CBR bedingte, Anforderungen an NLP- sowie IE-Techniken, die zur Extraktion dieser Daten verwendet werden, eingegangen. Die in den theoretischen Betrachtungen erlangten Erkenntnisse werden dann dazu eingesetzt, eine Anwendung zur Informationsextraktion aus einer Webcommunity für ein CBR-System, in Form der Knowledge Extraction Workbench zu implementieren. Diese IEAnwendung arbeitet im Kontext des auf der SEASALT-Architektur aufbauenden Projektes docQuery. Die Realisierung dieser IE-Anwendung wird dokumentiert sowie die Extraktionsergebnisse der Anwendung hinsichtlich ihres Umfanges und ihrer Qualität evaluiert.
    Theme
    Case Based Reasoning
  11. Brenner, S.; Ehlen, D.: Zusatzinformationen im interaktiven Katalog : LibraryThing - Social Cataloging-Plattform und Kataloganreicherung für Bibliotheken (2012) 0.01 
    0.008183694 = product of:
  0.065469556 = sum of:
    0.065469556 = weight(_text_:libraries in 574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.065469556 = score(doc=574,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.5029192 = fieldWeight in 574, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=574)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    In zahlreichen Social Cataloging-Plattformen haben Nutzer die Möglichkeit, ihre Buchsammlung zu präsentieren und sich über diese auszutauschen. Bekannte Beispiele sind Lovelybooks, Goodreads oder Shelfari. Die weltweit größte Community trifft sich auf LibraryThing. Neben der öffentlichen Plattform bietet LibraryThing auch entgeltpflichtige Kataloganreicherungen für Bibliotheken - LibraryThing for Libraries. Dirk Ehlen und Simon Brenner berichten im Folgenden über das Produkt.
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Brenner, S.: LibraryThing for Libraries in Deutschland: Community-generierte Anreicherung deutschsprachiger Bibliothekskatalog mit LibraryThing for Libraries [Master-Thesis, 2011].
  12. Handbuch Bibliothek 2.0 (2010) 0.01 
    0.0072334325 = product of:
  0.05786746 = sum of:
    0.05786746 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05786746 = score(doc=4076,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.44452196 = fieldWeight in 4076, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4076)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    LCSH
    Libraries and the Internet
    Libraries / Information technology
    Public services (Libraries) / Technological innovations
    Subject
    Libraries and the Internet
    Libraries / Information technology
    Public services (Libraries) / Technological innovations
  13. Handbuch Bibliothek : Geschichte, Aufgaben, Perspektiven (2012) 0.01 
    0.0072334325 = product of:
  0.05786746 = sum of:
    0.05786746 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05786746 = score(doc=1080,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.44452196 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    LCSH
    Libraries / Handbooks, manuals, etc
    Libraries / Aims and objectives
    Libraries and society
    Subject
    Libraries / Handbooks, manuals, etc
    Libraries / Aims and objectives
    Libraries and society
  14. Schenk, J.: Konzept Gender Thesaurus : zur Bedeutung einer gemeinsamen Dokumentationssprache für Forschung und Informationseinrichtungen (2016) 0.01 
    0.0069712265 = product of:
  0.055769812 = sum of:
    0.055769812 = weight(_text_:studies in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055769812 = score(doc=3141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15812531 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Angesichts aktueller und voraussichtlich in naher Zukunft startender Infrastrukturprojekte der Frauen/Gender-Informationseinrichtungen einerseits und der Gender Studies andererseits, soll im Folgenden auf den Sinn und die Notwendigkeit einer gemeinsamen gendersensiblen Dokumentationssprache hingewiesen werden. Dieser Beitrag entstand im Rahmen des Masterstudiums der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften (MALIS) an der Technischen Hochschule Köln und verfolgt das Ziel, Vorschläge für die Erarbeitung eines Gender Thesaurus zu entwickeln.
  15. Brenner, S.; Ehlen, D.: Kunden entdecken den Bibliothekskatalog neu : Der (inter)aktive Katalog mit LibraryThing for Libraries - ein Pilotprojekt in Nordrhein-Westfalen (2012) 0.01 
    0.0066819587 = product of:
  0.05345567 = sum of:
    0.05345567 = weight(_text_:libraries in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05345567 = score(doc=150,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.4106318 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    In einem vom Ministerium für Familie, Kinder, Jugend, Kultur und Sport des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen für zwei Jahre finanzierten Pilotprojekt wurden die Katalogoberflächen von 24 ausgewählten Bibliotheken in Nordrhein-Westfalen (NRW) mit LibraryThing for Libraries-Elementen versehen? Im Folgenden soll das Landesprojekt vorgestellt werden. Neben dem aktuellen Projektstand werden anfängliche Schwierigkeiten und bisherige Erfolge beschrieben. Das Projekt sollte möglichst viele der in Deutschland verbreiteten Bibliothekssysteme beinhalten, sodass die erlangten Erkenntnisse auch von zahlreichen weiteren Bibliotheken nachgenutzt werden können.
  16. Ohly, H.P.: Wissen - Wissenschaft - Organisation : eine Einführung (2013) 0.01 
    0.0063469075 = product of:
  0.05077526 = sum of:
    0.05077526 = weight(_text_:case in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05077526 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Die Wissensorganisation, der sich die ISKO verpflichtet hat, umfasst folgende Ziele und Aufgaben (vgl. auch Dahlberg 1998 u. 2006): - Wissensorganisation klärt Grundlagen und Prinzipien der Prozesse und Formen, unter denen Wissen produziert, gestaltet, kommuniziert, dokumentiert und recherchiert wird... - ...Frage nach der jeweils geeigneten Wissensstrukturierung - ...untersucht interdisziplinär alle Prozesse, die mit der Entstehung etwa einer Publikation beginnen und bis zur Rezeption durch die Leser führen. Weiter spiegeln die Tagungen der Deutschen ISKO das Spektrum der Themen in diesem Gebiet wieder: Tools for Knowledge Organization and the Human interface - Darmstadt 1990 Kognitive Ansätze zum Ordnen und Darstellen des Wissens - Weilburg 1991 Konstruktion und Retrieval von Wissen - Weilburg 1993 Case-Based Reasoning - Trier 1995 Wissensorganisation mit multimedialen Techniken Berlin 1997 Globalisierung und Wissensorganisation - Hamburg 1999 Wissensorganisation und Edutainment - Berlin 2001 Wissensorganisation in kooperativen Lern- und Arbeitsumgebungen - Regensburg 2002 Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung Duisburg 2004 Kompatibilität und Heterogenität in der Wissensorganisation - Wien 2006 Wissensspeicherung in digitalen Räumen - Konstanz 2008
  17. Althaus, B.; Hentschke, J.; Heuvelmann, R.; Löhden, A.: SWIB14 - Die sechste »Semantic Web in Libraries Conference« : Bibliotheken, Daten, Anwendungen und Linked Data (2015) 0.01 
    0.005906073 = product of:
  0.047248583 = sum of:
    0.047248583 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047248583 = score(doc=2533,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.36295068 = fieldWeight in 2533, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2533)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
  18. Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011) 0.01 
    0.0058467137 = product of:
  0.04677371 = sum of:
    0.04677371 = weight(_text_:libraries in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04677371 = score(doc=174,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.35930282 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
  19. Karlova-Bourbonus, N.: Automatic detection of contradictions in texts (2018) 0.01 
    0.005496583 = product of:
  0.043972664 = sum of:
    0.043972664 = weight(_text_:case in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043972664 = score(doc=5976,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.25239778 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Natural language contradictions are of complex nature. As will be shown in Chapter 5, the realization of contradictions is not limited to the examples such as Socrates is a man and Socrates is not a man (under the condition that Socrates refers to the same object in the real world), which is discussed by Aristotle (Section 3.1.1). Empirical evidence (see Chapter 5 for more details) shows that only a few contradictions occurring in the real life are of that explicit (prototypical) kind. Rather, con-tradictions make use of a variety of natural language devices such as, e.g., paraphrasing, synonyms and antonyms, passive and active voice, diversity of negation expression, and figurative linguistic means such as idioms, irony, and metaphors. Additionally, the most so-phisticated kind of contradictions, the so-called implicit contradictions, can be found only when applying world knowledge and after conducting a sequence of logical operations such as e.g. in: (1.1) The first prize was given to the experienced grandmaster L. Stein who, in total, col-lected ten points (7 wins and 3 draws). Those familiar with the chess rules know that a chess player gets one point for winning and zero points for losing the game. In case of a draw, each player gets a half point. Built on this idea and by conducting some simple mathematical operations, we can infer that in the case of 7 wins and 3 draws (the second part of the sentence), a player can only collect 8.5 points and not 10 points. Hence, we observe that there is a contradiction between the first and the second parts of the sentence.
    Implicit contradictions will only partially be the subject of the present study, aiming primarily at identifying the realization mechanism and cues (Chapter 5) as well as finding the parts of contradictions by applying the state of the art algorithms for natural language processing without conducting deep meaning processing. Further in focus are the explicit and implicit contradictions that can be detected by means of explicit linguistic, structural, lexical cues, and by conducting some additional processing operations (e.g., counting the sum in order to detect contradictions arising from numerical divergencies). One should note that an additional complexity in finding contradictions can arise in case parts of the contradictions occur on different levels of realization. Thus, a contradiction can be observed on the word- and phrase-level, such as in a married bachelor (for variations of contradictions on lexical level, see Ganeev 2004), on the sentence level - between parts of a sentence or between two or more sentences, or on the text level - between the portions of a text or between the whole texts such as a contradiction between the Bible and the Quran, for example. Only contradictions arising at the level of single sentences occurring in one or more texts, as well as parts of a sentence, will be considered for the purpose of this study. Though the focus of interest will be on single sentences, it will make use of text particularities such as coreference resolution without establishing the referents in the real world. Finally, another aspect to be considered is that parts of the contradictions are not neces-sarily to appear at the same time. They can be separated by many years and centuries with or without time expression making their recognition by human and detection by machine challenging. According to Aristotle's ontological version of the LNC (Section 3.1.1), how-ever, the same time reference is required in order for two statements to be judged as a contradiction. Taking this into account, we set the borders for the study by limiting the ana-lyzed textual data thematically (only nine world events) and temporally (three days after the reported event had happened) (Section 5.1). No sophisticated time processing will thus be conducted.
  20. Pinker, S.: Aufklärung jetzt : Für Vernunft, Wissenschaft, Humanismus und Fortschritt. Eine Verteidigung (2018) 0.01 
    0.0052890894 = product of:
  0.042312715 = sum of:
    0.042312715 = weight(_text_:case in 4539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042312715 = score(doc=4539,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03962768 = queryNorm
        0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 4539, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4539)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Footnote
    Originaltitel: Enlightenment now: the case for reason, science, humanism, and progress

Authors

Types

  • a 151
  • el 45
  • m 26
  • x 14
  • s 8
  • r 5
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications