Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.00728298 = product of:
  0.04369788 = sum of:
    0.04369788 = product of:
      0.08739576 = sum of:
        0.08739576 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08739576 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14117907 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040315803 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.01 
    0.00728298 = product of:
  0.04369788 = sum of:
    0.04369788 = product of:
      0.08739576 = sum of:
        0.08739576 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08739576 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14117907 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040315803 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  3. Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.; Bollaker, K.: Digital libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing (1999) 0.01 
    0.00679799 = product of:
  0.04078794 = sum of:
    0.04078794 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04078794 = score(doc=4951,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.30797386 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Autonomous Citation Indexing (ACI) automates the construction of citation indexes - Lower cost, wider availability: ACI is completely autonomous - no manual effort is required. This should result in lower cost and wider availability. Broader coverage: Because no manual effort is required, there are few barriers to indexing a broader range of literature, compared to indexes like the Science Citation Index that require manual effort. More timely feedback: Conference papers, technical reports, and preprints can be indexed, providing far more timely feedback in many cases (often such publications appear far in advance of corresponding journal publications). Citation context: ACI groups together the context of citations to a given article, allowing researchers to easily see what is being said and why the article was cited. Benefits for both literature search and evaluation. Freely available: Our implementation of ACI is available at no cost for non-commercial use. Several orgnizations have requested the software and expressed interest in providing an index within their domain, or in using ACI within their own digital libraries.
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01 
    0.0064373054 = product of:
  0.038623832 = sum of:
    0.038623832 = product of:
      0.077247664 = sum of:
        0.077247664 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077247664 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14117907 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040315803 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  5. Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993) 0.01 
    0.0064092064 = product of:
  0.038455237 = sum of:
    0.038455237 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038455237 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Investigates the relative efficacy of searching by terms and by citations in searches collected in health science libraries. In pilot and field studies the odds that overlap items retrieved would be relevant or partially relevant were greatly improved. In the field setting citation searching was able to add average of 24% recall to traditional subject retrieval. Attempts to identify distinguishing characteristics in queries which might benefit most from additional citation searches proved inclusive. Online access of citation databases has been hampered by their high cost
  6. Oppenheim, C.: Do citations count? : Citation indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) (1996) 0.01 
    0.0064092064 = product of:
  0.038455237 = sum of:
    0.038455237 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038455237 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Citations are used to illustrate or elaborate on a point, or to criticize. Citation studies, based on ISI's citation indexes, can help evaluate scientific research, while impact factors aid libraries in deciding which journals to cancel or purchase. Suggests that citiation counts can replace the costly RAE in assessing the research output of university departments
  7. Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996) 0.01 
    0.0056080557 = product of:
  0.033648334 = sum of:
    0.033648334 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033648334 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reports recent experiences with the publishing, via the Internet and WWW of ISI's biweekly newspaper, The Scientist; which was originally mounted on the NSFnet. Compares the use of the Internet for SDI by comparing Web searches via AltaVista with similar searches on CD-ROM. Predicts that future current awareness services and SDI services will be linked to electronic periodicals in electronic libraries. Concludes with a note on cited reference searching, a variation on the theme of hypertext searching, with particular reference to SCI and Web crawlers
  8. Feitelson, D.G.; Yovel, U.: Predictive ranking of computer scientists using CiteSeer data (2004) 0.01 
    0.0056080557 = product of:
  0.033648334 = sum of:
    0.033648334 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033648334 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The increasing availability of digital libraries with cross-citation data on the Internet enables new studies in bibliometrics. The paper focuses on the list of 10.000 top-cited authors in computer science available as part of CiteSeer. Using data from several consecutive lists a model of how authors accrue citations with time is constructed. By comparing the rate at which individual authors accrue citations with the average rate, predictions are made of how their ranking in the list will change in the future.
  9. Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995) 0.00 
    0.0048069046 = product of:
  0.028841427 = sum of:
    0.028841427 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028841427 = score(doc=1825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
  10. Sidiropoulos, A.; Manolopoulos, Y.: ¬A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries (2005) 0.00 
    0.0048069046 = product of:
  0.028841427 = sum of:
    0.028841427 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028841427 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  11. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00 
    0.0045518624 = product of:
  0.027311174 = sum of:
    0.027311174 = product of:
      0.05462235 = sum of:
        0.05462235 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05462235 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14117907 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040315803 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  12. Harter, S.P.; Nisonger, T.E.; Weng, A.: Semantic relationsships between cited and citing articles in library and information science journals (1993) 0.00 
    0.0040057544 = product of:
  0.024034524 = sum of:
    0.024034524 = weight(_text_:libraries in 5644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024034524 = score(doc=5644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 5644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5644)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The act of referencing another author's work in a scholarly or research paper is usually assumed to signal a direct semantic relationship between the citing and cited work. The present article reports a study that examines this assumption directly. The purpose of the research is to investigate the semantic relationship between citing and cited documents for a sample of document pairs in three journals in library and information science: 'Library journal', 'College and research libraries' and 'Journal of the American Society for Information Science'. A macroanalysis, absed on a comparison of the Library of Congress class numbers assigned citing and cited documents, and a microanalysis, based on a comparison of descriptors assigned citing and cited documents by three indexing and abstracting journals, ERIC, LISA and LiLi, were conducted. Both analyses suggest that the subject similarity among pairs of cited and citing documents is typically very small, supporting a subjective, psychological view of relevance and a trial-and-error, heuristic understanding of the information search and research processes. The results of the study have implications for collection development, for an understanding of psychological relevance, and for the results of doing information retrieval using cited references. Several intriguing methodological questions are raised for future research, including the role of indexing depth, specifity, and quality on the measurement of document similarity
  13. Hammond, C.C.; Brown, S.W.: Citation searching : search smarter & find more (2008) 0.00 
    0.0040057544 = product of:
  0.024034524 = sum of:
    0.024034524 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024034524 = score(doc=2206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 28(2008) no.5, S.10-
  14. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.0038623835 = product of:
  0.0231743 = sum of:
    0.0231743 = product of:
      0.0463486 = sum of:
        0.0463486 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0463486 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14117907 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040315803 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  15. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.00 
    0.00364149 = product of:
  0.02184894 = sum of:
    0.02184894 = product of:
      0.04369788 = sum of:
        0.04369788 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04369788 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14117907 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040315803 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  16. Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science (1985) 0.00 
    0.0032046032 = product of:
  0.019227618 = sum of:
    0.019227618 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019227618 = score(doc=3632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.14518027 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Imprint
    Littleton, CO : Libraries Unlimited
  17. Haridasan, S.; Kulshrestha, V.K.: Citation analysis of scholarly communication in the journal Knowledge Organization (2007) 0.00 
    0.0032046032 = product of:
  0.019227618 = sum of:
    0.019227618 = weight(_text_:libraries in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019227618 = score(doc=863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13243961 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040315803 = queryNorm
        0.14518027 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vgl..: Burton, P.F.: On reading "The banning of books in libraries". In: Library review. 56(2007) no.3, S.197-199.
  18. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.00 
    0.0031863037 = product of:
  0.019117821 = sum of:
    0.019117821 = product of:
      0.038235642 = sum of:
        0.038235642 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038235642 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14117907 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040315803 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  19. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.00 
    0.0031863037 = product of:
  0.019117821 = sum of:
    0.019117821 = product of:
      0.038235642 = sum of:
        0.038235642 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038235642 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14117907 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040315803 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  20. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.00 
    0.0031863037 = product of:
  0.019117821 = sum of:
    0.019117821 = product of:
      0.038235642 = sum of:
        0.038235642 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038235642 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14117907 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040315803 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 26
  • d 5

Types

Themes