Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sauperl, A."
  1. Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999) 0.03
    0.032346506 = product of:
      0.08086626 = sum of:
        0.06336284 = weight(_text_:education in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06336284 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.3123144 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
        0.01750343 = product of:
          0.03500686 = sum of:
            0.03500686 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03500686 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Twenty-five years of research in expert systems for descriptive cataloging and related areas are reviewed. Researchers who developed prototype expert cataloging systems in the 1980s found that cataloging rules are extremely comprehensive and complicated, but still insufficient to permit these systems accurate cataloging results. Those researchers also identified smaller areas that need to be pursued for successful implementation of expert cataloging systems. Subsequent research has focused on narrower areas. Cataloging rules were studied and more was learned about problems with their logic structure and organization. Another focus was optical reading of bibliographic elements in documents. Categories of responsibility and graphic design continue to pose problems. The visual characteristics of documents were studied to understand more about the automatic recognition of bibliographic elements necessary for the bibliographic description of documents. The systematic study of the cataloging process, necessary for development of expert systems, may result in improvement of manual working procedures and enrich the education of new catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Saye, J.; Sauperl, A.: Cataloging education on the sunny side of the alps (Slovenia) (2005) 0.03
    0.029266043 = product of:
      0.14633021 = sum of:
        0.14633021 = weight(_text_:education in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14633021 = score(doc=530,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.72125924 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the status of library and information science education in Slovenia with emphasis on cataloging and classification courses. The program in the Department of Library and Information Science and Book Studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana is reported in detail at both the undergraduate and master's level. Also addressed are requirements to be employed as a librarian in Slovenia and continuing educations opportunities for catalogers.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Education for cataloging: international perspectives. Part II"
  3. Pogorelec, A.; Sauperl, A.: ¬The alternative model of classification of belles-lettres in libraries (2006) 0.01
    0.010560473 = product of:
      0.052802365 = sum of:
        0.052802365 = weight(_text_:education in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052802365 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20288157 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043063257 = queryNorm
            0.260262 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Several systems for the classification of fiction have been proposed to date, but experience shows that such classification partially depends on the culture and literary education in specific countries. Slovenian public libraries have traditionally used UDC as the only subject information on belles-lettres. Research has shown that users would prefer richer subject information. Therefore an attempt was made to enhance UDC by adding subject information, that should be helpful to users and librarians. The newly proposed Alternative Model system contains lists of verbal and alpha-numerical denotations for the basic groups of belles-lettres book material (main-genres: lyrics, drama, epics) and all other categorical criteria (language of the original literary work, literature to which the work belongs, genre, sub-genre) and half-categorical (accessibility of the content of literary works, origin within the periods of literary history, the century in which the literary work was written, the rhythm of the language). All these lists are available, but not included in this paper. The idea of the Alternative Model system is to show the possibilities of making the classification of belles-lettres in libraries more helpful, efficient and exact.
  4. Sauperl, A.; Rozman, D.: Subject cataloguing at the crossroads : with or without subject heading strings? (2007) 0.01
    0.0058344766 = product of:
      0.029172383 = sum of:
        0.029172383 = product of:
          0.058344766 = sum of:
            0.058344766 = weight(_text_:22 in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058344766 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knjiznice za prihodnost : napredek in sodelovanje : zbornik referatov [ Libraries for the future : development and collaboration: proceedings / Professional conference of Union of associations of Slovene Librarians], Portoroz, October 22-23, 2007; ed. M. Ambrozic
  5. Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not? : a new view of the old question (2009) 0.00
    0.0029172383 = product of:
      0.014586192 = sum of:
        0.014586192 = product of:
          0.029172383 = sum of:
            0.029172383 = weight(_text_:22 in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029172383 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 6.2010 14:22:43
  6. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.00
    0.0017503429 = product of:
      0.008751715 = sum of:
        0.008751715 = product of:
          0.01750343 = sum of:
            0.01750343 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01750343 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15080018 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043063257 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19