Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bodoff, D."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Bodoff, D.: Test theory for evaluating reliability of IR test collections (2008) 0.01 
    0.007413407 = product of:
  0.029653627 = sum of:
    0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029653627 = score(doc=2085,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.3, S.1117-1145
  2. Bodoff, D.: Emergence of terminological conventions as a searcher-indexer coordination game (2009) 0.00 
    0.0038418232 = product of:
  0.015367293 = sum of:
    0.015367293 = product of:
      0.030734586 = sum of:
        0.030734586 = weight(_text_:science in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030734586 = score(doc=3299,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In the traditional model of information retrieval, searchers and indexers choose query and index terms, respectively, and these term choices are ultimately compared in a matching process. One of the main challenges in information science and information retrieval is that searchers and indexers often do not choose the same term even though the item is relevant to the need whereas at other times they do choose the same term even though it is not relevant. But if both searchers and indexers have the opportunity to review feedback data showing the success or failure of their previous term choices, then there exists an evolutionary force that, all else being equal, will lead to helpful convergence in searchers' and indexers' term usage when the information is relevant, and helpful divergence of term usage when it is not. Based on learning theory, and new theory presented here, it is possible to predict which terms will emerge as the terminological conventions that are used by groups of searchers and the indexers of relevant and nonrelevant information items.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.12, S.2509-2529
  3. Bodoff, D.; Wu, B.; Wong, K.Y.M.: Relevance data for language models using maximum likelihood (2003) 0.00 
    0.0031693424 = product of:
  0.01267737 = sum of:
    0.01267737 = product of:
      0.02535474 = sum of:
        0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 1822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02535474 = score(doc=1822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1822)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.11, S.1050-1061
  4. Bodoff, D.: Relevance for browsing, relevance for searching (2006) 0.00 
    0.0031693424 = product of:
  0.01267737 = sum of:
    0.01267737 = product of:
      0.02535474 = sum of:
        0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 4909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02535474 = score(doc=4909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4909)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.1, S.69-86
  5. Bodoff, D.; Enache, D.; Kambil, A.; Simon, G.; Yukhimets, A.: ¬A unified maximum likelihood approach to document retrieval (2001) 0.00 
    0.002716579 = product of:
  0.010866316 = sum of:
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021732632 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.10, S.785-796
  6. Bodoff, D.; Robertson, S.: ¬A new unified probabilistic model (2004) 0.00 
    0.002716579 = product of:
  0.010866316 = sum of:
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 2129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021732632 = score(doc=2129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.471-487
  7. Bodoff, D.; Wong, S.P.-S.: Documents and queries as random variables : history and implications (2006) 0.00 
    0.002716579 = product of:
  0.010866316 = sum of:
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021732632 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1138-1154

Authors

Themes