Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Losee, R.M."
  1. Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.03
    0.031960126 = product of:
      0.06392025 = sum of:
        0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04151508 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
        0.022405172 = product of:
          0.044810344 = sum of:
            0.044810344 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044810344 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.4, S.555-572
  2. Losee, R.M.: Term dependence : truncating the Bahadur Lazarsfeld expansion (1994) 0.02
    0.017792176 = product of:
      0.071168706 = sum of:
        0.071168706 = weight(_text_:management in 7390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071168706 = score(doc=7390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 7390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7390)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 30(1994) no.2, S.293-303
  3. Losee, R.M.: Browsing mixed structured and unstructured data (2006) 0.01
    0.012580969 = product of:
      0.050323877 = sum of:
        0.050323877 = weight(_text_:management in 173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050323877 = score(doc=173,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 173, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=173)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Both structured and unstructured data, as well as structured data representing several different types of tuples, may be integrated into a single list for browsing or retrieval. Data may be arranged in the Gray code order of the features and metadata, producing optimal ordering for browsing. We provide several metrics for evaluating the performance of systems supporting browsing, given some constraints. Metadata and indexing terms are used for sorting keys and attributes for structured data, as well as for semi-structured or unstructured documents, images, media, etc. Economic and information theoretic models are suggested that enable the ordering to adapt to user preferences. Different relational structures and unstructured data may be integrated into a single, optimal ordering for browsing or for displaying tables in digital libraries, database management systems, or information retrieval systems. Adaptive displays of data are discussed.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.2, S.440-452
  4. Losee, R.M.: ¬The science of information : measurement and applications (1990) 0.01
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.043465264 = sum of:
        0.043465264 = product of:
          0.08693053 = sum of:
            0.08693053 = weight(_text_:science in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08693053 = score(doc=813,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.6984763 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    COMPASS
    Information science
    Series
    Library and information science
    Subject
    Information science
  5. Losee, R.M.: Text windows and phrases differing by discipline, location in document, and syntactic structure (1996) 0.01
    0.01037877 = product of:
      0.04151508 = sum of:
        0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 6962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04151508 = score(doc=6962,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 6962, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6962)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.6, S.747-767
  6. Losee, R.M.: Upper bounds for retrieval performance and their user measuring performance and generating optimal queries : can it get any better than this? (1994) 0.01
    0.008896088 = product of:
      0.035584353 = sum of:
        0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 7418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035584353 = score(doc=7418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 7418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7418)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 30(1994) no.2, S.193-203
  7. Haas, S.W.; Losee, R.M.: Looking in text windows : their size and composition (1994) 0.01
    0.008896088 = product of:
      0.035584353 = sum of:
        0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 8525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035584353 = score(doc=8525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 8525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8525)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 30(1994) no.5, S.619-629
  8. Losee, R.M.: Learning syntactic rules and tags with genetic algorithms for information retrieval and filtering : an empirical basis for grammatical rules (1996) 0.01
    0.008896088 = product of:
      0.035584353 = sum of:
        0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 4068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035584353 = score(doc=4068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 4068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4068)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.2, S.185-197
  9. Losee, R.M.: Browsing document collections : automatically organizing digital libraries and hypermedia using the Gray code (1997) 0.01
    0.008896088 = product of:
      0.035584353 = sum of:
        0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035584353 = score(doc=146,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 146, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=146)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 33(1997) no.2, S.175-192
  10. Losee, R.M.: Decisions in thesaurus construction and use (2007) 0.01
    0.008896088 = product of:
      0.035584353 = sum of:
        0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035584353 = score(doc=924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=924)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.4, S.958-968
  11. Losee, R.M.; Paris, L.A.H.: Measuring search-engine quality and query difficulty : ranking with Target and Freestyle (1999) 0.01
    0.005433158 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = product of:
          0.043465264 = sum of:
            0.043465264 = weight(_text_:science in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043465264 = score(doc=4310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.10, S.882-889
  12. Losee, R.M.: Seven fundamental questions for the science of library classification (1993) 0.01
    0.0051224306 = product of:
      0.020489722 = sum of:
        0.020489722 = product of:
          0.040979445 = sum of:
            0.040979445 = weight(_text_:science in 4508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040979445 = score(doc=4508,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 4508, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    For classification to advance to the point where optimal systems may be developed for manual or automated use, it will be necessary for a science of document or library classification to be developed. Seven questions are posed which the author feels must be answered before such optimal systems can be developed. Suggestions are made as to the forms that answers to these questions might take
  13. Losee, R.M.; Haas, S.W.: Sublanguage terms : dictionaries, usage, and automatic classification (1995) 0.01
    0.0051224306 = product of:
      0.020489722 = sum of:
        0.020489722 = product of:
          0.040979445 = sum of:
            0.040979445 = weight(_text_:science in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040979445 = score(doc=2650,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The use of terms from natural and social science titles and abstracts is studied from the perspective of sublanguages and their specialized dictionaries. Explores different notions of sublanguage distinctiveness. Object methods for separating hard and soft sciences are suggested based on measures of sublanguage use, dictionary characteristics, and sublanguage distinctiveness. Abstracts were automatically classified with a high degree of accuracy by using a formula that condsiders the degree of uniqueness of terms in each sublanguage. This may prove useful for text filtering of information retrieval systems
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.7, S.519-529
  14. Spink, A.; Losee, R.M.: Feedback in information retrieval (1996) 0.00
    0.0036221053 = product of:
      0.014488421 = sum of:
        0.014488421 = product of:
          0.028976843 = sum of:
            0.028976843 = weight(_text_:science in 7441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028976843 = score(doc=7441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 7441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 31(1996), S.33-78
  15. Losee, R.M.: ¬A discipline independent definition of information (1997) 0.00
    0.0036221053 = product of:
      0.014488421 = sum of:
        0.014488421 = product of:
          0.028976843 = sum of:
            0.028976843 = weight(_text_:science in 380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028976843 = score(doc=380,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 380, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=380)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.3, S.254-269
  16. Losee, R.M.: ¬A Gray code based ordering for documents on shelves : classification for browsing and retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0031693424 = product of:
      0.01267737 = sum of:
        0.01267737 = product of:
          0.02535474 = sum of:
            0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535474 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43(1992) no.4, S.312-322
  17. Losee, R.M.: Comparing Boolean and probabilistic information retrieval systems across queries and disciplines (1997) 0.00
    0.0031693424 = product of:
      0.01267737 = sum of:
        0.01267737 = product of:
          0.02535474 = sum of:
            0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 7709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535474 = score(doc=7709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 7709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.2, S.143-156
  18. Losee, R.M.: When information retrieval measures agree about the relative quality of document rankings (2000) 0.00
    0.0031693424 = product of:
      0.01267737 = sum of:
        0.01267737 = product of:
          0.02535474 = sum of:
            0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 4860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535474 = score(doc=4860,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4860, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4860)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.9, S.834-840
  19. Losee, R.M.; Church Jr., L.: Are two document clusters better than one? : the cluster performance question for information retrieval (2005) 0.00
    0.0031693424 = product of:
      0.01267737 = sum of:
        0.01267737 = product of:
          0.02535474 = sum of:
            0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535474 = score(doc=3270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.1, S.106-108
  20. Losee, R.M.: Evaluating retrieval performance given database and query characteristics : analytic determination of performance surfaces (1996) 0.00
    0.002716579 = product of:
      0.010866316 = sum of:
        0.010866316 = product of:
          0.021732632 = sum of:
            0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021732632 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.95-105