Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Oppenheim, C."
  1. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.04
    0.036525857 = product of:
      0.07305171 = sum of:
        0.047445804 = weight(_text_:management in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047445804 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
        0.025605911 = product of:
          0.051211823 = sum of:
            0.051211823 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051211823 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  2. Grainger-Smith, N.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The role of information systems and technology (IS/IT) in investment banks (1994) 0.04
    0.036250114 = product of:
      0.07250023 = sum of:
        0.061633915 = weight(_text_:management in 957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061633915 = score(doc=957,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 957, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=957)
        0.010866316 = product of:
          0.021732632 = sum of:
            0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021732632 = score(doc=957,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 957, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=957)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the role of information systems and information technology (IT) within investment banks, based upon a survey of the literature and a small scale case study. Considers whether investment banks receive value for money from their investment in IT, and ways in which IT can be evaluated for its contribution to profitability. Concludes that failure to implement techniques for systematically identifying and qualifying IT costs and benefits has mede it difficult for them to determine the level of added value resulting from such investment and the contribution of IT towards the bottom line. Considers also what role technology plays in the strategic management process and concludes that it is essential to incorporate both information and IT strategy into the strategic management process, to ensue that IT is cooncentrated in those areas in which it cann add most value. Finally, considers the potential for deriving competitive advantage from IT
    Source
    Journal of information science. 20(1994) no.5, S.323-333
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  3. Oppenheim, C.: Intellectual property : legal and other issues (1997) 0.03
    0.027394392 = product of:
      0.054788783 = sum of:
        0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035584353 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
        0.019204432 = product of:
          0.038408864 = sum of:
            0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038408864 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The rapidly increasing volume and variety of electronic or digitized information sources and their accessibility worldwide, have brought to the surface new issues concerning intellectual property, the complexity of the related legal questions and application of legislative measures in real world situations. Attemps to define 'intellectual property' from different points of view; considers the different types with different 'strengths' of protection, and the underlying objectives of such protection. Discusses copyright and international treaties on intellectual property, what is protected and for how long, the concept of fair use and the role of organizations concerned with reproduction rights. Presents a brief overview of the intellectual property questions relating to electronic media: machine readable databases, the information resources on the Internet, and images; electrocopying and downloading of texts and images from networks; and the special nature and copyright problems of multimedia. Also considers moral rights and the need for and feasibility of establishing Electronic Copyright Management System (ECMS)
    Source
    Information studies. 3(1997) no.1, S.5-22
  4. Oppenheim, C.: Recent EC initiatives on copyright (1993) 0.02
    0.02075754 = product of:
      0.08303016 = sum of:
        0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08303016 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1993, Feb., S.9-13
  5. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The legal problems associated with electronic copyright management systems (1996) 0.02
    0.020544639 = product of:
      0.082178555 = sum of:
        0.082178555 = weight(_text_:management in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082178555 = score(doc=5056,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines existing treaties and legislation relating to copyright such as the Berne Convention, the Unfair Contract Terms Act and the concept of fair dealing. Assesses the role of Electronic Copyright Management Systems (ECMS) in protecting holders of rights; their relationship to the law in the UK, USA, and Europe; and their value in providing an agreed framework between libraries, users and publishers, so that the concept of the 'electronic' library can become a reality
    Source
    Information management report. 1996, May, S.11-16
  6. Oppenheim, C.: ¬An agenda for action to achieve the information society in the UK (1996) 0.02
    0.020047165 = product of:
      0.08018866 = sum of:
        0.08018866 = sum of:
          0.028976843 = weight(_text_:science in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028976843 = score(doc=7670,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
          0.051211823 = weight(_text_:22 in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051211823 = score(doc=7670,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.407-421
  7. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.02
    0.015035374 = product of:
      0.060141496 = sum of:
        0.060141496 = sum of:
          0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021732632 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
          0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038408864 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45
    Source
    Information science in transition, Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  8. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic copyright (1993) 0.01
    0.014826814 = product of:
      0.059307255 = sum of:
        0.059307255 = weight(_text_:management in 6087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059307255 = score(doc=6087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 6087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6087)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1993, Jan., S.9-14
  9. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The applications of virtual reality : pt.1.2 (1993) 0.01
    0.014826814 = product of:
      0.059307255 = sum of:
        0.059307255 = weight(_text_:management in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059307255 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1993, Nov., S. - , Dec., S.10-14
  10. Oppenheim, C.: Managers' use and handling of information (1997) 0.01
    0.012580969 = product of:
      0.050323877 = sum of:
        0.050323877 = weight(_text_:management in 357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050323877 = score(doc=357,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 357, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=357)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International journal of information management. 17(1997) no.4, S.239-248
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  11. Oppenheim, C.: Document delivery and electronic copyright : what is copyright? (1995) 0.01
    0.011861451 = product of:
      0.047445804 = sum of:
        0.047445804 = weight(_text_:management in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047445804 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1995, March, S.1-6
  12. Oppenheim, C.: National information policies and the need for a coalition for public information (1996) 0.01
    0.01037877 = product of:
      0.04151508 = sum of:
        0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04151508 = score(doc=4859,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1996, Mar., S.7-13
  13. Ahmed, S.M.Z.; McKnight, C.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬A study of users' performance and satisfaction with the Web of Science IR interface : making sense of it all (2005) 0.01
    0.009410507 = product of:
      0.03764203 = sum of:
        0.03764203 = product of:
          0.07528406 = sum of:
            0.07528406 = weight(_text_:science in 4656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07528406 = score(doc=4656,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.60489833 = fieldWeight in 4656, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Object
    Web of Science
    Source
    Journal of information science. 30(2005) no.5, S.459-
  14. Summers, R.; Oppenheim, C.; Meadows, J.; McKnight, C.; Kinnell, M.: Information science in 2010 : a Loughborough University view (1999) 0.01
    0.009055263 = product of:
      0.036221053 = sum of:
        0.036221053 = product of:
          0.07244211 = sum of:
            0.07244211 = weight(_text_:science in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07244211 = score(doc=4343,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.5820636 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.2: Paradigms, models, and models of information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.12, S.1153-
  15. Oppenheim, C.: Using the h-Index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship (2007) 0.01
    0.006074456 = product of:
      0.024297824 = sum of:
        0.024297824 = product of:
          0.04859565 = sum of:
            0.04859565 = weight(_text_:science in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04859565 = score(doc=780,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.39046016 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The recently developed h-index has been applied to the literature produced by senior British-based academics in librarianship and information science. The majority of those evaluated currently hold senior positions in UK information science and librarianship departments; however, a small number of staff in other departments and retired "founding fathers" were analyzed as well. The analysis was carried out using the Web of Science (Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, PA) for the years from 1992 to October 2005, and included both secondauthored papers and self-citations. The top-ranking British information scientist, Peter Willett, has an h-index of 31. However, it was found that Eugene Garfield, the founder of modern citation studies, has an even higher h-index of 36. These results support other studies suggesting that the h-index is a useful tool in the armory of bibliometrics.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.2, S.297-301
  16. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.; Oppenheim, C.: Variations between subjects in the extent to which the social sciences have become more interdisciplinary (2011) 0.00
    0.0045276317 = product of:
      0.018110527 = sum of:
        0.018110527 = product of:
          0.036221053 = sum of:
            0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 4465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036221053 = score(doc=4465,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4465, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4465)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Increasing interdisciplinarity has been a policy objective since the 1990s, promoted by many governments and funding agencies, but the question is: How deeply has this affected the social sciences? Although numerous articles have suggested that research has become more interdisciplinary, yet no study has compared the extent to which the interdisciplinarity of different social science subjects has changed. To address this gap, changes in the level of interdisciplinarity since 1980 are investigated for subjects with many articles in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), using the percentage of cross-disciplinary citing documents (PCDCD) to evaluate interdisciplinarity. For the 14 SSCI subjects investigated, the median level of interdisciplinarity, as measured using cross-disciplinary citations, declined from 1980 to 1990, but rose sharply between 1990 and 2000, confirming previous research. This increase was not fully matched by an increase in the percentage of articles that were assigned to more than one subject category. Nevertheless, although on average the social sciences have recently become more interdisciplinary, the extent of this change varies substantially from subject to subject. The SSCI subject with the largest increase in interdisciplinarity between 1990 and 2000 was Information Science & Library Science (IS&LS) but there is evidence that the level of interdisciplinarity of IS&LS increased less quickly during the first decade of this century.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.6, S.1118-1129
  17. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.00
    0.0040009236 = product of:
      0.016003694 = sum of:
        0.016003694 = product of:
          0.03200739 = sum of:
            0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03200739 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
  18. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.; Rowland, F.: ¬The citation advantage of open-access articles (2008) 0.00
    0.0032015191 = product of:
      0.012806077 = sum of:
        0.012806077 = product of:
          0.025612153 = sum of:
            0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 2374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025612153 = score(doc=2374,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2374, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Four subjects - ecology, applied mathematics, sociology, and economics - were selected to assess whether there is a citation advantage between journal articles that have an open-access (OA) version on the Internet compared to those articles that are exclusively toll access (TA). Citations were counted using the Web of Science, and the OA status of articles was determined by searching OAIster, OpenDOAR, Google, and Google Scholar. Of a sample of 4,633 articles examined, 2,280 (49%) were OA and had a mean citation count of 9.04 whereas the mean for TA articles was 5.76. There appears to be a clear citation advantage for those articles that are OA as opposed to those that are TA. This advantage, however, varies between disciplines, with sociology having the highest citation advantage, but the lowest number of OA articles, from the sample taken, and ecology having the highest individual citation count for OA articles, but the smallest citation advantage. Tests of correlation or association between OA status and a number of variables were generally found to weak or inconsistent. The cause of this citation advantage has not been determined.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.12, S.1963-1972
  19. Baird, L.M.; Oppenheim, C.: Do citations matter? (1994) 0.00
    0.002716579 = product of:
      0.010866316 = sum of:
        0.010866316 = product of:
          0.021732632 = sum of:
            0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021732632 = score(doc=6896,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 20(1994) no.1, S.2-15
  20. Eager, C.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬An observational method for undertaking user needs studies (1996) 0.00
    0.0022638158 = product of:
      0.009055263 = sum of:
        0.009055263 = product of:
          0.018110527 = sum of:
            0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018110527 = score(doc=3671,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.1, S.15-24