Search (194 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.26
    0.26287085 = product of:
      0.35049447 = sum of:
        0.07504265 = product of:
          0.22512795 = sum of:
            0.22512795 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22512795 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22512795 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22512795 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.050323877 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050323877 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.08
    0.08231123 = product of:
      0.16462246 = sum of:
        0.13261506 = weight(_text_:management in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13261506 = score(doc=1000,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.83271974 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.03200739 = product of:
          0.06401478 = sum of:
            0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06401478 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  3. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.06
    0.064438134 = product of:
      0.12887627 = sum of:
        0.05871119 = weight(_text_:management in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05871119 = score(doc=758,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.07016508 = sum of:
          0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02535474 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
          0.044810344 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044810344 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
  4. Martin, P.; Vaillant, S.: ¬Le records management : Concept nouveau? Pratique ancienne? (1998) 0.06
    0.062258124 = product of:
      0.12451625 = sum of:
        0.092830546 = weight(_text_:management in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092830546 = score(doc=2430,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
        0.0316857 = product of:
          0.0633714 = sum of:
            0.0633714 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0633714 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Records management has appeared lately in France to designate the management of organizational documents and electronic data an enterprise must retain as proof of its activities and transactions. An international standard is under discussion to address issues concerned with retention. At the same time, some information professionals are finding themselves increasingly involved with active company records, since the role of records manager requires skills found in the professions of archivists, information scientist and quality controller. Presents examples which pose the question, is records management in fact a new profession or simply a new form of a familiar job?
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    31.12.1998 15:32:22
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Records management: new concept or old practice?
  5. Barbat, P.; Neste, E. van den; Drouhet, G.: Records management et archivistique française (1998) 0.06
    0.062258124 = product of:
      0.12451625 = sum of:
        0.092830546 = weight(_text_:management in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092830546 = score(doc=2988,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
        0.0316857 = product of:
          0.0633714 = sum of:
            0.0633714 = weight(_text_:22 in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0633714 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    An article in documentaliste 35(1998) no.1, presented the concept and contexts for the application of records management. This article, devoted to the experience of archivists, continues to focus on professional active and semi-active records management practices and their evolution in different countries and eras. P. Barbat analyzes the discovery in France in the 1960s of active records and the invlovement of both archivists and the departments actually generating the records in their management, and the impact this development has had on archival practices. Also discusses the impact that the international standard now being drafted by ISO will have on the profession. A government and a company archivist also describe their experience
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    21. 2.1999 15:22:35
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Records management and French archival practices
  6. Taylor, P.: Perception and change in records management : rethinking the fundamentals (1997) 0.06
    0.062047966 = product of:
      0.12409593 = sum of:
        0.10169076 = weight(_text_:management in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10169076 = score(doc=2787,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.6385391 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
        0.022405172 = product of:
          0.044810344 = sum of:
            0.044810344 = weight(_text_:22 in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044810344 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies some of the fundamental issues for the future records management, and assesses their relevance for the future. Considers traditional records management and suggests a new record keeping approach which impacts directly upon the organization by ensuring records are properly created according to the organization's needs. Stresses the importance of making better use of new technologies. Important issues are: the myth of the information manager, implementation of records management standards, replacing the life cycle approach with one of a records continuum, new relationships between the archival and records management community, and development of competency based standards
    Date
    24. 1.1999 12:22:46
    Source
    Records management bulletin. 1997, no.82, S.11-15,18
  7. Electronic systems and records management in the information ages (1997) 0.06
    0.061934225 = product of:
      0.12386845 = sum of:
        0.09489161 = weight(_text_:management in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09489161 = score(doc=1382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
        0.028976843 = product of:
          0.057953686 = sum of:
            0.057953686 = weight(_text_:science in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057953686 = score(doc=1382,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1997) no.5, S.7-29
  8. Walters, T.O.: Rediscovering the theoretical base of records management and its implications for graduate education (1995) 0.06
    0.05793999 = product of:
      0.11587998 = sum of:
        0.094147354 = weight(_text_:management in 3063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094147354 = score(doc=3063,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.59117234 = fieldWeight in 3063, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3063)
        0.021732632 = product of:
          0.043465264 = sum of:
            0.043465264 = weight(_text_:science in 3063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043465264 = score(doc=3063,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3063, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes briefly the records management education programme at Texas University at Austin, Graduate School of Library and Information Science which attempted to demonstrate to library educators the importance of supporting records management education because of its sharing of a theoretical base with librarianship. While this goal is desirable, the linking of records management theory with the broader discipline of information science and its information resources management perspectives is a more fruitful approach. Shows that the critical link between archives and records management theory is central to records management education whereas librarianship theory is only tangential to it, calls for changes in the range of outside disciplines that information professionals and educators are aware of
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Journal of education for library and information science 33(1992) no.4, S.333-337
    Source
    Journal of education for library and information science. 36(1995) no.2, S.139-154
  9. Hare, C.E.; McLeaod, J.; King, L.A.: Continuing professional development for the information discipline of records management : pt.1: context and initial indications of current activities (1996) 0.06
    0.057617858 = product of:
      0.115235716 = sum of:
        0.092830546 = weight(_text_:management in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092830546 = score(doc=5049,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
        0.022405172 = product of:
          0.044810344 = sum of:
            0.044810344 = weight(_text_:22 in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044810344 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the newly emerging information discipline of records management, focusing on its current status in the UK where it is represented by a range of sector specific and general organizations for information professionals. While records management involves some skills and knowledge which are different from those already mastered by library and information professionals, there are significant overlaps in terms of cataloguing, classification, indexing, identifying and meeting user needs and the challenge of dealing with information in electronic form. Concludes that, in the changing and sometimes shrinking market of of some of the more traditional library sectors, records management may offer the opportunity for information professionals to develop or shift their career path while remaining within the discipline of information management
    Source
    Librarian career development. 4(1996) no.2, S.22-27
  10. Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives (1994) 0.05
    0.054788783 = product of:
      0.10957757 = sum of:
        0.071168706 = weight(_text_:management in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071168706 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
        0.038408864 = product of:
          0.07681773 = sum of:
            0.07681773 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07681773 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Issues devoted in part to the topic of: Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives; covering techniques of records management involving electronic archival materials
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.14-135
  11. Dootson, P.; Tate, M.; Desouza, K.C.; Townson, P.: Transforming public records management : six key insights (2021) 0.05
    0.054690015 = product of:
      0.10938003 = sum of:
        0.09489161 = weight(_text_:management in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09489161 = score(doc=214,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
        0.014488421 = product of:
          0.028976843 = sum of:
            0.028976843 = weight(_text_:science in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028976843 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Records management in the public sector is integral for delivering public good. However, several institutional challenges inhibit the required implementation of innovative and information-centric tools to transform records management in response to the challenges of digitization and to capitalize on new opportunities in the digital economy. In this article, we make recommendations to overcome institutional and legislative barriers to transform records management in the public sector.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.5, S.643-648
  12. Thiel, T.J.: Automated indexing of information stored on optical disk electronic document image management systems (1994) 0.05
    0.054192446 = product of:
      0.10838489 = sum of:
        0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08303016 = score(doc=1260,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
        0.02535474 = product of:
          0.05070948 = sum of:
            0.05070948 = weight(_text_:science in 1260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05070948 = score(doc=1260,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 1260, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1260)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.54, [=Suppl.17]
  13. Cox, R.J.: Electronic systems and records management in the information age : an introduction (1997) 0.05
    0.054192446 = product of:
      0.10838489 = sum of:
        0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08303016 = score(doc=189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
        0.02535474 = product of:
          0.05070948 = sum of:
            0.05070948 = weight(_text_:science in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05070948 = score(doc=189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1997) no.5, S.7-9
  14. Giguere, M.D.: Automatic electronic records management in a transactional environment : the Philadelphia story (1997) 0.05
    0.054192446 = product of:
      0.10838489 = sum of:
        0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08303016 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.02535474 = product of:
          0.05070948 = sum of:
            0.05070948 = weight(_text_:science in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05070948 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1997) no.5, S.17-19
  15. Kowlowitz, A.; Kelly, K.: Models for action : developing practical approaches to electronic records management and preservation (1997) 0.05
    0.054192446 = product of:
      0.10838489 = sum of:
        0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08303016 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
        0.02535474 = product of:
          0.05070948 = sum of:
            0.05070948 = weight(_text_:science in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05070948 = score(doc=194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1997) no.5, S.20-24
  16. Heijst, A.L.M. v.: Records management : the art of making choices (1995) 0.05
    0.053892232 = product of:
      0.107784465 = sum of:
        0.082178555 = weight(_text_:management in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082178555 = score(doc=3355,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.025605911 = product of:
          0.051211823 = sum of:
            0.051211823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051211823 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the problems associated with electronic archiving and draws attention to work by the University of Pittsburgh on developing a standard for archiving electronic documents. Examines elements of effective archival and records management and considers the problems associated with archives such as backlogs and time taken to search for information. The basis of good records management lies in making responsible choices
    Date
    22. 2.1996 9:30:18
  17. Gonzalez, A.C.: Analisis y diseno de sistemas de gestion electronica de documentacion en grandes entidades (1997) 0.05
    0.053892232 = product of:
      0.107784465 = sum of:
        0.082178555 = weight(_text_:management in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082178555 = score(doc=2923,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
        0.025605911 = product of:
          0.051211823 = sum of:
            0.051211823 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051211823 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan
    Date
    11. 2.1999 21:02:22
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Analysis and design of electronic document management systems in large enterprises
  18. Toebak, P.: ¬Das Dossier nicht die Klassifikation als Herzstück des Records Management (2009) 0.05
    0.04993841 = product of:
      0.09987682 = sum of:
        0.08387313 = weight(_text_:management in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08387313 = score(doc=3220,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
        0.016003694 = product of:
          0.03200739 = sum of:
            0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03200739 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die September/Oktober-Ausgabe 2009 der IWP ist eine Schwerpunktausgabe zum Records Management. Es ist interessant, dass einmal aus fachlich ganz anderer Perspektive auf diese Management- Disziplin geschaut wird. Viele Aspekte werden angesprochen: Terminologie, Rolle des Archivwesens, Interdisziplinarität, Langzeitaufbewahrung und Standardisierung. Im Artikel "Wissensorganisation und Records Management. Was ist der 'state of the art'?" steht die Wissensorganisation als Schwachstelle des Records Management zentral. Dies zu Recht: Das logische Datenmodell von DOMEA - das Gleiche gilt für GEVER und ELAK - entspricht beispielsweise nicht in allen Hinsichten der Geschäftsrealität. Daraus entstehen für die Mitarbeitenden im Arbeitsalltag öfters mehr Verständnisprobleme als sie bewältigen können oder wollen. Die systemische Unterstützung der eingesetzten EDRMS (nicht alle Produkte verdienen übrigens diesen Namen) wird dadurch geschwächt. Die Wissensorganisation genügt in vielen Fällen (noch) nicht. Das Problem liegt allerdings weniger bei der Klassifikation (Aktenplan), wie Ulrike Spree meint. Auch hier kommen Anomalien vor. Ein Ordnungssystem im Records Management umfasst mehr als nur die Klassifikation. Zudem dürfen die prinzipiellen, inhärenten Unterschiede zwischen Records Management einerseits und Wissens- und Informationsmanagement andererseits nicht vergessen gehen. Nicht die Klassifikation ist beim Records Management das zentrale Werkzeug der Informationsrepräsentation und -organisation, sondern die saubere Dossierbildung und die stringente, strukturstabile Umsetzung davon im Datenmodell. Hierauf geht die Autorin nicht ein. Ich werde aus dieser Sicht auf ihren Beitrag in der Schwerpunktausgabe reagieren.
    Date
    6.12.2009 17:22:17
  19. Pemberton, M.; Nugent, C.R.: Information studies : emergent field, convergent curriculum (1995) 0.05
    0.04833349 = product of:
      0.09666698 = sum of:
        0.082178555 = weight(_text_:management in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082178555 = score(doc=3064,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
        0.014488421 = product of:
          0.028976843 = sum of:
            0.028976843 = weight(_text_:science in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028976843 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    traditionally, librarianship, archives management, and records management have functioned largely as autonomous disciplines. However, economic, technological and higher education trends conspire against continued, possibly self defeating, claims to uniqueness. Areas of convergence include the information life cycle concept, gatekeepers, information storage and retrieval, information representation, assistive and instructional roles, ethics, and custodial and preservation concerns. Suggests implications for education and research in an emerging field of 'information management' or information studies
    Source
    Journal of education for library and information science. 36(1995) no.2, S.126-138
  20. Bondarenko, O.; Janssen, R.; Driessen, S.: Requirements for the design of a personal document-management system (2010) 0.05
    0.047853764 = product of:
      0.09570753 = sum of:
        0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08303016 = score(doc=3430,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
        0.01267737 = product of:
          0.02535474 = sum of:
            0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535474 = score(doc=3430,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a set of requirements for the design of a personal document management system is presented, based on the results of three research studies (Bondarenko, [2006]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2005]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2009]). We propose a framework, based on layers of task decomposition, that helps to understand the needs of information workers with regard to personal document and task management. Relevant user processes are described and requirements for a document-management system are derived for each layer. The derived requirements are compared to related studies, and implications for system design are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.3, S.468-482

Years

Languages

  • e 129
  • d 58
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 153
  • m 26
  • x 9
  • s 6
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…