-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.05
0.049386732 = product of:
0.098773465 = sum of:
0.079569034 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079569034 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.019204432 = product of:
0.038408864 = sum of:
0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038408864 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Integrating multiple overlapping metadata standards (1999)
0.04
0.03870889 = product of:
0.07741778 = sum of:
0.059307255 = weight(_text_:management in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059307255 = score(doc=4052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
0.018110527 = product of:
0.036221053 = sum of:
0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036221053 = score(doc=4052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This special issue of JASIS addresses different applications of metadata standards in geospatial collections, education, historical costume collection, data management, and information retrieval, end explores the future thinking of metadata standards for digital libraries
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1164-1223
-
Metadata and semantics research : 9th Research Conference, MTSR 2015, Manchester, UK, September 9-11, 2015, Proceedings (2015)
0.04
0.03731085 = product of:
0.0746217 = sum of:
0.050323877 = weight(_text_:management in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050323877 = score(doc=3274,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
0.024297824 = product of:
0.04859565 = sum of:
0.04859565 = weight(_text_:science in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04859565 = score(doc=3274,freq=10.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.39046016 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- LCSH
- Computer science
Database management
Text processing (Computer science)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 544
- Subject
- Computer science
Database management
Text processing (Computer science)
-
Burnett, K.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.: ¬A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development (1999)
0.03
0.034572445 = product of:
0.06914489 = sum of:
0.050323877 = weight(_text_:management in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050323877 = score(doc=4056,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.018821014 = product of:
0.03764203 = sum of:
0.03764203 = weight(_text_:science in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03764203 = score(doc=4056,freq=6.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata has taken on a more significant role than ever before in the emerging digital library context because the effective organization of networked information clearly depends on the effective management and organization of metadata. The issue of metadata has been approached variously by different intellectual communities. The 2 main approaches may be characterized as: (1) the bibliographic control approach (origins and major proponents in library science); and (2) data management approach (origins and major proponents in computer science). This article examines the different conceptual foundations and orientations of the 2 major approaches contributing to the metadata discussion. An examination of the on-going efforts to establish metadata standards, and comparison of different metadata formats, supports a proposal for an integrated concept of metadata to facilitate the merging of the 2 approaches
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1209-1217
-
Metadata and semantics research : 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings (2014)
0.03
0.032947272 = product of:
0.065894544 = sum of:
0.041936565 = weight(_text_:management in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041936565 = score(doc=2192,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
0.023957977 = product of:
0.047915954 = sum of:
0.047915954 = weight(_text_:science in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047915954 = score(doc=2192,freq=14.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.38499892 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 8th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2014, held in Karlsruhe, Germany, in November 2014. The 23 full papers and 9 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 57 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks. They cover the following topics: metadata and linked data: tools and models; (meta) data quality assessment and curation; semantic interoperability, ontology-based data access and representation; big data and digital libraries in health, science and technology; metadata and semantics for open repositories, research information systems and data infrastructure; metadata and semantics for cultural collections and applications; semantics for agriculture, food and environment.
- Content
- Metadata and linked data.- Tools and models.- (Meta)data quality assessment and curation.- Semantic interoperability, ontology-based data access and representation.- Big data and digital libraries in health, science and technology.- Metadata and semantics for open repositories, research information systems and data infrastructure.- Metadata and semantics for cultural collections and applications.- Semantics for agriculture, food and environment.
- LCSH
- Computer science
Database management
Text processing (Computer science)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 478
- Subject
- Computer science
Database management
Text processing (Computer science)
-
Chilvers, A.: ¬The super-metadata framework for managing long-term access to digital data objects : a possible way forward with specific reference to the UK (2002)
0.03
0.030208427 = product of:
0.060416855 = sum of:
0.05136159 = weight(_text_:management in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05136159 = score(doc=4468,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
0.009055263 = product of:
0.018110527 = sum of:
0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018110527 = score(doc=4468,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the reasons why existing management practices designed to cope with paper-based data objects appear to be inadequate for managing digital data objects (DDOs). The research described suggests the need for a reassessment of the way we view long-term access to DDOs. There is a need for a shift in emphasis which embraces the fluid nature of such objects and addresses the multifaceted issues involved in achieving such access. It would appear from the findings of this research that a conceptual framework needs to be developed which addresses a range of elements. The research achieved this by examining the issues facing stakeholders involved in this field; examining the need for and structure of a new generic conceptual framework, the super-metadata framework; identifying and discussing the issues central to the development of such a framework; and justifying the feasibility through the creation of an interactive cost model and stakeholder evaluation. The wider conceptual justification for such a framework is discussed and this involves an examination of the "public good" argument for the long-term retention of DDOs and the importance of selection in the management process. The paper concludes by considering the benefits to practitioners and the role they might play in testing the feasibility of such a framework. The paper also suggests possible avenues researchers may wish to consider to develop further the management of this field. (Note: This paper is derived from the author's Loughborough University phD thesis, "Managing long-term access to digital data objects: a metadata approach", written while holding a research studentship funded by the Department of Information Science.)
-
Stubley, P.: Cataloguing standards and metadata for e-commerce (1999)
0.03
0.029355595 = product of:
0.11742238 = sum of:
0.11742238 = weight(_text_:management in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11742238 = score(doc=1915,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.73732144 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information management report. 1999, Dec., S.16-18
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Hooland, S. van; Bontemps, Y.; Kaufman, S.: Answering the call for more accountability : applying data profiling to museum metadata (2008)
0.03
0.027394392 = product of:
0.054788783 = sum of:
0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035584353 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.019204432 = product of:
0.038408864 = sum of:
0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038408864 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Although the issue of metadata quality is recognized as an important topic within the metadata research community, the cultural heritage sector has been slow to develop methodologies, guidelines and tools for addressing this topic in practice. This paper concentrates on metadata quality specifically within the museum sector and describes the potential of data-profiling techniques for metadata quality evaluation. A case study illustrates the application of a generalpurpose data-profiling tool on a large collection of metadata records from an ethnographic collection. After an analysis of the results of the case-study the paper reviews further steps in our research and presents the implementation of a metadata quality tool within an open-source collection management software.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Desconnets, J.-C.; Chahdi, H.; Mougenot, I.: Application profile for earth observation images (2014)
0.03
0.027096223 = product of:
0.054192446 = sum of:
0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 1573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04151508 = score(doc=1573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1573)
0.01267737 = product of:
0.02535474 = sum of:
0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 1573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02535474 = score(doc=1573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1573)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Based on the concept of an application profile as proposed by the Dublin Core initiative, the work presented in this manuscript attempts to propose an application profile for the Earth Observation images. This approach aims to provide an open and extensible model facilitating the sharing and management of distributed images within decentralized architectures. It is intended to eventually cover the needs of discovery, localization, consulting, preservation and processing of data for decision support. We are using the Singapore framework recommendations to build the application profile. A particular focus on the formalization and representation of Description Set Profile (DSP) in RDF is proposed.
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 478
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.03
0.025058959 = product of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036221053 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06401478 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.03
0.025058959 = product of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036221053 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06401478 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.03
0.025058959 = product of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036221053 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06401478 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Managing metadata in web-scale discovery systems (2016)
0.02
0.024166744 = product of:
0.04833349 = sum of:
0.041089278 = weight(_text_:management in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041089278 = score(doc=3336,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.25800878 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.0072442107 = product of:
0.014488421 = sum of:
0.014488421 = weight(_text_:science in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014488421 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This book shows you how to harness the power of linked data and web-scale discovery systems to manage and link widely varied content across your library collection. Libraries are increasingly using web-scale discovery systems to help clients find a wide assortment of library materials, including books, journal articles, special collections, archival collections, videos, music and open access collections. Depending on the library material catalogued, the discovery system might need to negotiate different metadata standards, such as AACR, RDA, RAD, FOAF, VRA Core, METS, MODS, RDF and more. In Managing Metadata in Web-Scale Discovery Systems, editor Louise Spiteri and a range of international experts show you how to: * maximize the effectiveness of web-scale discovery systems * provide a smooth and seamless discovery experience to your users * help users conduct searches that yield relevant results * manage the sheer volume of items to which you can provide access, so your users can actually find what they need * maintain shared records that reflect the needs, languages, and identities of culturally and ethnically varied communities * manage metadata both within, across, and outside, library discovery tools by converting your library metadata to linked open data that all systems can access * manage user generated metadata from external services such as Goodreads and LibraryThing * mine user generated metadata to better serve your users in areas such as collection development or readers' advisory. The book will be essential reading for cataloguers, technical services and systems librarians and library and information science students studying modules on metadata, cataloguing, systems design, data management, and digital libraries. The book will also be of interest to those managing metadata in archives, museums and other cultural heritage institutions.
- LCSH
- Metadata / Management
- Subject
- Metadata / Management
-
Philips, J.T.: Metadata - information about electronic records (1995)
0.02
0.023722902 = product of:
0.09489161 = sum of:
0.09489161 = weight(_text_:management in 4556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09489161 = score(doc=4556,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 4556, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4556)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata is a term to describe the information required to documents the characteristics of information contained within databases. Describes the elements that make up metadata. A number of software tools exist to help apply document management principles to electronic records but they have, so far, been inadequately applied. Describes 2 initiative currently under way to develop software to automate many records management functions. Understanding document management principles as applied to electronic records are vital to records managers
- Source
- Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.53-55
-
Hill, L.L.; Janée, G.; Dolin, R.; Frew, J.; Larsgaard, M.: Collection metadata solutions for digital library applications (1999)
0.02
0.023225334 = product of:
0.046450667 = sum of:
0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 4053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035584353 = score(doc=4053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 4053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4053)
0.010866316 = product of:
0.021732632 = sum of:
0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 4053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021732632 = score(doc=4053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4053)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Within a digital library, collections may range from an ad hoc set of objects that serve a temporary purpose to established library collections intended to persist through time. The objects in these collections vary widely, from library and data center holdings to pointers to real-world objects, such as geographic places, and the various metadata schemes that describe them. The key to integrated use of such a variety of collections in a digital library is collection metadata that represents the inherent and contextual characteristics of a collection. The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) Project has designed and implemented collection metadata for several purposes: in XML form, the collection metadatada 'registers' the collection with the user interface client; in HTML form, it is used for user documentation; eventually, it will be used to describe the collection to network search agents; and it is used for internal collection management, including mapping the object metadata attributes to the common search parameters of the system
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1169-1181
-
Sutton, S.A.: Conceptual design and deployment of a metadata framework for educational resources on the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.023225334 = product of:
0.046450667 = sum of:
0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035584353 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
0.010866316 = product of:
0.021732632 = sum of:
0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021732632 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The metadata framework described in this article stems from a growing concern of the U.S. Department of Education and its National Library of Education that teachers, students, and parents are encountering increasing difficulty in accessing educational resources on the Internet even as those resources are becoming more abundant. This concern is joined by the realization that as Internet matures as a publishing environment, the successful management of resource repositories will hinge to a great extent on the intelligent use of metadata. We first explicate the conceptual foundations for the Gateway to Educational Materials (GEM) framework including the adoption of the Dublin Core Element Set as its base referent, and the extension of that set to meet the needs of the domain. We then discuss the complex of decisions that must be made regarding selection of the units of description and the structuring of an information space. The article concludes with a discussion of metadata generation, the association of metadata to the objects described, and a general description of the GEM system architecture
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1182-1192
-
Hert, C.A.; Denn, S.O.; Gillman, D.W.; Oh, J.S.; Pattuelli, M.C.; Hernandez, N.: Investigating and modeling metadata use to support information architecture development in the statistical knowledge network (2007)
0.02
0.023225334 = product of:
0.046450667 = sum of:
0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035584353 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
0.010866316 = product of:
0.021732632 = sum of:
0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021732632 = score(doc=422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata and an appropriate metadata model are nontrivial components of information architecture conceptualization and implementation, particularly when disparate and dispersed systems are integrated. Metadata availability can enhance retrieval processes, improve information organization and navigation, and support management of digital objects. To support these activities efficiently, metadata need to be modeled appropriately for the tasks. The authors' work focuses on how to understand and model metadata requirements to support the work of end users of an integrative statistical knowledge network (SKN). They report on a series of user studies. These studies provide an understanding of metadata elements necessary for a variety of user-oriented tasks, related business rules associated with the use of these elements, and their relationship to other perspectives on metadata model development. This work demonstrates the importance of the user perspective in this type of design activity and provides a set of strategies by which the results of user studies can be systematically utilized to support that design.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.9, S.1267-1284
-
Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008)
0.02
0.02282866 = product of:
0.04565732 = sum of:
0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029653627 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.016003694 = product of:
0.03200739 = sum of:
0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03200739 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013)
0.02
0.021229852 = product of:
0.042459704 = sum of:
0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029653627 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
0.012806077 = product of:
0.025612153 = sum of:
0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025612153 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
- Series
- Advances in information science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.651-662
-
Chivers, A.; Feather, J.: ¬The management of digital data : a metadata approach (1998)
0.02
0.020968283 = product of:
0.08387313 = sum of:
0.08387313 = weight(_text_:management in 2363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08387313 = score(doc=2363,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2363, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2363)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Reports on a research study, conducted at the Department of Information and Library Studies, Loughborough University, to investigate the potential of metadata for universal data management and explore the attitudes of UK information professionals to these issues
