-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000)
0.06
0.06392025 = product of:
0.1278405 = sum of:
0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08303016 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.044810344 = product of:
0.08962069 = sum of:
0.08962069 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962069 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 16:22:19
- Source
- Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36
-
Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990)
0.04
0.03508254 = product of:
0.14033017 = sum of:
0.14033017 = sum of:
0.05070948 = weight(_text_:science in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05070948 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.08962069 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08962069 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:43:54
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.4, S.272-281
-
Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994)
0.03
0.031960126 = product of:
0.06392025 = sum of:
0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04151508 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
0.022405172 = product of:
0.044810344 = sum of:
0.044810344 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044810344 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
- Source
- Information processing and management. 30(1994) no.2, S.205-221
-
Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995)
0.03
0.031960126 = product of:
0.06392025 = sum of:
0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04151508 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
0.022405172 = product of:
0.044810344 = sum of:
0.044810344 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044810344 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 13:14:10
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.4, S.555-572
-
Gilchrist, A.: Research and consultancy (1998)
0.03
0.030967113 = product of:
0.061934225 = sum of:
0.047445804 = weight(_text_:management in 1394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047445804 = score(doc=1394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1394)
0.014488421 = product of:
0.028976843 = sum of:
0.028976843 = weight(_text_:science in 1394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028976843 = score(doc=1394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1394)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of literature published about research and consultancy in library and information science (LIS). Issues covered include: scope and definitions of what constitutes research and consultancy; funding of research and development; national LIS research and the funding agencies; electronic libraries; document delivery; multimedia document delivery; the Z39.50 standard for client server computer architecture, the Internet and WWW; electronic publishing; information retrieval; evaluation and evaluation techniques; the Text Retrieval Conferences (TREC); the user domain; management issues; decision support systems; information politics and organizational culture; and value for money issues
-
Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995)
0.03
0.027394392 = product of:
0.054788783 = sum of:
0.035584353 = weight(_text_:management in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035584353 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.019204432 = product of:
0.038408864 = sum of:
0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038408864 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.2, S.173-190
-
Armstrong, C.J.; Medawar, K.: Investigation into the quality of databases in general use in the UK (1996)
0.03
0.027096223 = product of:
0.054192446 = sum of:
0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04151508 = score(doc=6768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
0.01267737 = product of:
0.02535474 = sum of:
0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02535474 = score(doc=6768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Reports on a Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) BLRRD funded project which investigated the quality of databases in general use in the UK. Gives a literature review of quality in library and information services. Reports the results of a CIQM questionnaire survey on the quality problems of databases and their affect on users. Carries out databases evaluations of: INSPEC on ESA-IRS, INSPEC on KR Data-Star, INSPEC on UMI CD-ROM, BNB on CD-ROM, and Information Science Abstracts Plus CD-ROM. Sets out a methodology for evaluation of bibliographic databases
-
Gluck, M.: Exploring the relationship between user satisfaction and relevance in information systems (1996)
0.03
0.025495915 = product of:
0.05099183 = sum of:
0.041936565 = weight(_text_:management in 4082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041936565 = score(doc=4082,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 4082, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4082)
0.009055263 = product of:
0.018110527 = sum of:
0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 4082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018110527 = score(doc=4082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4082)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Aims to better understand the relationship between relevance and user satisfaction, the 2 predominant aspects of user based performance in information systems. Unconfounds relevance and user satisfaction assessments of system performance at the retrieved item level. To minimize the idiosyncrasies of any one system, a generalized, naturalistic information system was employed in this study. Respondents completed sensemaking timeline questionnaires in which they described a recent need they had for geographic information. Retrieved documents from the generalized system consisted of the responses users obtained while resolving their information needs. Respondents directly provided process, product, cost benefit, and overall satisfaction assessments with the generalized geographic systems. Relevance judgements of retrieved items were obtained through content analysis from sensemaking questionnaires as a secondary observation technique. The content analysis provided relevance values on both 5 category and 2 category scales. Results indicate that relevance has strong relationships with process, product and overall user satisfaction measures while relevance and cost benefit satisfaction measures have no significant relationship. This analysis also indicates that neither relevance nor user satisfaction subsumes the other concept, and that understanding the proper units of analysis for these measures helps resolve the paradox of the management information system and information science literature not informing aech other concerning user based information system performance measures
- Source
- Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.1, S.89-104
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.03
0.025058959 = product of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036221053 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06401478 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.22-25
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol. 20
-
Logan, E.: Cognitive styles and online behaviour of novice searchers (1990)
0.02
0.023722902 = product of:
0.09489161 = sum of:
0.09489161 = weight(_text_:management in 6891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09489161 = score(doc=6891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 6891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6891)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.503-510
-
Cooper, W.S.: ¬The paradoxal role of unexamined documents in the evaluation of retrieval effectiveness (1976)
0.02
0.023722902 = product of:
0.09489161 = sum of:
0.09489161 = weight(_text_:management in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09489161 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 12(1976), S.367-375
-
Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008)
0.02
0.02282866 = product of:
0.04565732 = sum of:
0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029653627 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
0.016003694 = product of:
0.03200739 = sum of:
0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03200739 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
-
Ravana, S.D.; Taheri, M.S.; Rajagopal, P.: Document-based approach to improve the accuracy of pairwise comparison in evaluating information retrieval systems (2015)
0.02
0.02282866 = product of:
0.04565732 = sum of:
0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029653627 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
0.016003694 = product of:
0.03200739 = sum of:
0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03200739 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.4, S.408-421
-
Rajagopal, P.; Ravana, S.D.; Koh, Y.S.; Balakrishnan, V.: Evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems using effort-based relevance judgment (2019)
0.02
0.02282866 = product of:
0.04565732 = sum of:
0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029653627 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.016003694 = product of:
0.03200739 = sum of:
0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03200739 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 71(2019) no.1, S.2-17
-
Evans, D.A.; Lefferts, R.G.: CLARIT-TREC experiments (1995)
0.02
0.020968283 = product of:
0.08387313 = sum of:
0.08387313 = weight(_text_:management in 1912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08387313 = score(doc=1912,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 1912, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1912)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the following elements of the CLARIT system information management system: natural language processing, document indexing, vector space querying and query augmentation. Reports on the processing results carried out as part of the TREC-2 and into system parameterization. Results demonstrate high prescision and excellent recall, but the system is not yet optimized
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.3, S.385-395
-
Hersh, W.R.; Over, P.: Interactivity at the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) (2001)
0.02
0.02075754 = product of:
0.08303016 = sum of:
0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 5486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08303016 = score(doc=5486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5486)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.365-367
-
Over, P.: ¬The TREC interactive track : an annotated bibliography (2001)
0.02
0.02075754 = product of:
0.08303016 = sum of:
0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08303016 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.369-381
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Variations in relevance judgements and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness (2000)
0.02
0.02075754 = product of:
0.08303016 = sum of:
0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 8710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08303016 = score(doc=8710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 8710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8710)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.5, S.697-716
-
Rao, A.; Lu, A.; Meier, E.; Ahmed, S.; Pliske, D.: Query processing in TREC6 (2000)
0.02
0.02075754 = product of:
0.08303016 = sum of:
0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 6420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08303016 = score(doc=6420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6420)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.179-186
-
Smeaton, A.F.: TREC-6: personal highlights (2000)
0.02
0.02075754 = product of:
0.08303016 = sum of:
0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 6439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08303016 = score(doc=6439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6439)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.87-94
