Search (4643 results, page 1 of 233)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.26
    0.26287085 = product of:
      0.35049447 = sum of:
        0.07504265 = product of:
          0.22512795 = sum of:
            0.22512795 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22512795 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22512795 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22512795 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.050323877 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050323877 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.24
    0.23953128 = product of:
      0.31937504 = sum of:
        0.07504265 = product of:
          0.22512795 = sum of:
            0.22512795 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22512795 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22512795 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22512795 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.019204432 = product of:
          0.038408864 = sum of:
            0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038408864 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.20
    0.20011374 = product of:
      0.4002275 = sum of:
        0.10005687 = product of:
          0.3001706 = sum of:
            0.3001706 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3001706 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.3001706 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3001706 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  4. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.18
    0.17509954 = product of:
      0.35019907 = sum of:
        0.08754977 = product of:
          0.2626493 = sum of:
            0.2626493 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2626493 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.2626493 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2626493 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  5. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.13
    0.1250711 = product of:
      0.2501422 = sum of:
        0.06253555 = product of:
          0.18760663 = sum of:
            0.18760663 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18760663 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18760663 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18760663 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  6. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.10
    0.10005687 = product of:
      0.20011374 = sum of:
        0.050028436 = product of:
          0.1500853 = sum of:
            0.1500853 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1500853 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1500853 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1500853 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  7. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.09
    0.09205449 = product of:
      0.18410897 = sum of:
        0.08387313 = weight(_text_:management in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08387313 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
        0.100235835 = sum of:
          0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036221053 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06401478 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
    Footnote
    Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
    Source
    Journal of education for library and information science. 41(2000) no.?, S.294-306
  8. Kmuche, W.: Strategischer Erfolgsfaktor Wissen : Content Management: der Weg zum erfolgreichen Informationsmanagement (2000) 0.08
    0.08111636 = product of:
      0.16223273 = sum of:
        0.11742238 = weight(_text_:management in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11742238 = score(doc=644,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.73732144 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
        0.044810344 = product of:
          0.08962069 = sum of:
            0.08962069 = weight(_text_:22 in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08962069 = score(doc=644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    19. 7.2002 22:05:14
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  9. Taylor, A.: Engaging with knowledge : emerging concepts in knowledge management (2003) 0.08
    0.080838345 = product of:
      0.16167669 = sum of:
        0.12326783 = weight(_text_:management in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12326783 = score(doc=60,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.77402633 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
        0.038408864 = product of:
          0.07681773 = sum of:
            0.07681773 = weight(_text_:22 in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07681773 = score(doc=60,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses the knowledge management phenomenon and provides an overview of emerging concepts
    Date
    2. 2.2003 18:31:22
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  10. Wu, I.-L.; Lin, H.-C.: ¬A strategy-based process for implementing knowledge management : an integrative view and empirical study (2009) 0.08
    0.07714443 = product of:
      0.15428886 = sum of:
        0.094147354 = weight(_text_:management in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094147354 = score(doc=2764,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.59117234 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
        0.060141496 = sum of:
          0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021732632 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
          0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038408864 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge resource is unique and valuable for a link to competitive advantage based on the knowledge-based perspective. Effective knowledge management is the major concern of contemporary business managers. The key determinant of effective knowledge management is the firm's competitive strategy. The link between business strategy and knowledge management, while often discussed, has been widely ignored in practice. Moreover, while knowledge management is complex in nature, it is difficult to directly translate a firm's competitive strategy into the specific knowledge management activities. This requires first defining knowledge strategy to guide further information technology (IT)-supported implementation approaches. Finally, the ultimate goal of knowledge management lies in the realization of firm performance. Previous studies have just discussed partial relationship among these relevant knowledge concepts rather than in an integrative manner. Thus, this research proposes a complete process-based model with four components: competitive strategy, knowledge strategy, implementation approach, and firm performance. Empirical results have shown positive relationships between any two consecutive components and useful insight for knowledge implementation practice.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:08:51
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.789-802
  11. AI-Hawamdeh, S.: Designing an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management (2005) 0.08
    0.075696275 = product of:
      0.15139255 = sum of:
        0.093773015 = weight(_text_:management in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093773015 = score(doc=4236,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.58882177 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
        0.057619542 = sum of:
          0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025612153 = score(doc=4236,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
          0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03200739 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Designing an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management requires a good understanding of knowledge processes and the ability to differentiate between information management and knowledge management. Given the complexity of knowledge and the nature of its existence, there is a need for graduate programs to go beyond information management and include in the curriculum disciplines that deal with social, cultural, and economic issues such as communication, cognitive science, and business. An understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of knowledge management is necessary for a more balanced and practical approach to the development of a knowledge management curriculum. In this article, the design and development of an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore is reported. The initiation of the program was influenced by the strong demand from the public sector in Singapore for knowledge management professionals. It was developed in close association with the information studies program at Nanyang Technological University. In the first year, the program attracted 230 applicants, of which 45 were selected-22 students came from the public sector and 23 students came from the private sector.
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenschwerpunktes: Knowledge Management in Asia
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.11, S.1200-1206
  12. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.07
    0.0736098 = product of:
      0.1472196 = sum of:
        0.071168706 = weight(_text_:management in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071168706 = score(doc=994,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.07605089 = sum of:
          0.03764203 = weight(_text_:science in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03764203 = score(doc=994,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038408864 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
  13. Ehlers, L.H.: Content Management Anwendungen : Spezifikation von Internet-Anwendungen auf Basis von Content Management Systemen (2003) 0.07
    0.07250023 = product of:
      0.14500046 = sum of:
        0.12326783 = weight(_text_:management in 4943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12326783 = score(doc=4943,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.77402633 = fieldWeight in 4943, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4943)
        0.021732632 = product of:
          0.043465264 = sum of:
            0.043465264 = weight(_text_:science in 4943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043465264 = score(doc=4943,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 4943, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Series
    Advances in information systems and management science; 1
  14. Blair, D.C.: Knowledge management : hype, hope, or help? (2002) 0.07
    0.07197979 = product of:
      0.14395958 = sum of:
        0.13128221 = weight(_text_:management in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13128221 = score(doc=982,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.8243505 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
        0.01267737 = product of:
          0.02535474 = sum of:
            0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535474 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines the nature of Knowledge Management- how it differs from Data Management and Information Management, and its relationship to the development of Expert Systems and Decision Support Systems. It also examines the importance of Communities of Practice and Tacit Knowledge for Knowledge Management. The discussion is organized around five explicit questions. One: What is "knowledge"? Two: Why are people, especially managers, thinking about Knowledge Management? Three: What are the enabling technologies for Knowledge Management? Four: What are the prerequisites for Knowledge Management? Five: What are the major challenges for Knowledge Management?
    Footnote
    Part of a special section on knowledge management
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.12, S.1019-1028
  15. Nyseter, T.: Learning centres and knowledge management : based on common ideas? (2005) 0.07
    0.07103566 = product of:
      0.14207132 = sum of:
        0.07190624 = weight(_text_:management in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07190624 = score(doc=3014,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
        0.07016508 = sum of:
          0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02535474 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
          0.044810344 = weight(_text_:22 in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044810344 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    New roles for libraries and librarians in the information and knowledge society are discussed worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to present the ideas behind the philosophy of Learning Centres (LC) and Knowledge Management (KM) respectively, and make a comparative study between the two approaches. The paper is based on KM theory and a case-study of the Learning Centres at Oslo University College (OUC), and was originally written as a theme paper in connection to the course "Information in Organizations and Knowledge Management" which is part of the Masters' programme in Library and Information science at OUC.
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:55:29
  16. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.07
    0.06538868 = product of:
      0.13077736 = sum of:
        0.061633915 = weight(_text_:management in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061633915 = score(doc=2766,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.06914345 = sum of:
          0.030734586 = weight(_text_:science in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030734586 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038408864 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
  17. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.07
    0.06512061 = product of:
      0.13024122 = sum of:
        0.04151508 = weight(_text_:management in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04151508 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
        0.08872613 = sum of:
          0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02535474 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.0633714 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0633714 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.792-796
  18. International yearbook of library and information management : 2001/2002 information services in an electronic environment (2001) 0.06
    0.06392025 = product of:
      0.1278405 = sum of:
        0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08303016 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
        0.044810344 = product of:
          0.08962069 = sum of:
            0.08962069 = weight(_text_:22 in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08962069 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    25. 3.2003 13:22:23
  19. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.06
    0.06392025 = product of:
      0.1278405 = sum of:
        0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08303016 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
        0.044810344 = product of:
          0.08962069 = sum of:
            0.08962069 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08962069 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36
  20. Domingue, J.; Motta, E.: PlanetOnto : from news publishing to integrated knowledge management support (2000) 0.06
    0.06392025 = product of:
      0.1278405 = sum of:
        0.08303016 = weight(_text_:management in 6872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08303016 = score(doc=6872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6872)
        0.044810344 = product of:
          0.08962069 = sum of:
            0.08962069 = weight(_text_:22 in 6872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08962069 = score(doc=6872,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6872, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2002 11:47:22

Languages

Types

  • a 3950
  • m 528
  • s 189
  • el 167
  • x 40
  • b 31
  • i 18
  • r 8
  • n 6
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications