Search (3309 results, page 1 of 166)

0.3001706 = product of:
  0.6003412 = sum of:
    0.1500853 = product of:
      0.4502559 = sum of:
        0.4502559 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4502559 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.4502559 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4502559 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.2501422 = product of:
  0.5002844 = sum of:
    0.1250711 = product of:
      0.37521327 = sum of:
        0.37521327 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37521327 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.37521327 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37521327 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.23327768 = product of:
  0.3110369 = sum of:
    0.07504265 = product of:
      0.22512795 = sum of:
        0.22512795 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22512795 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22512795 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22512795 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021732632 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.202144 = product of:
  0.26952532 = sum of:
    0.050028436 = product of:
      0.1500853 = sum of:
        0.1500853 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1500853 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21225268 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21225268 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.0072442107 = product of:
      0.014488421 = sum of:
        0.014488421 = weight(_text_:science in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014488421 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.11641272 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

Imprint

Pittsburgh, PA : Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Language Technologies Institute

0.19671082 = product of:
  0.39342165 = sum of:
    0.07504265 = product of:
      0.22512795 = sum of:
        0.22512795 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22512795 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.31837898 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31837898 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.19439808 = product of:
  0.25919744 = sum of:
    0.06253555 = product of:
      0.18760663 = sum of:
        0.18760663 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18760663 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18760663 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18760663 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.009055263 = product of:
      0.018110527 = sum of:
        0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018110527 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

Imprint

Trento : University / Department of information engineering and computer science

0.17509954 = product of:
  0.35019907 = sum of:
    0.08754977 = product of:
      0.2626493 = sum of:
        0.2626493 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2626493 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2626493 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2626493 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.1471357 = product of:
  0.2942714 = sum of:
    0.22512795 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22512795 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.06914345 = sum of:
      0.030734586 = weight(_text_:science in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030734586 = score(doc=563,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038408864 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.

Date

10. 1.2013 19:22:47

0.1250711 = product of:
  0.2501422 = sum of:
    0.06253555 = product of:
      0.18760663 = sum of:
        0.18760663 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18760663 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18760663 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18760663 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.1250711 = product of:
  0.2501422 = sum of:
    0.06253555 = product of:
      0.18760663 = sum of:
        0.18760663 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18760663 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18760663 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18760663 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

0.087273166 = product of:
  0.17454633 = sum of:
    0.059307255 = weight(_text_:management in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059307255 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
    0.115239084 = sum of:
      0.051224306 = weight(_text_:science in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051224306 = score(doc=3304,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
      0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06401478 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Footnote

Guest editorial für ein Special issue on "The reward system of science".

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.478-485

0.07504265 = product of:
  0.3001706 = sum of:
    0.3001706 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3001706 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4005707 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.

0.07305171 = product of:
  0.14610343 = sum of:
    0.09489161 = weight(_text_:management in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09489161 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
    0.051211823 = product of:
      0.102423646 = sum of:
        0.102423646 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102423646 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 65(2013) ff. Früher u.d.T.: Aslib proceedings, (bis 2012)

0.07103566 = product of:
  0.14207132 = sum of:
    0.07190624 = weight(_text_:management in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07190624 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.07016508 = sum of:
      0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02535474 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.044810344 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044810344 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.

Date

22. 1.2011 14:23:07

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.363-374

Theme

Content Management System

0.06137709 = product of:
  0.12275418 = sum of:
    0.07263626 = weight(_text_:management in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07263626 = score(doc=1003,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
    0.050117917 = sum of:
      0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018110527 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200739 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1590-1607

0.057368666 = product of:
  0.11473733 = sum of:
    0.05136159 = weight(_text_:management in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05136159 = score(doc=241,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
    0.06337574 = sum of:
      0.031368356 = weight(_text_:science in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031368356 = score(doc=241,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
      0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200739 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

We address how individuals' (workers) knowledge needs influence the design of knowledge management systems (KMS), enabling knowledge creation and utilization. It is evident that KMS technologies and activities are indiscriminately deployed in most organizations with little regard to the actual context of their adoption. Moreover, it is apparent that the extant literature pertaining to knowledge management projects is frequently deficient in identifying the variety of factors indicative for successful KMS. This presents an obvious business practice and research gap that requires a critical analysis of the necessary intervention that will actually improve how workers can leverage and form organization-wide knowledge. This research involved an extensive review of the literature, a grounded theory methodological approach and rigorous data collection and synthesis through an empirical case analysis (Parsons Brinckerhoff and Samsung). The contribution of this study is the formulation of a model for designing KMS based upon the design science paradigm, which aspires to create artifacts that are interdependent of people and organizations. The essential proposition is that KMS design and implementation must be contextualized in relation to knowledge needs and that these will differ for various organizational settings. The findings present valuable insights and further understanding of the way in which KMS design efforts should be focused.

Date

11. 6.2012 14:22:34

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.948-966

0.057184067 = product of:
  0.11436813 = sum of:
    0.10169076 = weight(_text_:management in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10169076 = score(doc=157,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.6385391 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
    0.01267737 = product of:
      0.02535474 = sum of:
        0.02535474 = weight(_text_:science in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02535474 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This book focuses on the role of special libraries as knowledge management centres in their organisations. It describes the work of a special library and the special library draws on the characteristics that make the nucleus of collecting and organising knowledge which is used for the benefit of the institution. By acquiring and sharing knowledge, staff will enhance the intellectual capital of the institution. Traditionally libraries are the information centres that organise and classify information. Further on they are the proper places to create human networks and to organise the knowledge

Imprint

Burlington : Elsevier Science

LCSH

Knowledge management

RSWK

Wirtschaft / Management

Subject

Wirtschaft / Management
Knowledge management

0.056406997 = product of:
  0.112813994 = sum of:
    0.041936565 = weight(_text_:management in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041936565 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.07087743 = sum of:
      0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025612153 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.045265283 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045265283 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22
17. 9.2018 18:22:23

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.27-54

0.054849304 = product of:
  0.10969861 = sum of:
    0.041089278 = weight(_text_:management in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041089278 = score(doc=2753,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.25800878 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
    0.06860933 = sum of:
      0.0323971 = weight(_text_:science in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0323971 = score(doc=2753,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.26030678 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
      0.03621223 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03621223 = score(doc=2753,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This book constitutes the thoroughly refereed post-conference proceedings of the First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference on semantic Keyword-based Search on Structured Data Sources, IKC 2015, held in Coimbra, Portugal, in September 2015. The 13 revised full papers, 3 revised short papers, and 2 invited papers were carefully reviewed and selected from 22 initial submissions. The paper topics cover techniques for keyword search, semantic data management, social Web and social media, information retrieval, benchmarking for search on big data.

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

LCSH

Computer science
Database management
Text processing (Computer science)

Series

Lecture notes in computer science ; 9398

Subject

Computer science
Database management
Text processing (Computer science)

0.054757323 = product of:
  0.109514646 = sum of:
    0.094147354 = weight(_text_:management in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.094147354 = score(doc=1551,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.59117234 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
    0.015367293 = product of:
      0.030734586 = sum of:
        0.030734586 = weight(_text_:science in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030734586 = score(doc=1551,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

In this article, the authors introduce two citation-based approaches to facilitate a multidimensional evaluation of 39 selected management journals. The first is a refined application of PageRank via the differentiation of citation types. The second is a form of mathematical manipulation to identify the roles that the selected management journals play. Their findings reveal that Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, and Administrative Science Quarterly are the top three management journals, respectively. They also discovered that these three journals play the role of a knowledge hub in the domain. Finally, when compared with Journal Citation Reports (Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA), their results closely match expert opinions.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.12, S.2581-2591