Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
lcsh's%3a%22Education%2c higher %2f effect of technological innovations on %2f great britain%22 2
lcsh's%3a%22Education%2c higher %2f effect of technological innovation on %2f great britain%22 2
lcsh's%3a%22Education%2c higher %2f effect of technological innovations on %2f great brittain%22 2
lcsh's%3a%22Education%2c higher %2f effect of technological innovations on %2f groat britain%22 2
lcshs%3a%22Education%2c higher %2f effect of technological innovations on %2f great britain%22 2

Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997) 0.01

0.006287033 = product of:
  0.03457868 = sum of:
    0.021659635 = weight(_text_:of in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021659635 = score(doc=91,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034531306 = queryNorm
        0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.012919044 = weight(_text_:on in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012919044 = score(doc=91,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034531306 = queryNorm
        0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)

Abstract: Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model
Source: Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.1, S.1-18

Taniguchi, S.: ¬An analysis of the oriented-ness in cataloguing rules (1997) 0.00

0.0020774936 = product of:
  0.022852428 = sum of:
    0.022852428 = weight(_text_:of in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022852428 = score(doc=6343,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034531306 = queryNorm
        0.42320424 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)

Abstract: Proposes an approach to the analysis of cataloguing rules seen as bibliographic description in terms of 'oriented-ness'. Assesses the validity and usefulness of the proposed approach and considers its problems and issues
Source: Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.3, S.129-139