Search (61 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"chi"
  1. Yang, H.-W.: Information-seeking behavior of the scientists (1998) 0.03
    0.029864104 = product of:
      0.10950171 = sum of:
        0.07492303 = weight(_text_:effect in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07492303 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
        0.021659635 = weight(_text_:of in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021659635 = score(doc=2992,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
        0.012919044 = weight(_text_:on in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012919044 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    A review of studies related to the information needs and communication behaviour of scientists which aims to explore the factors that influence their needs and methods of problem solving. Particular work environments affect needs. Information seeking and basic requirements are comprehensiveness, precision and availability. convenience of information access has a direct effect on the efficiency of a scientist's research but a lack of confidence in applying the solutions to information problems which are employed by librarians limits scientists to the more traditional ways of finding information in libraries. An awareness of this should lead librarians to improve collections and user services for the benefit of scientists and thus win their trust
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1998, no.25, S.24-43
  2. Huang, M.-h.: Factors affecting relevance judgement : a preliminary study (1998) 0.02
    0.023572942 = product of:
      0.12965117 = sum of:
        0.11909609 = weight(_text_:higher in 926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11909609 = score(doc=926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.6565945 = fieldWeight in 926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=926)
        0.010555085 = weight(_text_:of in 926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010555085 = score(doc=926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=926)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to investigate situational variables which can affect the results of relevance judgements, including computer experience, search experience, familiarity with search topic, preparation time, research objecttives, and research stages. The results show only the search experience will affect relevance judgements. Concerning research objectives, students writing term papers yield less relevance odds but a higher precision rate. concerning research stage, searchers in the early research stage yield more relevance odds and a higher precision rate
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1998) no.3, S.39-50
  3. Lee, Y.-R.: ¬A study on the conditions of using OPAC access points and subject searching by users (1997) 0.01
    0.013682111 = product of:
      0.05016774 = sum of:
        0.016689055 = weight(_text_:of in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016689055 = score(doc=933,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
        0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014764623 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
        0.018714061 = product of:
          0.037428122 = sum of:
            0.037428122 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037428122 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Uses the results of various user studies to offer some insight into user behaviour in connection with OPAC access points and to explore conditions for subject searching, the difficulties involved and the matching of queries to subject headings. Sums up suggestions for the improvement of subject access to OPACs
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55
  4. Pu, H.-T.: Exploration of personalized information service for OPAC (1997) 0.01
    0.013332471 = product of:
      0.048885725 = sum of:
        0.019591875 = weight(_text_:of in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019591875 = score(doc=1772,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
        0.012919044 = weight(_text_:on in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012919044 = score(doc=1772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
        0.016374804 = product of:
          0.03274961 = sum of:
            0.03274961 = weight(_text_:22 in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03274961 = score(doc=1772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Library OPACs have long been the gateways between users and information. They present to users the achievements of library automation, and are the most widely available automated retrieval systems and the first that many user encounter. Current trends in OPAC design are toward a user oriented, individual information service which can meet the different needs of users with a variety of background and interests. Compared with the rather inactive, short term and general information service of conventional systems, this type of system focuses on active, long term and personalized service. Proposes a framework for the design of such an OPAC and discusses some recent developments in personalized information service
    Date
    4. 8.1998 19:36:22
    Source
    Bulletin of the Library Association of China. 1997, no.59, Dec., S.127-133
  5. Tseng, Y.-H.: Solving vocabulary problems with interactive query expansion (1998) 0.01
    0.011974213 = product of:
      0.06585817 = sum of:
        0.053516448 = weight(_text_:effect in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053516448 = score(doc=5159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
        0.012341722 = weight(_text_:of in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012341722 = score(doc=5159,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    One of the major causes of search failures in information retrieval systems is vocabulary mismatch. Presents a solution to the vocabulary problem through 2 strategies known as term suggestion (TS) and term relevance feedback (TRF). In TS, collection specific terms are extracted from the text collection. These terms and their frequencies constitute the keyword database for suggesting terms in response to users' queries. One effect of this term suggestion is that it functions as a dynamic directory if the query is a general term that contains broad meaning. In term relevance feedback, terms extracted from the top ranked documents retrieved from the previous query are shown to users for relevance feedback. In the experiment, interactive TS provides very high precision rates while achieving similar recall rates as n-gram matching. Local TRF achieves improvement in both precision and recall rate in a full text news database and degrades slightly in recall rate in bibliographic databases due to the very limited source of information for feedback. In terms of Rijsbergen's combined measure of recall and precision, both TS and TRF achieve better performance than n-gram matching, which implies that the greater improvement in precision rate compensates the slight degradation in recall rate for TS and TRF
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 24(1998) no.1, S.1-18
  6. Hsieh, Y.-s.: ¬A study on the users' perception to the body language of reference librarians (1997) 0.01
    0.009233429 = product of:
      0.050783858 = sum of:
        0.024683444 = weight(_text_:of in 2819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024683444 = score(doc=2819,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.45711282 = fieldWeight in 2819, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2819)
        0.026100414 = weight(_text_:on in 2819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026100414 = score(doc=2819,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3436586 = fieldWeight in 2819, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2819)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Part 2 of an article reporting results of a questionnaire survey of library users' perceptions of reference librarians' body language aims and its influence on the users' satisfaction of the reference interviews
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 35(1997) no.3, S.258-282
  7. Fu, Y.-h.: ¬The theory and empirical studies on information seeking (1997) 0.01
    0.00808298 = product of:
      0.04445639 = sum of:
        0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014927144 = score(doc=397,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
        0.029529246 = weight(_text_:on in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029529246 = score(doc=397,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Defines information seeking as using information to satisfy one's needs. Traditionally, quantitative research has focused on objective information and the external behaviour of users, while the alternative paradigm in user studies focused on subjective information and the internal cognition of users. In the context of the paradigm shift, scholars are calling for supplementing quantitative approaches with qualitative approaches. Reviews the literature and presents theories and empirical studies on information needs and information seeking behaviour
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.20, S.13-28
  8. Lu, S.J.: ¬A study on the principles of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (2000) 0.01
    0.008056271 = product of:
      0.04430949 = sum of:
        0.0184714 = weight(_text_:of in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0184714 = score(doc=2872,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
        0.025838088 = weight(_text_:on in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025838088 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 2000, no.32, S.16-44
  9. Wu, C.-J.: Experiments on using the Dublin Core to reduce the retrieval error ratio (1998) 0.01
    0.0076271123 = product of:
      0.041949116 = sum of:
        0.0130612515 = weight(_text_:of in 5201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0130612515 = score(doc=5201,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 5201, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5201)
        0.028887864 = weight(_text_:on in 5201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028887864 = score(doc=5201,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.38036036 = fieldWeight in 5201, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5201)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    In order to test the power of metadata on information retrieval, an experiment was designed and conducted on a group of 7 graduate students using the Dublin Core as the cataloguing metadata. Results show that, on average, the retrieval error rate is only 2.9 per cent for the MES system (http://140.136.85.194), which utilizes the Dublin Core to describe the documents on the World Wide Web, in contrast to 20.7 per cent for the 7 famous search engines including HOTBOT, GAIS, LYCOS, EXCITE, INFOSEEK, YAHOO, and OCTOPUS. The very low error rate indicates that the users can use the information of the Dublin Core to decide whether to retrieve the documents or not
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 24(1998) no.1, S.50-64
  10. Yi, H.; Shubai, L.: Application of classification in information organization under the networking environment (1998) 0.01
    0.0074735954 = product of:
      0.041104775 = sum of:
        0.022390714 = weight(_text_:of in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022390714 = score(doc=3236,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.41465375 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
        0.018714061 = product of:
          0.037428122 = sum of:
            0.037428122 = weight(_text_:22 in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037428122 = score(doc=3236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Classification plays a very important role in the traditional organization and manual retrieval of documents. The advantages of classification are becoming evident again in the networked environment, in the areas of online browsing, organization of non text information, management of hypertext, and as a common language for the organization of information, which will promote the integration of classification schemes and thesauri
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.1, S.19-22
  11. Huang, M.-h.: End-users' searching behaviour : changes in search type over time (1996) 0.01
    0.007386743 = product of:
      0.040627085 = sum of:
        0.019746756 = weight(_text_:of in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019746756 = score(doc=5128,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
        0.02088033 = weight(_text_:on in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02088033 = score(doc=5128,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies 6 types of searches on the basis of paudsing behaviour by using cluster analysis. The 6 types of search were highly associated with search fleuncy and the construction of a mental model. Examines learning during multiple searches on the basis of the 6 types. Finds that searchers gain more experience, increase their searching proficiency and become more fluent at searching while online. The changes of search level in multiple searches showed that most searchers moved towards greater fleuncy
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1996, no.16, S.7-20
  12. Xiong, L.J.: On the compiling of cataloguing rules for Chinese document(s) (1997) 0.01
    0.007144413 = product of:
      0.03929427 = sum of:
        0.013193856 = weight(_text_:of in 3199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013193856 = score(doc=3199,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 3199, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3199)
        0.026100414 = weight(_text_:on in 3199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026100414 = score(doc=3199,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3436586 = fieldWeight in 3199, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3199)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the author's practice and experience in compiling 'Cataloguing rules for Chinese documents', explains the background to the rules and their style, highlighting various points which need attention when using them
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.1, S.32-37
  13. Jin, Z.; Yuan, C.: On the ambiguity of information retrieval for visualization (1998) 0.01
    0.0071204132 = product of:
      0.03916227 = sum of:
        0.018281942 = weight(_text_:of in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018281942 = score(doc=3216,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
        0.02088033 = weight(_text_:on in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02088033 = score(doc=3216,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses the issue of ambiguity of information retrieval for visualization in respect of distance and angle retrieval. Analyzes the cause of the ambiguitiy, its impact on information retrieval, and its resolution. Describes a system where the techniques described are realized
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.3, S.175-179
  14. Shuiqing, H.; Hanqing, H.: ¬The realizing of Chinese PRECIS on computer (1991) 0.01
    0.0070726075 = product of:
      0.03889934 = sum of:
        0.0130612515 = weight(_text_:of in 2129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0130612515 = score(doc=2129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2129)
        0.025838088 = weight(_text_:on in 2129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025838088 = score(doc=2129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 2129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2129)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
  15. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.006992876 = product of:
      0.038460817 = sum of:
        0.019746756 = weight(_text_:of in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019746756 = score(doc=5083,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
        0.018714061 = product of:
          0.037428122 = sum of:
            0.037428122 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037428122 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 47(2006) no.2, S.153-171
  16. Chang, H.-C.: Introduction to the fifth edition of National Library of Medicine Classification (1998) 0.01
    0.006755516 = product of:
      0.037155338 = sum of:
        0.022390714 = weight(_text_:of in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022390714 = score(doc=3234,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.41465375 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
        0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014764623 = score(doc=3234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Introduces the content and structure of the US National Library of Medicine Classification, focusing on the revisions and features of the 5th ed. Cites as an example, for the reference of other medical libraries in Taiwan, the National Taiwan Univeristy Medical Library's reclassification of its collection in response to the publication of the 5th edition
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1998, no.25, S.6-15
  17. Yongcheng, W.; Xiaoming, G.; Lixia, W.: Automatic indexing on subject of Chinese text (1998) 0.01
    0.006748129 = product of:
      0.03711471 = sum of:
        0.01865893 = weight(_text_:of in 3241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01865893 = score(doc=3241,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 3241, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3241)
        0.018455777 = weight(_text_:on in 3241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018455777 = score(doc=3241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 3241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3241)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the underlying ideas, the basic algorithm and structure of CSAIS 2.1, an automatic indexing system for the subjects of Chinese documents, developed by the authors in 1993
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.3, S.219-225
  18. Cheng, K.-H.: Automatic identification for topics of electronic documents (1997) 0.01
    0.0066803074 = product of:
      0.03674169 = sum of:
        0.0184714 = weight(_text_:of in 1811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0184714 = score(doc=1811,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 1811, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1811)
        0.01827029 = weight(_text_:on in 1811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01827029 = score(doc=1811,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 1811, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1811)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapid rise in numbers of electronic documents on the Internet, how to effectively assign topics to documents become an important issue. Current research in this area focuses on the behaviour of nouns in documents. Proposes, however, that nouns and verbs together contribute to the process of topic identification. Constructs a mathematical model taking into account the following factors: word importance, word frequency, word co-occurence, and word distance. Preliminary experiments ahow that the performance of the proposed model is equivalent to that of a human being
    Source
    Bulletin of the Library Association of China. 1997, no.59, Dec., S.43-58
  19. Xianghao, G.; Yixin, Z.; Li, Y.: ¬A new method of news test understanding and abstracting based on speech acts theory (1998) 0.01
    0.0065226895 = product of:
      0.03587479 = sum of:
        0.02111017 = weight(_text_:of in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02111017 = score(doc=3532,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
        0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014764623 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a method for the automated analysis and comprehension of foreign affairs news produced by a Chinese news agency. Notes that the development of the method was prededed by a study of the structuring rules of the news. Describes how an abstract of the news story is produced automatically from the analysis. Stresses the main aim of the work which is to use specch act theory to analyse and classify sentences
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.4, S.257-262
  20. Li, Z.: Research on dynamic morphological indexing (1998) 0.01
    0.0065104505 = product of:
      0.035807475 = sum of:
        0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 3242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014927144 = score(doc=3242,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3242, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3242)
        0.02088033 = weight(_text_:on in 3242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02088033 = score(doc=3242,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 3242, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3242)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Notes that in automatic indexing of Chinese words using dictionary matching methods, there is some difficulty in the indexing of proper nouns. Presents a solution called dynamic morphological indexing, based on work using automatic indexing of archive documents. Presents the algorithm for this solution
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.3, S.226-229