-
Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007)
0.10
0.09871573 = product of:
0.5429365 = sum of:
0.27146825 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27146825 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.27146825 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27146825 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Footnote
- DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
-
Khoo, C.; Chan, S.; Niu, Y.: ¬The many facets of the cause-effect relation (2002)
0.03
0.031293757 = product of:
0.17211567 = sum of:
0.1573056 = weight(_text_:effect in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1573056 = score(doc=1192,freq=12.0), product of:
0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.8600655 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.014810067 = weight(_text_:of in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014810067 = score(doc=1192,freq=14.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- This chapter presents a broad survey of the cause-effect relation, with particular emphasis an how the relation is expressed in text. Philosophers have been grappling with the concept of causation for centuries. Researchers in social psychology have found that the human mind has a very complex mechanism for identifying and attributing the cause for an event. Inferring cause-effect relations between events and statements has also been found to be an important part of reading and text comprehension, especially for narrative text. Though many of the cause-effect relations in text are implied and have to be inferred by the reader, there is also a wide variety of linguistic expressions for explicitly indicating cause and effect. In addition, it has been found that certain words have "causal valence"-they bias the reader to attribute cause in certain ways. Cause-effect relations can also be divided into several different types.
- Source
- The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: Green, R., C.A. Bean u. S.H. Myaeng
-
Gerbé, O.; Mineau, G.W.; Keller, R.K.: Conceptual graphs, metamodelling, and notation of concepts : fundamental issues (2000)
0.03
0.025235984 = product of:
0.09253194 = sum of:
0.06316024 = weight(_text_:higher in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06316024 = score(doc=5078,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.34821182 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
0.013711456 = weight(_text_:of in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013711456 = score(doc=5078,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
0.015660247 = weight(_text_:on in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015660247 = score(doc=5078,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Knowledge management, in particular corporate knowledge management, is a challenge companies and researchers have to meet. The conceptual graph formalism is a good candidate for the representation of corporate knowledge, and for the development of knowledge management systems. But many of the issues concerning the use of conceptual graphs as a metalanguage have not been worked out in detail. By introducing a function that maps higher level to lower level, this paper clarifies the metalevel semantics, notation and manipulation of concepts in the conceptual graph formalism. In addition, this function allows metamodeling activities to take place using the CG notation
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.1867: Lecture notes on artificial intelligence
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002)
0.02
0.023881651 = product of:
0.087566055 = sum of:
0.053516448 = weight(_text_:effect in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053516448 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
0.018066432 = weight(_text_:of in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018066432 = score(doc=1430,freq=30.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
0.015983174 = weight(_text_:on in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015983174 = score(doc=1430,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Work on relationships takes place in many communities, including, among others, data modeling, knowledge representation, natural language processing, linguistics, and information retrieval. Unfortunately, continued disciplinary splintering and specialization keeps any one person from being familiar with the full expanse of that work. By including contributions form experts in a variety of disciplines and backgrounds, this volume demonstrates both the parallels that inform work on relationships across a number of fields and the singular emphases that have yet to be fully embraced, The volume is organized into 3 parts: (1) Types of relationships (2) Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning (3) Applications of relationships
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: Types of relationships: CRUDE, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties; FELLBAUM, C.: On the semantics of troponymy; PRIBBENOW, S.: Meronymic relationships: from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations; KHOO, C. u.a.: The many facets of cause-effect relation - Pt.2: Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning: GREEN, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics; HOVY, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies; GUARINO, N., C. WELTY: Identity and subsumption; JOUIS; C.: Logic of relationships - Pt.3: Applications of relationships: EVENS, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval; KHOO, C., S.H. MYAENG: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction; McCRAY, A.T., O. BODENREICHER: A conceptual framework for the biiomedical domain; HETZLER, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships
- Footnote
- Mit ausführlicher Einleitung der Herausgeber zu den Themen: Types of relationships - Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning - Applications of relationships
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.01
0.009304918 = product of:
0.034118034 = sum of:
0.013193856 = weight(_text_:of in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013193856 = score(doc=5588,freq=16.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.009227889 = weight(_text_:on in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009227889 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.011696288 = product of:
0.023392577 = sum of:
0.023392577 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023392577 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
-
Dahlberg, I.: On the theory of the concept (1979)
0.01
0.008573296 = product of:
0.047153123 = sum of:
0.015832627 = weight(_text_:of in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015832627 = score(doc=1615,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
0.031320494 = weight(_text_:on in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031320494 = score(doc=1615,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.4123903 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Ordering systems for global information networks. Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay 1975
-
Deese, J.E.: On the structure of associative meaning (1962)
0.01
0.00808298 = product of:
0.04445639 = sum of:
0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 7867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014927144 = score(doc=7867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 7867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7867)
0.029529246 = weight(_text_:on in 7867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029529246 = score(doc=7867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 7867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7867)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
-
Zawada, B.; Swanepoel, P.: On the empirical adequacy of terminological concept theories : the case for prototype theory (1994)
0.01
0.00808298 = product of:
0.04445639 = sum of:
0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014927144 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
0.029529246 = weight(_text_:on in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029529246 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
-
Kageura, K.: Terminological semantics : an examination of 'concept' and 'meaning' in the study of terms (1995)
0.01
0.0073853084 = product of:
0.040619195 = sum of:
0.025854573 = weight(_text_:of in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025854573 = score(doc=4561,freq=24.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.47880095 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014764623 = score(doc=4561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- The importance of 'concept' in the study of terms is recognized by most researchers in the field of terminological research. However, the theoretical status of 'concept' in the study of terms has not been clarified so far. Against this background, the status of 'concept' in the study of terms is theoretically examined in comparison with the status of 'meaning' in the semantic study of general languages. Sketches a possible scheme by which 'concept' and 'meaning' are properly plyced in the theoretical study of terms
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 20(1995) no.4, S.25-31
-
Harras, G.: Concepts in linguistics : concepts in natural language (2000)
0.01
0.007352912 = product of:
0.040441014 = sum of:
0.014602924 = weight(_text_:of in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014602924 = score(doc=5068,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
0.025838088 = weight(_text_:on in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025838088 = score(doc=5068,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- This paper deals with different views of lexical semantics. The focus is on the relationship between lexical expressions and conceptual components. First the assumptions about lexicalization and decompositionality of concepts shared by the most semanticists are presented, followed by a discussion of the differences between two-level-semants and one-level-semantics. The final part is concentrated on the interpretation of conceptual components in situations of communication
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; vol.1867: Lecture notes on artificial intelligence
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Sager, J.C.; Ndi-Kimbi, A.: ¬The conceptual structure of terminological definitions and their realisations : a report on research in progress (1995)
0.01
0.0070726075 = product of:
0.03889934 = sum of:
0.0130612515 = weight(_text_:of in 7579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0130612515 = score(doc=7579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 7579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7579)
0.025838088 = weight(_text_:on in 7579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025838088 = score(doc=7579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 7579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7579)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
-
Bivins, K.T.: Concept formation : the evidence from experimental psychology and linguistics and its relationship to information science (1980)
0.01
0.006905375 = product of:
0.03797956 = sum of:
0.015832627 = weight(_text_:of in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015832627 = score(doc=1319,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.022146935 = weight(_text_:on in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022146935 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
-
Nelson, S.J.: From meaning to term : semantic locality in the UMLS metathesaurus (1992)
0.01
0.006905375 = product of:
0.03797956 = sum of:
0.015832627 = weight(_text_:of in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015832627 = score(doc=5611,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
0.022146935 = weight(_text_:on in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022146935 = score(doc=5611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Assessing the value of medical informatics: Proc. of the 15th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington, DC, Nov.1991
-
Dahlberg, I.: Zur Theorie des Begriffs (1974)
0.01
0.006705677 = product of:
0.036881223 = sum of:
0.017701415 = weight(_text_:of in 1617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017701415 = score(doc=1617,freq=20.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 1617, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1617)
0.01917981 = weight(_text_:on in 1617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01917981 = score(doc=1617,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 1617, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1617)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- A concept is regarded as the common element of both classification systems and thesauri. Reality and knowledge are not represented by words or terms but by the meanings "behind" these tokens. A concept of, say, an object, a property of an object, a process, etc. is derived from verbal statements on these as subjects and may therefore be defined as the whole of true and possible predicates that can be collected on a given subject. It is from these predicates that the characteristics of the corresponding concepts can be derived. Common characteristics in different concepts lead to relationsbetween concepts, which relations in turn are factors for the formation of concept systems. Different kinds of relationships as well as different kinds of concepts are distinguished. It is pointed out that an orderly supply of the elements for propositions (informative statements) on new knowledge requires the construction and availability of such concept systems
-
Conceptual structures : theory, tools and applications. 6th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS'98, Montpellier, France, August, 10-12, 1998, Proceedings (1998)
0.01
0.0065687574 = product of:
0.036128163 = sum of:
0.010555085 = weight(_text_:of in 1378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010555085 = score(doc=1378,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 1378, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1378)
0.025573079 = weight(_text_:on in 1378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025573079 = score(doc=1378,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 1378, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1378)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS'98, held in Montpellier, France, in August 1998. The 20 revised full papers and 10 research reports presented were carefully selected from a total of 66 submissions; also included are three invited contributions. The volume is divided in topical sections on knowledge representation and knowledge engineering, tools, conceptual graphs and other models, relationships with logics, algorithms and complexity, natural language processing, and applications.
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.01
0.0065393965 = product of:
0.03596668 = sum of:
0.019591875 = weight(_text_:of in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019591875 = score(doc=2574,freq=18.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.016374804 = product of:
0.03274961 = sum of:
0.03274961 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03274961 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- A method (HICLAS, DeBoeck & Rosenberg, 1988) for studying the internal structure of semantic concepts is presented. The proposed method reveals the internal structure of the extension as well as the intesion of a concept, together with a correspondence relation that shows the mutual dependence of both structures. Its use is illustrated with the analysis of simple concepts (e.g. sports) and conjunctive concepts (e.g. birds that are also pets). The underlying structure that is revealed can be interpreted as a differentiation of the simple concepts studied and for conjunctive concepts the proposed method is able to extract non-inherited and emergent features (Hampton, 1988)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
- Source
- European journal of cognitive psychology. 6(1994) no.1, S.43-75
-
Gilreath, C.T.: Merons, taxons, and qualities : a taxonomy of aspects (1995)
0.01
0.0062936153 = product of:
0.034614883 = sum of:
0.016159108 = weight(_text_:of in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016159108 = score(doc=2944,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
0.018455777 = weight(_text_:on in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018455777 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- A new comprehensive taxonomy of all kinds of aspects (such as attribute, characteristic, feature, property and quality) is proposed, and concise, uniform names are suggested for the respective concepts. Based on this taxonomy, a new semantic network notation called ETA is briefly introduced
-
¬The role of formal ontology in the information technology (1995)
0.01
0.0062936153 = product of:
0.034614883 = sum of:
0.016159108 = weight(_text_:of in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016159108 = score(doc=4746,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
0.018455777 = weight(_text_:on in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018455777 = score(doc=4746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- A special issue devoted to the role of formal ontology in information technology. Papers were given at the International Workshop on Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation, held in Padova, Iatly, Mar 95
- Source
- International journal of human-computer studies. 43(1995) nos.5/6, S.623-965
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.01
0.0062815845 = product of:
0.034548715 = sum of:
0.022852428 = weight(_text_:of in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022852428 = score(doc=1440,freq=48.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.42320424 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
6.928203 = tf(freq=48.0), with freq of:
48.0 = termFreq=48.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.011696288 = product of:
0.023392577 = sum of:
0.023392577 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023392577 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to analyze the Gottlob Frege's (1848-1925) theory of definition as a tool for knowledge organization. The objective was achieved by discussing the theory of definition including: the aims of definition, kinds of definition, condition of correct definition, what is undefinable. Frege indicated the following aims of a defining: (1) to introduce a new word, which has had no precise meaning until then (2) to explain the meaning of a word; (3) to catch a thought. We would like to present three kinds of definitions used by Frege: a contextual definition, a stipulative definition and a piecemeal definition. In the history of theory of definition Frege was the first to have formulated the condition of a correct definition. According to Frege not everything can be defined, what is logically simple cannot have a proper definition Usability of Frege's theory of definition is referred in the case study. Definitions that serve as an example are definitions of 'context'. The term 'context' is used in different situations and meanings in the field of knowledge organization. The paper is rounded by a discussion of how Frege's theory of definition can be useful for knowledge organization. To present G. Frege's theory of definition in view of the need for knowledge organization we shall start with different ranges of knowledge organization.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Machado, L.M.O.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Simões, M.da Graça de Melo: Concept theory in library and information science : an epistemological analysis (2019)
0.01
0.006150554 = product of:
0.033828046 = sum of:
0.013193856 = weight(_text_:of in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013193856 = score(doc=5457,freq=16.0), product of:
0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
0.02063419 = weight(_text_:on in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02063419 = score(doc=5457,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.034531306 = queryNorm
0.271686 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the literature on concept theory in library and information science (LIS) from an epistemological perspective, ascribing each paper to an epistemological family and discussing their relevance in the context of the knowledge organization (KO) domain. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a hermeneutic approach for the analysis of the texts that compose the corpus of study following contingency and categorical analyses. More specifically, the paper works with Bardin's contingency analysis and follows Hjørland's families of epistemologies for the categorization. Findings The analysis corroborates the observations made for the last ten years about the scarcity of studies on concept theory in LIS and KO. However, the study also reveals an epistemological turn on concept theory since 2009 that could be considered a departure from the rationalist views that dominated the field and a continuation of a broader paradigm shift in LIS and KO. All analyzed papers except two follow pragmatist or historicist approaches. Originality/value This paper follows-up and systematizes the contributions to the LIS and KO fields on concept theory mainly during the last decade. The epistemological analysis reveals the dominant views in this paradigm shift and the main authors and trends that are present in the LIS literature on concept theory.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 75(2019) no.4, S.876-891
