Search (234 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Kim, H.H.: Toward video semantic search based on a structured folksonomy (2011) 0.06
    0.056827784 = product of:
      0.1562764 = sum of:
        0.074435055 = weight(_text_:higher in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074435055 = score(doc=4350,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.41037157 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
        0.053516448 = weight(_text_:effect in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053516448 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
        0.012341722 = weight(_text_:of in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012341722 = score(doc=4350,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
        0.015983174 = weight(_text_:on in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015983174 = score(doc=4350,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated the effectiveness of query expansion using synonymous and co-occurrence tags in users' video searches as well as the effect of visual storyboard surrogates on users' relevance judgments when browsing videos. To do so, we designed a structured folksonomy-based system in which tag queries can be expanded via synonyms or co-occurrence words, based on the use of WordNet 2.1 synonyms and Flickr's related tags. To evaluate the structured folksonomy-based system, we conducted an experiment, the results of which suggest that the mean recall rate in the structured folksonomy-based system is statistically higher than that in a tag-based system without query expansion; however, the mean precision rate in the structured folksonomy-based system is not statistically higher than that in the tag-based system. Next, we compared the precision rates of the proposed system with storyboards (SB), in which SB and text metadata are shown to users when they browse video search results, with those of the proposed system without SB, in which only text metadata are shown. Our result showed that browsing only text surrogates-including tags without multimedia surrogates-is not sufficient for users' relevance judgments.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.3, S.478-492
  2. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006) 0.03
    0.03382332 = product of:
      0.09301412 = sum of:
        0.053516448 = weight(_text_:effect in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053516448 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
        0.014751178 = weight(_text_:of in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014751178 = score(doc=56,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
        0.013050207 = weight(_text_:on in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013050207 = score(doc=56,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
        0.011696288 = product of:
          0.023392577 = sum of:
            0.023392577 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023392577 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:43
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.4, S.462-478
  3. Thenmalar, S.; Geetha, T.V.: Enhanced ontology-based indexing and searching (2014) 0.03
    0.027068492 = product of:
      0.07443835 = sum of:
        0.03684347 = weight(_text_:higher in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03684347 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20312355 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
        0.014963541 = weight(_text_:of in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014963541 = score(doc=1633,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2771099 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
        0.014443932 = weight(_text_:on in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014443932 = score(doc=1633,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19018018 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
        0.008187402 = product of:
          0.016374804 = sum of:
            0.016374804 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016374804 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to improve the conceptual-based search by incorporating structural ontological information such as concepts and relations. Generally, Semantic-based information retrieval aims to identify relevant information based on the meanings of the query terms or on the context of the terms and the performance of semantic information retrieval is carried out through standard measures-precision and recall. Higher precision leads to the (meaningful) relevant documents obtained and lower recall leads to the less coverage of the concepts. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper, the authors enhance the existing ontology-based indexing proposed by Kohler et al., by incorporating sibling information to the index. The index designed by Kohler et al., contains only super and sub-concepts from the ontology. In addition, in our approach, we focus on two tasks; query expansion and ranking of the expanded queries, to improve the efficiency of the ontology-based search. The aforementioned tasks make use of ontological concepts, and relations existing between those concepts so as to obtain semantically more relevant search results for a given query. Findings - The proposed ontology-based indexing technique is investigated by analysing the coverage of concepts that are being populated in the index. Here, we introduce a new measure called index enhancement measure, to estimate the coverage of ontological concepts being indexed. We have evaluated the ontology-based search for the tourism domain with the tourism documents and tourism-specific ontology. The comparison of search results based on the use of ontology "with and without query expansion" is examined to estimate the efficiency of the proposed query expansion task. The ranking is compared with the ORank system to evaluate the performance of our ontology-based search. From these analyses, the ontology-based search results shows better recall when compared to the other concept-based search systems. The mean average precision of the ontology-based search is found to be 0.79 and the recall is found to be 0.65, the ORank system has the mean average precision of 0.62 and the recall is found to be 0.51, while the concept-based search has the mean average precision of 0.56 and the recall is found to be 0.42. Practical implications - When the concept is not present in the domain-specific ontology, the concept cannot be indexed. When the given query term is not available in the ontology then the term-based results are retrieved. Originality/value - In addition to super and sub-concepts, we incorporate the concepts present in same level (siblings) to the ontological index. The structural information from the ontology is determined for the query expansion. The ranking of the documents depends on the type of the query (single concept query, multiple concept queries and concept with relation queries) and the ontological relations that exists in the query and the documents. With this ontological structural information, the search results showed us better coverage of concepts with respect to the query.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.6, S.678-696
  4. Baofu, P.: ¬The future of information architecture : conceiving a better way to understand taxonomy, network, and intelligence (2008) 0.03
    0.026014088 = product of:
      0.095384985 = sum of:
        0.053516448 = weight(_text_:effect in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053516448 = score(doc=2257,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
        0.01745383 = weight(_text_:of in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01745383 = score(doc=2257,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
        0.024414703 = weight(_text_:on in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024414703 = score(doc=2257,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3214632 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The Future of Information Architecture examines issues surrounding why information is processed, stored and applied in the way that it has, since time immemorial. Contrary to the conventional wisdom held by many scholars in human history, the recurrent debate on the explanation of the most basic categories of information (eg space, time causation, quality, quantity) has been misconstrued, to the effect that there exists some deeper categories and principles behind these categories of information - with enormous implications for our understanding of reality in general. To understand this, the book is organised in to four main parts: Part I begins with the vital question concerning the role of information within the context of the larger theoretical debate in the literature. Part II provides a critical examination of the nature of data taxonomy from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part III constructively invesitgates the world of information network from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part IV proposes six main theses in the authors synthetic theory of information architecture, namely, (a) the first thesis on the simpleness-complicatedness principle, (b) the second thesis on the exactness-vagueness principle (c) the third thesis on the slowness-quickness principle (d) the fourth thesis on the order-chaos principle, (e) the fifth thesis on the symmetry-asymmetry principle, and (f) the sixth thesis on the post-human stage.
  5. Sanfilippo, M.; Yang, S.; Fichman, P.: Trolling here, there, and everywhere : perceptions of trolling behaviors in context (2017) 0.03
    0.02570876 = product of:
      0.094265446 = sum of:
        0.018565401 = weight(_text_:of in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018565401 = score(doc=3823,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
        0.064626575 = weight(_text_:technological in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064626575 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3522307 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
        0.011073467 = weight(_text_:on in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011073467 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Online trolling has become increasingly prevalent and visible in online communities. Perceptions of and reactions to trolling behaviors varies significantly from one community to another, as trolling behaviors are contextual and vary across platforms and communities. Through an examination of seven trolling scenarios, this article intends to answer the following questions: how do trolling behaviors differ across contexts; how do perceptions of trolling differ from case to case; and what aspects of context of trolling are perceived to be important by the public? Based on focus groups and interview data, we discuss the ways in which community norms and demographics, technological features of platforms, and community boundaries are perceived to impact trolling behaviors. Two major contributions of the study include a codebook to support future analysis of trolling and formal concept analysis surrounding contextual perceptions of trolling.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.10, S.2313-2327
  6. Kelly, D.: Measuring online information seeking context : Part 1: background and method (2006) 0.02
    0.024273606 = product of:
      0.08900322 = sum of:
        0.015471167 = weight(_text_:of in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015471167 = score(doc=206,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
        0.013050207 = weight(_text_:on in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013050207 = score(doc=206,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
        0.060481843 = weight(_text_:great in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060481843 = score(doc=206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Context is one of the most important concepts in information seeking and retrieval research. However, the challenges of studying context are great; thus, it is more common for researchers to use context as a post hoc explanatory factor, rather than as a concept that drives inquiry. The purposes of this study were to develop a method for collecting data about information seeking context in natural online environments, and identify which aspects of context should be considered when studying online information seeking. The study is reported in two parts. In this, the first part, the background and method are presented. Results and implications of this research are presented in Part 2 (Kelly, in press). Part 1 discusses previous literature on information seeking context and behavior and situates the current work within this literature. This part further describes the naturalistic, longitudinal research design that was used to examine and measure the online information seeking contexts of users during a 14-week period. In this design, information seeking context was characterized by a user's self-identified tasks and topics, and several attributes of these, such as the length of time the user expected to work on a task and the user's familiarity with a topic. At weekly intervals, users evaluated the usefulness of the documents that they viewed, and classified these documents according to their tasks and topics. At the end of the study, users provided feedback about the study method.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1729-1739
  7. Lehtokangas, R.; Järvelin, K.: Consistency of textual expression in newspaper articles : an argument for semantically based query expansion (2001) 0.02
    0.024005156 = product of:
      0.0880189 = sum of:
        0.05263353 = weight(_text_:higher in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05263353 = score(doc=4485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2901765 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
        0.014751178 = weight(_text_:of in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014751178 = score(doc=4485,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
        0.02063419 = weight(_text_:on in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02063419 = score(doc=4485,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.271686 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    This article investigates how consistent different newspapers are in their choice of words when writing about the same news events. News articles on the same news events were taken from three Finnish newspapers and compared in regard to their central concepts and words representing the concepts in the news texts. Consistency figures were calculated for each set of three articles (the total number of sets was sixty). Inconsistency in words and concepts was found between news articles from different newspapers. The mean value of consistency calculated on the basis of words was 65 per cent; this however depended on the article length. For short news wires consistency was 83 per cent while for long articles it was only 47 per cent. At the concept level, consistency was considerably higher, ranging from 92 per cent to 97 per cent between short and long articles. The articles also represented three categories of topic (event, process and opinion). Statistically significant differences in consistency were found in regard to length but not in regard to the categories of topic. We argue that the expression inconsistency is a clear sign of a retrieval problem and that query expansion based on semantic relationships can significantly improve retrieval performance on free-text sources.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 57(2001) no.4, S.535-548
  8. Berry, M.W.; Dumais, S.T.; O'Brien, G.W.: Using linear algebra for intelligent information retrieval (1995) 0.02
    0.023659227 = product of:
      0.0867505 = sum of:
        0.06316024 = weight(_text_:higher in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06316024 = score(doc=2206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34821182 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
        0.012516791 = weight(_text_:of in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012516791 = score(doc=2206,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
        0.011073467 = weight(_text_:on in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011073467 = score(doc=2206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, most approaches to retrieving textual materials from scientific databases depend on a lexical match between words in users' requests and those in or assigned to documents in a database. Because of the tremendous diversity in the words people use to describe the same document, lexical methods are necessarily incomplete and imprecise. Using the singular value decomposition (SVD), one can take advantage of the implicit higher-order structure in the association of terms with documents by determining the SVD of large sparse term by document matrices. Terms and documents represented by 200-300 of the largest singular vectors are then matched against user queries. We call this retrieval method Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) because the subspace represents important associative relationships between terms and documents that are not evident in individual documents. LSI is a completely automatic yet intelligent indexing method, widely applicable, and a promising way to improve users...
  9. Shiri, A.; Revie, C.: Usability and user perceptions of a thesaurus-enhanced search interface (2005) 0.02
    0.023361472 = product of:
      0.08565873 = sum of:
        0.053516448 = weight(_text_:effect in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053516448 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
        0.016159108 = weight(_text_:of in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016159108 = score(doc=4331,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
        0.015983174 = weight(_text_:on in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015983174 = score(doc=4331,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to report an investigation into the ways in which end-users perceive a thesaurus-enhanced search interface, in particular thesaurus and search interface usability. Design/methodology/approach - Thirty academic users, split between staff and postgraduate students, carrying out real search requests were observed during this study. Users were asked to comment on a range of thesaurus and interface characteristics including: ease of use, ease of learning, ease of browsing and navigation, problems and difficulties encountered while interacting with the system, and the effect of browsing on search term selection. Findings - The results suggest that interface usability is a factor affecting thesaurus browsing/navigation and other information-searching behaviours. Academic staff viewed the function of a thesaurus as being useful for narrowing down a search and providing alternative search terms, while postgraduates stressed the role of the thesaurus for broadening searches and providing new terms. Originality/value - The paper provides an insight into the ways in which end-users make use of and interact with a thesaurus-enhanced search interface. This area is new since previous research has particularly focused on how professional searchers and librarians make use of thesauri and thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces. The research reported here suggests that end-users with varying levels of domain knowledge are able to use thesauri that are integrated into search interfaces. It also provides design implications for search interface developers as well as information professionals who are involved in teaching online searching.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.5, S.640-656
  10. Kelly, D.: Measuring online information seeking context : Part 2: Findings and discussion (2006) 0.02
    0.023231154 = product of:
      0.08518089 = sum of:
        0.015471167 = weight(_text_:of in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015471167 = score(doc=215,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
        0.009227889 = weight(_text_:on in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009227889 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
        0.060481843 = weight(_text_:great in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060481843 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Context is one of the most important concepts in information seeking and retrieval research. However, the challenges of studying context are great; thus, it is more common for researchers to use context as a post hoc explanatory factor, rather than as a concept that drives inquiry. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for collecting data about information seeking context in natural online environments, and identify which aspects of context should be considered when studying online information seeking. The study is reported in two parts. In this, the second part, results and implications of this research are presented. Part 1 (Kelly, 2006) discussed previous literature on information seeking context and behavior, situated the current study within this literature, and described the naturalistic, longitudinal research design that was used to examine and measure the online information seeking context of seven users during a 14-week period. Results provide support for the value of the method in studying online information seeking context, the relative importance of various measures of context, how these measures change over time, and, finally, the relationship between these measures. In particular, results demonstrate significant differences in distributions of usefulness ratings according to task and topic.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.14, S.1862-1874
  11. Ruotsalo, T.; Jacucci, G.; Kaski, S.: Interactive faceted query suggestion for exploratory search : whole-session effectiveness and interaction engagement (2020) 0.02
    0.022994712 = product of:
      0.084313944 = sum of:
        0.053516448 = weight(_text_:effect in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053516448 = score(doc=5915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
        0.012341722 = weight(_text_:of in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012341722 = score(doc=5915,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
        0.018455777 = weight(_text_:on in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018455777 = score(doc=5915,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The outcome of exploratory information retrieval is not only dependent on the effectiveness of individual responses to a set of queries, but also on relevant information retrieved during the entire exploratory search session. We study the effect of search assistance, operationalized as an interactive faceted query suggestion, for both whole-session effectiveness and engagement through interactive faceted query suggestion. A user experiment is reported, where users performed exploratory search tasks, comparing interactive faceted query suggestion and a control condition with only conventional typed-query interaction. Data comprised of interaction and search logs show that the availability of interactive faceted query suggestion substantially improves whole-session effectiveness by increasing recall without sacrificing precision. The increased engagement with interactive faceted query suggestion is targeted to direct situated navigation around the initial query scope, but is not found to improve individual queries on average. The results imply that research in exploratory search should focus on measuring and designing tools that engage users with directed situated navigation support for improving whole-session performance.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.7, S.742-756
  12. Olmos, R.; Jorge-Botana, G.; Luzón, J.M.; Martín-Cordero, J.I.; León, J.A.: Transforming LSA space dimensions into a rubric for an automatic assessment and feedback system (2016) 0.02
    0.022673883 = product of:
      0.083137564 = sum of:
        0.05263353 = weight(_text_:higher in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05263353 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2901765 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
        0.01745383 = weight(_text_:of in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01745383 = score(doc=2878,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
        0.013050207 = weight(_text_:on in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013050207 = score(doc=2878,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this article is to validate, through two empirical studies, a new method for automatic evaluation of written texts, called Inbuilt Rubric, based on the Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) technique, which constitutes an innovative and distinct turn with respect to LSA application so far. In the first empirical study, evidence of the validity of the method to identify and evaluate the conceptual axes of a text in a sample of 78 summaries by secondary school students is sought. Results show that the proposed method has a significantly higher degree of reliability than classic LSA methods of text evaluation, and displays very high sensitivity to identify which conceptual axes are included or not in each summary. A second study evaluates the method's capacity to interact and provide feedback about quality in a real online system on a sample of 924 discursive texts written by university students. Results show that students improved the quality of their written texts using this system, and also rated the experience very highly. The final conclusion is that this new method opens a very interesting way regarding the role of automatic assessors in the identification of presence/absence and quality of elaboration of relevant conceptual information in texts written by students with lower time costs than the usual LSA-based methods.
  13. Bayer, O.; Höhfeld, S.; Josbächer, F.; Kimm, N.; Kradepohl, I.; Kwiatkowski, M.; Puschmann, C.; Sabbagh, M.; Werner, N.; Vollmer, U.: Evaluation of an ontology-based knowledge-management-system : a case study of Convera RetrievalWare 8.0 (2005) 0.02
    0.022131765 = product of:
      0.0811498 = sum of:
        0.018066432 = weight(_text_:of in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018066432 = score(doc=624,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
        0.053855482 = weight(_text_:technological in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053855482 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.29352558 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
        0.009227889 = weight(_text_:on in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009227889 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    With RetrievalWare 8.0(TM) the American company Convera offers an elaborated software in the range of Information Retrieval, Information Indexing and Knowledge Management. Convera promises the possibility of handling different file formats in many different languages. Regarding comparable products one innovation is to be stressed particularly: the possibility of the preparation as well as integration of an ontology. One tool of the software package is useful in order to produce ontologies manually, to process existing ontologies and to import the very. The processing of search results is also to be mentioned. By means of categorization strategies search results can be classified dynamically and presented in personalized representations. This study presents an evaluation of the functions and components of the system. Technological aspects and modes of operation under the surface of Convera RetrievalWare will be analysed, with a focus on the creation of libraries and thesauri, and the problems posed by the integration of an existing thesaurus. Broader aspects such as usability and system ergonomics are integrated in the examination as well.
  14. Adhikari, A.; Dutta, B.; Dutta, A.; Mondal, D.; Singh, S.: ¬An intrinsic information content-based semantic similarity measure considering the disjoint common subsumers of concepts of an ontology (2018) 0.02
    0.02046962 = product of:
      0.07505527 = sum of:
        0.05263353 = weight(_text_:higher in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05263353 = score(doc=4372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2901765 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
        0.013193856 = weight(_text_:of in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013193856 = score(doc=4372,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
        0.009227889 = weight(_text_:on in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009227889 = score(doc=4372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Finding similarity between concepts based on semantics has become a new trend in many applications (e.g., biomedical informatics, natural language processing). Measuring the Semantic Similarity (SS) with higher accuracy is a challenging task. In this context, the Information Content (IC)-based SS measure has gained popularity over the others. The notion of IC evolves from the science of information theory. Information theory has very high potential to characterize the semantics of concepts. Designing an IC-based SS framework comprises (i) an IC calculator, and (ii) an SS calculator. In this article, we propose a generic intrinsic IC-based SS calculator. We also introduce here a new structural aspect of an ontology called DCS (Disjoint Common Subsumers) that plays a significant role in deciding the similarity between two concepts. We evaluated our proposed similarity calculator with the existing intrinsic IC-based similarity calculators, as well as corpora-dependent similarity calculators using several benchmark data sets. The experimental results show that the proposed similarity calculator produces a high correlation with human evaluation over the existing state-of-the-art IC-based similarity calculators.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.8, S.1023-1034
  15. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.019540623 = product of:
      0.07164895 = sum of:
        0.0130612515 = weight(_text_:of in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0130612515 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
        0.025838088 = weight(_text_:on in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025838088 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
        0.03274961 = product of:
          0.06549922 = sum of:
            0.06549922 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06549922 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  16. Bilal, D.; Kirby, J.: Differences and similarities in information seeking : children and adults as Web users (2002) 0.02
    0.018189356 = product of:
      0.066694304 = sum of:
        0.042106826 = weight(_text_:higher in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042106826 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.23214121 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
        0.011800943 = weight(_text_:of in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011800943 = score(doc=2591,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.21854173 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
        0.012786539 = weight(_text_:on in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012786539 = score(doc=2591,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.16835764 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    This study examined the success and information seeking behaviors of seventh-grade science students and graduate students in information science in using Yahooligans! Web search engine/directory. It investigated these users' cognitive, affective, and physical behaviors as they sought the answer for a fact-finding task. It analyzed and compared the overall patterns of children's and graduate students' Web activities, including searching moves, browsing moves, backtracking moves, looping moves, screen scrolling, target location and deviation moves, and the time they took to complete the task. The authors applied Bilal's Web Traversal Measure to quantify these users' effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of moves they made. Results were based on 14 children's Web sessions and nine graduate students' sessions. Both groups' Web activities were captured online using Lotus ScreenCam, a software package that records and replays online activities in Web browsers. Children's affective states were captured via exit interviews. Graduate students' affective states were extracted from the journal writings they kept during the traversal process. The study findings reveal that 89% of the graduate students found the correct answer to the search task as opposed to 50% of the children. Based on the Measure, graduate students' weighted effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of the Web moves they made were much higher than those of the children. Regardless of success and weighted scores, however, similarities and differences in information seeking were found between the two groups. Yahooligans! poor structure of keyword searching was a major factor that contributed to the "breakdowns" children and graduate students experienced. Unlike children, graduate students were able to recover from "breakdowns" quickly and effectively. Three main factors influenced these users' performance: ability to recover from "breakdowns", navigational style, and focus on task. Children and graduate students made recommendations for improving Yahooligans! interface design. Implications for Web user training and system design improvements are made.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: "Issues of context in information retrieval (IR)"
  17. Koopman, B.; Zuccon, G.; Bruza, P.; Sitbon, L.; Lawley, M.: Information retrieval as semantic inference : a graph Inference model applied to medical search (2016) 0.02
    0.017576914 = product of:
      0.064448684 = sum of:
        0.04281316 = weight(_text_:effect in 3260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04281316 = score(doc=3260,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.23408018 = fieldWeight in 3260, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3260)
        0.011195357 = weight(_text_:of in 3260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011195357 = score(doc=3260,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20732687 = fieldWeight in 3260, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3260)
        0.010440165 = weight(_text_:on in 3260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010440165 = score(doc=3260,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.13746344 = fieldWeight in 3260, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3260)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a Graph Inference retrieval model that integrates structured knowledge resources, statistical information retrieval methods and inference in a unified framework. Key components of the model are a graph-based representation of the corpus and retrieval driven by an inference mechanism achieved as a traversal over the graph. The model is proposed to tackle the semantic gap problem-the mismatch between the raw data and the way a human being interprets it. We break down the semantic gap problem into five core issues, each requiring a specific type of inference in order to be overcome. Our model and evaluation is applied to the medical domain because search within this domain is particularly challenging and, as we show, often requires inference. In addition, this domain features both structured knowledge resources as well as unstructured text. Our evaluation shows that inference can be effective, retrieving many new relevant documents that are not retrieved by state-of-the-art information retrieval models. We show that many retrieved documents were not pooled by keyword-based search methods, prompting us to perform additional relevance assessment on these new documents. A third of the newly retrieved documents judged were found to be relevant. Our analysis provides a thorough understanding of when and how to apply inference for retrieval, including a categorisation of queries according to the effect of inference. The inference mechanism promoted recall by retrieving new relevant documents not found by previous keyword-based approaches. In addition, it promoted precision by an effective reranking of documents. When inference is used, performance gains can generally be expected on hard queries. However, inference should not be applied universally: for easy, unambiguous queries and queries with few relevant documents, inference did adversely affect effectiveness. These conclusions reflect the fact that for retrieval as inference to be effective, a careful balancing act is involved. Finally, although the Graph Inference model is developed and applied to medical search, it is a general retrieval model applicable to other areas such as web search, where an emerging research trend is to utilise structured knowledge resources for more effective semantic search.
  18. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.02
    0.016447347 = product of:
      0.060306933 = sum of:
        0.011311376 = weight(_text_:of in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011311376 = score(doc=5295,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
        0.025838088 = weight(_text_:on in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025838088 = score(doc=5295,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
        0.02315747 = product of:
          0.04631494 = sum of:
            0.04631494 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04631494 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.792-796
  19. Cool, C.; Spink, A.: Issues of context in information retrieval (IR) : an introduction to the special issue (2002) 0.02
    0.016249318 = product of:
      0.08937125 = sum of:
        0.016793035 = weight(_text_:of in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016793035 = score(doc=2587,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
        0.072578214 = weight(_text_:great in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072578214 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    The subject of context has received a great deal of attention in the information retrieval (IR) literature over the past decade, primarily in studies of information seeking and IR interactions. Recently, attention to context in IR has expanded to address new problems in new environments. In this paper we outline five overlapping dimensions of context which we believe to be important constituent elements and we discuss how they are related to different issues in IR research. The papers in this special issue are summarized with respect to how they represent work that is being conducted within these dimensions of context. We conclude with future areas of research which are needed in order to fully understand the multidimensional nature of context in IR.
    Footnote
    Einführung in ein Themenheft: "Issues of context in information retrieval (IR)"
  20. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.02
    0.015606178 = product of:
      0.05722265 = sum of:
        0.0184714 = weight(_text_:of in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0184714 = score(doc=6958,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
        0.022376444 = weight(_text_:on in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022376444 = score(doc=6958,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
        0.016374804 = product of:
          0.03274961 = sum of:
            0.03274961 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03274961 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon

Years

Languages

  • e 221
  • d 9
  • f 2
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 206
  • el 25
  • m 16
  • r 4
  • x 3
  • p 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…