Search (520 results, page 1 of 26)

  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.24
    0.2369526 = product of:
      0.5212957 = sum of:
        0.054844867 = product of:
          0.21937947 = sum of:
            0.21937947 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21937947 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.21937947 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21937947 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.012927286 = weight(_text_:of in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012927286 = score(doc=230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014764623 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.21937947 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21937947 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  2. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.10
    0.09871573 = product of:
      0.5429365 = sum of:
        0.27146825 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27146825 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.27146825 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27146825 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
  3. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (1971-2007) 0.08
    0.08461348 = product of:
      0.4653741 = sum of:
        0.23268706 = weight(_text_:2f in 4032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23268706 = score(doc=4032,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 4032, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4032)
        0.23268706 = weight(_text_:2f in 4032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23268706 = score(doc=4032,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2927568 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 4032, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4032)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Footnote
    Online unter: https://hwph.ch/ bzw. https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27hwph_productpage%27%5D__1515856966402.
  4. Goldhor, H.: ¬The effect of prime display location on public library circulation of selected adult titles (1972) 0.06
    0.06051602 = product of:
      0.22189206 = sum of:
        0.17125264 = weight(_text_:effect in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17125264 = score(doc=1035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.9363207 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
        0.02111017 = weight(_text_:of in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02111017 = score(doc=1035,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
        0.029529246 = weight(_text_:on in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029529246 = score(doc=1035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
  5. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.05
    0.049379658 = product of:
      0.13579406 = sum of:
        0.08562632 = weight(_text_:effect in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08562632 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
        0.016689055 = weight(_text_:of in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016689055 = score(doc=5002,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
        0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014764623 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
        0.018714061 = product of:
          0.037428122 = sum of:
            0.037428122 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037428122 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Many retrievalexperiments are intended to discover ways of improving performance, taking the results obtained with some particular technique as a baseline. The fact that substantial alterations to a system often have little or no effect on particular collections is puzzling. This may be due to the initially poor seperation of relevant and non-relevant documents. The paper presents a procedure for characterizing this seperation for a collection, which can be used to show whether proposed modifications of the base system are likely to be useful.
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.3, S.251-257
  6. Austin, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems : some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973 (1979) 0.04
    0.03655243 = product of:
      0.13402557 = sum of:
        0.009329465 = weight(_text_:of in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009329465 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
        0.018455777 = weight(_text_:on in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018455777 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
        0.10624033 = product of:
          0.21248066 = sum of:
            0.21248066 = weight(_text_:britain in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21248066 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25769958 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.8245286 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Ordering systems for global information networks. Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay 1975. Ed. by A. Neelameghan
  7. Cleveland, A.D.; Cleveland, D.B.: ¬A test of Buck's prime number coding scheme (1979) 0.03
    0.030904971 = product of:
      0.11331823 = sum of:
        0.08562632 = weight(_text_:effect in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08562632 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
        0.012927286 = weight(_text_:of in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012927286 = score(doc=5492,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
        0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014764623 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    An experiment was carried out to study the effect of coding, as an independent variable, on the information retrieval process. A simple prime number coding scheme was utilized in conjunction with Goffman's indirect method file structuring and searching technique. The results demonstrated that a code, in itself, can affect retrieval. It introduces a noticeable viriable into the process. Generally, coding has been considered a minor element, but clearly much more needs to be learned about how codes interact with the other functions in the retrieval system
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 30(1979), S.291-295
  8. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.03
    0.029569414 = product of:
      0.10842118 = sum of:
        0.020182718 = weight(_text_:of in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020182718 = score(doc=2103,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
        0.015660247 = weight(_text_:on in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015660247 = score(doc=2103,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
        0.072578214 = weight(_text_:great in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072578214 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
  9. Ordering systems for global information networks : Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay, 1975 (1979) 0.02
    0.020145351 = product of:
      0.073866285 = sum of:
        0.019591875 = weight(_text_:of in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019591875 = score(doc=3431,freq=72.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              8.485281 = tf(freq=72.0), with freq of:
                72.0 = termFreq=72.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
        0.017090293 = weight(_text_:on in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017090293 = score(doc=3431,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.22502424 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
        0.03718412 = product of:
          0.07436824 = sum of:
            0.07436824 = weight(_text_:britain in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07436824 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25769958 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.288585 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: HENRIKSEN, T.: A linguistic description model for indexing languages; MONTGOMERY, C.A.: Toward a natural language communications inferface; SPANG-HANSSEN, H.: Are classification systems similar to natural languages; LANCASTER, F.W.: Vocabulary control for on-line interactive retrieval systems: requirements and possible approaches; DAHLBERG, I.: On the theory of the concept; GROLIER, E. de: In search of an objective basis for the organization of knowledge; BELING, G.: Towards a set theoretical foundation of classification; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Fundamenbtal of subject indexing languages; CAVALCANTI, C.R.: Universal integrated media for information processing; DESAI, A.R.: Theory of integrative levels, general systems theory, theory of classification, theory of wvolution, and theory of pattern recognition (abstract); GOPINATH, M.A. u. S. SEETHARAMA: Interdisciplinary subjects and their classification; IMMROTH, J.P.: A lexical essay toward the developments of the theory of indexes to classification schemes; KOCHEN, M.: Organising knowledge for coping with needs; KURBAKOV, K.I. u. V.G. BOLDOV: Problem of compatibility of information classification systems and some probable methods of its solution; MAIXNER, V.: Classification systems and retrieval languages; MEINCKE, P.P.M. u. P. ATHERTON: Knowledge space: a conceptual basis for the organization of knowledge; NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Absolute syntax and structure of an indexing and switching language; NEILL, S.D. MacLuhan and classification; RICHMOND, P.A. u. N.J. WILLIAMSON: Three dimensional physical models in classification; SVENONIUS, E.: Translation between hierarchical structures: an exercise in abstract classification; BORKO, H.: Changing roles of and developments in automated classification; DREESE, M.J.: Comparison of document retrieval using UDC - notation given by UDC - expert with catch-words taken from title by clerk, stored in computer memory; GARFIELD, E., MALIN, M.V. u. H. SMALL: A system for automatic classification of scientific literature (abstract); HEAPS, H.S. u. K.V. LEuNG: Automatic document classification based on a theory of relevance; HOYLE, W.G.: A measure of overlap in classification systems; KLESZCZ: Method of information retrieval and subject index compilation for abstracting periodicals with the use of a thesaurus enlarged with machine part classification; SCHNEIDER, J.H.: AUTOCLASS: a computer system for facilitating the creation and updating of hierarchical classifications; JANOS, J.: Information systems with automated indexing based an the analysis of texts; RIGBY, M.: Advances since Elsinore in the use of automated equipment for vocabulary, classification schedule and information or data control on a universal scale; TOMAN, J.: Trend of the future: two ordering system used together? TOMAN, J. u. G.A. Lloyd: Introduction to the Subject-field Reference Code (SRC) or Broad System of Ordering (BSO) for UNISIST purposes; AUSTIN, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems; some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973; JACHOWICZ, R.L.: Application of classification as basis for the formulation of thesaurus; KOFNOVEC, L. u. D. SIMANDL: Quantitative structure of world scientific and technical literature and its use for optimizing general classifications; RAJAN, T.N. u. B. GUHA: A comparative study of subject heading structuring according to POPSI and PRECIS; ROLLING, L.N.: Computer management of multi-lingual thesauri; SOKOLOV, A.V.: Compound indexing languages; VILENSKAYA, S.C.: Systems approach as a principle of thesaurus building on the basis of the subject headings language; WAHLIN, E.: Special classification systems used together with a common reference system; the AR-complex; WERSIG, G.: Experiences in compatibility research in documentary languages; WOLFF-TERROINE, M.: A macrothesaurus. Why? How? SAMUELSON, K.: Information ordering in worldwise communications; SHEPHERD, M. u. C. WATTERS: Hierarchical retrieval from structured text
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Universal classification I. Subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research ... , S.6-18 (H. Beck); Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 97(1983) S.435-450 (H. Beck)
  10. Mountcastle, V.B.: ¬An organizing principle for cerebral function : the unit model and the distributed system (1978) 0.02
    0.016668588 = product of:
      0.091677226 = sum of:
        0.08421365 = weight(_text_:higher in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08421365 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.46428242 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
        0.007463572 = weight(_text_:of in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007463572 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Mindful brain: cortical organization and the group-selective theory of higher brain function. Eds.: Gerald M. Edelman u. B.B. Mountcastle
  11. Eyre, J.J.: Computer-based indexing systems : implications for the book indexer (1974) 0.02
    0.015301588 = product of:
      0.08415873 = sum of:
        0.07492303 = weight(_text_:effect in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07492303 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
        0.0092357 = weight(_text_:of in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0092357 = score(doc=1206,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    The terms which comprise an entry in an index can be arranged in various ways. The use use roles or facets such as 'thing-action-part-effect' under which terms can be categorized allows the use of citation orders which preserve the syntactic relationships between terms in a string. Alphabetization and rotation in context are simple methods but with certain disadvantages for the users. The citation order of BTI results in a detailed index using punctation to indicate relationships. PRECIS incorporates prepositions which preserve necessary entries. Articulated indexes use natural language phrases displayed under selectes subject headings. These methods could be used to construct book indexes
  12. Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975) 0.01
    0.01320159 = product of:
      0.048405826 = sum of:
        0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014927144 = score(doc=4431,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
        0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014764623 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
        0.018714061 = product of:
          0.037428122 = sum of:
            0.037428122 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037428122 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    A method is outlined which would permit a large number of libraries of all types to use centralised cataloguing facilities without the need for their own automatic data processing equipment and outlay. The method is seen as an alternative to the OCLC on-line data bank, and permits the ordering of printed catalogue cards by machine-readable but hand-prepared data cards, such as the loan cards which readers at the Münster library are at present required to complete. The proposed sequence of ordering is set out in 11 stages
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
  13. Scibor, E.: Some remarks on the future desired development of UDC from the viewpoint of mechanized information retrieval (1971) 0.01
    0.010756969 = product of:
      0.059163332 = sum of:
        0.022622751 = weight(_text_:of in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022622751 = score(doc=2020,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
        0.03654058 = weight(_text_:on in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03654058 = score(doc=2020,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.48112202 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of 2nd Seminar on UDC and mechanized information systems
  14. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.01
    0.010643326 = product of:
      0.05853829 = sum of:
        0.02111017 = weight(_text_:of in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02111017 = score(doc=3069,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
        0.037428122 = product of:
          0.074856244 = sum of:
            0.074856244 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074856244 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  15. Artandi, S.: Document retrieval and the concept of sets (1971) 0.01
    0.010643326 = product of:
      0.05853829 = sum of:
        0.02111017 = weight(_text_:of in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02111017 = score(doc=5458,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
        0.037428122 = product of:
          0.074856244 = sum of:
            0.074856244 = weight(_text_:22 in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074856244 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 22(1971) no.4, S.289-290
  16. Mendez, A.: Some considerations on the retrieval of literature based on citations (1978) 0.01
    0.010306874 = product of:
      0.056687806 = sum of:
        0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014927144 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
        0.04176066 = weight(_text_:on in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04176066 = score(doc=778,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.54985374 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
  17. Turski, W.M.: On a model of information retrieval system based on thesaurus (1971) 0.01
    0.010306874 = product of:
      0.056687806 = sum of:
        0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 3913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014927144 = score(doc=3913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3913)
        0.04176066 = weight(_text_:on in 3913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04176066 = score(doc=3913,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.54985374 = fieldWeight in 3913, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3913)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
  18. Conceptual basis of the classification of knowledge : Proc. of the Ottawa Conf. on the Conceptual basis of the Classification of Knowledge, 1.-5.10.1971 (1978) 0.01
    0.010007989 = product of:
      0.055043936 = sum of:
        0.029205848 = weight(_text_:of in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029205848 = score(doc=1166,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.5408632 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
        0.025838088 = weight(_text_:on in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025838088 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
  19. Bhattacharyya, G.: Project on study of subjects (1975) 0.01
    0.009840886 = product of:
      0.054124873 = sum of:
        0.02111017 = weight(_text_:of in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02111017 = score(doc=1593,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
        0.033014704 = weight(_text_:on in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033014704 = score(doc=1593,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.43469757 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Argues for the inclusion of a project on study of subjects in courses in library and information science. Suggests contents of the project and provides proforma for the collection and organisation of information about subjects. Lists types of information sources / reference books for study about subjects and suggests proforma for collecting information about various types of reference books, about primary periodicals, on on-going research, on institutional sources of information, and about experts, consultants etc
  20. Birket-Smith, K.: ¬Die Klassifikation der Library of Congress mit ausländischen Augen gesehen (1972) 0.01
    0.009519139 = product of:
      0.052355267 = sum of:
        0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014927144 = score(doc=1124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
        0.037428122 = product of:
          0.074856244 = sum of:
            0.074856244 = weight(_text_:22 in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074856244 = score(doc=1124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungsblatt. VdB NW. N.F. 22(1972), S.117-131

Authors

Languages

  • e 466
  • d 43
  • m 5
  • f 2
  • nl 2
  • i 1
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 403
  • m 73
  • s 25
  • ? 6
  • b 6
  • r 4
  • d 3
  • i 3
  • n 2
  • el 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications