Search (107 results, page 1 of 6)

0.03605946 = product of:
  0.096158564 = sum of:
    0.063734315 = weight(_text_:great in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063734315 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20489426 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
    0.020098975 = weight(_text_:data in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020098975 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
    0.012325268 = product of:
      0.024650536 = sum of:
        0.024650536 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024650536 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Presents a brief, critical review of LISA PLaus: the CD-ROM database version of LISA and which includes the database of Current Research in Library and Information Science (CRLIS). The review covers the DOS version only, as it appeared in the Summer 1996 CD-ROM, noting that the Windows version was planned for the future. Points to the way LISA has found its mark, if not its fortune, in LISA Plus and notes its strengths, including: ideal suitability for current awareness in library and information science (LIS); massive and convenient consolidation of the published LIS literature; and massive increase in coverage from 7.900 abstracts in 1993 to over 12.000 currently. Criticizes certain features of LISA Plus, notably: the OPTI-Ware search interface; the combination of 2 databases (LISA and CRLIS) in a single, searchable database; and certain unexpected effects caused by the building of the Subject and Free Text indexes. Points particularly to great lack of consistency in the indexes and the indexing (faults that were fully rectified by a complete overhaul of the data in Summer 1996). Notes that LISA Plus is the first port of call for both information researchers and information science students. The Windows version of LISA Plus was launched in Spring 1997

Date

9. 2.1997 18:44:22

0.026620854 = product of:
  0.106483415 = sum of:
    0.08922804 = weight(_text_:great in 3534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08922804 = score(doc=3534,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20489426 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 3534, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3534)
    0.017255375 = product of:
      0.03451075 = sum of:
        0.03451075 = weight(_text_:22 in 3534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03451075 = score(doc=3534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3534)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Presents a research project funded by the Spanish government and conducted by professors and students of library and information science, principally from the University of Granada, in collaboration with 2 organizations specializing in electronic information. The research group, 'Virtual reality interface for accessing electronic information', aims to define and develop a new interface for access to electronic information, with particular emphasis on the need for a 3-dimensional metaphor designed specially to improve inter-user communication and to facilitate browsing among great volumes of electronic information

Source

Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.34-39

0.021703705 = product of:
  0.17362964 = sum of:
    0.17362964 = weight(_text_:higher in 6055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17362964 = score(doc=6055,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.19113865 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.90839624 = fieldWeight in 6055, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6055)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Reports the findings of a study, conducted by Temple, Barker and Sloane Inc., MA, which identified 7 measurable benefits of graphic user interfaces to computerized information retrieval systems; higher speed; more accurate work; higher productivity; less frustration; less fatigue, more facilities to self teach and explore system; greater facilities for novices to learn more about the system's capabilities. Concludes that, when compared with character based user interfaces, graphic user interfaces generate higher work outputs per work hour through higher productivity; higher work output per employee through lower levels of frustration and fatigue; and greater returns on information technology investment through reduced demand for user training

0.01813142 = product of:
  0.07252568 = sum of:
    0.04923223 = weight(_text_:data in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04923223 = score(doc=4545,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.4278775 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
    0.023293454 = product of:
      0.04658691 = sum of:
        0.04658691 = weight(_text_:processing in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04658691 = score(doc=4545,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.3162615 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

This article presents a novel user-oriented interface for generalised informetric analysis and demonstrates how informetric calculations can easily and declaratively be specified through advanced data modelling techniques. The interface is declarative and at a high level. Therefore it is easy to use, flexible and extensible. It enables end users to perform basic informetric ad hoc calculations easily and often with much less effort than in contemporary online retrieval systems. It also provides several fruitful generalisations of typical informetric measurements like impact factors. These are based on substituting traditional foci of analysis, for instance journals, by other object types, such as authors, organisations or countries. In the interface, bibliographic data are modelled as complex objects (non-first normal form relations) and terminological and citation networks involving transitive relationships are modelled as binary relations for deductive processing. The interface is flexible, because it makes it easy to switch focus between various object types for informetric calculations, e.g. from authors to institutions. Moreover, it is demonstrated that all informetric data can easily be broken down by criteria that foster advanced analysis, e.g. by years or content-bearing attributes. Such modelling allows flexible data aggregation along many dimensions. These salient features emerge from the query interface's general data restructuring and aggregation capabilities combined with transitive processing capabilities. The features are illustrated by means of sample queries and results in the article.

0.01426233 = product of:
  0.05704932 = sum of:
    0.039793942 = weight(_text_:data in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039793942 = score(doc=5301,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
    0.017255375 = product of:
      0.03451075 = sum of:
        0.03451075 = weight(_text_:22 in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03451075 = score(doc=5301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

The author presents a design case study of a search user interface for Web catalogs in the context of online shopping for consumer products such as clothing, furniture, and sporting goods. The case study provides a review of the user data for the user interface (UI), and the resulting redesign recommendations. Based on the case study and its user data, a set of common user requirements for searching in the context of online shopping is provided.

Date

22. 7.2006 18:23:19

0.012969697 = product of:
  0.051878788 = sum of:
    0.03215836 = weight(_text_:data in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03215836 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
    0.019720428 = product of:
      0.039440855 = sum of:
        0.039440855 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039440855 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Presents a brief report on a study, carried out by the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, to investigate the techniques used for evaluating OPACs: to explore and assess different data gathering methods in studying information seeking behaviour at the on-line catalogue; and to examine how a transaction logging facility could be enhanced to serve as a more effective diagnostic tool. For a full report see British Library research paper 78

Pages

S.20-22

0.012799477 = product of:
  0.05119791 = sum of:
    0.028138565 = weight(_text_:data in 2730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028138565 = score(doc=2730,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2730, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2730)
    0.023059342 = product of:
      0.046118684 = sum of:
        0.046118684 = weight(_text_:processing in 2730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046118684 = score(doc=2730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 2730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2730)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Source

Emerging communities: integrating networked information into library services. Proceedings of the Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, 4-6 April 1993. Ed.: A.P. Bishop

0.0123115 = product of:
  0.049246 = sum of:
    0.039385784 = weight(_text_:data in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039385784 = score(doc=168,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.342302 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
    0.009860214 = product of:
      0.019720428 = sum of:
        0.019720428 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019720428 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

The effect that content and layout of bibliographic displays had on the ability of end-users to process catalog information was tested using a 2 x 2 factorial experimental design. Participants were asked to perform two related tasks during the course of the experiment. In the first task, they were asked to select a set of items that they would examine further for a hypothetical paper they must write, using a simulated online catalog to make their assessments of relevance. In the second task, they were asked to examine 20 bibliographic records, decide whether they would choose to examine these items further on the shelf, and identify the data elements that they used to formulate their relevance decision. One group viewed bibliographic records on an interface similar to current online catalogs, one that used data labels and contained data elements commonly found. A second group viewed these records on an interface in which the labels had been removed, but the data elements were the same as those in the first. The third group viewed these records on a labeled display that included enhanced data elements on the brief record display. The final group viewed these records with the same brief record data elements as the third group, but with the labels removed, using ISBD and AACR2 punctuation standards. For the first task, participants using enhanced brief screen interfaces viewed more brief screens and fewer full screens than their counterparts. Screen durations for the second 10 screens were found to have dropped from those of the first 10 screens. Statistical analyses comparing demographic variables to the screen frequencies uncovered many significant differences. Participants using the enhanced-content interfaces made fewer selections from index and full screens, and more selections from brief screens. For the second task, participants who used enhanced-content interfaces were able to make some sort of relevance judgment more frequently than those who used standard-content interfaces.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.011153505 = product of:
  0.08922804 = sum of:
    0.08922804 = weight(_text_:great in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08922804 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20489426 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

0.011153505 = product of:
  0.08922804 = sum of:
    0.08922804 = weight(_text_:great in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08922804 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20489426 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Users uf multiple CD-ROM databases face variations between interfaces which causes libraries to spend a great deal of wasted time in installation, training, creation of documentation, and user assistance. Presents guidelines identifying 13 basic functions that every CD-ROM interface, whether command driven or graphical, should have

0.0110927895 = product of:
  0.088742316 = sum of:
    0.088742316 = weight(_text_:higher in 1258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.088742316 = score(doc=1258,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19113865 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.46428242 = fieldWeight in 1258, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1258)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Current user interfaces for textual database searching leave much to be desired: individually, they are often confusing, and as a group, they are seriously inconsistent. We propose a four- phase framework for user-interface design: the framework provides common structure and terminology for searching while preserving the distinct features of individual collections and search mechanisms. Users will benefit from faster learning, increased comprehension, and better control, leading to more effective searches and higher satisfaction.

0.009727273 = product of:
  0.038909093 = sum of:
    0.02411877 = weight(_text_:data in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02411877 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
    0.014790321 = product of:
      0.029580642 = sum of:
        0.029580642 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029580642 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

The authors describe user interface tools based on search histories to support legal information seekers. The design of the tools was informed by the results of a user study (Komlodi, 2002a) that examined the use of human memory, external memory aids, and search histories in legal information seeking and derived interface design recommendations for information storage and retrieval systems. The data collected were analyzed to identify potential task areas where search histories can support information seeking and use. The results show that many information-seeking tasks can take advantage of automatically and manually recorded history information. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools building on search history information: direct search history displays, history-enabled scratchpad facilities, and organized results collection tools.

Date

22. 7.2006 18:04:19

0.009706191 = product of:
  0.07764953 = sum of:
    0.07764953 = weight(_text_:higher in 3547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07764953 = score(doc=3547,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19113865 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.4062471 = fieldWeight in 3547, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3547)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

We describe a prototype Information Retrieval system; SENTINEL, under development at Harris Corporation's Information Systems Division. SENTINEL is a fusion of multiple information retrieval technologies, integrating n-grams, a vector space model, and a neural network training rule. One of the primary advantages of SENTINEL is its 3-dimensional visualization capability that is based fully upon the mathematical representation of information with SENTINEL. The 3-dimensional visualization capability provides users with an intuitive understanding, with relevance/query refinement techniques athat can be better utilized, resulting in higher retrieval precision

0.008319592 = product of:
  0.06655674 = sum of:
    0.06655674 = weight(_text_:higher in 4437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06655674 = score(doc=4437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19113865 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.34821182 = fieldWeight in 4437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4437)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

The advent of the heterogeneous digital library provides the opportunity and establishes the need for the design of new user interfaces. As a single portal to a wide array of information sources, the heterogeneous digital library requires that a variety of cataloging schemas, subject domains, document genres, and institutional biases be accomodated. SenseMaker is a user-centered interface for information exploration in a heterogeneous digital library. It unifies citations and articles from heterogeneous sources by presenting them in a common schema with affordances for quick comparisons of properties. At the same time, SenseMaker users can recover a degree of context by iteratively organizing citations and articles into higher-level bundles based on either metadata or content. Furthermore, SenseMaker enables users to move fluidly from browsing to searching by introducing structure-based searching and structure-based filtering. This paper outlines the SenseMaker interface design and details some of our experimental findings surrounding its use

0.006878221 = product of:
  0.027512884 = sum of:
    0.017054547 = weight(_text_:data in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017054547 = score(doc=1784,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.14822112 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
    0.010458337 = product of:
      0.020916674 = sum of:
        0.020916674 = weight(_text_:22 in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020916674 = score(doc=1784,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries exploit the power of human vision and spatial cognition to help individuals mentally organize and electronically access and manage large and complex information spaces. They draw on progress in the field of information visualization and seek to shift the users' mental load from slow reading to faster perceptual processes such as visual pattern recognition.Based on two workshops, the book presents an introductory overview as well as a closing listing of the top ten problems in the area by the volume editors. Also included are 16 thoroughly reviewed and revised full papers organized in topical sections on visual interfaces to documents, document parts, document variants, and document usage data; visual interfaces to image and video documents; visualization of knowledge domains; cartographic interfaces to digital libraries; and a general framework.

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: Katy Börner and Chaomei Chen: Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries: Motivation, Utilization, and Socio-technical Challenges - Part I. Visual interfaces to Documents, Document Parts, Document Variants, and Document Usage Data - George Buchanan, Ann Blandford, Matt Jones, and Harold Thimbleby: Spatial Hypertext as a Reader Tool in Digital Libraries; Michael Christoffel and Bethina Schmitt: Accessing Libraries as Easy as a Game; Carlos Monroy, Rajiv Kochumman, Richard Furuta, and Eduardo Urbina: Interactive Timeline Viewer (ItLv): A Tool to Visualize Variants Among Documents; Mischa Weiss-Lijn, Janet T. McDonnell, and Leslie James: An Empirical Evaluation of the Interactive Visualization of Metadata to Support Document Use; Stephen G. Eick: Visual Analysis of Website Browsing Patterns - Part II. Visual Interfaces to Image and Video Documents - Adrian Graham, Hector Garcia-Molina, Andreas Paepcke, and Terry Winograd: Extreme Temporal Photo Browsing; Michael G. Christel: Accessing News Video Libraries through Dynamic Information Extraction, Summarization, and Visualization; Anselm Spoerri: Handwritten Notes as a Visual Interface to Index, Edit and Publish Audio/Video Highlights - Part III. Visualization of Knowledge Domains - Jan W. Buzydlowski, Howard D. White, and Xia Lin: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries; Kevin W. Boyack, Brian N. Wylie, and George S. Davidson: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology: Domain Visualizations - Part IV. Cartographic Interfaces to Digital Libraries - André Skupin: On Geometry and Transformation in Map-Like Information Visualization; Guoray Cai: GeoVIBE: A Visual Interface for Geographic Digital Libraries: Teong Joo Ong, John J. Leggett, Hugh D. Wilson, Stephan L. Hatch, and Monique D. Reed: Interactive Information Visualization in the Digital Flora of Texas; Dan Ancona, Mike Freeston, Terry Smith, and Sara Fabrikant: Visual Explorations for the Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype - Part V. Towards a General Framework - Rao Shen, Jun Wang, and Edward A. Fox: A Lightweight Protocol between Digital Libraries and Visualization Systems; Chaomei Chen and Katy Börner: Top Ten Problems in Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries

Date

22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 3.2008 15:02:37

0.006404397 = product of:
  0.051235177 = sum of:
    0.051235177 = product of:
      0.10247035 = sum of:
        0.10247035 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10247035 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:16:22

0.0060296925 = product of:
  0.04823754 = sum of:
    0.04823754 = weight(_text_:data in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04823754 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

0.0060296925 = product of:
  0.04823754 = sum of:
    0.04823754 = weight(_text_:data in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04823754 = score(doc=62,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

The growth of medical, academic resources on the World Wide Web has led to much greater incentives and opportunities for nursing and medical students, researchers and practitioners to access Web resources. However, usersindividual differences and the variety of information-retrieval mechanisms provided by medical web resources may combine to reduce the benefits of this information resource. In a study designed to qualitatively analyse the interaction of such individual- and system-differences, a reliable method of representing WWW navigational data was found to be important in assisting traditional methodologies of representation and analysis. The methodology of graphically representing such navigational data, and the support such a technique may offer the qualitative analysis of user-system interactions, is thus described in detail and with reference to one specific example drawn from the data collected. Further, some preliminary findings deriving from the use of graphical and more traditional methodologies in this study are also represented

0.0057648355 = product of:
  0.046118684 = sum of:
    0.046118684 = product of:
      0.09223737 = sum of:
        0.09223737 = weight(_text_:processing in 4537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09223737 = score(doc=4537,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 4537, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4537)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

0.0052291686 = product of:
  0.04183335 = sum of:
    0.04183335 = product of:
      0.0836667 = sum of:
        0.0836667 = weight(_text_:22 in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0836667 = score(doc=4840,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Date

22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:13:11