Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Holley, R.P."
  1. Holley, R.P.: Subject access tools in English for Canadian topics : Canadian extensions to U.S. subject access tools (2008) 0.11
    0.106056914 = product of:
      0.21211383 = sum of:
        0.098280884 = weight(_text_:united in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098280884 = score(doc=2553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.43829006 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
        0.09468659 = weight(_text_:states in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09468659 = score(doc=2553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.43020093 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
        0.019146346 = product of:
          0.03829269 = sum of:
            0.03829269 = weight(_text_:22 in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03829269 = score(doc=2553,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Canada has a long history of adapting United States subject access tools, including the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), the Dewey Decimal Classification, and the Sears List of Subject Headings, to meet the specific needs of Canadians. This paper addresses the extensions to these American tools for English-speaking Canadians. While the United States and Canada have many similarities, differences exist that require changing terminology and providing greater depth and precision in subject headings and classification for specifically Canadian topics. The major effort has been for Library and Archives Canada (LAC) systematically to provide extensions for LCC and LCSH for use within its cataloging records. This paper examines the history and philosophy of these Canadian efforts to provide enhanced subject access. Paradoxically, French-speaking Canadians may have found it easier to start from scratch with the Repertoire de vedettes-matiere because of the difficult decisions for English-language tools on how much change to implement in an environment where most Canadian libraries use the American subject access tools. Canadian studies scholars around the world can use Canadian records, especially those maintained by LAC, to obtain superior subject access for Canadian topics even if they obtain the documents from other sources.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:18
  2. Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986) 0.09
    0.090051495 = product of:
      0.27015448 = sum of:
        0.13759324 = weight(_text_:united in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13759324 = score(doc=1524,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.6136061 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
        0.13256122 = weight(_text_:states in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13256122 = score(doc=1524,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.6022813 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
  3. Holley, R.P.: Is popular culture forgotten? (1993) 0.00
    0.003158986 = product of:
      0.018953916 = sum of:
        0.018953916 = product of:
          0.03790783 = sum of:
            0.03790783 = weight(_text_:22 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03790783 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.1, S.13-17
  4. Holley, R.P.: ¬The Répertoire de Vedettes-matière de l'Université Laval Library, 1946-92 : Francophone subject access in North America and Europe (2002) 0.00
    0.0022564186 = product of:
      0.0135385115 = sum of:
        0.0135385115 = product of:
          0.027077023 = sum of:
            0.027077023 = weight(_text_:22 in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027077023 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22