-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002)
0.14
0.14060274 = product of:
0.28120548 = sum of:
0.16851662 = weight(_text_:united in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16851662 = score(doc=5479,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.7515109 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.09373494 = weight(_text_:states in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09373494 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.018953916 = product of:
0.03790783 = sum of:
0.03790783 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03790783 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the development of descriptive cataloging from 1830 to 1908 and focuses on the careers of Antonio Panizzi, Charles Coffin Jewett, and Charles Ammi Cutter and the development of the American Library Association (ALA) and the Library Association of the United Kingdom (LAUK). It analyzes the various rules and codes put forth by both Americans and British librarians and the eventual cooperation between the United States and the United Kingdom.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
-
Chapman, L.: How to catalogue : a practical manual using AACR2 and Library of Congress (1990)
0.10
0.10291599 = product of:
0.30874795 = sum of:
0.15724942 = weight(_text_:united in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15724942 = score(doc=6081,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.7012641 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
0.15149854 = weight(_text_:states in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15149854 = score(doc=6081,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.6883215 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- LCSH
- MARC System / United States
- Subject
- MARC System / United States
-
Graham, C.: Rethinking national policy for cataloging microform reproductions (1986)
0.10
0.10291599 = product of:
0.30874795 = sum of:
0.15724942 = weight(_text_:united in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15724942 = score(doc=371,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.7012641 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
0.15149854 = weight(_text_:states in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15149854 = score(doc=371,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.6883215 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Current national cataloging policy requires the creation of unique cataloging records for an original publication and each of its microfilm reproductions. Such redundant entries are difficult to decipher and expensive to produce and maintain. The case of serial publications is most urgent, especially due to the proliferation of preservation microfilming efforts and union list projects. The master record concept used in the United States Newspaper Project offers a viable alternative method. Librarians should lobby to have the single record approach adopted as national policy.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as The United States Newspaper Program: Cataloging Aspects
-
Harriman, R.B.: Coordination of cataloging practices in the United States newspaper program (1986)
0.09
0.09453438 = product of:
0.28360313 = sum of:
0.14444281 = weight(_text_:united in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14444281 = score(doc=368,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.6441522 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
0.1391603 = weight(_text_:states in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1391603 = score(doc=368,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.63226366 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The bibliographic component of the United States Newspaper Program comprises cooperative efforts to locate and catalog the more than 300,000 newspapers published in the U.S. and its territories since colonial times, and to enter bibliographic and holdings information about those titles into the CONSER data base. The attempt to gain bibliographic control over existing newspaper collections, as well as the attempt to gather and organize previously uncollected materials, has required procedural adaptations determined by a unique set of working conditions. The scale of the program has required specificity of goals and objectives, satisfying standards for inclusion of records in the national serials data base while maintaining reasonable economies. This paper outlines some of the mechanisms put in place to achieve that balance.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as The United States Newspaper Program: Cataloging Aspects
-
Tillett, B.B.: Catalog it once for all : a history of cooperative cataloging in the United States prior to 1967 (before MARC) (1993)
0.09
0.090051495 = product of:
0.27015448 = sum of:
0.13759324 = weight(_text_:united in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13759324 = score(doc=575,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.6136061 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
0.13256122 = weight(_text_:states in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13256122 = score(doc=575,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.6022813 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Librarians in the United States always seem to be trying to reduce their costs and share resources through various centralized or cooperative endeavors. Early cooperative cataloging efforts, prior to 1967 when the MARC format made its appearance and automation took off, clearly recognized the need to create a shared national resource of bibliographic records. Yet, the dreams of cataloging it once for all turned into nightmares over and over as many schemes were tried and failed. However, some schemes succeeded and millions of items were cataloged through these early efforts. The promise of our preliminary steps in cooperative cataloging during the pre-automation era sparked our imaginations and raised our hopes for the future.
-
Liu, J.: CIP in China : the development and status quo (1996)
0.09
0.08999228 = product of:
0.17998455 = sum of:
0.083394095 = weight(_text_:united in 5528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083394095 = score(doc=5528,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 5528, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5528)
0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 5528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08034424 = score(doc=5528,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 5528, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5528)
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 5528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=5528,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5528, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5528)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- This paper provides a brief overview of the development and current status of the Cataloging-in-Publication (CIP) project in China. The China CIP project is a new one implemented in 1993. In the paper, the development of CIP in the world is described, followed by when and how it was introduced into China. The paper tells the significances of CIP in detail. The implementation of the CIP project and differences of CIP work in China from that in the United States are also reflected here. Finally, the contribution discusses the problems in implementing the project and suggests ways to solve them. The project combines the publishing house, library, and distributor into the document information system. CIP is not only a kind of cataloging, but also a bond among them. It is believed that the CIP project in China has a bright future.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.69-76
-
Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000)
0.09
0.08999228 = product of:
0.17998455 = sum of:
0.083394095 = weight(_text_:united in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083394095 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08034424 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 27. 7.2006 18:22:11
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Managing cataloging and the organization of information: philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century. Part II: Specialized and academic libraries in the United States"
-
Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005)
0.09
0.08999228 = product of:
0.17998455 = sum of:
0.083394095 = weight(_text_:united in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083394095 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08034424 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Ho, J.: Cataloging practices and access methods for videos at arl and public libraries in the United States (2004)
0.09
0.08999228 = product of:
0.17998455 = sum of:
0.083394095 = weight(_text_:united in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083394095 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08034424 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011)
0.09
0.08999228 = product of:
0.17998455 = sum of:
0.083394095 = weight(_text_:united in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083394095 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08034424 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:25:32
-
Shuler, J.A.: Foundations of government information and bibliographic control in the United States : 1789-1900 (2003)
0.08
0.07718699 = product of:
0.23156096 = sum of:
0.11793706 = weight(_text_:united in 5636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11793706 = score(doc=5636,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.52594805 = fieldWeight in 5636, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5636)
0.1136239 = weight(_text_:states in 5636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1136239 = score(doc=5636,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.5162411 = fieldWeight in 5636, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5636)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A history of classification and bibliographic control of government information is, by necessity, a tangled tale that involves the complex evolution of governments, the regularization of official publishing, along with the growth of professional librarianship. For the purposes of this article, the main argument will draw its narrative largely from the historic evolution of bibliographic control and U.S. government information during the nineteenth century. The standards and practices developed in the United States during this period remain a common framework for the discussion of any government in the world. It is further argued that these bibliographic arrangements remained in play until the 1980s when the advent of distributed computer networks began to undermine the traditions of what had largely been a print culture.
-
Shuler, J.A.: Foundations of government information and bibliographic control in the United States : 1789-1900 (2003)
0.08
0.07718699 = product of:
0.23156096 = sum of:
0.11793706 = weight(_text_:united in 5637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11793706 = score(doc=5637,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.52594805 = fieldWeight in 5637, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5637)
0.1136239 = weight(_text_:states in 5637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1136239 = score(doc=5637,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.5162411 = fieldWeight in 5637, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5637)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A history of classification and bibliographic control of government information is, by necessity, a tangled tale that involves the complex evolution of governments, the regularization of official publishing, along with the growth of professional librarianship. For the purposes of this article, the main argument will draw its narrative largely from the historic evolution of bibliographic control and U.S. government information during the nineteenth century. The standards and practices developed in the United States during this period remain a common framework for the discussion of any government in the world. It is further argued that these bibliographic arrangements remained in play until the 1980s when the advent of distributed computer networks began to undermine the traditions of what had largely been a print culture.
-
Pitti, D.V.: Encoded Archival Description : an introduction and overview (1999)
0.08
0.07718699 = product of:
0.23156096 = sum of:
0.11793706 = weight(_text_:united in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11793706 = score(doc=1152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.52594805 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
0.1136239 = weight(_text_:states in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1136239 = score(doc=1152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.5162411 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Encoded Archival Description (EAD) is an emerging standard used internationally in an increasing number of archives and manuscripts libraries to encode data describing corporate records and personal papers. The individual descriptions are variously called finding aids, guides, handlists, or catalogs. While archival description shares many objectives with bibliographic description, it differs from it in several essential ways. From its inception, EAD was based on SGML, and, with the release of EAD version 1.0 in 1998, it is also compliant with XML. EAD was, and continues to be, developed by the archival community. While development was initiated in the United States, international interest and contribution are increasing. EAD is currently administered and maintained jointly by the Society of American Archivists and the United States Library of Congress. Developers are currently exploring ways to internationalize the administration and maintenance of EAD to reflect and represent the expanding base of users.
-
Münnich, M.: REUSE or rule harmonization : just a project? (2000)
0.07
0.074993566 = product of:
0.14998713 = sum of:
0.06949508 = weight(_text_:united in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06949508 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
0.06695353 = weight(_text_:states in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06695353 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.304198 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
0.0135385115 = product of:
0.027077023 = sum of:
0.027077023 = weight(_text_:22 in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027077023 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- German academic libraries acquire a large number of books from British and American publishers. The bibliographic records of the Library of Congress and the British National Bibliography are offered in most German library networks. Thus, projects REUSE and REUSE+ were undertaken when there was a demand for harmonization of Germany cataloging rules with AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules). Experts in the United States and Germany systematically analyzed bibliographic data and compared the codes on which the data were based. Major and minor differences in cataloging rules were identified. The REUSE group proposed German participation in international authority files and changes in RAK, the German cataloging rules. In REUSE+ the different types of hierarchical bibliographic structures in USMARC and MAB2 and other German formats were analyzed. The German project group made suggestions concerning both the German formats and the USMARC format. Steps toward rule alignment and harmonization of online requirements were made when the German Cataloging Rules Conference made decisions on resolutions prepared by the Working Groups on Descriptive Cataloging that dealt with titles, encoding of form titles and conference terms, prefixes in names, hierarchies, entries under persons and corporate bodies, and the conceptual basis of RAK2 in the context of harmonization. Although problems remain, German rule makers have made progress toward internationality.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bradley, C.J.: Classifying and cataloging music in American libraries : a historical overview (2003)
0.07
0.07277259 = product of:
0.21831778 = sum of:
0.11119213 = weight(_text_:united in 5515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11119213 = score(doc=5515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 5515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5515)
0.10712565 = weight(_text_:states in 5515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10712565 = score(doc=5515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 5515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5515)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an account of the development of music classifications, cataloguing codes, and subject heading lists in the United States. It also discusses pertinent activities within the Music Library Association, particularly the efforts of Eva Judd O'Meara, music librarian at Yale University from 1924 to 1952.
-
Bradley, C.J.: Classifying and cataloging music in American libraries : an historical overview (2003)
0.07
0.07277259 = product of:
0.21831778 = sum of:
0.11119213 = weight(_text_:united in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11119213 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
0.10712565 = weight(_text_:states in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10712565 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an account of the development of music classifications, cataloguing codes, and subject heading lists in the United States. It also discusses pertinent activities within the Music Library Association, particularly the efforts of Eva Judd O'Meara, music librarian at Yale University from 1924 to 1952.
-
Cole, J.E.: ¬The Newspaper Cataloging Manual and AACR2 (1986)
0.07
0.07277259 = product of:
0.21831778 = sum of:
0.11119213 = weight(_text_:united in 356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11119213 = score(doc=356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=356)
0.10712565 = weight(_text_:states in 356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10712565 = score(doc=356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=356)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as The United States Newspaper Program: Cataloging Aspects
-
Chan, L.M.: Instructional materials used in teaching cataloging and classification (1987)
0.07
0.07277259 = product of:
0.21831778 = sum of:
0.11119213 = weight(_text_:united in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11119213 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.10712565 = weight(_text_:states in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10712565 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- An informal survey was conducted for the purpose of identifying instructional materials used in teaching cataloging and classification in library and information science programs in the United States and Canada. Based on responses from instructors in these areas, three groups of instructional materials were identified: cataloging and classification tools, textbooks, and background and supplementary reading materials.
-
Kuhagen, J.: Training for the U.S. RDA test (2011)
0.07
0.07277259 = product of:
0.21831778 = sum of:
0.11119213 = weight(_text_:united in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11119213 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
0.10712565 = weight(_text_:states in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10712565 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article describes activities related to training for the 2010 test in the United States of the new descriptive cataloging standard RDA: Resource Description and Access. The main focus is on activities carried out at the Library of Congress on behalf of all the participants and specifically for LC's participants. Lessons learned from these activities for future training are included.
-
St. Clair, G.: Chaos, convenience, and catalogers (2000)
0.07
0.066093765 = product of:
0.19828129 = sum of:
0.11793706 = weight(_text_:united in 5374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11793706 = score(doc=5374,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.52594805 = fieldWeight in 5374, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5374)
0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 5374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08034424 = score(doc=5374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 5374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5374)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This Foreword provides an overview of the two parts of a collection of papers describing philosophies, practices and challenges in a cross section of libraries and how their cataloging and technical services managers are dealing with their responsibilities at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Part one includes the National Library of Canada and the Library of Congress. University libraries in Mexico, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and Botswana are represented. A survey reports the use of classification systems in Latin American libraries including the factors influencing the selection of a particular scheme. Part Two is devoted to specialized and academic libraries in the United States. One academic medical library, one historical society, and two academic law libraries are represented. Philosophies and practices are described in twelve articles discussing fourteen college and university libraries ranging from the very small to the largest research libraries.
