-
Bland, R.N.: ¬The concept of intellectual level in cataloging and classification (1983)
0.07
0.07277259 = product of:
0.21831778 = sum of:
0.11119213 = weight(_text_:united in 321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11119213 = score(doc=321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=321)
0.10712565 = weight(_text_:states in 321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10712565 = score(doc=321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=321)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper traces the history of the concept of intellectual level in cataloging and classification in the United States. Past cataloging codes, subject-heading practice, and classification systems have provided library users with little systematic information concerning the intellectual level or intended audience of works. Reasons for this omission are discussed, and arguments are developed to show that this kind of information would be a useful addition to the catalog record of the present and the future.
-
Short, M.: Text mining and subject analysis for fiction; or, using machine learning and information extraction to assign subject headings to dime novels (2019)
0.06
0.06367602 = product of:
0.19102806 = sum of:
0.09729311 = weight(_text_:united in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09729311 = score(doc=5481,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.433885 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
0.09373494 = weight(_text_:states in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09373494 = score(doc=5481,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article describes multiple experiments in text mining at Northern Illinois University that were undertaken to improve the efficiency and accuracy of cataloging. It focuses narrowly on subject analysis of dime novels, a format of inexpensive fiction that was popular in the United States between 1860 and 1915. NIU holds more than 55,000 dime novels in its collections, which it is in the process of comprehensively digitizing. Classification, keyword extraction, named-entity recognition, clustering, and topic modeling are discussed as means of assigning subject headings to improve their discoverability by researchers and to increase the productivity of digitization workflows.
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.04
0.04499614 = product of:
0.08999228 = sum of:
0.041697048 = weight(_text_:united in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041697048 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.18595073 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.04017212 = weight(_text_:states in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04017212 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.1825188 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.008123106 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016246213 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.2, S.114-115 (M. Hudon); "This most interesting contribution to the literature of subject cataloguing originates in the author's doctoral dissertation, prepared under the direction of jerry Saye at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In seven highly readable chapters, Alenka Sauperl develops possible answers to her principal research question: How do cataloguers determine or identify the topic of a document and choose appropriate subject representations? Specific questions at the source of this research an a process which has not been a frequent object of study include: Where do cataloguers look for an overall sense of what a document is about? How do they get an overall sense of what a document is about, especially when they are not familiar with the discipline? Do they consider only one or several possible interpretations? How do they translate meanings in appropriate and valid class numbers and subject headings? Using a strictly qualitative methodology, Dr. Sauperl's research is a study of twelve cataloguers in reallife situation. The author insists an the holistic rather than purely theoretical understanding of the process she is targeting. Participants in the study were professional cataloguers, with at least one year experience in their current job at one of three large academic libraries in the Southeastern United States. All three libraries have a large central cataloguing department, and use OCLC sources and the same automated system; the context of cataloguing tasks is thus considered to be reasonably comparable. All participants were volunteers in this study which combined two datagathering techniques: the think-aloud method and time-line interviews. A model of the subject cataloguing process was first developed from observations of a group of six cataloguers who were asked to independently perform original cataloguing an three nonfiction, non-serial items selected from materials regularly assigned to them for processing. The model was then used for follow-up interviews. Each participant in the second group of cataloguers was invited to reflect an his/her work process for a recent challenging document they had catalogued. Results are presented in 12 stories describing as many personal approaches to subject cataloguing. From these stories a summarization is offered and a theoretical model of subject cataloguing is developed which, according to the author, represents a realistic approach to subject cataloguing. Stories alternate comments from the researcher and direct quotations from the observed or interviewed cataloguers. Not surprisingly, the participants' stories reveal similarities in the sequence and accomplishment of several tasks in the process of subject cataloguing. Sauperl's proposed model, described in Chapter 5, includes as main stages: 1) Examination of the book and subject identification; 2) Search for subject headings; 3) Classification. Chapter 6 is a hypothetical Gase study, using the proposed model to describe the various stages of cataloguing a hypothetical resource. ...
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.04
0.035544034 = product of:
0.07108807 = sum of:
0.027798032 = weight(_text_:united in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027798032 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.12396715 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.037874635 = weight(_text_:states in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037874635 = score(doc=1858,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.17208037 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.005415404 = product of:
0.010830808 = sum of:
0.010830808 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010830808 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Footnote
- Rez. in JASIST 54(2003) no.4, S.356-357 (S.J. Lincicum): "Reliance upon shared cataloging in academic libraries in the United States has been driven largely by the need to reduce the expense of cataloging operations without muck regard for the Impact that this approach might have an the quality of the records included in local catalogs. In recent years, ever increasing pressures have prompted libraries to adopt practices such as "rapid" copy cataloging that purposely reduce the scrutiny applied to bibliographic records downloaded from shared databases, possibly increasing the number of errors that slip through unnoticed. Errors in bibliographic records can lead to serious problems for library catalog users. If the data contained in bibliographic records is inaccurate, users will have difficulty discovering and recognizing resources in a library's collection that are relevant to their needs. Thus, it has become increasingly important to understand the extent and nature of errors that occur in the records found in large shared bibliographic databases, such as OCLC WorldCat, to develop cataloging practices optimized for the shared cataloging environment. Although this monograph raises a few legitimate concerns about recent trends in cataloging practice, it fails to provide the "detailed look" at misinformation in library catalogs arising from linguistic errors and mistakes in subject analysis promised by the publisher. A basic premise advanced throughout the text is that a certain amount of linguistic and subject knowledge is required to catalog library materials effectively. The author emphasizes repeatedly that most catalogers today are asked to catalog an increasingly diverse array of materials, and that they are often required to work in languages or subject areas of which they have little or no knowledge. He argues that the records contributed to shared databases are increasingly being created by catalogers with inadequate linguistic or subject expertise. This adversely affects the quality of individual library catalogs because errors often go uncorrected as records are downloaded from shared databases to local catalogs by copy catalogers who possess even less knowledge. Calling misinformation an "evil phenomenon," Bade states that his main goal is to discuss, "two fundamental types of misinformation found in bibliographic and authority records in library catalogs: that arising from linguistic errors, and that caused by errors in subject analysis, including missing or wrong subject headings" (p. 2). After a superficial discussion of "other" types of errors that can occur in bibliographic records, such as typographical errors and errors in the application of descriptive cataloging rules, Bade begins his discussion of linguistic errors. He asserts that sharing bibliographic records created by catalogers with inadequate linguistic or subject knowledge has, "disastrous effects an the library community" (p. 6). To support this bold assertion, Bade provides as evidence little more than a laundry list of errors that he has personally observed in bibliographic records over the years. When he eventually cites several studies that have addressed the availability and quality of records available for materials in languages other than English, he fails to describe the findings of these studies in any detail, let alone relate the findings to his own observations in a meaningful way. Bade claims that a lack of linguistic expertise among catalogers is the "primary source for linguistic misinformation in our databases" (p. 10), but he neither cites substantive data from existing studies nor provides any new data regarding the overall level of linguistic knowledge among catalogers to support this claim. The section concludes with a brief list of eight sensible, if unoriginal, suggestions for coping with the challenge of cataloging materials in unfamiliar languages.
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.00
0.004512837 = product of:
0.027077023 = sum of:
0.027077023 = product of:
0.054154046 = sum of:
0.054154046 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054154046 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.00
0.0036102696 = product of:
0.021661617 = sum of:
0.021661617 = product of:
0.043323234 = sum of:
0.043323234 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043323234 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021)
0.00
0.0036102696 = product of:
0.021661617 = sum of:
0.021661617 = product of:
0.043323234 = sum of:
0.043323234 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043323234 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.00
0.0031910576 = product of:
0.019146346 = sum of:
0.019146346 = product of:
0.03829269 = sum of:
0.03829269 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03829269 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996)
0.00
0.002707702 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.00
0.002707702 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006)
0.00
0.002707702 = product of:
0.016246213 = sum of:
0.016246213 = product of:
0.032492425 = sum of:
0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032492425 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.039970156 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
