Search (783 results, page 1 of 40)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.44
    0.44438243 = product of:
      0.88876486 = sum of:
        0.12696642 = product of:
          0.38089922 = sum of:
            0.38089922 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38089922 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.38089922 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38089922 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.38089922 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38089922 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.37
    0.37031868 = product of:
      0.74063736 = sum of:
        0.10580534 = product of:
          0.317416 = sum of:
            0.317416 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.317416 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.317416 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.317416 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.317416 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.317416 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.30
    0.30107802 = product of:
      0.60215604 = sum of:
        0.06348321 = product of:
          0.19044961 = sum of:
            0.19044961 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19044961 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.2693364 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2693364 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.2693364 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2693364 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.26
    0.2592231 = product of:
      0.5184462 = sum of:
        0.07406374 = product of:
          0.22219121 = sum of:
            0.22219121 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22219121 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22219121 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22219121 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.22219121 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22219121 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  5. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.22
    0.22219121 = product of:
      0.44438243 = sum of:
        0.06348321 = product of:
          0.19044961 = sum of:
            0.19044961 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19044961 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19044961 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19044961 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.19044961 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19044961 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  6. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.20
    0.20071867 = product of:
      0.40143734 = sum of:
        0.042322136 = product of:
          0.1269664 = sum of:
            0.1269664 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1269664 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.1795576 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1795576 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.1795576 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1795576 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  7. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.20
    0.19857271 = product of:
      0.39714542 = sum of:
        0.19044961 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19044961 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.19044961 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19044961 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.016246213 = product of:
          0.032492425 = sum of:
            0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032492425 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  8. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.19
    0.18515934 = product of:
      0.37031868 = sum of:
        0.05290267 = product of:
          0.158708 = sum of:
            0.158708 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.158708 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.158708 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.158708 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.158708 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.158708 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  9. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.19
    0.18515934 = product of:
      0.37031868 = sum of:
        0.05290267 = product of:
          0.158708 = sum of:
            0.158708 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.158708 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.158708 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.158708 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.158708 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.158708 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  10. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.19
    0.18515934 = product of:
      0.37031868 = sum of:
        0.05290267 = product of:
          0.158708 = sum of:
            0.158708 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.158708 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.158708 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.158708 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.158708 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.158708 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  11. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.17
    0.16928855 = product of:
      0.5078656 = sum of:
        0.2539328 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2539328 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.2539328 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2539328 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33886743 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  12. Burke, C.B.: America's information wars : the untold story of information systems in America's conflicts and politics from World War II to the internet age (2018) 0.16
    0.15597375 = product of:
      0.46792123 = sum of:
        0.23831846 = weight(_text_:united in 5953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23831846 = score(doc=5953,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            1.0627968 = fieldWeight in 5953, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5953)
        0.22960277 = weight(_text_:states in 5953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22960277 = score(doc=5953,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            1.0431818 = fieldWeight in 5953, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5953)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    LCSH
    Information technology / United States / Management
    Management information systems / United States
    Internet Access control / United States
    Subject
    Information technology / United States / Management
    Management information systems / United States
    Internet Access control / United States
  13. Walters, W.H.; Wilder, E.I.: Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007-2012 (2016) 0.11
    0.11015628 = product of:
      0.33046883 = sum of:
        0.19656177 = weight(_text_:united in 2940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19656177 = score(doc=2940,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.8765801 = fieldWeight in 2940, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2940)
        0.13390706 = weight(_text_:states in 2940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13390706 = score(doc=2940,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.608396 = fieldWeight in 2940, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2940)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    We investigate the contributions of particular disciplines, countries, and academic departments to the literature of library and information science (LIS) using data for the articles published in 31 journals from 2007 to 2012. In particular, we examine the contributions of authors outside the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada; faculty in departments other than LIS; and practicing librarians. Worldwide, faculty in LIS departments account for 31% of the journal literature; librarians, 23%; computer science faculty, 10%; and management faculty, 10%. The top contributing nations are the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, China, Canada, and Taiwan. Within the United States and the United Kingdom, the current productivity of LIS departments is correlated with past productivity and with other measures of reputation and performance. More generally, the distribution of contributions is highly skewed. In the United States, five departments account for 27% of the articles contributed by LIS faculty; in the United Kingdom, four departments account for nearly two-thirds of the articles. This skewed distribution reinforces the possibility that high-status departments may gain a permanent advantage in the competition for students, faculty, journal space, and research funding. At the same time, concentrations of research-active faculty in particular departments may generate beneficial spillover effects.
  14. Levy, S.: In the plex : how Google thinks, works, and shapes our lives (2011) 0.09
    0.091732085 = product of:
      0.18346417 = sum of:
        0.06879662 = weight(_text_:united in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06879662 = score(doc=9,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.30680305 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
        0.06628061 = weight(_text_:states in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06628061 = score(doc=9,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.30114064 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
        0.048386928 = product of:
          0.096773855 = sum of:
            0.096773855 = weight(_text_:biography in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096773855 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31627175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.30598325 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    The world according to Google: biography of a search engine -- Googlenomics: cracking the code on internet profits -- Don't be evil: how Google built its culture -- Google's cloud: how Google built data centers and killed the hard drive -- Outside the box: the Google phone company. and the Google t.v. company -- Guge: Google moral dilemma in China -- Google.gov: is what's good for Google, good for government or the public? -- Epilogue: chasing tail lights: trying to crack the social code.
    LCSH
    Internet industry / United States
    Subject
    Internet industry / United States
  15. Shelton, R.D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Publish or patent : bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies (2012) 0.09
    0.09096575 = product of:
      0.27289724 = sum of:
        0.13899016 = weight(_text_:united in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13899016 = score(doc=70,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.61983573 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
        0.13390706 = weight(_text_:states in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13390706 = score(doc=70,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.608396 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Multivariate linear regression models suggest a trade-off in allocations of national research and development (R&D). Government funding and spending in the higher education sector encourage publications as a long-term research benefit. Conversely, other components such as industrial funding and spending in the business sector encourage patenting. Our results help explain why the United States trails the European Union in publications: The focus in the United States is on industrial funding-some 70% of its total R&D investment. Likewise, our results also help explain why the European Union trails the United States in patenting, since its focus on government funding is less effective than industrial funding in predicting triadic patenting. Government funding contributes negatively to patenting in a multiple regression, and this relationship is significant in the case of triadic patenting. We provide new forecasts about the relationships of the United States, the European Union, and China for publishing; these results suggest much later dates for changes than previous forecasts because Chinese growth has been slowing down since 2003. Models for individual countries might be more successful than regression models whose parameters are averaged over a set of countries because nations can be expected to differ historically in terms of the institutional arrangements and funding schemes.
  16. Park, N.; Oh, H.S.; Kang, N.: Effects of ego involvement and social norms on individuals' uploading intention on Wikipedia : a comparative study between the United States and South Korea (2015) 0.09
    0.09096575 = product of:
      0.27289724 = sum of:
        0.13899016 = weight(_text_:united in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13899016 = score(doc=2038,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.61983573 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
        0.13390706 = weight(_text_:states in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13390706 = score(doc=2038,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.608396 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigates the reasons and factors associated with individuals' intentions to upload content on Wikipedia with a focus on the role of ego involvement and social norms. The study also compares the associations between the factors and uploading intentions of two different cultures, the United States and South Korea. Using data from surveys of college students from the two countries (n?=?249 and 173), structural equation modeling analyses revealed that ego involvement not only plays an essential role in explaining uploading intention but also functions as an antecedent of attitude and perceived behavioral control in both countries. However, the subjective norm was not significantly associated with uploading intention in either country, and the descriptive norm was a marginally significant factor in accounting for uploading intention in the United States. Moreover, it was found that, only in the United States, attitude was significantly associated with uploading intention, whereas perceived behavioral control was a significant factor in explaining uploading intention in both countries. These findings suggest that the effects of cultural differences, the impact of subjective norms in particular, may be weakened with the more self-oriented nature of Web 2.0 applications and social media such as Wikipedia. Theoretical implications are discussed.
  17. O'Neil, C.: Angriff der Algorithmen : wie sie Wahlen manipulieren, Berufschancen zerstören und unsere Gesundheit gefährden (2017) 0.09
    0.090051495 = product of:
      0.27015448 = sum of:
        0.13759324 = weight(_text_:united in 4060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13759324 = score(doc=4060,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.6136061 = fieldWeight in 4060, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4060)
        0.13256122 = weight(_text_:states in 4060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13256122 = score(doc=4060,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.6022813 = fieldWeight in 4060, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4060)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    LCSH
    Big data / Social aspects / United States
    Big data / Political aspects / United States
    Democracy / United States
    United States / Social conditions / 21st century
    Subject
    Big data / Social aspects / United States
    Big data / Political aspects / United States
    Democracy / United States
    United States / Social conditions / 21st century
  18. Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011) 0.09
    0.08999228 = product of:
      0.17998455 = sum of:
        0.083394095 = weight(_text_:united in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083394095 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08034424 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.016246213 = product of:
          0.032492425 = sum of:
            0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032492425 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:25:32
  19. Huang, M.; Barbour, J.; Su, C.; Contractor, N.: Why do group members provide information to digital knowledge repositories? : a multilevel application of transactive memory theory (2013) 0.09
    0.08999228 = product of:
      0.17998455 = sum of:
        0.083394095 = weight(_text_:united in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083394095 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
        0.08034424 = weight(_text_:states in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08034424 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
        0.016246213 = product of:
          0.032492425 = sum of:
            0.032492425 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032492425 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13996868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039970156 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) used for distributed and collocated work raises important questions about how to manage these technologies. This study investigates why individuals contribute information to DKRs by applying and extending transactive memory theory. Data from knowledge workers (N = 208) nested in work groups (J = 17) located in Europe and the United States revealed, consistent with transactive memory theory, that perceptions of experts' retrieval of information were positively related to the likelihood of information provision to DKRs. The relationship between experts' perceptions of retrieval and information provision varied from group to group, and cross-level interactions indicated that trust in how the information would be used and the interdependence of tasks within groups could explain that variation. Furthermore, information provision to DKRs was related to communication networks in ways consistent with theorizing regarding the formation of transactive memory systems. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, emphasizing the utility of multilevel approaches for conceptualizing and modeling why individuals provide information to DKRs.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:39:00
  20. Ho, Y.-S.; Kahn, M.: ¬A bibliometric study of highly cited reviews in the Science Citation Index expanded(TM) (2014) 0.08
    0.084985696 = product of:
      0.25495708 = sum of:
        0.13899016 = weight(_text_:united in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13899016 = score(doc=1203,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22423708 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.61983573 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
        0.11596692 = weight(_text_:states in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11596692 = score(doc=1203,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22009853 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039970156 = queryNorm
            0.5268864 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Some 1,857 highly cited reviews, namely those cited at least 1,000 times since publication to 2011, were identified using the data hosted on the Science Citation Index ExpandedT database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) between 1899 and 2011. The data are disaggregated by publication date, citation counts, journals, Web of Science® (Thomson Reuters) subject areas, citation life cycles, and publications by Nobel Prize winners. Six indicators, total publications, independent publications, collaborative publications, first-author publications, corresponding-author publications, and single-author publications were applied to evaluate publication of institutions and countries. Among the highly cited reviews, 33% were single-author, 61% were single-institution, and 83% were single-country reviews. The United States ranked top for all 6 indicators. The G7 (United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, France, Japan, and Italy) countries were the site of almost all the highly cited reviews. The top 12 most productive institutions were all located in the United States with Harvard University (Cambridge, MA) the leader. The top 3 most productive journals were Chemical Reviews, Nature, and the Annual Review of Biochemistry. In addition, the impact of the reviews was analyzed by total citations from publication to 2011, citations in 2011, and citation in publication year.

Languages

  • e 592
  • d 183
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 683
  • el 64
  • m 58
  • s 15
  • x 12
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications