Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.05
    0.048522554 = product of:
      0.12130638 = sum of:
        0.092339694 = weight(_text_:computers in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092339694 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22709264 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
        0.028966686 = product of:
          0.05793337 = sum of:
            0.05793337 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05793337 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04319373 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a survey of all academic members of the Association of Research Libraries in the 4th quarter of 1997 which examined how academic libraries incorporate electronic information sources into their reference activities and the effects on libraries services. There was a response rate of 68 per cent, Compares results surveys carried out in 1991 and 1994. The survey covered: numbers of computers access options (intermediary, end user online, CD-ROM locally loaded databases or those accessible through the library catalogue and the Internet. There is a trend away from print resources, particularly indexing and abstracting materials, and away from CD-ROM LANs and local loading of databases towards remote online resources
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  2. Tenopir, C.: Generations of online searching (1996) 0.02
    0.018467939 = product of:
      0.092339694 = sum of:
        0.092339694 = weight(_text_:computers in 6990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092339694 = score(doc=6990,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22709264 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 6990, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6990)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines 3 generations of online searching: to 1981, when personal computers became ubiquitous, when searching was done from dumb terminals by intermediaries; from 1982 to 1991, when through the use of the PC, faster transmission speeds and the advent of ASCII full text, specialized end users joined intermediaries in the exploitation of online; and a generation characterized by multimedia PCs, higher transmission speeds, ASCII and 'image' full text databases, the invlovement of the general end user. Reviews the evolution of these 3 generations in 4 specific areas: content/databases; people and organizations involved; the places people search; motives for using online; and search engines and interfaces used
  3. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Huntington, P.; Fieldhouse, M.; Gunter, B.; Withey, R.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: ¬The Google generation : the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008) 0.01
    0.013191386 = product of:
      0.06595693 = sum of:
        0.06595693 = weight(_text_:computers in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06595693 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22709264 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.29044062 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article is an edited version of a report commissioned by the British Library and JISC to identify how the specialist researchers of the future (those born after 1993) are likely to access and interact with digital resources in five to ten years' time. The purpose is to investigate the impact of digital transition on the information behaviour of the Google Generation and to guide library and information services to anticipate and react to any new or emerging behaviours in the most effective way. Design/methodology/approach - The study was virtually longitudinal and is based on a number of extensive reviews of related literature, survey data mining and a deep log analysis of a British Library and a JISC web site intended for younger people. Findings - The study shows that much of the impact of ICTs on the young has been overestimated. The study claims that although young people demonstrate an apparent ease and familiarity with computers, they rely heavily on search engines, view rather than read and do not possess the critical and analytical skills to assess the information that they find on the web. Originality/value - The paper reports on a study that overturns the common assumption that the "Google generation" is the most web-literate.
  4. Tenopir, C.: Reference services from RLG (1995) 0.00
    0.004681723 = product of:
      0.023408616 = sum of:
        0.023408616 = product of:
          0.046817232 = sum of:
            0.046817232 = weight(_text_:22 in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046817232 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04319373 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  5. Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995) 0.00
    0.004681723 = product of:
      0.023408616 = sum of:
        0.023408616 = product of:
          0.046817232 = sum of:
            0.046817232 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046817232 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04319373 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  6. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992) 0.00
    0.0040965076 = product of:
      0.020482538 = sum of:
        0.020482538 = product of:
          0.040965077 = sum of:
            0.040965077 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040965077 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04319373 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
  7. Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009) 0.00
    0.0029260772 = product of:
      0.014630386 = sum of:
        0.014630386 = product of:
          0.029260771 = sum of:
            0.029260771 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029260771 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04319373 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:37