Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998) 0.04 
    0.038681913 = product of:
  0.09670478 = sum of:
    0.079148315 = weight(_text_:computers in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079148315 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22709264 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04319373 = queryNorm
        0.34852874 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
    0.017556462 = product of:
      0.035112925 = sum of:
        0.035112925 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035112925 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Creates an open, metadata aware system for distributed, collaborative WWW indexing. The system has 3 main components: a harvester (for collecting information), a database (for making the collection searchable), and a user interface (for making the information available). all components can be distributed across networked computers, thus supporting scalability. The system is metadata aware and thus allows searches on several fields including title, document author and URL. Nordic Web Index (NWI) is an application using this system to create a regional Nordic Web-indexing service. NWI is built using 5 collaborating service points within the Nordic countries. The NWI databases can be used to build additional services
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  2. Walker, S.: Views on classification as a search tool on a computer (1991) 0.03 
    0.026117612 = product of:
  0.13058805 = sum of:
    0.13058805 = weight(_text_:computers in 4837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13058805 = score(doc=4837,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22709264 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04319373 = queryNorm
        0.5750431 = fieldWeight in 4837, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4837)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Computers in libraries international 91. Proc. of the 5th Annual Conference on Computers in Libraries, London, February 1991
  3. Slavic, A.: Classification revisited : a web of knowledge (2011) 0.01 
    0.013191386 = product of:
  0.06595693 = sum of:
    0.06595693 = weight(_text_:computers in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06595693 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22709264 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04319373 = queryNorm
        0.29044062 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The vision of the semantic web is gradually unfolding and taking shape through a web of linked data, a part of which is built by capturing semantics stored in existing knowledge organization systems (KOS), subject metadata and resource metadata. The content of vast bibliographic collections is currently categorized by some widely used bibliographic classification and we may soon see them being mined for information and linked in a meaningful way across the web. Bibliographic classifications are designed for knowledge mediation, which offers both a rich terminology and different ways in which concepts can be categorized and related to each other in the universe of knowledge. From 1990 to 2010 they have been used in various resource discovery services on the web, and they continue to be used to support information integration in a number of international digital library projects. In this chapter we will revisit some of the ways in which universal classifications, as language-independent concept schemes, can assist humans and computers in structuring and presenting information and formulating queries. Most importantly, we will highlight issues important to understanding bibliographic classifications, identifying both their unused potential and their technical limitations.
  4. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.01 
    0.009363446 = product of:
  0.046817232 = sum of:
    0.046817232 = product of:
      0.093634464 = sum of:
        0.093634464 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093634464 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  5. Welty, C.A.; Jenkins, J.: Formal ontology for subject (1999) 0.01 
    0.008262127 = product of:
  0.041310634 = sum of:
    0.041310634 = product of:
      0.08262127 = sum of:
        0.08262127 = weight(_text_:history in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08262127 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Subject based classification is an important part of information retrieval, and has a long history in libraries, where a subject taxonomy was used to determine the location of books on the shelves. We have been studying the notion of subject itself, in order to determine a formal ontology of subject for a large scale digital library card catalog system. Deep analysis reveals a lot of ambiguity regarding the usage of subjects in existing systems and terminology, and we attempt to formalize these notions into a single framework for representing it.
  6. Zaytseva, E.: Classification tools for librarians and users : the Russian experience (2008) 0.01 
    0.008262127 = product of:
  0.041310634 = sum of:
    0.041310634 = product of:
      0.08262127 = sum of:
        0.08262127 = weight(_text_:history in 2179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08262127 = score(doc=2179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 2179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2179)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper considers the history of the development of electronic versions of library classifications in Russia. It describes classification tools specially designed for OPAC users and librarians - classifiers and classification editors.
  7. National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001) 0.01 
    0.008183068 = product of:
  0.040915336 = sum of:
    0.040915336 = sum of:
      0.02921103 = weight(_text_:history in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02921103 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04319373 = queryNorm
          0.14537445 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.011704308 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011704308 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04319373 = queryNorm
          0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    2. 1.2004 10:35:22
    Footnote
    PARAMESWARAN (Classification and Indexing: Impact of Classification Theory an PRECIS) reviews the PRECIS system and finds that "it Gould not escape from the impact of the theory of classification" (p. 131). The author further argues that the purpose of classification and subject indexing is the same and that both approaches depends an syntax. This leads to the conclusion that "there is an absolute syntax as the Indian theory of classification points out" (p. 131). SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 1. SA TSAN- A Computer Based Learning Package) and SATYAPAL and SANJIVINI SATYAPAL (Classifying Documents According to Postulational Approach: 2. Semi-Automatic Synthesis of CC Numbers) present an application to automate classification using a facet classification system, in this Gase, the Colon Classification system. GAIKAIWARI (An Interactive Application for Faceted Classification Systems) presents an application, called SRR, for managing and using a faceted classification scheme in a digital environment. IYER (Use of Instructional Technology to Support Traditional Classroom Learning: A Case Study) describes a course an "Information and Knowledge Organization" that she teaches at the University at Albany (SUNY). The course is a conceptual course that introduces the student to various aspects of knowledge organization. GOPINATH (Universal Classification: How can it be used?) lists fifteen uses of universal classifications and discusses the entities of a number of disciplines. GOPINATH (Knowledge Classification: The Theory of Classification) briefly reviews the foundations for research in automatic classification, summarizes the history of classification, and places Ranganathan's thought in the history of classification.
  8. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.01 
    0.0070225853 = product of:
  0.035112925 = sum of:
    0.035112925 = product of:
      0.07022585 = sum of:
        0.07022585 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07022585 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  9. Frost, C.O.: ¬The University of Michigan School of Information Art Image Browser : designing and testing a model for image retrieval (1996) 0.01 
    0.0061965953 = product of:
  0.030982977 = sum of:
    0.030982977 = product of:
      0.061965954 = sum of:
        0.061965954 = weight(_text_:history in 5174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061965954 = score(doc=5174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 5174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A team at the University of Michigan School of Information designed, implemented and is evaluating a WWW-based experimental system which uses classification to facilitate browsing of art images. The research team built a database of approximately 3.000 digitized images from Art History to determine if classification can be used for retrieving images from a digital database in a networked environment. A key premise in this research is that browsing can serve an important role in retrieving image information. The system was evaluated in controlled tests and through a questionnaire available to WWW users
  10. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.01 
    0.0058521545 = product of:
  0.029260771 = sum of:
    0.029260771 = product of:
      0.058521543 = sum of:
        0.058521543 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058521543 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  11. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.01 
    0.0058521545 = product of:
  0.029260771 = sum of:
    0.029260771 = product of:
      0.058521543 = sum of:
        0.058521543 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058521543 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  12. Duncan, E.B.: Structuring knowledge bases for designers of learning materials (1989) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  13. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A faceted approach to hypertext (1989) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  14. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A concept-map thesaurus as a knowledge-based hypertext interface to a bibliographic database (1990) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 2481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=2481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 2481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2481)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  15. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cuncliffe, D.: Representation and retrieval in faceted systems (2003) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses two inter-related themes: the retrieval potential of faceted thesauri and XML representations of fundamental facets. Initial findings are discussed from the ongoing 'FACET' project, in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry. The work discussed seeks to take advantage of the structure afforded by faceted systems for multi-term queries and flexible matching, focusing in this paper an the Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A multi-term matching function yields ranked results with partial matches via semantic term expansion, based an a measure of distance over the semantic index space formed by thesaurus relationships. Our intention is to drive the system from general representations and a common query structure and interface. To this end, we are developing an XML representation based an work by the Classification Research Group an fundamental facets or categories. The XML representation maps categories to particular thesauri and hierarchies. The system interface, which is configured by the mapping, incorporates a thesaurus browser with navigation history together with a term search facility and drag and drop query builder.
  16. Slavic, A.: UDC in subject gateways : experiment or opportunity? (2006) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 4879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=4879,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 4879, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4879)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper gives a short overview of the history of use of UDC in Internet subject gateways (SGs) with an English interface, from 1993 to 2006. There were in total, nine quality controlled SGs that were functional for shorter or longer periods of time. Their typology and functionality is described. Quality SGs have evolved and the role of classification has changed accordingly from supporting subject organization on the interface and automatic categorization of resources, towards supporting a semantic linking, control and vocabulary mapping between different indexing systems in subject hubs and federated SGs. In this period, many SGs ceased to exist and little information remains available regarding their status. SGs currently using UDC, for some part of their resource organization, do not use a UDC subject hierarchy at the interface and its role in resource indexing has become more difficult to observe. Since 2000, UDC has become more prevalent in East European SGs, portals and hubs, which are outside the scope of this research. This paper is an attempt to provide a record on this particular application of UDC and to offer some consideration of the changes in requirements when it comes to the use of library classification in resource discovery.
  17. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
  18. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.00 
    0.004965718 = product of:
  0.024828589 = sum of:
    0.024828589 = product of:
      0.049657177 = sum of:
        0.049657177 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049657177 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  19. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.00 
    0.004681723 = product of:
  0.023408616 = sum of:
    0.023408616 = product of:
      0.046817232 = sum of:
        0.046817232 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046817232 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  20. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.00 
    0.004681723 = product of:
  0.023408616 = sum of:
    0.023408616 = product of:
      0.046817232 = sum of:
        0.046817232 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046817232 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 31
  • d 6

Types

  • a 32
  • el 3
  • m 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications