Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.03 
    0.025887702 = product of:
  0.1294385 = sum of:
    0.1294385 = sum of:
      0.08262127 = weight(_text_:history in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08262127 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04319373 = queryNorm
          0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.046817232 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046817232 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04319373 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  2. Kochar, R.S.: Library classification systems (1998) 0.02 
    0.018467939 = product of:
  0.092339694 = sum of:
    0.092339694 = weight(_text_:computers in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.092339694 = score(doc=931,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22709264 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04319373 = queryNorm
        0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Library classification traces the origins of the subject and leads an to the latest developments in it. This user-friendly text explains concepts through analogies, diagrams, and tables. The fundamental but important topics an terminology of classification has been uniquely explained. The book deals with the recent trends in the use of computers in cataloguing including on-line systems, artificial intelligence systems etc. With its up-to-date and comprehensive coverage the book will serve as a degree students of Library and Information Science and also prove to be invaluable reference material to professionals and researchers.
  3. Bergman, M.K..: Hierarchy in knowledge systems (2022) 0.01 
    0.013191386 = product of:
  0.06595693 = sum of:
    0.06595693 = weight(_text_:computers in 1099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06595693 = score(doc=1099,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22709264 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04319373 = queryNorm
        0.29044062 = fieldWeight in 1099, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1099)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Hierarchies abound to help us organize our world. A hierarchy places items into a general order, where more 'general' is also more 'abstract'. The etymology of hierarchy is grounded in notions of religious and social rank. This article, after a historical review, focuses on knowledge systems, an interloper of the term hierarchy since at least the 1800s. Hierarchies in knowledge systems include taxonomies, classification systems, or thesauri in information science, and systems for representing information and knowledge to computers, notably ontologies and knowledge representation languages. Hierarchies are the logical underpinning of inference and reasoning in these systems, as well as the scaffolding for classification and inheritance. Hierarchies in knowledge systems express subsumption relations that have flexible variants, which we can represent algorithmically, and thus computationally. This article dissects that variability, leading to a proposed typology of hierarchies useful to knowledge systems. The article argues through a perspective informed by Charles Peirce that natural hierarchies are real, can be logically determined, and are the appropriate basis for knowledge systems. Description logics and semantic language standards reflect this perspective, importantly through their open-world logic and vocabularies for generalized subsumption hierarchies. Recent research suggests possible mechanisms for the emergence of natural hierarchies.
  4. Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1978) 0.01 
    0.008262127 = product of:
  0.041310634 = sum of:
    0.041310634 = product of:
      0.08262127 = sum of:
        0.08262127 = weight(_text_:history in 1650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08262127 = score(doc=1650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 1650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Neither in theory nor in practice does contemporary classification ignore temporal sequence in the sense of history. But it is regarded in a rather static way, as if classification could be reduced to some unique landscape to be viewed by the classifier as from a balloon. ...
  5. Maple, A.: Faceted access : a review of the literature (1995) 0.01 
    0.008262127 = product of:
  0.041310634 = sum of:
    0.041310634 = product of:
      0.08262127 = sum of:
        0.08262127 = weight(_text_:history in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08262127 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to define what is meant by facet analysis, and to review briefly the history of facet analysis within the context of other types of subject analysis in libraries and within the context of information retrieval research
  6. Keilty, P.: Tabulating queer : space, perversion, and belonging (2009) 0.01 
    0.008262127 = product of:
  0.041310634 = sum of:
    0.041310634 = product of:
      0.08262127 = sum of:
        0.08262127 = weight(_text_:history in 3253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08262127 = score(doc=3253,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 3253, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3253)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Considering fields as diverse as the history of science, Internet studies, border studies, and coalition politics, the article gives an historical overview of how the knowledge around queer phenomena has been structured, tabulated, and spacialized: the hazards, coercive and productive qualities, as well as queer's paradoxical relationship as both resistant to and reliant on categories, classification, and knowledge structures. In the process, the article also considers the development of Western hierarchical knowledge structures in relation to societal power dynamics, proximity, and space.
  7. Husain, S.: Library classification : facets and analyses (1993) 0.01 
    0.007229361 = product of:
  0.036146805 = sum of:
    0.036146805 = product of:
      0.07229361 = sum of:
        0.07229361 = weight(_text_:history in 3752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07229361 = score(doc=3752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 3752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3752)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Enthält folgende Kapitel: (1) Definition, need and purpose of classification, (2) History of library classification, (3) Terminology of classification, (4) Development of a theory of classification, (5) Work of classification in three planes and their interrelationship, (6) Work of classification in idea plane, (7) Verbal plane, (8) Notation, definition, need functions, (9) Multidimensional nature of subjects, (10) Growing universe of subjects: problems and solutions, (11) Postulational approach to classification, (12) Formation of sharpening of isolates, (13) Species of classification schemes, (14) DDC, UDC and CC, (15) Designing the depth schedules of classification, (16) Recent trends in classification
  8. Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995) 0.01 
    0.007229361 = product of:
  0.036146805 = sum of:
    0.036146805 = product of:
      0.07229361 = sum of:
        0.07229361 = weight(_text_:history in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07229361 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
  9. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01 
    0.0070225853 = product of:
  0.035112925 = sum of:
    0.035112925 = product of:
      0.07022585 = sum of:
        0.07022585 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07022585 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  10. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01 
    0.0070225853 = product of:
  0.035112925 = sum of:
    0.035112925 = product of:
      0.07022585 = sum of:
        0.07022585 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07022585 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  11. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.01 
    0.0070225853 = product of:
  0.035112925 = sum of:
    0.035112925 = product of:
      0.07022585 = sum of:
        0.07022585 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07022585 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  12. Gnoli, C.: Phylogenetic classification (2006) 0.01 
    0.0061965953 = product of:
  0.030982977 = sum of:
    0.030982977 = product of:
      0.061965954 = sum of:
        0.061965954 = weight(_text_:history in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061965954 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    One general principle in the construction of classification schemes is that of grouping phenomena to be classified according to their shared origin in evolution or history (phylogenesis). In general schemes, this idea has been applied by several classificationists in identifying a series of integrative levels, each originated from the previous ones, and using them as the main classes. In special schemes, common origin is a key principle in many domains: examples are given from the classification of climates, of organisms, and of musical instruments. Experience from these domains, however, suggests that using common origin alone, as done in cladistic taxonomy, can produce weird results, like having birds as a subclass of reptiles; while the most satisfying classifications use a well balanced mix of common origin and similarity. It is discussed how this could be applied to the development of a general classification of phenomena in an emergentist perspective, and how the resulting classification tree could be structured. Charles Bennett's notion of logical depth appears to be a promising conceptual tool for this purpose.
  13. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
  14. Blake, J.: Some issues in the classification of zoology (2011) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 4845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=4845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 4845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    This paper is based on a thesis of the same title, completed as part of an MA in Library and Information Studies at University College London in 2009, and available at http://62.32.98.6/elibsql2uk_Z10300UK_Documents/Catalogued_PDFs/ Some_issues_in_the_classification_of_zoology.PDF. Thanks are due to Vanda Broughton, who supervised the MA thesis; and to Diane Tough of the Natural History Museum, London and Ann Sylph of the Zoological Society of London, who both provided valuable insights into the classification of zoological literature.
  15. Frické, M.: Logical division (2016) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Contents: 1. Introduction: Kinds of Division; 2. The Basics of Logical Division; 3. History; 4. Formalization; 5. The Rules; 6. The Status of the Rules; 7. The Process of Logical Division; 8. Conclusion
  16. Dimensions of knowledge : facets for knowledge organization (2017) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The identification and contextual definition of concepts is the core of knowledge organization. The full expression of comprehension is accomplished through the use of an extension device called the facet. A facet is a category of dimensional characteristics that cross the hierarchical array of concepts to provide extension, or breadth, to the contexts in which they are discovered or expressed in knowledge organization systems. The use of the facet in knowledge organization has a rich history arising in the mid-nineteenth century. As it has matured through more than a century of application, the notion of the facet in knowledge organization has taken on a variety of meanings, from that of simple categories used in web search engines to the more sophisticated idea of intersecting dimensions of knowledge. This book describes the state of the art of the understanding of facets in knowledge organization today.
  17. Parrochia, D.: Mathematical theory of classification (2018) 0.01 
    0.0051638293 = product of:
  0.025819147 = sum of:
    0.025819147 = product of:
      0.051638294 = sum of:
        0.051638294 = weight(_text_:history in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051638294 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20093648 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    One of the main topics of scientific research, classification is the operation consisting of distributing objects in classes or groups which are, in general, less numerous than them. From Antiquity to the Classical Age, it has a long history where philosophers (Aristotle), and natural scientists (Linnaeus), took a great part. But from the nineteenth century (with the growth of chemistry and information science) and the twentieth century (with the arrival of mathematical models and computer science), mathematics (especially theory of orders and theory of graphs or hypergraphs) allows us to compute all the possible partitions, chains of partitions, covers, hypergraphs or systems of classes we can construct on a domain. In spite of these advances, most of classifications are still based on the evaluation of ressemblances between objects that constitute the empirical data. However, all these classifications remain, for technical and epistemological reasons we detail below, very unstable ones. We lack a real algebra of classifications, which could explain their properties and the relations existing between them. Though the aim of a general theory of classifications is surely a wishful thought, some recent conjecture gives the hope that the existence of a metaclassification (or classification of all classification schemes) is possible
  18. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.00 
    0.004681723 = product of:
  0.023408616 = sum of:
    0.023408616 = product of:
      0.046817232 = sum of:
        0.046817232 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046817232 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  19. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.00 
    0.004681723 = product of:
  0.023408616 = sum of:
    0.023408616 = product of:
      0.046817232 = sum of:
        0.046817232 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046817232 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  20. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.00 
    0.004681723 = product of:
  0.023408616 = sum of:
    0.023408616 = product of:
      0.046817232 = sum of:
        0.046817232 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046817232 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15125708 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04319373 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.1-22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • f 3
  • chi 1
  • d 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 34
  • m 6
  • el 3
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications