Wainer, J; Przibisczki de Oliveira, H.; Anido, R.: Patterns of bibliographic references in the ACM published papers (2011)
0.03
0.03434532 = product of:
0.06869064 = sum of:
0.06869064 = product of:
0.13738129 = sum of:
0.13738129 = weight(_text_:books in 4240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13738129 = score(doc=4240,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
0.051222645 = queryNorm
0.5549339 = fieldWeight in 4240, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4240)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper analyzes the bibliographic references made by all papers published by ACM in 2006. Both an automatic classification of all references and a human classification of a random sample of them resulted that around 40% of the references are to conference proceedings papers, around 30% are to journal papers, and around 8% are to books. Among the other types of documents, standards and RFC correspond to 3% of the references, technical and other reports correspond to 4%, and other Web references to 3%. Among the documents cited at least 10 times by the 2006 ACM papers, 41% are conferences papers, 37% are books, and 16% are journal papers.
- Content
- Ergebnisse: - Conferences amounts to around 40% of the references in the CS papers - Journal papers amounts to 30% of the references - 41% of the papers cited more than 10 times are from conferences - 37% of the documents cited more than 10 times are books
