Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Frohmann, B.: Subjectivity and information ethics (2008) 0.02
    0.024003197 = product of:
      0.048006393 = sum of:
        0.048006393 = product of:
          0.096012786 = sum of:
            0.096012786 = weight(_text_:commerce in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096012786 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32931858 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.29154986 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In A Brief History of Information Ethics, Thomas Froehlich (2004) quickly surveyed under several broad categories some of the many issues that constitute information ethics: under the category of librarianship - censorship, privacy, access, balance in collections, copyright, fair use, and codes of ethics; under information science, which Froehlich sees as closely related to librarianship - confidentiality, bias, and quality of information; under computer ethics - intellectual property, privacy, fair representation, nonmaleficence, computer crime, software reliability, artificial intelligence, and e-commerce; under cyberethics (issues related to the Internet, or cyberspace) - expert systems, artificial intelligence (again), and robotics; under media ethics - news, impartiality, journalistic ethics, deceit, lies, sexuality, censorship (again), and violence in the press; and under intercultural information ethics - digital divide, and the ethical role of the Internet for social, political, cultural, and economic development. Many of the debates in information ethics, on these and other issues, have to do with specific kinds of relationships between subjects. The most important subject and a familiar figure in information ethics is the ethical subject engaged in moral deliberation, whether appearing as the bearer of moral rights and obligations to other subjects, or as an agent whose actions are judged, whether by others or by oneself, according to the standards of various moral codes and ethical principles. Many debates in information ethics revolve around conflicts between those acting according to principles of unfettered access to information and those finding some information offensive or harmful. Subjectivity is at the heart of information ethics. But how is subjectivity understood? Can it be understood in ways that broaden ethical reflection to include problems that remain invisible when subjectivity is taken for granted and when how it is created remains unquestioned? This article proposes some answers by investigating the meaning and role of subjectivity in information ethics.[In an article on cyberethics (2000), I asserted that there was no information ethics in any special sense beyond the application of general ethical principles to information services. Here, I take a more expansive view.]
  2. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.01
    0.013526749 = product of:
      0.027053498 = sum of:
        0.027053498 = product of:
          0.054106995 = sum of:
            0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054106995 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  3. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.01
    0.013526749 = product of:
      0.027053498 = sum of:
        0.027053498 = product of:
          0.054106995 = sum of:
            0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054106995 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  4. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.01
    0.013526749 = product of:
      0.027053498 = sum of:
        0.027053498 = product of:
          0.054106995 = sum of:
            0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054106995 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
  5. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.01
    0.013526749 = product of:
      0.027053498 = sum of:
        0.027053498 = product of:
          0.054106995 = sum of:
            0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054106995 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
  6. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.01
    0.013526749 = product of:
      0.027053498 = sum of:
        0.027053498 = product of:
          0.054106995 = sum of:
            0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054106995 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
  7. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.01
    0.011835906 = product of:
      0.023671811 = sum of:
        0.023671811 = product of:
          0.047343623 = sum of:
            0.047343623 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047343623 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  8. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.01
    0.011835906 = product of:
      0.023671811 = sum of:
        0.023671811 = product of:
          0.047343623 = sum of:
            0.047343623 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047343623 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
  9. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.01
    0.0084542185 = product of:
      0.016908437 = sum of:
        0.016908437 = product of:
          0.033816874 = sum of:
            0.033816874 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033816874 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
  10. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01
    0.0084542185 = product of:
      0.016908437 = sum of:
        0.016908437 = product of:
          0.033816874 = sum of:
            0.033816874 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033816874 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  11. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.01
    0.005978035 = product of:
      0.01195607 = sum of:
        0.01195607 = product of:
          0.02391214 = sum of:
            0.02391214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02391214 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
  12. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.01
    0.005917953 = product of:
      0.011835906 = sum of:
        0.011835906 = product of:
          0.023671811 = sum of:
            0.023671811 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023671811 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
  13. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.01
    0.005072531 = product of:
      0.010145062 = sum of:
        0.010145062 = product of:
          0.020290123 = sum of:
            0.020290123 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020290123 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04991929 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.