-
Stubley, P.: Cataloguing standards and metadata for e-commerce (1999)
0.08
0.08401119 = product of:
0.16802238 = sum of:
0.16802238 = product of:
0.33604476 = sum of:
0.33604476 = weight(_text_:commerce in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33604476 = score(doc=1915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32931858 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
1.0204245 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Greenberg, J.: Metadata and the World Wide Web (2002)
0.04
0.042432062 = product of:
0.084864125 = sum of:
0.084864125 = product of:
0.16972825 = sum of:
0.16972825 = weight(_text_:commerce in 4264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16972825 = score(doc=4264,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32931858 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.51539224 = fieldWeight in 4264, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata is of paramount importance for persons, organizations, and endeavors of every dimension that are increasingly turning to the World Wide Web (hereafter referred to as the Web) as a chief conduit for accessing and disseminating information. This is evidenced by the development and implementation of metadata schemas supporting projects ranging from restricted corporate intranets, data warehouses, and consumer-oriented electronic commerce enterprises to freely accessible digital libraries, educational initiatives, virtual museums, and other public Web sites. Today's metadata activities are unprecedented because they extend beyond the traditional library environment in an effort to deal with the Web's exponential growth. This article considers metadata in today's Web environment. The article defines metadata, examines the relationship between metadata and cataloging, provides definitions for key metadata vocabulary terms, and explores the topic of metadata generation. Metadata is an extensive and expanding subject that is prevalent in many environments. For practical reasons, this article has elected to concentrate an the information resource domain, which is defined by electronic textual documents, graphical images, archival materials, museum artifacts, and other objects found in both digital and physical information centers (e.g., libraries, museums, record centers, and archives). To show the extent and larger application of metadata, several examples are also drawn from the data warehouse, electronic commerce, open source, and medical communities.
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.03
0.02869457 = product of:
0.05738914 = sum of:
0.05738914 = product of:
0.11477828 = sum of:
0.11477828 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11477828 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.03
0.027053498 = product of:
0.054106995 = sum of:
0.054106995 = product of:
0.10821399 = sum of:
0.10821399 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10821399 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.027053498 = product of:
0.054106995 = sum of:
0.054106995 = product of:
0.10821399 = sum of:
0.10821399 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10821399 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.023671811 = product of:
0.047343623 = sum of:
0.047343623 = product of:
0.094687246 = sum of:
0.094687246 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094687246 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.023671811 = product of:
0.047343623 = sum of:
0.047343623 = product of:
0.094687246 = sum of:
0.094687246 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094687246 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.023671811 = product of:
0.047343623 = sum of:
0.047343623 = product of:
0.094687246 = sum of:
0.094687246 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094687246 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Baker, T.: Languages for Dublin Core (1998)
0.02
0.021002797 = product of:
0.042005595 = sum of:
0.042005595 = product of:
0.08401119 = sum of:
0.08401119 = weight(_text_:commerce in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08401119 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32931858 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.25510612 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Over the past three years, the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative has achieved a broad international consensus on the semantics of a simple element set for describing electronic resources. Since the first workshop in March 1995, which was reported in the very first issue of D-Lib Magazine, Dublin Core has been the topic of perhaps a dozen articles here. Originally intended to be simple and intuitive enough for authors to tag Web pages without special training, Dublin Core is being adapted now for more specialized uses, from government information and legal deposit to museum informatics and electronic commerce. To meet such specialized requirements, Dublin Core can be customized with additional elements or qualifiers. However, these refinements can compromise interoperability across applications. There are tradeoffs between using specific terms that precisely meet local needs versus general terms that are understood more widely. We can better understand this inevitable tension between simplicity and complexity if we recognize that metadata is a form of human language. With Dublin Core, as with a natural language, people are inclined to stretch definitions, make general terms more specific, specific terms more general, misunderstand intended meanings, and coin new terms. One goal of this paper, therefore, will be to examine the experience of some related ways to seek semantic interoperability through simplicity: planned languages, interlingua constructs, and pidgins. The problem of semantic interoperability is compounded when we consider Dublin Core in translation. All of the workshops, documents, mailing lists, user guides, and working group outputs of the Dublin Core Initiative have been in English. But in many countries and for many applications, people need a metadata standard in their own language. In principle, the broad elements of Dublin Core can be defined equally well in Bulgarian or Hindi. Since Dublin Core is a controlled standard, however, any parallel definitions need to be kept in sync as the standard evolves. Another goal of the paper, then, will be to define the conceptual and organizational problem of maintaining a metadata standard in multiple languages. In addition to a name and definition, which are meant for human consumption, each Dublin Core element has a label, or indexing token, meant for harvesting by search engines. For practical reasons, these machine-readable tokens are English-looking strings such as Creator and Subject (just as HTML tags are called HEAD, BODY, or TITLE). These tokens, which are shared by Dublin Cores in every language, ensure that metadata fields created in any particular language are indexed together across repositories. As symbols of underlying universal semantics, these tokens form the basis of semantic interoperability among the multiple Dublin Cores. As long as we limit ourselves to sharing these indexing tokens among exact translations of a simple set of fifteen broad elements, the definitions of which fit easily onto two pages, the problem of Dublin Core in multiple languages is straightforward. But nothing having to do with human language is ever so simple. Just as speakers of various languages must learn the language of Dublin Core in their own tongues, we must find the right words to talk about a metadata language that is expressable in many discipline-specific jargons and natural languages and that inevitably will evolve and change over time.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.020290123 = product of:
0.040580247 = sum of:
0.040580247 = product of:
0.08116049 = sum of:
0.08116049 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08116049 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.019129712 = product of:
0.038259424 = sum of:
0.038259424 = product of:
0.07651885 = sum of:
0.07651885 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07651885 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.019129712 = product of:
0.038259424 = sum of:
0.038259424 = product of:
0.07651885 = sum of:
0.07651885 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07651885 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998)
0.02
0.016908437 = product of:
0.033816874 = sum of:
0.033816874 = product of:
0.06763375 = sum of:
0.06763375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06763375 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1998 18:45:36
-
Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998)
0.02
0.016908437 = product of:
0.033816874 = sum of:
0.033816874 = product of:
0.06763375 = sum of:
0.06763375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06763375 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.02
0.016908437 = product of:
0.033816874 = sum of:
0.033816874 = product of:
0.06763375 = sum of:
0.06763375 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06763375 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.02
0.016908437 = product of:
0.033816874 = sum of:
0.033816874 = product of:
0.06763375 = sum of:
0.06763375 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06763375 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.02
0.016908437 = product of:
0.033816874 = sum of:
0.033816874 = product of:
0.06763375 = sum of:
0.06763375 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06763375 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.01
0.013526749 = product of:
0.027053498 = sum of:
0.027053498 = product of:
0.054106995 = sum of:
0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054106995 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.013526749 = product of:
0.027053498 = sum of:
0.027053498 = product of:
0.054106995 = sum of:
0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054106995 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.01
0.013526749 = product of:
0.027053498 = sum of:
0.027053498 = product of:
0.054106995 = sum of:
0.054106995 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054106995 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17480884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04991929 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
