Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Giess, M.D."
  1. Wild, P.J.; Giess, M.D.; McMahon, C.A.: Describing engineering documents with faceted approaches : observations and reflections (2009) 0.02
    0.019776927 = product of:
      0.08899617 = sum of:
        0.023465473 = weight(_text_:study in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023465473 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04018021 = queryNorm
            0.17961644 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
        0.065530695 = weight(_text_:teaching in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065530695 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04018021 = queryNorm
            0.30016068 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to highlight the difficulty of applying faceted classification outside of library contexts and also to indicate that faceted approaches are poorly expressed to non-experts. Design/methodology/approach - The faceted approach is being applied outside of its "home" community, with mixed results. The approach is based in part on examination of a broad base of literature and in part on results and reflections on a case study applying faceted notions to "real world" engineering documentation. Findings - The paper comes across a number of pragmatic and theoretical issues namely: differing interpretations of the facet notion; confusion between faceted analysis and faceted classification; lack of methodological guidance; the use of simplistic domains as exemplars; description verses analysis; facet recognition is unproblematic; and is the process purely top-down or bottom-up. Research limitations/implications - That facet analysis is not inherently associated with a particular epistemology; that greater guidance about the derivation is needed, that greater realism is needed when teaching faceted approaches. Practical implications - Experiences of applying faceted classifications are presented that can be drawn upon to guide future work in the area. Originality/value - No previous work has reflected on the actual empirical experience used to create a faceted description, especially with reference to engineering documents.