Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  1. Shoffner, M.; Greenberg, J.; Kramer-Duffield, J.; Woodbury, D.: Web 2.0 semantic systems : collaborative learning in science (2008) 0.09
    0.088156395 = product of:
      0.1586815 = sum of:
        0.0077389665 = weight(_text_:information in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0077389665 = score(doc=2661,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04018021 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.06108209 = weight(_text_:literacy in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06108209 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04018021 = queryNorm
            0.25919902 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.026548153 = weight(_text_:study in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026548153 = score(doc=2661,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04018021 = queryNorm
            0.2032128 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.052424558 = weight(_text_:teaching in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052424558 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04018021 = queryNorm
            0.24012855 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.010887727 = product of:
          0.021775454 = sum of:
            0.021775454 = weight(_text_:22 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021775454 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14070424 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04018021 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
    
    Abstract
    The basic goal of education within a discipline is to transform a novice into an expert. This entails moving the novice toward the "semantic space" that the expert inhabits-the space of concepts, meanings, vocabularies, and other intellectual constructs that comprise the discipline. Metadata is significant to this goal in digitally mediated education environments. Encoding the experts' semantic space not only enables the sharing of semantics among discipline scientists, but also creates an environment that bridges the semantic gap between the common vocabulary of the novice and the granular descriptive language of the seasoned scientist (Greenberg, et al, 2005). Developments underlying the Semantic Web, where vocabularies are formalized in the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and Web 2.0 approaches of user-generated folksonomies provide an infrastructure for linking vocabulary systems and promoting group learning via metadata literacy. Group learning is a pedagogical approach to teaching that harnesses the phenomenon of "collective intelligence" to increase learning by means of collaboration. Learning a new semantic system can be daunting for a novice, and yet it is integral to advance one's knowledge in a discipline and retain interest. These ideas are key to the "BOT 2.0: Botany through Web 2.0, the Memex and Social Learning" project (Bot 2.0).72 Bot 2.0 is a collaboration involving the North Carolina Botanical Garden, the UNC SILS Metadata Research center, and the Renaissance Computing Institute (RENCI). Bot 2.0 presents a curriculum utilizing a memex as a way for students to link and share digital information, working asynchronously in an environment beyond the traditional classroom. Our conception of a memex is not a centralized black box but rather a flexible, distributed framework that uses the most salient and easiest-to-use collaborative platforms (e.g., Facebook, Flickr, wiki and blog technology) for personal information management. By meeting students "where they live" digitally, we hope to attract students to the study of botanical science. A key aspect is to teach students scientific terminology and about the value of metadata, an inherent function in several of the technologies and in the instructional approach we are utilizing. This poster will report on a study examining the value of both folksonomies and taxonomies for post-secondary college students learning plant identification. Our data is drawn from a curriculum involving a virtual independent learning portion and a "BotCamp" weekend at UNC, where students work with digital plan specimens that they have captured. Results provide some insight into the importance of collaboration and shared vocabulary for gaining confidence and for student progression from novice to expert in botany.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Hitzler, P.; Krötzsch, M.; Rudolph, S.: Foundations of Semantic Web technologies (2010) 0.02
    0.01582154 = product of:
      0.071196936 = sum of:
        0.018772379 = weight(_text_:study in 359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018772379 = score(doc=359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04018021 = queryNorm
            0.14369315 = fieldWeight in 359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=359)
        0.052424558 = weight(_text_:teaching in 359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052424558 = score(doc=359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04018021 = queryNorm
            0.24012855 = fieldWeight in 359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=359)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This text introduces the standardized knowledge representation languages for modeling ontologies operating at the core of the semantic web. It covers RDF schema, Web Ontology Language (OWL), rules, query languages, the OWL 2 revision, and the forthcoming Rule Interchange Format (RIF). A 2010 CHOICE Outstanding Academic Title ! The nine chapters of the book guide the reader through the major foundational languages for the semantic Web and highlight the formal semantics. ! the book has very interesting supporting material and exercises, is oriented to W3C standards, and provides the necessary foundations for the semantic Web. It will be easy to follow by the computer scientist who already has a basic background on semantic Web issues; it will also be helpful for both self-study and teaching purposes. I recommend this book primarily as a complementary textbook for a graduate or undergraduate course in a computer science or a Web science academic program. --Computing Reviews, February 2010 This book is unique in several respects. It contains an in-depth treatment of all the major foundational languages for the Semantic Web and provides a full treatment of the underlying formal semantics, which is central to the Semantic Web effort. It is also the very first textbook that addresses the forthcoming W3C recommended standards OWL 2 and RIF. Furthermore, the covered topics and underlying concepts are easily accessible for the reader due to a clear separation of syntax and semantics ! I am confident this book will be well received and play an important role in training a larger number of students who will seek to become proficient in this growing discipline.

Languages

Types

Classifications