-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.06
0.06346937 = product of:
0.12693875 = sum of:
0.12693875 = sum of:
0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08539981 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041538943 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
Oppenheim, C.: Do citations count? : Citation indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) (1996)
0.03
0.028466603 = product of:
0.056933206 = sum of:
0.056933206 = product of:
0.11386641 = sum of:
0.11386641 = weight(_text_:journals in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11386641 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.44380352 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Citations are used to illustrate or elaborate on a point, or to criticize. Citation studies, based on ISI's citation indexes, can help evaluate scientific research, while impact factors aid libraries in deciding which journals to cancel or purchase. Suggests that citiation counts can replace the costly RAE in assessing the research output of university departments
-
Baird, L.M.; Oppenheim, C.: Do citations matter? (1994)
0.02
0.021349952 = product of:
0.042699903 = sum of:
0.042699903 = product of:
0.08539981 = sum of:
0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08539981 = score(doc=6896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Citation indexes are based on the principle of authors citing previous articles of relevance. The paper demonstrates the long history of citing for precedent and notes how ISI's citation indexes differ from 'Shephards Citations'. The paper analyses some of the criticisms of citations counting, and some of the uses for which citation analysis has been employed. The paper also examines the idea of the development of an Acknowledgement Index, and concludes such an index is unlikely to be commercially viable. The paper describes a citation study of Eugene Garfield, and concludes that he may be the most heavily cited information scientist, that he is a heavy self-citer, and that the reasons why other authors cite Garfield are different from the reasons why he cites himself. The paper concludes that citation studies remain a valid methgod of analysis of individuals', institutions', or journals' impact, but need to be used with caution and in conjunction with other measures
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬An agenda for action to achieve the information society in the UK (1996)
0.01
0.0138463145 = product of:
0.027692629 = sum of:
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055385258 = score(doc=7670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.407-421
-
Oppenheim, C.: Intellectual property : legal and other issues (1997)
0.01
0.010384736 = product of:
0.020769471 = sum of:
0.020769471 = product of:
0.041538943 = sum of:
0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041538943 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information studies. 3(1997) no.1, S.5-22
-
Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010)
0.01
0.008653947 = product of:
0.017307894 = sum of:
0.017307894 = product of:
0.03461579 = sum of:
0.03461579 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03461579 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2011 19:22:13
