-
Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006)
0.09
0.08847439 = product of:
0.17694879 = sum of:
0.17694879 = sum of:
0.142333 = weight(_text_:journals in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.142333 = score(doc=1088,freq=8.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.5547544 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.03461579 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03461579 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Kling, R.: ¬The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing (2003)
0.06
0.064049855 = product of:
0.12809971 = sum of:
0.12809971 = product of:
0.25619942 = sum of:
0.25619942 = weight(_text_:journals in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25619942 = score(doc=4272,freq=18.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.9985579 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the early 1990s, much of the enthusiasm for the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication focused an electronic journals, especially electronic-only, (pure) e journals (see for example, Peek & Newby's [1996] anthology). Much of the systematic research an the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication also focused an electronic journals. However, by the late 1990s, numerous scientific publishers had transformed their paper journals (p journals) into paper and electronic journals (p-e journals) and sold them via subscription models that did not provide the significant costs savings, speed of access, or breadth of audience that pure e -journal advocates had expected (Okerson, 1996). In 2001, a group of senior life scientists led a campaign to have publishers make their journals freely available online six months after publication (Russo, 2001). The campaign leaders, using the name "Public Library of Science," asked scientists to boycott journals that did not comply with these demands for open access. Although the proposal was discussed in scientific magazines and conferences, it apparently did not persuade any journal publishers to comply (Young, 2002). Most productive scientists, who work for major universities and research institutes
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.06
0.06346937 = product of:
0.12693875 = sum of:
0.12693875 = sum of:
0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08539981 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041538943 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Kling, R.; Callahan, E.: Electronic journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication (2002)
0.05
0.049816553 = product of:
0.099633105 = sum of:
0.099633105 = product of:
0.19926621 = sum of:
0.19926621 = weight(_text_:journals in 1969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19926621 = score(doc=1969,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.77665615 = fieldWeight in 1969, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1969)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Candela, L.; Castelli, D.; Manghi, P.; Tani, A.: Data journals : a survey (2015)
0.04
0.042699903 = product of:
0.08539981 = sum of:
0.08539981 = product of:
0.17079961 = sum of:
0.17079961 = weight(_text_:journals in 2156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17079961 = score(doc=2156,freq=8.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.66570526 = fieldWeight in 2156, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Data occupy a key role in our information society. However, although the amount of published data continues to grow and terms such as data deluge and big data today characterize numerous (research) initiatives, much work is still needed in the direction of publishing data in order to make them effectively discoverable, available, and reusable by others. Several barriers hinder data publishing, from lack of attribution and rewards, vague citation practices, and quality issues to a rather general lack of a data-sharing culture. Lately, data journals have overcome some of these barriers. In this study of more than 100 currently existing data journals, we describe the approaches they promote for data set description, availability, citation, quality, and open access. We close by identifying ways to expand and strengthen the data journals approach as a means to promote data set access and exploitation.
-
Poulin, M.: Electronic journals : a bibliography (1998)
0.04
0.03558325 = product of:
0.0711665 = sum of:
0.0711665 = product of:
0.142333 = sum of:
0.142333 = weight(_text_:journals in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.142333 = score(doc=774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.5547544 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Adkins, S.L.: CD-ROM: a review of the 1994-1995 literature (1996)
0.04
0.03558325 = product of:
0.0711665 = sum of:
0.0711665 = product of:
0.142333 = sum of:
0.142333 = weight(_text_:journals in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.142333 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.5547544 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A literature review of English language CD-ROM library literature published in journals and proceedings during 1994 and the 1st half of 1995. Covers: hardware, networking, multimedia, CD-R, other optical disc formats, CD-ROM versus online, developing countries, selection and evaluation, and reference issues and bibliographic instruction
-
Dewey, S.H.: Foucault's toolbox : use of Foucault's writings in LIS journal literature, 1990-2016 (2020)
0.03
0.030816004 = product of:
0.061632007 = sum of:
0.061632007 = product of:
0.123264015 = sum of:
0.123264015 = weight(_text_:journals in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.123264015 = score(doc=5841,freq=6.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.48043144 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose To provide a close, detailed analysis of the frequency, nature, and depth of visible use of Michel Foucault's works by library and information science/studies (LIS) scholars. Design/methodology/approach The study conducted extensive full-text searches in a large number of electronically available LIS journal databases to find citations of Foucault's works, then examined each cited article to evaluate the nature and depth of use. Findings Most uses of Foucault are brief or in passing. In-depth explorations of Foucault's works are comparatively rare and relatively little-used by other LIS scholars. Yet the relatively brief uses of Foucault encompass a wide array of different topics spread across a wide spectrum of LIS journal literature. Research limitations/implications The study was limited to articles from particular relatively prominent LIS journals. Results might vary if different journals or non-journal literature were studied. More sophisticated bibliometric techniques might reveal different relative performance among journals and might better test, confirm, or reject various patterns and relationships found here. Other research approaches, such as discourse analysis, social network analysis, or scholar interviews, might reveal patterns of use and influence not visible in this literature sample. Originality/value This intensive study of both quality and quantity of citations may challenge some existing assumptions regarding citation analysis, plus illuminating Foucault scholarship. It also indicates possible problems for future application of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to similar depth-of-use studies.
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Selected cataloging tools on the Internet (2003)
0.03
0.028466603 = product of:
0.056933206 = sum of:
0.056933206 = product of:
0.11386641 = sum of:
0.11386641 = weight(_text_:journals in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11386641 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.44380352 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This bibliography contains selected cataloging tools an the Internet. It is divided into seven sections as follows: authority management and subject headings tools; cataloging tools by type of materials; dictionaries, encyclopedias, and place names; listservs and workshops; software and vendors; technical service professional organizations; and journals and newsletters. Resources are arranged in alphabetical order under each topic. Selected cataloging tools are annotated. There is some overlap since a given web site can cover many tools.
-
Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:01:26
-
Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 9:30:22
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.1996 14:22:33
-
Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
-
Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.03
0.027692629 = product of:
0.055385258 = sum of:
0.055385258 = product of:
0.110770516 = sum of:
0.110770516 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110770516 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011)
0.02
0.02423105 = product of:
0.0484621 = sum of:
0.0484621 = product of:
0.0969242 = sum of:
0.0969242 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0969242 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.12.2014 18:54:22
-
Chen, A.-P.; Chen, M.-Y.: ¬A review of survey research in knowledge management performance (2005)
0.02
0.021349952 = product of:
0.042699903 = sum of:
0.042699903 = product of:
0.08539981 = sum of:
0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08539981 = score(doc=3025,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys knowledge management (KM) development using a literature review and classification of articles from 1995 to 2004 with a keyword index and article abstract in order to explore how KM performance evaluation has developed during this period. Based on the scope of 76 articles from 78 academic journals of KM, this paper surveys and classifies KM measurements using the following eight categories: qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis, financial indicator analysis, non-financial indicator analysis, internal performance analysis, external performance analysis, project-oriented analysis, and organizational-oriented analysis together with their measurement matrices for different research and problem domains. Discussion is presented, indicating the followings future development directions for KM performance evaluation: (1) KM performance evaluation is getting more important. (2) The quantitative analysis is the primary methodology in KM performance evaluation. (3) Firms are now highlighting the KM performance of competitors, through benchmarking or best practices, rather than internally auditing KM performance via balanced scorecard. (4) Firms may begin to focus more on project management measurement, than on the entire organization.
-
Desale, S.K.; Kumbhar, R.: Research on automatic classification of documents in library environment : a literature review (2013)
0.02
0.021349952 = product of:
0.042699903 = sum of:
0.042699903 = product of:
0.08539981 = sum of:
0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08539981 = score(doc=1071,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.05109862 = queryNorm
0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper aims to provide an overview of automatic classification research, which focuses on issues related to the automatic classification of documents in a library environment. The review covers literature published in mainstream library and information science studies. The review was done on literature published in both academic and professional LIS journals and other documents. This review reveals that basically three types of research are being done on automatic classification: 1) hierarchical classification using different library classification schemes, 2) text categorization and document categorization using different type of classifiers with or without using training documents, and 3) automatic bibliographic classification. Predominantly this research is directed towards solving problems of organization of digital documents in an online environment. However, very little research is devoted towards solving the problems of arrangement of physical documents.
