Search (1548 results, page 1 of 78)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998) 0.15 
    0.15499915 = product of:
  0.3099983 = sum of:
    0.3099983 = sum of:
      0.25461304 = weight(_text_:journals in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25461304 = score(doc=3035,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.9923749 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055385258 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Studies the effects of e-journals on the scholarly communities they are serving. Considers to what extent scholars and researchers are aware of, influenced by, using, or building their own work on research published in e-journals. Draws a sample of scholarly, peer-reviewed e-journals and conducts several analyzes thorugh citation analysis. The data show that the impact of journals on scholarly communication has been minimal
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:56:06
  2. Speier, C.; Palmer, J.; Wren, D.; Hahn, S.: Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication : a question of prestige and legitimacy (1999) 0.14 
    0.14155903 = product of:
  0.28311807 = sum of:
    0.28311807 = sum of:
      0.22773282 = weight(_text_:journals in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22773282 = score(doc=3674,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.88760704 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
      0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055385258 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Recent years have seen a proliferation of electronic journals across academic disciplines. Electronic journals offer many advantages to multiple constituencies, however, their acceptance by faculty and university promotion and tenure committees is unclear. This research examines perceptions of faculty and promotion and tenure committee members regarding the perceived prestige and legitimacy of electronic journals as an outlet for scholarly communication
    Date
    22. 5.1999 14:43:47
  3. Valauskas, E.J.: Using the Internet in libraries (1994) 0.13 
    0.12693875 = product of:
  0.2538775 = sum of:
    0.2538775 = sum of:
      0.17079961 = weight(_text_:journals in 7053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17079961 = score(doc=7053,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.66570526 = fieldWeight in 7053, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7053)
      0.083077885 = weight(_text_:22 in 7053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083077885 = score(doc=7053,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7053, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7053)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Kapitel zu: Internet tools: Gopher, WAIS, World-Wide Web, NCSA Mosaic; Online library catalogues; Discussion lists; Electronic journals and newsletters; FTP
    Source
    IFLA journal. 20(1994) no.1, S.22-28
  4. Weibel, S.: ¬An architecture for scholarly publishing on the World Wide Web (1995) 0.13 
    0.12630384 = product of:
  0.25260767 = sum of:
    0.25260767 = sum of:
      0.19722241 = weight(_text_:journals in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19722241 = score(doc=4555,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.7686903 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
      0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055385258 = score(doc=4555,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    OCLC distributes several scholarly journals under its Electronic Journals Online programme, acting, in effect, as an 'electronic printer' for scholarly publishers. It is prototyping a WWW accessible version of these journals. Describes the problems encountered, detail some of the short term solutions, and highlight changes to existing standards that will enhance the use of the WWW for scholarly electronic publishing
    Date
    23. 7.1996 10:22:20
  5. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.11 
    0.10820834 = product of:
  0.21641669 = sum of:
    0.21641669 = sum of:
      0.16103142 = weight(_text_:journals in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16103142 = score(doc=3687,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.627633 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055385258 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey to assess the attitudes of scholarly users towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in 2 departments in each of 5 faculties of a UK university
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  6. Kreider, J.: ¬The correlation of local citation data with citation data from Journal Citation Reports (1999) 0.09 
    0.094727874 = product of:
  0.18945575 = sum of:
    0.18945575 = sum of:
      0.14791681 = weight(_text_:journals in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14791681 = score(doc=102,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.5765177 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
      0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041538943 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    University librarians continue to face the difficult task of determining which journals remain crucial for their collections during these times of static financial resources and escalating journal costs. One evaluative tool, Journal Citation Reports (JCR), recently has become available on CD-ROM, making it simpler for librarians to use its citation data as input for ranking journals. But many librarians remain unconvinced that the global citation data from the JCR bears enough correspondence to their local situation to be useful. In this project, I explore the correlation between global citation data available from JCR with local citation data generated specifically for the University of British Columbia, for 20 subject fields in the sciences and social sciences. The significant correlations obtained in this study suggest that large research-oriented university libraries could consider substituting global citation data for local citation data when evaluating their journals, with certain cautions.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Davis, E.; Stone, J.: ¬A painless route on to the Web : Web services 1: The Royal Postgraduate Medical School (1997) 0.08 
    0.08462583 = product of:
  0.16925167 = sum of:
    0.16925167 = sum of:
      0.11386641 = weight(_text_:journals in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11386641 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.44380352 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055385258 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    1st of 2 articles detailing how library management systems have been used in special libraries to launch WWW catalogue services. Describes how the Royal Postgraduate Medical School, London, UK, used Sirsi Unicorn software to add WWW browser catalogue access, WebCat, to their WWW service. Explains how WebCat was set up, its facilities, providing links to electronic journals, and links via the homepage to other sites
    Date
    29. 7.1998 21:22:27
  8. Chang, H.-Y.: Cataloguing electronic resources (1997) 0.08 
    0.08462583 = product of:
  0.16925167 = sum of:
    0.16925167 = sum of:
      0.11386641 = weight(_text_:journals in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11386641 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.44380352 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
      0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055385258 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Considers issues surrounding cataloguing electronic resources on the MELVYL online system at the University of California, USA. Considers implications of the differences between online and paper versions of serials, difficulties in providing precises information on holdings of full text articles, cataloguing rules changes that are need to integrate MARC formats, adding URLs as a subfield, archiving electronic journals and restricting access to electronic materials
    Source
    DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.22-24
  9. Satija, M.P.: Birth centenary literature on Ranganathan : a review (1993) 0.08 
    0.08462583 = product of:
  0.16925167 = sum of:
    0.16925167 = sum of:
      0.11386641 = weight(_text_:journals in 2518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11386641 = score(doc=2518,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.44380352 = fieldWeight in 2518, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2518)
      0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 2518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055385258 = score(doc=2518,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2518, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2518)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses the books and articles written to commemmorate the centenary of the birth of S.R. Ranganathan in 1992. 9 books were published for the occasion and 6 special issues of journals; in addition articles about Ranganathan appeared in at least 10 other periodicals. Topics covered included Ranganathan's biography, his research methodology, his influence on classification and library science, and evaluations of his work
    Date
    5. 1.1999 16:27:22
  10. Machovec, G.S.: Key elements in using technology for library support in distance education (1997) 0.08 
    0.08462583 = product of:
  0.16925167 = sum of:
    0.16925167 = sum of:
      0.11386641 = weight(_text_:journals in 3019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11386641 = score(doc=3019,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.44380352 = fieldWeight in 3019, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3019)
      0.055385258 = weight(_text_:22 in 3019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055385258 = score(doc=3019,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3019, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3019)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Traces the development of distance education programmes which has been fuelled by the non-traditional student, the growth of the Internet, television and videoconferencing. Key elements of library services for distance education are: reference services, a portfolio of nearby libraries or other resources, document delivery, provision of a broad suite of electronic databases, electronic journals, a database of subject specialists, and use of electronic resources on the WWW
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:25:34
  11. Clement, G.: science journals published on the Internet : Evolution of a species (1994) 0.08 
    0.079566576 = product of:
  0.15913315 = sum of:
    0.15913315 = product of:
      0.3182663 = sum of:
        0.3182663 = weight(_text_:journals in 976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3182663 = score(doc=976,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05109862 = queryNorm
            1.2404686 = fieldWeight in 976, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=976)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Examines science journals published on the Internet. Describes the form that these journals take and what they offer. Discusses whether these journals herald a new age in science publishing. Shows how to identify the journals, and where to find them. Describes how to access them and how to use them. Examines future trends
  12. Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.: ¬The standard impact factor as an evaluation tool of science fields and scientific journals (1996) 0.08 
    0.07531556 = product of:
  0.15063111 = sum of:
    0.15063111 = product of:
      0.30126223 = sum of:
        0.30126223 = weight(_text_:journals in 5075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30126223 = score(doc=5075,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05109862 = queryNorm
            1.1741939 = fieldWeight in 5075, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5075)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Introduces the standard impact factor for particular fields of science (Ig) and the relative impact factor K for scientific journals. The technique for the calculation of the standard impact factor for a field is an inherent part of a methods which allows a cross field evaluation of scientific journals. This method for evaluating scientific journals elaborated in 1988 was aimed at the analysis of Russian journals covered by the SCI database; it was also used for chemical journals and for journals in the life sciences
  13. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997) 0.07 
    0.06972865 = product of:
  0.1394573 = sum of:
    0.1394573 = product of:
      0.2789146 = sum of:
        0.2789146 = weight(_text_:journals in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2789146 = score(doc=2749,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05109862 = queryNorm
            1.0870922 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Structured abstracts have now become widespread in medical research journals. Considers whether or not such structured abstracts can be used effectively in social science journals. Reviews a a selection of studies to see if structured abstracts written for social science journals are more informative, easier to read and easier to search than their traditional equivalents. Results suggest that structured abstracts are appropriate for social science journals. Editors of social science journals should consider adopting structured abstracts
  14. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.06 
    0.06346937 = product of:
  0.12693875 = sum of:
    0.12693875 = sum of:
      0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08539981 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041538943 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  15. Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997) 0.06 
    0.06346937 = product of:
  0.12693875 = sum of:
    0.12693875 = sum of:
      0.08539981 = weight(_text_:journals in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08539981 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.33285263 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
      0.041538943 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041538943 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17893866 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05109862 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
  16. Udofia, U.I.: Selecting veterinary medical periodicals through citation analysis (1997) 0.06 
    0.061012566 = product of:
  0.12202513 = sum of:
    0.12202513 = product of:
      0.24405026 = sum of:
        0.24405026 = weight(_text_:journals in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24405026 = score(doc=785,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05109862 = queryNorm
            0.9512056 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Describes a study using citation analysis to select journals that could be used in the veterinary medical field. The study determines the principal journals to which a veterinary medical library should subscribe, thus obtaining the highest possible utility of materials. By using a database of 105 journals for a period of five years (1982-86), citation data were applied on the Bradford bibliography and Bradford-Zipf distribution to determine the ranking of journals in the field and the "core journals". Reports the results of the study which discovered that the Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa is the most cited journal with 305 citations, and the core journals were eight in number, having 1,067 citations representing 66.2 per cent of the total citations.
  17. Quinn, B.: Mainstreaming electronic journals through improved indexing : prospects for the social sciences (1999) 0.06 
    0.060386784 = product of:
  0.12077357 = sum of:
    0.12077357 = product of:
      0.24154714 = sum of:
        0.24154714 = weight(_text_:journals in 3130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24154714 = score(doc=3130,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05109862 = queryNorm
            0.94144946 = fieldWeight in 3130, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3130)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An overview in how far electronic journals are indexed in the major social sciences abstract services
  18. Gerhard, K.H.; Jacobson, T.E.; Williamson, S.G.: Indexing adequacy and interdisciplinary journals : the case of women's studies (1993) 0.06 
    0.056933206 = product of:
  0.11386641 = sum of:
    0.11386641 = product of:
      0.22773282 = sum of:
        0.22773282 = weight(_text_:journals in 5931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22773282 = score(doc=5931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05109862 = queryNorm
            0.88760704 = fieldWeight in 5931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5931)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. Gaines, B.R.: Social and technical dimensions of electronic journals (1993) 0.06 
    0.056933206 = product of:
  0.11386641 = sum of:
    0.11386641 = product of:
      0.22773282 = sum of:
        0.22773282 = weight(_text_:journals in 8026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22773282 = score(doc=8026,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05109862 = queryNorm
            0.88760704 = fieldWeight in 8026, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8026)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses the role of journals in knowledge dissemination and in the processes and value systems of scholarship. There are many different ways of attempting to improve scholarly communication using information technology, examines the dimensions of digital journals and presents a statement of objectives for the development of digital journals. Describes a number of simple initiatives oopen to the scholarly community that could develop digital publication services by mobilizing existing resources at a minimum cost with a high chance of success
  20. Woodward, H.; McKnight, C.: Electronic journals : issues of access and bibliographic control (1995) 0.06 
    0.056933206 = product of:
  0.11386641 = sum of:
    0.11386641 = product of:
      0.22773282 = sum of:
        0.22773282 = weight(_text_:journals in 3079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22773282 = score(doc=3079,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.25656942 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05109862 = queryNorm
            0.88760704 = fieldWeight in 3079, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.021064 = idf(docFreq=792, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    While the use of academic computer networks for scholarly communication purposes id widely documented, it is only recently that electronic journals have appeared on the network. Explores the issues of access to and bibliographic control of electronic journals from a local and national perspective, and to assist librarians in the implementation and enhancement of access mechanisms and bibliographic control of electronic journals by the identification of information sources and examination of good practice

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1315
  • m 134
  • s 70
  • el 20
  • i 16
  • b 9
  • r 8
  • x 6
  • ? 5
  • d 3
  • p 3
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications