Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Brown, D.J."
  1. Brown, D.J.: Access to scientific research : challenges facing communications in STM (2016) 0.09
    0.08530359 = product of:
      0.17060718 = sum of:
        0.17060718 = sum of:
          0.14286593 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14286593 = score(doc=3769,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051188353 = queryNorm
              0.5712626 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
          0.02774126 = weight(_text_:22 in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02774126 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1792529 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051188353 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The debate about access to scientific research raises questions about the current effectiveness of scholarly communication processes. This book explores, from an independent point of view, the current state of the STM publishing market, new publishing technologies and business models as well as the information habit of researchers, the politics of research funders, and the demand for scientific research as a public good. The book also investigates the democratisation of science including how the information needs of knowledge workers outside academia can be embraced in future.
    Content
    Inhalt: Chapter 1. Background -- Chapter 2. Definitions -- Chapter 3. Aims, Objectives, and Methodology -- Chapter 4. Setting the Scene -- Chapter 5. Information Society -- Chapter 6. Drivers for Change -- Chapter 7 A Dysfunctional STM Scene? -- Chapter 8. Comments on the Dysfunctionality of STM Publishing -- Chapter 9. The Main Stakeholders -- Chapter 10. Search and Discovery -- Chapter 11. Impact of Google -- Chapter 12. Psychological Issues -- Chapter 13. Users of Research Output -- Chapter 14. Underlying Sociological Developments -- Chapter 15. Social Media and Social Networking -- Chapter 16. Forms of Article Delivery -- Chapter 17. Future Communication Trends -- Chapter 18. Academic Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 19. Unaffiliated Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 20. The Professions -- Chapter 21. Small and Medium Enterprises -- Chapter 22. Citizen Scientists -- Chapter 23. Learned Societies -- Chapter 24. Business Models -- Chapter 25. Open Access -- Chapter 26. Political Initiatives -- Chapter 27. Summary and Conclusions -- Chapter 28. Research Questions Addressed
    LCSH
    Science publishing
    Scholarly publishing
    Subject
    Science publishing
    Scholarly publishing
  2. Brown, D.J.: Electronic publishing and libraries : Planning for the impact and growth to 2003 (1996) 0.05
    0.047248457 = product of:
      0.09449691 = sum of:
        0.09449691 = product of:
          0.18899383 = sum of:
            0.18899383 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18899383 = score(doc=3256,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051188353 = queryNorm
                0.7557093 = fieldWeight in 3256, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study, conducted by DJB Associates on behalf of the British Library, to forecast the future trends in electronic publishing during the period 1995 to 2003. The emphasis is on scholarly publishing and the project, initiated by the BL, Corporate Research Group, aimed to help in the BL's assessment of the acqusition policy for electronic media
    Content
    Vgl. auch die 2. Aufl. unter: Brown, D., R. Boulderstone: The impact of electronic publishing: the future for publishers and librarians.
  3. Brown, D.J.; Boulderstone, R.: ¬The impact of electronic publishing : the future for publishers and librarians 0.03
    0.02699912 = product of:
      0.05399824 = sum of:
        0.05399824 = product of:
          0.10799648 = sum of:
            0.10799648 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10799648 = score(doc=3589,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051188353 = queryNorm
                0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The second edition of Electronic Publishing and Libraries. It aims to quantify the future size of the electronic publishing industry, and provides practical data to support investment decisions as an aid to forward planning. All sources of the original book are revised and updated.
    Content
    2. Aufl. von: Brown, D.J.: Electronic publishing and libraries: Planning for the impact and growth to 2003. East Grinstead: Bowker-Saur 1996.
  4. Brown, D.J.: Repositories and journals: are they in conflict? : a literature review of relevant literature (2010) 0.02
    0.023864077 = product of:
      0.047728155 = sum of:
        0.047728155 = product of:
          0.09545631 = sum of:
            0.09545631 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09545631 = score(doc=3954,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051188353 = queryNorm
                0.38169086 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to bring together information on whether any evidence exists of a commercial conflict between the creation of digital archives at research institutions and by key subject centres of excellence, and the business of journal publishing. Design/methodology/approach - Relevant publications, including articles published in refereed books and journals, as well as informal commentaries on listservs, blogs and wikis, were analysed to determine whether there is any evidence of a commercial relationship. Findings - Most of the published comments are highly subjective and anecdotal - there is a significant emotional overtone to many of the views expressed. There is precious little hard evidence currently available to support or debunk the idea that a commercial conflict exists between repositories and journal subscriptions. The situation is made more difficult by the many technological, sociological and administrative changes that are taking place in parallel to the establishment of repositories. Practical implications - Separating the key drivers and their impact is a major strategic challenge facing all stakeholders in the scholarly communication industry in future. Research limitations/implications - This is an important area which requires close monitoring - the possible threat that the established journal publishing system could be eroded away by a new "free" scholarly information system needs attention. One significant study in this area is being undertaken by the PEER group, funded by the European Commission with hard evidence being collected by UCL's CIBER research group. The results from this impartial investigation will be very welcome. Originality/value - The paper shows that relationship between repositories and journal subscriptions is vague.