Search (111 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. St. Pierre, M.; LaPlante, B.: We used to call it publishing : issues in crosswalking content metadata standards (1999) 0.05 
    0.047248457 = product of:
  0.09449691 = sum of:
    0.09449691 = product of:
      0.18899383 = sum of:
        0.18899383 = weight(_text_:publishing in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18899383 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.7557093 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Wessel, C.: "Publishing and sharing your metadata application profile" : 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop in Bonn (2001) 0.04 
    0.04086975 = product of:
  0.0817395 = sum of:
    0.0817395 = sum of:
      0.05399824 = weight(_text_:publishing in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05399824 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051188353 = queryNorm
          0.21591695 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
      0.02774126 = weight(_text_:22 in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02774126 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1792529 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051188353 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 3.2001 17:10:22
  3. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03 
    0.029424053 = product of:
  0.058848105 = sum of:
    0.058848105 = product of:
      0.11769621 = sum of:
        0.11769621 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11769621 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1792529 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  4. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.03 
    0.02774126 = product of:
  0.05548252 = sum of:
    0.05548252 = product of:
      0.11096504 = sum of:
        0.11096504 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11096504 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1792529 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  5. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03 
    0.02774126 = product of:
  0.05548252 = sum of:
    0.05548252 = product of:
      0.11096504 = sum of:
        0.11096504 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11096504 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1792529 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  6. ¬A fine metadata mess is in prospect (1997) 0.03 
    0.02699912 = product of:
  0.05399824 = sum of:
    0.05399824 = product of:
      0.10799648 = sum of:
        0.10799648 = weight(_text_:publishing in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10799648 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Digital publishing technologies. 2(1997) no.7, S.6
  7. McDonough, J.P.: SGML and USMARC standard : applying markup to bibliographic data (1998) 0.03 
    0.02699912 = product of:
  0.05399824 = sum of:
    0.05399824 = product of:
      0.10799648 = sum of:
        0.10799648 = weight(_text_:publishing in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10799648 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The recent increase in electronic publishing has led many in the library community to consider altering standards for bibliographic data to promote greater compatibility between digital works and their bibliographic representation. SGML has been prominently mentioned as a mechanism for encoding bibliographic data. Examines the problems and potential of applying SGML to to USMARC record standard, with a particular emphasis on issues of field order and repeatability, character set encoding, and obsolete fields
  8. Markup and metadata (1998) 0.03 
    0.02699912 = product of:
  0.05399824 = sum of:
    0.05399824 = product of:
      0.10799648 = sum of:
        0.10799648 = weight(_text_:publishing in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10799648 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Digital publishing technologies. 3(1998) no.4, S.11-14
  9. Wendler, R.: Branching out : cataloging skills and functions in the digital age (1999) 0.03 
    0.02699912 = product of:
  0.05399824 = sum of:
    0.05399824 = product of:
      0.10799648 = sum of:
        0.10799648 = weight(_text_:publishing in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10799648 = score(doc=6100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Librarians create metadata including cataloging to manage and provide access to collections. Two recent technological developments, the explosion in electronic publishing and the conversion of metadata previously unavailable online into machine-readable form, are providing challenges to cataloging. Disparate types of resources, such as images and museum objects, archives, and library collections in print and electronic form, must be brought together in a coherent information environment. While catalogers exclusively cannot do these tasks, they and their skills are essential to bring order out of the chaos of the many different access systems
  10. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02 
    0.024273602 = product of:
  0.048547205 = sum of:
    0.048547205 = product of:
      0.09709441 = sum of:
        0.09709441 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09709441 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1792529 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.024273602 = product of:
  0.048547205 = sum of:
    0.048547205 = product of:
      0.09709441 = sum of:
        0.09709441 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09709441 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1792529 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02 
    0.024273602 = product of:
  0.048547205 = sum of:
    0.048547205 = product of:
      0.09709441 = sum of:
        0.09709441 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09709441 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1792529 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  13. Weibel, S.L.: Border crossings : reflections on a decade of metadata consensus building (2005) 0.02 
    0.023864077 = product of:
  0.047728155 = sum of:
    0.047728155 = product of:
      0.09545631 = sum of:
        0.09545631 = weight(_text_:publishing in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09545631 = score(doc=1187,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.38169086 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In June of this year, I performed my final official duties as part of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative management team. It is a happy irony to affix a seal on that service in this journal, as both D-Lib Magazine and the Dublin Core celebrate their tenth anniversaries. This essay is a personal reflection on some of the achievements and lessons of that decade. The OCLC-NCSA Metadata Workshop took place in March of 1995, and as we tried to understand what it meant and who would care, D-Lib magazine came into being and offered a natural venue for sharing our work. I recall a certain skepticism when Bill Arms said "We want D-Lib to be the first place people look for the latest developments in digital library research." These were the early days in the evolution of electronic publishing, and the goal was ambitious. By any measure, a decade of high-quality electronic publishing is an auspicious accomplishment, and D-Lib (and its host, CNRI) deserve congratulations for having achieved their goal. I am grateful to have been a contributor. That first DC workshop led to further workshops, a community, a variety of standards in several countries, an ISO standard, a conference series, and an international consortium. Looking back on this evolution is both satisfying and wistful. While I am pleased that the achievements are substantial, the unmet challenges also provide a rich till in which to cultivate insights on the development of digital infrastructure.
  14. Social tagging in a linked data environment. Edited by Diane Rasmussen Pennington and Louise F. Spiteri. London, UK: Facet Publishing, 2018. 240 pp. £74.95 (paperback). (ISBN 9781783303380) (2019) 0.02 
    0.023864077 = product of:
  0.047728155 = sum of:
    0.047728155 = product of:
      0.09545631 = sum of:
        0.09545631 = weight(_text_:publishing in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09545631 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.38169086 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Imprint
    London, UK : Facet Publishing
  15. Rossiter, B.N.; Sillitoe, T.J.; Heather, M.A.: Database support for very large hypertexts (1990) 0.02 
    0.023624228 = product of:
  0.047248457 = sum of:
    0.047248457 = product of:
      0.09449691 = sum of:
        0.09449691 = weight(_text_:publishing in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09449691 = score(doc=48,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.37785465 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Electronic publishing review. 3(1990) no.3, S.141-154
  16. Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997) 0.02 
    0.023624228 = product of:
  0.047248457 = sum of:
    0.047248457 = product of:
      0.09449691 = sum of:
        0.09449691 = weight(_text_:publishing in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09449691 = score(doc=892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.37785465 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Secondary information, e.g. MARC based bibliographic records, comprises structured data for identifying, tagging, retrieving and management of primary documents. SGML, the standard format for coding content and structure of primary documents, was introduced in 1986 as a publishing tool but is now being applied to bibliographic records. SGML now comprises standard definitions (DTD) for books, serials, articles and mathematical formulae. A simplified version (HTML) is used for Web pages. Pilot projects to develop SGML as a standard for bibliographic exchange include the Dublin Core, listing 13 descriptive elements for Internet documents; the French GRISELI programme using SGML for exchanging grey literature and US experiments on reformatting USMARC for use with SGML-based records
  17. Zhang, J.; Jastram, I.: ¬A study of the metadata creation behavior of different user groups on the Internet (2006) 0.02 
    0.023624228 = product of:
  0.047248457 = sum of:
    0.047248457 = product of:
      0.09449691 = sum of:
        0.09449691 = weight(_text_:publishing in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09449691 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.37785465 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Metadata is designed to improve information organization and information retrieval effectiveness and efficiency on the Internet. The way web publishers respond to metadata and the way they use it when publishing their web pages, however, is still a mystery. The authors of this paper aim to solve this mystery by defining different professional publisher groups, examining the behaviors of these user groups, and identifying the characteristics of their metadata use. This study will enhance the current understanding of metadata application behavior and provide evidence useful to researchers, web publishers, and search engine designers.
  18. Miller, E.: ¬An introduction to the Resource Description Framework (1998) 0.02 
    0.023624228 = product of:
  0.047248457 = sum of:
    0.047248457 = product of:
      0.09449691 = sum of:
        0.09449691 = weight(_text_:publishing in 1231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09449691 = score(doc=1231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.37785465 = fieldWeight in 1231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is an infrastructure that enables the encoding, exchange and reuse of structured metadata. RDF is an application of XML that imposes needed structural constraints to provide unambiguous methods of expressing semantics. RDF additionally provides a means for publishing both human-readable and machine-processable vocabularies designed to encourage the reuse and extension of metadata semantics among disparate information communities. The structural constraints RDF imposes to support the consistent encoding and exchange of standardized metadata provides for the interchangeability of separate packages of metadata defined by different resource description communities.
  19. Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.: Linked data for Lilibraries, archives and museums : how to clean, link, and publish your metadata (2014) 0.02 
    0.023381924 = product of:
  0.04676385 = sum of:
    0.04676385 = product of:
      0.0935277 = sum of:
        0.0935277 = weight(_text_:publishing in 5153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0935277 = score(doc=5153,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.250088 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.37397915 = fieldWeight in 5153, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5153)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This highly practical handbook teaches you how to unlock the value of your existing metadata through cleaning, reconciliation, enrichment and linking and how to streamline the process of new metadata creation. Libraries, archives and museums are facing up to the challenge of providing access to fast growing collections whilst managing cuts to budgets. Key to this is the creation, linking and publishing of good quality metadata as Linked Data that will allow their collections to be discovered, accessed and disseminated in a sustainable manner. This highly practical handbook teaches you how to unlock the value of your existing metadata through cleaning, reconciliation, enrichment and linking and how to streamline the process of new metadata creation. Metadata experts Seth van Hooland and Ruben Verborgh introduce the key concepts of metadata standards and Linked Data and how they can be practically applied to existing metadata, giving readers the tools and understanding to achieve maximum results with limited resources. Readers will learn how to critically assess and use (semi-)automated methods of managing metadata through hands-on exercises within the book and on the accompanying website. Each chapter is built around a case study from institutions around the world, demonstrating how freely available tools are being successfully used in different metadata contexts. This handbook delivers the necessary conceptual and practical understanding to empower practitioners to make the right decisions when making their organisations resources accessible on the Web. Key topics include, the value of metadata; metadata creation - architecture, data models and standards; metadata cleaning; metadata reconciliation; metadata enrichment through Linked Data and named-entity recognition; importing and exporting metadata; ensuring a sustainable publishing model. This will be an invaluable guide for metadata practitioners and researchers within all cultural heritage contexts, from library cataloguers and archivists to museum curatorial staff. It will also be of interest to students and academics within information science and digital humanities fields. IT managers with responsibility for information systems, as well as strategy heads and budget holders, at cultural heritage organisations, will find this a valuable decision-making aid.
    Imprint
    London : Facet Publishing
  20. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02 
    0.020805946 = product of:
  0.04161189 = sum of:
    0.04161189 = product of:
      0.08322378 = sum of:
        0.08322378 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08322378 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1792529 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051188353 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 98
  • d 10
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 98
  • el 9
  • m 8
  • s 7
  • b 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications