Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Soergel, D."
  1. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.09 
    0.090601936 = product of:
  0.18120387 = sum of:
    0.18120387 = sum of:
      0.1121911 = weight(_text_:learning in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1121911 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05145426 = queryNorm
          0.48834592 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
      0.06901277 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06901277 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05145426 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Soergel, D.: Unleashing the power of data through organization : structure and connections for meaning, learning and discovery (2015) 0.07 
    0.066501744 = product of:
  0.13300349 = sum of:
    0.13300349 = sum of:
      0.09814678 = weight(_text_:learning in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09814678 = score(doc=2376,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05145426 = queryNorm
          0.42721373 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
      0.03485671 = weight(_text_:22 in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03485671 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05145426 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization is needed everywhere. Its importance is marked by its pervasiveness. This paper will show many areas, tasks, and functions where proper use of knowledge organization, construed as broadly as the term implies, provides support for learning and understanding, for sense making and meaning making, for inference, and for discovery by people and computer programs and thereby will make the world a better place. The paper focuses not on metadata but rather on structuring and representing the actual data or knowledge itself and argues for more communication between the largely separated KO, ontology, data modeling, and semantic web communities to address the many problems that need better solutions. In particular, the paper discusses the application of knowledge organization in knowledge bases for question answering and cognitive systems, knowledge bases for information extraction from text or multimedia, linked data, big data and data analytics, electronic health records as one example, influence diagrams (causal maps), dynamic system models, process diagrams, concept maps, and other node-link diagrams, information systems in organizations, knowledge organization for understanding and learning, and knowledge transfer between domains. The paper argues for moving beyond triples to a more powerful representation using entities and multi-way relationships but not attributes.
    Date
    27.11.2015 20:52:22
  3. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.06 
    0.057496607 = product of:
  0.114993215 = sum of:
    0.114993215 = sum of:
      0.08013651 = weight(_text_:learning in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08013651 = score(doc=1344,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05145426 = queryNorm
          0.34881854 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
      0.03485671 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03485671 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05145426 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This review introduces a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking to provide a theoretical basis for: - empirical studies that improve our understanding of the cognitive process and mechanisms of sensemaking and integration of results of such studies; - education in critical thinking and sensemaking skills; - the design of sensemaking assistant tools that support and guide users. The paper reviews and extends existing sensemaking models with ideas from learning and cognition. It reviews literature on sensemaking models in human-computer interaction (HCI), cognitive system engineering, organizational communication, and library and information sciences (LIS), learning theories, cognitive psychology, and task-based information seeking. The model resulting from this synthesis moves to a stronger basis for explaining sensemaking behaviors and conceptual changes. The model illustrates the iterative processes of sensemaking, extends existing models that focus on activities by integrating cognitive mechanisms and the creation of instantiated structure elements of knowledge, and different types of conceptual change to show a complete picture of the cognitive processes of sensemaking. The processes and cognitive mechanisms identified provide better foundations for knowledge creation, organization, and sharing practices and a stronger basis for design of sensemaking assistant systems and tools.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
  4. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Cognitive mechanisms in sensemaking : a qualitative user study (2020) 0.02 
    0.024536695 = product of:
  0.04907339 = sum of:
    0.04907339 = product of:
      0.09814678 = sum of:
        0.09814678 = weight(_text_:learning in 5614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09814678 = score(doc=5614,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05145426 = queryNorm
            0.42721373 = fieldWeight in 5614, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5614)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Throughout an information search, a user needs to make sense of the information found to create an understanding. This requires cognitive effort that can be demanding. Building on prior sensemaking models and expanding them with ideas from learning and cognitive psychology, we examined the use of cognitive mechanisms during individual sensemaking. We conducted a qualitative user study of 15 students who searched for and made sense of information for business analysis and news writing tasks. Through the analysis of think-aloud protocols, recordings of screen movements, intermediate work products of sensemaking, including notes and concept maps, and final reports, we observed the use of 17 data-driven and structure-driven mechanisms for processing new information, examining individual concepts and relationships, and detecting anomalies. These cognitive mechanisms, as the basic operators that move sensemaking forward, provide in-depth understanding of how people process information to produce sense. Meaningful learning and sensemaking are closely related, so our findings apply to learning as well. Our results contribute to a better understanding of the sensemaking process-how people think-and this better understanding can inform the teaching of thinking skills and the design of improved sensemaking assistants and mind tools.
  5. Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018) 0.01 
    0.013942684 = product of:
  0.027885368 = sum of:
    0.027885368 = product of:
      0.055770736 = sum of:
        0.055770736 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055770736 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05145426 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 1.2019 19:04:22
  6. Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006) 0.01 
    0.010457013 = product of:
  0.020914026 = sum of:
    0.020914026 = product of:
      0.04182805 = sum of:
        0.04182805 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04182805 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05145426 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:04:19
  7. Ahn, J.-w.; Soergel, D.; Lin, X.; Zhang, M.: Mapping between ARTstor terms and the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus (2014) 0.01 
    0.010457013 = product of:
  0.020914026 = sum of:
    0.020914026 = product of:
      0.04182805 = sum of:
        0.04182805 = weight(_text_:22 in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04182805 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05145426 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

Authors

Years

Themes