Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Semantic Web"
  1. Multimedia content and the Semantic Web : methods, standards, and tools (2005) 0.03
    0.029259665 = product of:
      0.05851933 = sum of:
        0.05851933 = sum of:
          0.028332531 = weight(_text_:learning in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028332531 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05145426 = queryNorm
              0.12332597 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
          0.030186798 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030186798 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05145426 = queryNorm
              0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    006.7 22
    Date
    7. 3.2007 19:30:22
    DDC
    006.7 22
    Footnote
    Semantic web technologies are explained, and ontology representation is emphasized. There is an excellent summary of the fundamental theory behind applying a knowledge-engineering approach to vision problems. This summary represents the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis. A definition of the fuzzy knowledge representation that can be used for realization in multimedia content applications has been provided, with a comprehensive analysis. The second part of the book introduces the multimedia content analysis approaches and applications. In addition, some examples of methods applicable to multimedia content analysis are presented. Multimedia content analysis is a very diverse field and concerns many other research fields at the same time; this creates strong diversity issues, as everything from low-level features (e.g., colors, DCT coefficients, motion vectors, etc.) up to the very high and semantic level (e.g., Object, Events, Tracks, etc.) are involved. The second part includes topics on structure identification (e.g., shot detection for video sequences), and object-based video indexing. These conventional analysis methods are supplemented by results on semantic multimedia analysis, including three detailed chapters on the development and use of knowledge models for automatic multimedia analysis. Starting from object-based indexing and continuing with machine learning, these three chapters are very logically organized. Because of the diversity of this research field, including several chapters of recent research results is not sufficient to cover the state of the art of multimedia. The editors of the book should write an introductory chapter about multimedia content analysis approaches, basic problems, and technical issues and challenges, and try to survey the state of the art of the field and thus introduce the field to the reader.
  2. Fensel, D.: Ontologies : a silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce (2004) 0.01
    0.012323707 = product of:
      0.024647415 = sum of:
        0.024647415 = product of:
          0.04929483 = sum of:
            0.04929483 = weight(_text_:22 in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04929483 = score(doc=1949,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    004.67/8 22
    DDC
    004.67/8 22
  3. Manning, C.D.; Raghavan, P.; Schütze, H.: Introduction to information retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.011333013 = product of:
      0.022666026 = sum of:
        0.022666026 = product of:
          0.04533205 = sum of:
            0.04533205 = weight(_text_:learning in 4041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04533205 = score(doc=4041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.19732155 = fieldWeight in 4041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4041)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Boolean retrieval - The term vocabulary & postings lists - Dictionaries and tolerant retrieval - Index construction - Index compression - Scoring, term weighting & the vector space model - Computing scores in a complete search system - Evaluation in information retrieval - Relevance feedback & query expansion - XML retrieval - Probabilistic information retrieval - Language models for information retrieval - Text classification & Naive Bayes - Vector space classification - Support vector machines & machine learning on documents - Flat clustering - Hierarchical clustering - Matrix decompositions & latent semantic indexing - Web search basics - Web crawling and indexes - Link analysis Vgl. die digitale Fassung unter: http://nlp.stanford.edu/IR-book/pdf/irbookprint.pdf.
  4. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.010457013 = product of:
      0.020914026 = sum of:
        0.020914026 = product of:
          0.04182805 = sum of:
            0.04182805 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04182805 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
  5. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.01
    0.010457013 = product of:
      0.020914026 = sum of:
        0.020914026 = product of:
          0.04182805 = sum of:
            0.04182805 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04182805 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
  6. Antoniou, G.; Harmelen, F. van: ¬A semantic Web primer (2004) 0.01
    0.007083133 = product of:
      0.014166266 = sum of:
        0.014166266 = product of:
          0.028332531 = sum of:
            0.028332531 = weight(_text_:learning in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028332531 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22973695 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.12332597 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    The next chapter introduces resource description framework (RDF) and RDF schema (RDFS). Unlike XML, RDF provides a foundation for expressing the semantics of dada: it is a standard dada model for machine-processable semantics. Resource description framework schema offers a number of modeling primitives for organizing RDF vocabularies in typed hierarchies. In addition to RDF and RDFS, a query language for RDF, i.e. RQL. is introduced. This chapter and the next chapter are two of the most important chapters in the book. Chapter 4 presents another language called Web Ontology Language (OWL). Because RDFS is quite primitive as a modeling language for the Web, more powerful languages are needed. A richer language. DAML+OIL, is thus proposed as a joint endeavor of the United States and Europe. OWL takes DAML+OIL as the starting point, and aims to be the standardized and broadly accepted ontology language. At the beginning of the chapter, the nontrivial relation with RDF/RDFS is discussed. Then the authors describe the various language elements of OWL in some detail. Moreover, Appendix A contains an abstract OWL syntax. which compresses OWL and makes OWL much easier to read. Chapter 5 covers both monotonic and nonmonotonic rules. Whereas the previous chapter's mainly concentrate on specializations of knowledge representation, this chapter depicts the foundation of knowledge representation and inference. Two examples are also givwn to explain monotonic and non-monotonic rules, respectively. "To get the most out of the chapter. readers had better gain a thorough understanding of predicate logic first. Chapter 6 presents several realistic application scenarios to which the Semantic Web technology can be applied. including horizontal information products at Elsevier, data integration at Audi, skill finding at Swiss Life, a think tank portal at EnerSearch, e-learning. Web services, multimedia collection indexing, online procurement, raid device interoperability. These case studies give us some real feelings about the Semantic Web.
  7. Daconta, M.C.; Oberst, L.J.; Smith, K.T.: ¬The Semantic Web : A guide to the future of XML, Web services and knowledge management (2003) 0.01
    0.006971342 = product of:
      0.013942684 = sum of:
        0.013942684 = product of:
          0.027885368 = sum of:
            0.027885368 = weight(_text_:22 in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027885368 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18018405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05145426 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2007 10:37:38

Types