Search (78 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"sp"
  1. Gonzalez, A.C.: Analisis y diseno de sistemas de gestion electronica de documentacion en grandes entidades (1997) 0.05
    0.04558525 = product of:
      0.15954836 = sum of:
        0.047353994 = weight(_text_:systems in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047353994 = score(doc=2923,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
        0.11219436 = sum of:
          0.06871759 = weight(_text_:applications in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06871759 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04011181 = queryNorm
              0.38913056 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
          0.04347677 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04347677 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04011181 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan
    Date
    11. 2.1999 21:02:22
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Analysis and design of electronic document management systems in large enterprises
  2. Casanova, P.G.: Clasificaciones y definiciones : notas para un bibliotecario (1996) 0.03
    0.03031678 = product of:
      0.07073915 = sum of:
        0.035515495 = weight(_text_:systems in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035515495 = score(doc=990,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
        0.009225064 = product of:
          0.018450128 = sum of:
            0.018450128 = weight(_text_:science in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018450128 = score(doc=990,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.025998589 = weight(_text_:library in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025998589 = score(doc=990,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The idea of classification is based on the concept of fixed and absolute order, though each classification system reflects its historical origin and its subject to the characteristics of the individual who applies it as well as variations in the real world. Traditional classifications sought to establish differences and hierarchies, reflected in libraries in such systems as LC and Dewey. The scientific revolution of the mid 20th century introduced theories of interdisciplinarity resulting in the need for new approaches to library classification as a practical tool for locating texts as well as a way of ordering concepts. Computerised systems offer the advantage of flexibility, with the concomitant problem of noise. Users must therefore be trained to understand that categories and networks are employed not as dogmatically but relatively
    Content
    Presentation given at the 14th Library Science Research colloquy at the national Autonomous University of Mexico
  3. Saracevic, T.: Ciencia da informacao, origem, evolucao e relacoes (1996) 0.03
    0.029563487 = product of:
      0.103472196 = sum of:
        0.08508842 = sum of:
          0.052184846 = weight(_text_:science in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052184846 = score(doc=811,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04011181 = queryNorm
              0.49389738 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
          0.03290357 = weight(_text_:29 in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03290357 = score(doc=811,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04011181 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
        0.018383777 = weight(_text_:library in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018383777 = score(doc=811,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Information science is best defined as a discipline in terms of the problems it addresses. Its origins date back to the scientific and technical revolution after the 2nd World War, and its development has been essentially characterised by interdisciplinarity. Librarianship, computer science, cognitive science and communication studies all share interests with infomation science, but with increasing emphasis on the information society and the information industry dictated by technological imparatives, information science is now at a critical point in its evolution. The problem it sets out to solve are not decreasing but changing, with the pressure to improve access to an ever increasing store of knowledge. The social need for information science is evident, whatever the name given to the knowledge and skills which it encompasses
    Content
    Translation of a presentation given at the International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science held at the University of Tampere in Aug 1991
    Date
    29. 1.1996 18:23:13
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Information science: origin, evolution and relations
  4. Cardona de Gil, B.N.: Nuevos paradigmas para el acceso y uso de la informacion : la biblioteca virtual (1996) 0.03
    0.025858672 = product of:
      0.060336903 = sum of:
        0.02511325 = weight(_text_:systems in 1460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02511325 = score(doc=1460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 1460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1460)
        0.009225064 = product of:
          0.018450128 = sum of:
            0.018450128 = weight(_text_:science in 1460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018450128 = score(doc=1460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.025998589 = weight(_text_:library in 1460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025998589 = score(doc=1460,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 1460, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1460)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    For higher education, new technology opens up the possibility of online access to international information networks comprising the totality of human knowledge. Developing countries however risk becoming marginalized because they have no culture of cooperation. The Colombian Institute for the Development of Higher Education, ICFES, has been instrumental in developing the National Science and Technology Information Network, linked in 1993 to the National Higher Education System. The next step is to create a common communications infrastructure for all national systems, based on Internet protocols, so that all information units can link into the resources of the virtual library
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: New paradigms for information access and use: the virtual library
  5. Alonso, M.A.L.: ¬Los tesauros conceptuales como herramienta de precision en los sistemas de organizacion cientifica (1999) 0.02
    0.023666881 = product of:
      0.08283408 = sum of:
        0.0502265 = weight(_text_:systems in 3894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0502265 = score(doc=3894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 3894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3894)
        0.032607578 = product of:
          0.065215155 = sum of:
            0.065215155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065215155 = score(doc=3894,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3894, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3894)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Conceptual thesauri as precision tools in scientific organisation systems
    Source
    Revista interamericana de bibliotecologia. 22(1999) no.1, S.21-35
  6. Rojas, M.A.R.: ¬Un analisis filosofico de la bibliotecologia (1996) 0.02
    0.020578418 = product of:
      0.07202446 = sum of:
        0.02406585 = product of:
          0.0481317 = sum of:
            0.0481317 = weight(_text_:science in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0481317 = score(doc=825,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.45553684 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.047958605 = weight(_text_:library in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047958605 = score(doc=825,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.45471698 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Discussion of the ontological status of library science, drawing on theoretical perspectives derived from Aristotle, Husserl, Heidegger and Marx. The objects and laws of library science as part of the social sciences are widely disputed. Library science is concerned with elements in the real world - documents, libraries, users - and has its roots in the human need for self-knowldge through documents as the objectivisation of the human spirit. Essentially a practical discipline, library science also has a theoretical basis reflecting objective relations between objective elements: its future development will be determined by its continuing adaptation so as to satisfy human needs
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: A philosophical analysis of library science
  7. Rojas, M.A.R.: Debate abierto sobre epistemologia de la bibliotecologia (1996) 0.02
    0.020578418 = product of:
      0.07202446 = sum of:
        0.02406585 = product of:
          0.0481317 = sum of:
            0.0481317 = weight(_text_:science in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0481317 = score(doc=826,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.45553684 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.047958605 = weight(_text_:library in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047958605 = score(doc=826,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.45471698 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Report of a concluding session at the 14th colloquy on library science at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, to discuss issues raised by the formal sessions on theoretical and philosophical problems. Three main themes emerged: (1) library science does have specific status although its specific limits, concepts and terminology are not agreed; (2) the ethical aspects, especially the question of the moral responsibilities of the leaders of the library science community, give rise to concern especially in relation to teaching curricula; and (3) the relation between information technology and society, which should ensure priority goes to the social aspects of library science in aiding human development
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Open debate on the epistemology of library science
  8. Souza, S.d.: Informacion : utopia y realidad de la bibliotelogia (1996) 0.02
    0.020353032 = product of:
      0.07123561 = sum of:
        0.022596702 = product of:
          0.045193404 = sum of:
            0.045193404 = weight(_text_:science in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045193404 = score(doc=824,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.42772767 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.048638906 = weight(_text_:library in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048638906 = score(doc=824,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.46116722 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Library science has no strong scientific image bacause it lacks a consistent theoretical framework. The key element is information, information is knowlegde, and library science is knowledge in the service of society. Society itself is sustained by development, information and ideology, with information as the transforming element. Because of the universal need for information, library science is increasingly valued. The great problem is to delimit the object of study because of its vast area of application. The goals of library science are utopian, bound up with making information available to everyone in the best possible way. But although developments suchg as the Internet seem able to make this possible, in reality computerised information is available only to a minority
    Content
    Presentation given at a round table on paradigmatic focuses of library sceince, during the 14th colloquy on library science at the National Autonomous University of Mexiko
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Information: utopia and reality in library science
  9. Aguado, P.M.: ¬Los sistemas expertos y la recuperacion documental : ejemplos de aplicacion (1995) 0.02
    0.01938375 = product of:
      0.067843124 = sum of:
        0.033484332 = weight(_text_:systems in 6746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033484332 = score(doc=6746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 6746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6746)
        0.034358796 = product of:
          0.06871759 = sum of:
            0.06871759 = weight(_text_:applications in 6746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06871759 = score(doc=6746,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.38913056 = fieldWeight in 6746, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6746)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews ways in which artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can be used for lawyers, based on typical procedures derived from the philosophy of law. Develops information tools by modelling legal problems into applications through AI. Illustrates this with ARPO-2, a prototype expert system in the field of legal information retrieval
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Expert systems and information retrieval: examples of application
  10. Yepes, J.L.: ¬El concepto de ciencia de la documentacion : unidad en la diversidad o diversidad en la unidad (1996) 0.02
    0.016071105 = product of:
      0.056248866 = sum of:
        0.024407228 = product of:
          0.048814457 = sum of:
            0.048814457 = weight(_text_:science in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048814457 = score(doc=812,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.4619987 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03184164 = weight(_text_:library in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03184164 = score(doc=812,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Documentation science has scientific status in that there is an identifiable scientific community and it uses research for problem-solving. It is characterised by both unity in diversity (i.e. documentation science integrates previous sciences such as library science, archive studies) and diversity in unity (i.e. it involves a whole range of non-documentation based disciplines). Documentation science seeks to generate new knowledge about documentary information, for the purpose of satisfying determined information needs. On this basis it can be understood as a conjunction of disciplines and sciences concerned with the study of that part of the documentation process focusing on information retrieval and dissemination
    Content
    Presentation given at a round table on paradigmatic focuses of library science, during the 14th colloque on library science at the National Autonomous University of Mexico
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The concept of information science: unity in diversity or diversity in unity
  11. Mostafa, S.P.: Enfoqies paradigmaticos de bibliotecologia : unidade na diversidad na unidad (1996) 0.02
    0.016071105 = product of:
      0.056248866 = sum of:
        0.024407228 = product of:
          0.048814457 = sum of:
            0.048814457 = weight(_text_:science in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048814457 = score(doc=829,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.4619987 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03184164 = weight(_text_:library in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03184164 = score(doc=829,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Information science is currently dominated by 2 paradigms: one emphasises information retrieval as a technological process, based on natural sciences; the other derives from the social sciences, focusing on the information process as a communication act. The first is based on the structure of atoms, the second as people as collective actors. In Brazil the social science approach predominates, chiefly through the influence of 3 currents of thought: American liberalism; German social democracy and French post-structuralism. The ideas of the chief exponents of these theories have been developed by Brazilian researchers, introducing elements from political economy, quantum physics, linguistics, social science and epistemology. This interdisciplinarity is the key to unity in information science
    Content
    Presentation given at a round table on paradigmatic focuses of library science, during the 14th colloque on library science at the National Autonomous University of Mexico
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Paradigmatic focuses of library science: unit of diversity or diversity in unity
  12. Perez, M.J.L.-H.: Metodologia para la ensenanze de la CDU a estudiantes de biblioteconomia y documentacion (1995) 0.01
    0.01487421 = product of:
      0.052059732 = sum of:
        0.017394949 = product of:
          0.034789898 = sum of:
            0.034789898 = weight(_text_:science in 5436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034789898 = score(doc=5436,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 5436, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5436)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.034664784 = weight(_text_:library in 5436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034664784 = score(doc=5436,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 5436, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5436)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies those skills required by a library and information science graduate. Describes a method for teaching UDC based on an analytic-synthetic approach to classification structure and function. This method reduces the practical time needed for learning UDC
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: A methodology for teaching UDC to undergraduate students in library and information science
  13. Eugenio, M.; Franca, R.O.; Perez, R.C.: Ciencia da informacao sob a otica paradigmatica de Thomas Kuhn : elementos de reflexao (1996) 0.01
    0.0141814025 = product of:
      0.099269815 = sum of:
        0.099269815 = sum of:
          0.06088232 = weight(_text_:science in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06088232 = score(doc=817,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04011181 = queryNorm
              0.5762136 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
          0.038387496 = weight(_text_:29 in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038387496 = score(doc=817,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04011181 = queryNorm
              0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    There is no generally agreed definition of what constitutes information or information science, but Kuhn's notion of paradigms provides a useful perspective for analysing current theories. If information science is considerd as an 'immature science', i.e. one yet to develop its own paradigm, this links it to the debate about science and technology: many of the activities associated with information science, e.g. organising information for users by creating databases, belong to the domain of technology. On this basis, computer related activities concerned with information can be dissociated from the domain of computer science, thus establishing an independent status for information science
    Date
    29. 1.1996 18:23:13
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Information science in the paradigmatic view of Thomas Kuhn: elements for reflection
  14. Solis, A.Q.; Navarrete, O.A.: Medidas de calidad en la creacion de catalogos de bibliotecas (1998) 0.01
    0.014100793 = product of:
      0.049352773 = sum of:
        0.030331684 = weight(_text_:library in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030331684 = score(doc=2825,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
        0.019021088 = product of:
          0.038042177 = sum of:
            0.038042177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038042177 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    A discussion of the importance of clear cataloguing policies and routines as the basis of quality control, in relation to the methods used in the College of Mexico Library. The fundamental principle is to prevent errors occuring rather than to correct them subsequently. Indices of quality and effiency in relation to errors which do and do not affect retrieval, established through monthly review of samples of the work of each cataloguer, are used to monitor activities and ensure high standards. This process, essentially collaborative, promotes an overall culture of quality
    Date
    30. 1.1999 19:22:45
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Measures of quality in the creation of library catalogues
  15. Gnoli, C.: Fundamentos ontológicos de la organización del conocimiento : la teoría de los niveles integrativos aplicada al orden de cita (2011) 0.01
    0.0138298515 = product of:
      0.048404478 = sum of:
        0.03743662 = weight(_text_:systems in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03743662 = score(doc=2659,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.3036947 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
        0.010967856 = product of:
          0.021935713 = sum of:
            0.021935713 = weight(_text_:29 in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021935713 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The field of knowledge organization (KO) can be described as composed of the four distinct but connected layers of theory, systems, representation, and application. This paper focuses on the relations between KO theory and KO systems. It is acknowledged how the structure of KO systems is the product of a mixture of ontological, epistemological, and pragmatical factors. However, different systems give different priorities to each factor. A more ontologically-oriented approach, though not offering quick solutions for any particular group of users, will produce systems of wide and long-lasting application as they are based on general, shareable principles. I take the case of the ontological theory of integrative levels, which has been considered as a useful source for general classifications for several decades, and is currently implemented in the Integrative Levels Classification system. The theory produces a sequence of main classes modelling a natural order between phenomena. This order has interesting effects also on other features of the system, like the citation order of concepts within compounds. As it has been shown by facet analytical theory, it is useful that citation order follow a principle of inversion, as compared to the order of the same concepts in the schedules. In the light of integrative levels theory, this principle also acquires an ontological meaning: phenomena of lower level should be cited first, as most often they act as specifications of higher-level ones. This ontological principle should be complemented by consideration of the epistemological treatment of phenomena: in case a lower-level phenomenon is the main theme, it can be promoted to the leading position in the compound subject heading. The integration of these principles is believed to produce optimal results in the ordering of knowledge contents.
    Source
    Scire. 17(2011) no.1, S.29-34
  16. Quijano-Solis, A.: Bibliotecas y Tecnologias una Propuesta de Integracion (1999) 0.01
    0.013360786 = product of:
      0.04676275 = sum of:
        0.016742166 = weight(_text_:systems in 6099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016742166 = score(doc=6099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.1358164 = fieldWeight in 6099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6099)
        0.030020583 = weight(_text_:library in 6099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030020583 = score(doc=6099,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.28463858 = fieldWeight in 6099, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6099)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines some of the ways in which the Biblioteca Daniel Cosio Villegas of El Colegio de Mexico is responding to meet goals stated in the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico's 1997-2000 Development Plan. The Plan aims to prepare students for life-long learning by teaching them reasoning and questioning skills as well a competencies in selecting, organizing and processing information from diverse systems and sources. It notes the need to discover the skill library professionals must have in order to assist patrons effectively to become self-sufficient users of information. The environment examined is one where most college and university students are products of a very traditional primary and secondary educational system that emphasizes learning through the use of class lectures and assigned textbooks rather than research and self-discovery. The author points out the need for library professionals in Mexico's institutions of higher education to teach students how to learn to access and process information themselves in order to transform this information into knowledge they can use. Some of the administrative changes made at the Biblioteca Daniel Cosio Villegas to accomplish this are described. These include: more participation by library professionals in planning; favoring matrical organization between departments and projects and making decisions in a more collegial fashion; subject specialization by library professionals who select, catalog, classify and give service in a specific area; and incorporation of the user into the evaluation of existing processes and services and the creation of new ones which favor a more efficacious development of their information skills. The author concludes by proposing three basic principles to guide the re-engineering process that must be undertaken by academic libraries if they are to survive and seek to shape the future of information technology rather than just responding to the challenges it presents. These principles are: the value which accrues to information by transforming it into knowledge can be analyzed systematically; the value which accrues to technology is incremented by the degree to which it is accepted by library professionals and users; and this acceptance is a function of other variables which can be understood and controlled, especially the frequency of use resulting in the development of information skills. The improvement of information skills of library professionals and users therefore constitutes the principles objective of technological integration
  17. Esteban Navarro, M.A.: Aplicaciones de la terminologia para la docencia de la gestion de lenguajes documentales (1995) 0.01
    0.01333111 = product of:
      0.04665888 = sum of:
        0.012300085 = product of:
          0.02460017 = sum of:
            0.02460017 = weight(_text_:science in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02460017 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.034358796 = product of:
          0.06871759 = sum of:
            0.06871759 = weight(_text_:applications in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06871759 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.38913056 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a teaching methodology for training information science students in the techniques of management of documentary languages. Discusses the need for applying the principles and methods of terminology. Considers teaching aims, theoretical content and practical exercises for knowledge acquisition
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Applications of terminology to documentary languages management education
  18. Garcia, A.L.: ¬La investigacion documentologica : hacia un ajuste interdisciplinar (1995) 0.01
    0.013081263 = product of:
      0.045784418 = sum of:
        0.033484332 = weight(_text_:systems in 6677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033484332 = score(doc=6677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 6677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6677)
        0.012300085 = product of:
          0.02460017 = sum of:
            0.02460017 = weight(_text_:science in 6677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02460017 = score(doc=6677,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 6677, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6677)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the past, present and the future of documentary research which should be approached from within the multidisciplinary framework of cognitive sciences. Criticises reductionist approaches and recommends a revision of the terminology towards a cultural-cognitive model of the documentary process, divided into reading, transformation, representation and retrieval. This model is completed with a theory of selection and use of documentary information. The research task of the next decade is considered to be the simulation of these new theoretical models with the help of expert systems
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Research in information science: towards an interdisciplinary adjustment
  19. Espinosa, L.; Ricardo, M.; Maturana, T.I.: Tesauro latinoamericano en bibliotecologia y ciencia de la informacion (1996) 0.01
    0.013014933 = product of:
      0.045552265 = sum of:
        0.01522058 = product of:
          0.03044116 = sum of:
            0.03044116 = weight(_text_:science in 989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03044116 = score(doc=989,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04011181 = queryNorm
                0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 989, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=989)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.030331684 = weight(_text_:library in 989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030331684 = score(doc=989,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 989, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=989)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    INFOBILA, a regional database of Latin American library and information science literature supported by the National Autonomous University of Mexico, the Organisation of American States and IFLA, is constructing a thesaurus to harmonise terminology used in Spanish-speaking countries, each of which has its own variations. A group comprising experts from Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela and Chile was initiated in 1995 to develop standardised terms, using thesauri from these countries. By the next meeting in 1996, group members will have individually tested the provisional integrated list and these results will have to be used to finalise a definitive thesaurus
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Latin American library and information science thesaurus
  20. Frias, J.A.: Sistemas expertos y catalogacion descriptiva : revision bibliografica (1996) 0.01
    0.0117170755 = product of:
      0.08201952 = sum of:
        0.08201952 = weight(_text_:systems in 6927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08201952 = score(doc=6927,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.6653617 = fieldWeight in 6927, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6927)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews literature on the main expert systems used in descriptive cataloguing. Discusses the features and problems of the three types of systems which have developed: advisory systems, systems to create bibliographic records and systems to carry out original cataloguing. The quantity and complexity of the rules of a cataloguing code make it difficult for them to be incorporated into the knowledge base of an expert system
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Expert systems and descriptive cataloguing: a literature review

Years

Types

  • a 78
  • el 1
  • More… Less…