-
Jiang, Z.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.: Recovering uncaptured citations in a scholarly network : a two-step citation analysis to estimate publication importance (2016)
0.07
0.066146925 = product of:
0.115757115 = sum of:
0.020927707 = weight(_text_:systems in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020927707 = score(doc=3018,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
0.04279475 = sum of:
0.0153751075 = weight(_text_:science in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0153751075 = score(doc=3018,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
0.027419642 = weight(_text_:29 in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027419642 = score(doc=3018,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
0.02166549 = weight(_text_:library in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02166549 = score(doc=3018,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
0.030369172 = product of:
0.060738344 = sum of:
0.060738344 = weight(_text_:applications in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060738344 = score(doc=3018,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.34394607 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- The citation relationships between publications, which are significant for assessing the importance of scholarly components within a network, have been used for various scientific applications. Missing citation metadata in scholarly databases, however, create problems for classical citation-based ranking algorithms and challenge the performance of citation-based retrieval systems. In this research, we utilize a two-step citation analysis method to investigate the importance of publications for which citation information is partially missing. First, we calculate the importance of the author and then use his importance to estimate the publication importance for some selected articles. To evaluate this method, we designed a simulation experiment-"random citation-missing"-to test the two-step citation analysis that we carried out with the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library (DL). In this experiment, we simulated different scenarios in a large-scale scientific digital library, from high-quality citation data, to very poor quality data, The results show that a two-step citation analysis can effectively uncover the importance of publications in different situations. More importantly, we found that the optimized impact from the importance of an author (first step) is exponentially increased when the quality of citation decreases. The findings from this study can further enhance citation-based publication-ranking algorithms for real-world applications.
- Date
- 12. 6.2016 20:31:29
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.7, S.1722-1735
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.05
0.04510499 = product of:
0.15786746 = sum of:
0.11982529 = sum of:
0.0430503 = weight(_text_:science in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0430503 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.07677499 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07677499 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.038042177 = product of:
0.07608435 = sum of:
0.07608435 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07608435 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.368-375
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.04
0.043912634 = product of:
0.10246281 = sum of:
0.02152515 = product of:
0.0430503 = sum of:
0.0430503 = weight(_text_:science in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0430503 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04289548 = weight(_text_:library in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04289548 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.038042177 = product of:
0.07608435 = sum of:
0.07608435 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07608435 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
-
Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96)
0.04
0.04250336 = product of:
0.09917451 = sum of:
0.017394949 = product of:
0.034789898 = sum of:
0.034789898 = weight(_text_:science in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034789898 = score(doc=673,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.060041167 = weight(_text_:library in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060041167 = score(doc=673,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.56927717 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.021738386 = product of:
0.04347677 = sum of:
0.04347677 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347677 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of 111 theses accepted by the Department of Library and Information Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, between 1977 and 1992. The analysis was based on year, type and degree awarded, subject, type of library and geographical area. Concludes that the highest number of submissions was 1991, when 108 MLS theses (97,29%) and 3 PhD theses (2,71%) were accepted. Libraries and readers was the most concetrated subject while the academic library was the most discussed type of library
- Source
- Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.04
0.0409418 = product of:
0.1432963 = sum of:
0.09533769 = sum of:
0.056950197 = weight(_text_:science in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056950197 = score(doc=1515,freq=14.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.5389985 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.038387496 = weight(_text_:29 in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038387496 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.047958605 = weight(_text_:library in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047958605 = score(doc=1515,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.45471698 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- COMPASS
- Information science / Statistical mathematics
- Date
- 29. 2.2008 19:02:46
- LCSH
- Library statistics
Information science / Statistical methods
Library science / Statistical methods
- Subject
- Information science / Statistical mathematics
Library statistics
Information science / Statistical methods
Library science / Statistical methods
-
Coleman, A.S.; Bracke, P.: Controlled vocabularies as a sphere of influence (2006)
0.04
0.04046459 = product of:
0.09441738 = sum of:
0.020927707 = weight(_text_:systems in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020927707 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
0.058169857 = sum of:
0.030750215 = weight(_text_:science in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030750215 = score(doc=1491,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
0.027419642 = weight(_text_:29 in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027419642 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
0.015319815 = weight(_text_:library in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015319815 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This study presents the results of a citation study of GeoRef articles with descriptors that represent the concept of "controlled vocabularies" a specialized area of study within Library and information Science to understand the use of this concept in Geographic Information Science (GIS) and distinguish information science concepts from information technology. Papers with pre-selected descriptors that represented the concept of "controlled vocabularies" from GeoRef were selected for a citation study that used bibliographic coupling and content analysis of the article titles and abstracts to draw clusters and understand the influence of the concept of controlled vocabularies in a geo-science discipline. The results from this analysis provide one perspective of the LIS sub-domain of "controlled vocabularies" as represented in GeoRef and used in the context of GIS research and scholarship. Findings are used to suggest future research directions to address issues related to better understanding of the concept of "controlled vocabularies" and the provision of knowledge organization tools that will promote interdisciplinary understanding. The creation of special. more-finely grained in-depth classifications and thesauri for the concept itself.
- Date
- 29. 2.2008 16:21:04
- Source
- Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
-
Aström, F.: Changes in the LIS research front : time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 (2007)
0.04
0.039196353 = product of:
0.068593614 = sum of:
0.020927707 = weight(_text_:systems in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020927707 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.0108718425 = product of:
0.021743685 = sum of:
0.021743685 = weight(_text_:science in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021743685 = score(doc=329,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.015319815 = weight(_text_:library in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015319815 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.021474248 = product of:
0.042948496 = sum of:
0.042948496 = weight(_text_:applications in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042948496 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2432066 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- Based on articles published in 1990-2004 in 21 library and information science (LIS) journals, a set of cocitation analyses was performed to study changes in research fronts over the last 15 years, where LIS is at now, and to discuss where it is heading. To study research fronts, here defined as current and influential cocited articles, a citations among documents methodology was applied; and to study changes, the analyses were time-sliced into three 5-year periods. The results show a stable structure of two distinct research fields: informetrics and information seeking and retrieval (ISR). However, experimental retrieval research and user oriented research have merged into one ISR field; and IR and informetrics also show signs of coming closer together, sharing research interests and methodologies, making informetrics research more visible in mainstream LIS research. Furthermore, the focus on the Internet, both in ISR research and in informetrics-where webometrics quickly has become a dominating research area-is an important change. The future is discussed in terms of LIS dependency on technology, how integration of research areas as well as technical systems can be expected to continue to characterize LIS research, and how webometrics will continue to develop and find applications.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.7, S.947-957
-
Deshpande, M.; Rajyalakshmi, D.: Citation study of dissertations in library and information science (1997)
0.04
0.038422227 = product of:
0.1344778 = sum of:
0.0865192 = sum of:
0.0481317 = weight(_text_:science in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0481317 = score(doc=1594,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.45553684 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.038387496 = weight(_text_:29 in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038387496 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.047958605 = weight(_text_:library in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047958605 = score(doc=1594,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.45471698 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- A study of 65 dissertations in library and information science, submitted to Nagpur University during the period 1990 to 1994 revealed that the majority of the works are in the field of literature survey and trends in various aspects of library and information science. Citation analyses have been carried out to find the types of cited source materials, subject distribution, authorship pattern and chronological distribution of cited references. The ranked list of periodicals indicated that the 'Annals of library science and documentation' ist the most cited
- Date
- 3. 8.2006 12:53:29
- Source
- Annals of library science and documentation. 44(1997) no.2, S.41-53
-
Pillai, C.V.R.; Girijakumari, S.: Widening horizons of informetrics (1996)
0.04
0.037036512 = product of:
0.086418524 = sum of:
0.017394949 = product of:
0.034789898 = sum of:
0.034789898 = weight(_text_:science in 7172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034789898 = score(doc=7172,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 7172, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034664784 = weight(_text_:library in 7172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034664784 = score(doc=7172,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 7172, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7172)
0.034358796 = product of:
0.06871759 = sum of:
0.06871759 = weight(_text_:applications in 7172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06871759 = score(doc=7172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.38913056 = fieldWeight in 7172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Traces the origin and development of informetrics in the field of library and information science. 'Informatrics' is seen as a generic term to denote studies in which quantitative methods are applied. Discusses various applications of informetrics including citation analysis; impact factor; absolescence and ageing studies; bibliographic coupling; co-citation; and measurement of information such as retrieval performance assessment. Outlines recent developments in informetrics and calls for attention to be paid to the quality of future research in the field to ensure its reliability
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 33(1996) no.1, S.39-43
-
Tsay, M.-Y.: From Science Citation Index to Journal Citation Reports, amd criteria for journals evaluation (1997)
0.04
0.036638457 = product of:
0.085489735 = sum of:
0.02152515 = product of:
0.0430503 = sum of:
0.0430503 = weight(_text_:science in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0430503 = score(doc=657,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02144774 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.04251684 = product of:
0.08503368 = sum of:
0.08503368 = weight(_text_:applications in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08503368 = score(doc=657,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.4815245 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Investigates the characteristics of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) through the study of the Science Citation Index (SCI). Other criteria for evaluating a journal are also discussed. The compilation process of SCI data, and the characteristics, applications and limitations of SCI are studied. A detailed description of JCR is provided including: journal ranking listing, citing journal listing, cited journal listing, subject category listing, source data, impact factor, immediacy index, cited half-life and citing half-life. The applications and limitations of JCR are also explored. In addition to the criteria listed in JCR, the size, circulation and influence of journals are also considered significant criteria fir evaluation purposes
- Object
- Science Citation Index
- Source
- Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.2, S.27-41
-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.04
0.03640468 = product of:
0.25483274 = sum of:
0.25483274 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25483274 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34006837 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Rees-Potter, L.K.: Dynamic thesaural systems : a bibliometric study of terminological and conceptual change in sociology and economics with application to the design of dynamic thesaural systems (1989)
0.04
0.03607105 = product of:
0.08416578 = sum of:
0.047353994 = weight(_text_:systems in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047353994 = score(doc=5059,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
0.012300085 = product of:
0.02460017 = sum of:
0.02460017 = weight(_text_:science in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02460017 = score(doc=5059,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024511702 = weight(_text_:library in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024511702 = score(doc=5059,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Thesauri have been used in the library and information science field to provide a standard descriptor language for indexers or searchers to use in an informations storage and retrieval system. One difficulty has been the maintenance and updating of thesauri since terms used to describe concepts change over time and vary between users. This study investigates a mechanism by which thesauri can be updated and maintained using citation, co-citation analysis and citation context analysis.
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.04
0.035007335 = product of:
0.081683785 = sum of:
0.05615493 = weight(_text_:systems in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05615493 = score(doc=201,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.45554203 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.009225064 = product of:
0.018450128 = sum of:
0.018450128 = weight(_text_:science in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018450128 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.016303789 = product of:
0.032607578 = sum of:
0.032607578 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032607578 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
-
González-Alcaide, G.; Castelló-Cogollos, L.; Navarro-Molina, C.; Aleixandre-Benavent, R.; Valderrama-Zurián, J.C.: Library and information science research areas : analysis of journal articles in LISA (2008)
0.03
0.034708623 = product of:
0.08098678 = sum of:
0.018450128 = product of:
0.036900256 = sum of:
0.036900256 = weight(_text_:science in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036900256 = score(doc=1347,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.036767554 = weight(_text_:library in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036767554 = score(doc=1347,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.025769096 = product of:
0.05153819 = sum of:
0.05153819 = weight(_text_:applications in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05153819 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2918479 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The main fields of research in Library Science and Documentation are identified by quantifying the frequency of appearance and the analysis of co-occurrence of the descriptors assigned to 11,273 indexed works in the Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) database for the 2004-2005 period. The analysis made has enabled three major core research areas to be identified: World Wide Web, Libraries and Education. There are a further 12 areas of research with specific development, one connected with the library sphere and another 11 connected with the World Wide Web and Internet: Networks, Computer Security, Information technologies, Electronic Resources, Electronic Publications, Bibliometrics, Electronic Commerce, Computer applications, Medicine, Searches and Online Information retrieval.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.1, S.150-154
-
Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997)
0.03
0.034289084 = product of:
0.080007866 = sum of:
0.022596702 = product of:
0.045193404 = sum of:
0.045193404 = weight(_text_:science in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045193404 = score(doc=853,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.42772767 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041107375 = weight(_text_:library in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041107375 = score(doc=853,freq=10.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.38975742 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.016303789 = product of:
0.032607578 = sum of:
0.032607578 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032607578 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
-
Chung, Y.-K.: Bradford distribution and core authors in classification systems literature (1994)
0.03
0.034256466 = product of:
0.07993175 = sum of:
0.033484332 = weight(_text_:systems in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033484332 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.021935713 = product of:
0.043871425 = sum of:
0.043871425 = weight(_text_:29 in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043871425 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024511702 = weight(_text_:library in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024511702 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Bradford's law of scatter was applied to the analysis of the authors of source documents on the subject of classification schemes, published in core periodicals over the period 1981-1990. Results indicated that: core authors of the international classification system literature are Library of Congress, M. Dewey, S. Ranganathan, J. Comaroni, A. Neelameghan, L. Chan and K. Markey; the highly cited authors are linked either to the developers of the classification schemes or to a research centre, or else they authored the most frequently cited books; and the data conforms to Bradford's Law of Scatter
- Source
- Scientometrics. 29(1994) no.2, S.253-269
-
Tsay, M.-y.; Shu, Z.-y.: Journal bibliometric analysis : a case study on the Journal of Documentation (2011)
0.03
0.031984285 = product of:
0.07462999 = sum of:
0.020927707 = weight(_text_:systems in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020927707 = score(doc=294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
0.02306266 = product of:
0.04612532 = sum of:
0.04612532 = weight(_text_:science in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04612532 = score(doc=294,freq=18.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.4365477 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03063963 = weight(_text_:library in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03063963 = score(doc=294,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This study aims to explore the journal bibliometric characteristics of the Journal of Documentation (JOD) and the subject relationship with other disciplines by citation analysis. Design/methodology/approach - The citation data were drawn from references of each article of JOD during 1998 and 2008. Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, Library of Congress Subject Heading, retrieved from the WorldCat and LISA database were used to identify the main class, subclass and subject of cited journals and books. Findings - The results of this study revealed that journal articles are the most cited document, followed by books and book chapters, electronic resources, and conference proceedings, respectively. The three main classes of cited journals in JOD papers are library science, science, and social sciences. The three subclasses of non-LIS journals that were highly cited in JOD papers are Science, "Mathematics. Computer science", and "Industries. Land use. Labor". The three highly cited subjects of library and information science journals encompass searching, information work, and online information retrieval. The most cited main class of books in JOD papers is library and information science, followed by social sciences, science, "Philosophy. Psychology. Religion." The three highly cited subclasses of books in JOD papers are "Books (General). Writing. Paleography. Book industries and trade. Libraries. Bibliography," "Philology and linguistics," and Science, and the most cited subject of books is information storage and retrieval systems. Originality/value - Results for the present research found that information science, as represented by JOD, is a developing discipline with an expanding literature relating to multiple subject areas.
-
Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995)
0.03
0.031627767 = product of:
0.07379812 = sum of:
0.017394949 = product of:
0.034789898 = sum of:
0.034789898 = weight(_text_:science in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034789898 = score(doc=5092,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034664784 = weight(_text_:library in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034664784 = score(doc=5092,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.021738386 = product of:
0.04347677 = sum of:
0.04347677 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347677 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
- Source
- Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1995) no.2, S.20-28
-
Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015)
0.03
0.0314396 = product of:
0.110038586 = sum of:
0.0108718425 = product of:
0.021743685 = sum of:
0.021743685 = weight(_text_:science in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021743685 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.09916674 = sum of:
0.060738344 = weight(_text_:applications in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060738344 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.34394607 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.0384284 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0384284 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
17. 9.2018 18:22:23
-
Ni, C.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Jiang, J.: Venue-author-coupling : a measure for identifying disciplines through author communities (2013)
0.03
0.03141901 = product of:
0.073311016 = sum of:
0.020927707 = weight(_text_:systems in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020927707 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
0.021743685 = product of:
0.04348737 = sum of:
0.04348737 = weight(_text_:science in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04348737 = score(doc=607,freq=16.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.41158113 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03063963 = weight(_text_:library in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03063963 = score(doc=607,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Conceptualizations of disciplinarity often focus on the social aspects of disciplines; that is, disciplines are defined by the set of individuals who participate in their activities and communications. However, operationalizations of disciplinarity often demarcate the boundaries of disciplines by standard classification schemes, which may be inflexible to changes in the participation profile of that discipline. To address this limitation, a metric called venue-author-coupling (VAC) is proposed and illustrated using journals from the Journal Citation Report's (JCR) library science and information science category. As JCRs are some of the most frequently used categories in bibliometric analyses, this allows for an examination of the extent to which the journals in JCR categories can be considered as proxies for disciplines. By extending the idea of bibliographic coupling, VAC identifies similarities among journals based on the similarities of their author profiles. The employment of this method using information science and library science journals provides evidence of four distinct subfields, that is, management information systems, specialized information and library science, library science-focused, and information science-focused research. The proposed VAC method provides a novel way to examine disciplinarity from the perspective of author communities.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.265-279
