Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

0.050796248 = product of:
  0.08889343 = sum of:
    0.035515495 = weight(_text_:systems in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035515495 = score(doc=5290,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
    0.009225064 = product of:
      0.018450128 = sum of:
        0.018450128 = weight(_text_:science in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018450128 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.018383777 = weight(_text_:library in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018383777 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
    0.025769096 = product of:
      0.05153819 = sum of:
        0.05153819 = weight(_text_:applications in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05153819 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.2918479 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)

Abstract

Hypermedia offers a new paradigm for the design of information systems, yet there are few working applications. The best situation is for a database to hold information and a hypermedia package to provide the interface. Explains why museum information systems are ideal for investigating the augmentation of traditional databases with hypermedia. 2 leading examples in the UK are the Micro Gallery at the National Gallery and the Design Museum public catalogue. Describes a prototype development of an interface for the visiting public to allow access to the museum database. Object records from Leicestershire Museums local collection and the George III collection of early scientific instruments from the Science Museum, London, were used. Object records were stored on an IBM PC in dBase databases. The hypermedia front-end was built using Hypercard on a Macintosh LC computer. Covers system design and evaluation

Source

Library and information research news. 15(1992) no.55, S.3-8

0.034265958 = product of:
  0.11993084 = sum of:
    0.059192497 = weight(_text_:systems in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059192497 = score(doc=756,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.48018348 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
    0.060738344 = product of:
      0.12147669 = sum of:
        0.12147669 = weight(_text_:applications in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12147669 = score(doc=756,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.68789214 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

PRECIS

Museums / Stock / Documentation / Applications of computer systems

Subject

Museums / Stock / Documentation / Applications of computer systems

0.01938375 = product of:
  0.067843124 = sum of:
    0.033484332 = weight(_text_:systems in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033484332 = score(doc=4393,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
    0.034358796 = product of:
      0.06871759 = sum of:
        0.06871759 = weight(_text_:applications in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06871759 = score(doc=4393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.38913056 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

The head of electronic engineering at Florence's Universita degli Studi describes how the department has used digitized imaging and computer reconstructions to aid the restoration and preservation of works of art in museums such as the Uffizi. The dapertmant shares in the MAN (Metropolitan Area Network) Toscana Telecoms project, whose applications include remote access to libraries and museums; and it also takes part in the EU MUSA project, which developed the Vasari (Visual Arts Systems Archiving Retrieval Images) scanner, and in the RAMA (Remote Access to Museum Archives) scheme

0.015777921 = product of:
  0.05522272 = sum of:
    0.033484332 = weight(_text_:systems in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033484332 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
    0.021738386 = product of:
      0.04347677 = sum of:
        0.04347677 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04347677 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Discusses the possibilities and difficulties encountered when using a thematic index to search contemporary art databanks. Jaconde and Videomuseum, 2 French databanks, are used as examples. the core problems found in the study are the methods and limits of indexing in both systems. A thematic index should be developed that is better adapted to 20th century art, based on the complementary and reciprocal relationship between text and image, and which fully exploits hypertext

Date

1. 8.1996 22:01:00

0.014150124 = product of:
  0.049525432 = sum of:
    0.019193748 = product of:
      0.038387496 = sum of:
        0.038387496 = weight(_text_:29 in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038387496 = score(doc=5188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.030331684 = weight(_text_:library in 5188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030331684 = score(doc=5188,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 5188, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5188)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Ellender Memorial Library at Nicholls State University, Louisiana has a slide collection including 10,000 slides in 60 sets devoted to art. Describes how the cataloguer solved the problem of entering sufficiently detailed records of this part of the collection on the OPAC of a small college library, using the OCLC authority file for artists' names and NUTPLUS which offers access via any combination of 15 data elements including e.g., aspects of the subject, call and item numbers and location of the works of art. NUTPLUS is now available in a new version, called Ultra-Plus Advanced, from Fairhaven Software of Stoughton, Massachusetts

Date

10. 9.2000 17:54:29

0.010652515 = product of:
  0.0372838 = sum of:
    0.029596249 = weight(_text_:systems in 4289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029596249 = score(doc=4289,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 4289, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4289)
    0.0076875538 = product of:
      0.0153751075 = sum of:
        0.0153751075 = weight(_text_:science in 4289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0153751075 = score(doc=4289,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4289, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4289)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

This article begins by presenting and discussing the distinction between record-oriented and pattern-oriented search. Examples or recordoriented (or item-oriented) questions include: "What (or how many, etc.) glass items made prior to 100 A.D. do we have in our collection?" and "How many paintings featuring dogs do we have that were painted during the 19th century, and who painted them?" Standard database systems are well suited to answering such questions, based on the data in, for example, a collections management system. Examples of pattern-oriented questions include: "How does the (apparent) productoin of glass objects vary over time between 400 B.C. and 100 A.D.?" and "What other animals are present in paintings with dogs (painted during the 19th century and in our collection)?" Standard database systems are not well suited to answering these sorts of questions, even though the basic data is properly stored in them. To answer pattern-oriented questions it is the accepted solution to transform the underlying (relational) data to what is called the data cube or cross tabulation form. We discuss how this can be done for non-numeric data, such as are found in museum collections and archives

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.14-23

0.009810947 = product of:
  0.034338314 = sum of:
    0.02511325 = weight(_text_:systems in 4288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02511325 = score(doc=4288,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 4288, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4288)
    0.009225064 = product of:
      0.018450128 = sum of:
        0.018450128 = weight(_text_:science in 4288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018450128 = score(doc=4288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4288)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.5-13

0.009810947 = product of:
  0.034338314 = sum of:
    0.02511325 = weight(_text_:systems in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02511325 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
    0.009225064 = product of:
      0.018450128 = sum of:
        0.018450128 = weight(_text_:science in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018450128 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

In 1996, with funding from the Henry Luce Foundation, Jack Lenor Larsen and an advisory committee composed of distinguished museum and design professionals developed Objects Classified by Mediums in response to the concern that existing systems do not provide the tools for comparing information on objects. A common understanding and definitions of terms are crucial to the success of a classification project meant to cross institutional and national boundaries. Objects Classified by Mediums seeks to organize areas of study in fiber, clay, metal, wood, and so on, to allow curators and scholars to compare information on similar methods used, build a conceptual framework for the greater understanding of whole categories of objects rather than as isolated works, and provide a finding tool for cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary investigation.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.9, S.1907-1914

0.009202948 = product of:
  0.032210317 = sum of:
    0.010762575 = product of:
      0.02152515 = sum of:
        0.02152515 = weight(_text_:science in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02152515 = score(doc=5000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02144774 = score(doc=5000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Museum informatics is the study of the sociotechnical interactions that take place at the intersection of people, information, and technology in museums. This entry presents an overview of museum informatics, covering such topics as information representation, information organization and access, information management, information technology, information interactions, and information professionals in museums. It explores the impact of information science and technology on museums, museum professionals, and museum visitors, and argues that museum researchers must take a sociotechnical approach to studying the use of information resources and technologies in museums.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.008294182 = product of:
  0.029029636 = sum of:
    0.013709821 = product of:
      0.027419642 = sum of:
        0.027419642 = weight(_text_:29 in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027419642 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.015319815 = weight(_text_:library in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015319815 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

It may be jumping the gun a bit to review this publication before it is actually published, but we are nothing if not current here at Current Cites, so we will do it anyway (so sue us!). This publication-in-process is a joint effort of the Visual Resources Association and the Digital Library Federation. It aims to "provide guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate catalog records" relating to cultural works. Although this work is far from finished (Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 9 are available, as well as front and back matter), the authors are making it available so pratictioners can use it and respond with information about how it can be improved to better aid their work. A stated goal is to publish it in print at some point in the future. Besides garnering support from the organizations named above as well as the Getty, the Mellon Foundation and others, the effort is being guided by experienced professionals at the top of their field. Get the point? If you're involved with creating metadata relating to any type of cultural object and/or images of such, this will need to be either on your bookshelf, or bookmarked in your browser, or both

Date

2.12.2015 11:29:57

0.0069415253 = product of:
  0.048590675 = sum of:
    0.048590675 = product of:
      0.09718135 = sum of:
        0.09718135 = weight(_text_:applications in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09718135 = score(doc=6100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.5503137 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Twenty years of experience with computers in museums has led from the original 'purely scientific' objectives to a more down-to-earth approach aimed at rationalizing repetitive procedures. Dealing with fragmentary or unclean data is of primary concern. In the 'small museums' project useful techniques from the field of thesaurus applications are customized in daily practice for this purpose

Source

Classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization: models and methods with applications. Proc. of the 14th annual conf. of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Univ. of Marburg, 12.-14.3.1990. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. P. Ihm

0.0066475254 = product of:
  0.046532676 = sum of:
    0.046532676 = product of:
      0.09306535 = sum of:
        0.09306535 = weight(_text_:29 in 4173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09306535 = score(doc=4173,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 4173, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4173)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

28.11.1999 13:32:29
27. 9.2005 14:29:52

0.006267347 = product of:
  0.043871425 = sum of:
    0.043871425 = product of:
      0.08774285 = sum of:
        0.08774285 = weight(_text_:29 in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08774285 = score(doc=5393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.1, S.51-57

0.0062109674 = product of:
  0.04347677 = sum of:
    0.04347677 = product of:
      0.08695354 = sum of:
        0.08695354 = weight(_text_:22 in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08695354 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

5. 3.1999 17:40:22

0.0047834762 = product of:
  0.033484332 = sum of:
    0.033484332 = weight(_text_:systems in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033484332 = score(doc=3477,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Because of the individual character of museums the use of online catalogues to describe objects in the collections in the Netherlands has lagged behind that of libraries. In 1993 the MIRO (Museale Informatieverzorgingen Registratie Opleidingen) project was inaugurated to identify probllem areas and devise solutions. The project identified 4 areas for which training is required for museum staff: description of objects, compilation of indexes, automation in museums, and the use of multimedia systems. Following the project's report the Dutch government has dedicated extra funds for museum automation

0.0046582255 = product of:
  0.032607578 = sum of:
    0.032607578 = product of:
      0.065215155 = sum of:
        0.065215155 = weight(_text_:22 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065215155 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier

0.004228036 = product of:
  0.029596249 = sum of:
    0.029596249 = weight(_text_:systems in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029596249 = score(doc=4986,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

LCSH

Information storage and retrieval systems / Museums

Subject

Information storage and retrieval systems / Museums

0.003881855 = product of:
  0.027172983 = sum of:
    0.027172983 = product of:
      0.054345965 = sum of:
        0.054345965 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054345965 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04011181 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill

0.0037140842 = product of:
  0.025998589 = sum of:
    0.025998589 = weight(_text_:library in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025998589 = score(doc=3759,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The entry provides an overview of the data content standard, Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO), developed by the Visual Resources Association (VRA), and published in 2006 by the American Library Association (ALA). CCO fills a gap in the array of descriptive standards by providing guidelines for visual resources curators, museum documentation specialists, archivists, librarians, or anyone engaged in the documentation of works of art and architecture, objects of material culture, and their images. The entry begins by placing CCO within the context of object and visual image cataloging and the broader framework of data content standards. Following the organization of the guide, which is divided into three parts, General Guidelines, Elements, and Authorities, it summarizes the main features of CCO. Finally, it evaluates CCO in terms of its suitability for use by the metadata communities that form its intended audience, and its sustainability.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.003063963 = product of:
  0.02144774 = sum of:
    0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 3720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02144774 = score(doc=3720,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04011181 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3720, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3720)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The National Gallery of Canada Library and Archives functions as Canada's national art and supports research on a national and international basis. Given this important mandate and the research interest in art exhibitions, it was important to catalogue the exhibition-related material and to publicize National Gallery holdings. Describes the project of creating an online finding aid for exhibition records and other material related to more than 1900 exhibitions held between 1880 and the present at the National Gallery of Canada. Sets out the goals and many benefits of the project