-
Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998)
0.08
0.0807024 = product of:
0.1412292 = sum of:
0.029596249 = weight(_text_:systems in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029596249 = score(doc=2339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
0.0108718425 = product of:
0.021743685 = sum of:
0.021743685 = weight(_text_:science in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021743685 = score(doc=2339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03063963 = weight(_text_:library in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03063963 = score(doc=2339,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
0.07012148 = sum of:
0.042948496 = weight(_text_:applications in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042948496 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2432066 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
0.027172983 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027172983 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- Over the last 4 years, the Information Interaction Laboratory at Rutgers' School of communication, Information and Library Studies has performed a series of investigations concerned with various aspects of people's interactions with advanced information retrieval (IR) systems. We have benn especially concerned with understanding not just what people do, and why, and with what effect, but also with what they would like to do, and how they attempt to accomplish it, and with what difficulties. These investigations have led to some quite interesting conclusions about the nature and structure of people's interactions with information, about support for cooperative human-computer interaction in query reformulation, and about the value of visualization of search results for supporting various forms of interaction with information. In this discussion, I give an overview of the research program and its projects, present representative results from the projects, and discuss some implications of these results for support of subject searching in information retrieval systems
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
-
Voiskunskii, V.G.: Evaluation of search results (2000)
0.05
0.04649165 = product of:
0.16272077 = sum of:
0.11982529 = sum of:
0.0430503 = weight(_text_:science in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0430503 = score(doc=4670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
0.07677499 = weight(_text_:29 in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07677499 = score(doc=4670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
0.04289548 = weight(_text_:library in 4670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04289548 = score(doc=4670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 4670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4670)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
-
Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990)
0.04
0.043912634 = product of:
0.10246281 = sum of:
0.02152515 = product of:
0.0430503 = sum of:
0.0430503 = weight(_text_:science in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0430503 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04289548 = weight(_text_:library in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04289548 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.038042177 = product of:
0.07608435 = sum of:
0.07608435 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07608435 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:43:54
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.4, S.272-281
-
King, D.W.: Blazing new trails : in celebration of an audacious career (2000)
0.04
0.04144902 = product of:
0.07253578 = sum of:
0.029596249 = weight(_text_:systems in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029596249 = score(doc=1184,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.24009174 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.0076875538 = product of:
0.0153751075 = sum of:
0.0153751075 = weight(_text_:science in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0153751075 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02166549 = weight(_text_:library in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02166549 = score(doc=1184,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.013586491 = product of:
0.027172983 = sum of:
0.027172983 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027172983 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- I had the distinct pleasure of working with Pauline Atherton (Cochrane) during the 1960s, a period that can be considered the heyday of automated information system design and evaluation in the United States. I first met Pauline at the 1962 American Documentation Institute annual meeting in North Hollywood, Florida. My company, Westat Research Analysts, had recently been awarded a contract by the U.S. Patent Office to provide statistical support for the design of experiments with automated information retrieval systems. I was asked to attend the meeting to learn more about information retrieval systems and to begin informing others of U.S. Patent Office activities in this area. At one session, Pauline and I questioned a speaker about the research that he presented. Pauline's questions concerned the logic of their approach and mine, the statistical aspects. After the session, she came over to talk to me and we began a professional and personal friendship that continues to this day. During the 1960s, Pauline was involved in several important information-retrieval projects including a series of studies for the American Institute of Physics, a dissertation examining the relevance of retrieved documents, and development and evaluation of an online information-retrieval system. I had the opportunity to work with Pauline and her colleagues an four of those projects and will briefly describe her work in the 1960s.
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
-
Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996)
0.04
0.040116034 = product of:
0.09360408 = sum of:
0.047353994 = weight(_text_:systems in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047353994 = score(doc=789,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.024511702 = weight(_text_:library in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024511702 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.021738386 = product of:
0.04347677 = sum of:
0.04347677 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347677 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- An introduction to the principal generic approaches to information retrieval research with their associated concepts, models and systems, this text is designed to keep the information professional up to date with the major themes and developments that have preoccupied researchers in recent month in relation to textual and documentary retrieval systems.
- Date
- 26. 7.2002 20:22:46
- Imprint
- London : Library association publishing
-
Marchionini, G.: Information seeking in full-text end-user-oriented search system : the roles of domain and search expertise (1993)
0.04
0.03607105 = product of:
0.08416578 = sum of:
0.047353994 = weight(_text_:systems in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047353994 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.012300085 = product of:
0.02460017 = sum of:
0.02460017 = weight(_text_:science in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02460017 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024511702 = weight(_text_:library in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024511702 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Presents a study that identifies and examines the roles that information-seeking expertise and domain expertise play in information seeking in full text, and user search systems. This forms part of an investigation to characterise information seeking and to determine how it is affected by interactive electronic access to primary information. Distinguishes between the approaches of search experts and domain experts. Makes recommendations for systems design
- Source
- Library and information science research. 15(1993) no.1, S.35-69
-
Allen, B.: Logical reasoning and retrieval performance (1993)
0.04
0.035553135 = product of:
0.08295731 = sum of:
0.050746992 = weight(_text_:systems in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050746992 = score(doc=5093,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.41167158 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
0.010762575 = product of:
0.02152515 = sum of:
0.02152515 = weight(_text_:science in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02152515 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02144774 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Tests the logical reasoning ability of end users of a CD-ROM index and assesses associations between different levels of this ability and aspects of retrieval performance. Users' selection of vocabulary and their selection of citations for further examination are both influenced by this ability. The designs of information systems should address the effects of logical reasoning on search behaviour. People with lower levels of logical reasoning ability may experience difficulty using systems in which user selectivity plays an important role. Other systems, such as those with ranked output, may decrease the need for users to make selections and would be easier to use for people with lower levels of logical reasoning ability
- Source
- Library and information science research. 15(1993) no.1, S.93-105
-
Gilchrist, A.: Research and consultancy (1998)
0.03
0.03447823 = product of:
0.0804492 = sum of:
0.033484332 = weight(_text_:systems in 1394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033484332 = score(doc=1394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 1394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1394)
0.012300085 = product of:
0.02460017 = sum of:
0.02460017 = weight(_text_:science in 1394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02460017 = score(doc=1394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1394)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.034664784 = weight(_text_:library in 1394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034664784 = score(doc=1394,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 1394, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1394)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of literature published about research and consultancy in library and information science (LIS). Issues covered include: scope and definitions of what constitutes research and consultancy; funding of research and development; national LIS research and the funding agencies; electronic libraries; document delivery; multimedia document delivery; the Z39.50 standard for client server computer architecture, the Internet and WWW; electronic publishing; information retrieval; evaluation and evaluation techniques; the Text Retrieval Conferences (TREC); the user domain; management issues; decision support systems; information politics and organizational culture; and value for money issues
- Source
- Library and information work worldwide 1998. Ed.: M.B. Line et al
-
Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; McKenzie, L.; Irving, A.: Evaluative protocols for searching behaviour in online library catalogues (1991)
0.03
0.032195617 = product of:
0.11268465 = sum of:
0.038387496 = product of:
0.07677499 = sum of:
0.07677499 = weight(_text_:29 in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07677499 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110081 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.07429716 = weight(_text_:library in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07429716 = score(doc=347,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.7044446 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:52:29
- Imprint
- London : British Library
- Series
- British Library research and development report; no.6031
-
Wolfram, D.; Dimitroff, A.: Preliminary findings on searcher performance and perceptions of performance in a hypertext bibliographic retrieval system (1997)
0.03
0.032079022 = product of:
0.07485105 = sum of:
0.02929879 = weight(_text_:systems in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02929879 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
0.01522058 = product of:
0.03044116 = sum of:
0.03044116 = weight(_text_:science in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03044116 = score(doc=1857,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.030331684 = weight(_text_:library in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030331684 = score(doc=1857,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Reports on research examining the relationship of searcher performance and perception of performance, particulary for hypertext-based onformation retrieval systems for bibliographic data. Employs a prototype hypertext bibliographic retrieval system called HyperLynx. Evaluates its use by 83 subjects at the School of Library and Information Science and the Golda Meir Library at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Measures of system usgae indicate that there is no significant relationship between confidence and the number of record pages visited, although confident searchers searched for shorter time periods. The reality check measures shows that both novice and experienced searchers were over confident in their performance
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.12, S.1142-1145
-
Qiu, L.: Analytical searching vs. browsing in hypertext information retrieval systems (1993)
0.03
0.031562172 = product of:
0.07364506 = sum of:
0.041434746 = weight(_text_:systems in 7416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041434746 = score(doc=7416,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.33612844 = fieldWeight in 7416, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7416)
0.010762575 = product of:
0.02152515 = sum of:
0.02152515 = weight(_text_:science in 7416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02152515 = score(doc=7416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 7416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 7416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02144774 = score(doc=7416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 7416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7416)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Reports an experiment conducted to study search behaviour of different user groups in a hypertext information retrieval system. A three-way analysis of variance test was conducted to study the effects of gender, search task, and search experience on search option (analytical searching versus browsing), as measured by the proportion of nodes reached through analytical searching. The search task factor influenced search option in that a general task caused more browsing and specific task more analytical searching. Gender or search experience alone did not affect the search option. These findings are discussed in light of evaluation of existing systems and implications for future design
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 18(1993) no.4, S.1-13
-
Prasher, R.G.: Evaluation of indexing system (1989)
0.03
0.03012691 = product of:
0.07029612 = sum of:
0.033484332 = weight(_text_:systems in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033484332 = score(doc=4998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
0.012300085 = product of:
0.02460017 = sum of:
0.02460017 = weight(_text_:science in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02460017 = score(doc=4998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024511702 = weight(_text_:library in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024511702 = score(doc=4998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Describes information system and its various components-index file construstion, query formulation and searching. Discusses an indexing system, and brings out the need for its evaluation. Explains the concept of the efficiency of indexing systems and discusses factors which control this efficiency. Gives criteria for evaluation. Discusses recall and precision ratios, as also noise ratio, novelty ratio, and exhaustivity and specificity and the impact of each on the efficiency of indexing system. Mention also various steps for evaluation.
- Source
- Herald of library science. 28(1989) no.3, S.157-65
-
Harman, D.: ¬The Text REtrieval Conferences (TRECs) : providing a test-bed for information retrieval systems (1998)
0.03
0.030053705 = product of:
0.07012531 = sum of:
0.02929879 = weight(_text_:systems in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02929879 = score(doc=1314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
0.010762575 = product of:
0.02152515 = sum of:
0.02152515 = weight(_text_:science in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02152515 = score(doc=1314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.030063946 = product of:
0.06012789 = sum of:
0.06012789 = weight(_text_:applications in 1314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06012789 = score(doc=1314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 1314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1314)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) workshop series encourages research in information retrieval from large text applications by providing a large test collection, uniform scoring procedures and a forum for organizations interested in comparing their results. Now in its seventh year, the conference has become the major experimental effort in the field. Participants in the TREC conferences have examined a wide variety of retrieval techniques, including methods using automatic thesauri, sophisticated term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching. The TREC conference series is co-sponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Information Technology Office of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 24(1998), April/May, S.11-13
-
Kantor, P.; Kim, M.H.; Ibraev, U.; Atasoy, K.: Estimating the number of relevant documents in enormous collections (1999)
0.03
0.029397404 = product of:
0.06859394 = sum of:
0.036247853 = weight(_text_:systems in 6690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036247853 = score(doc=6690,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.29405114 = fieldWeight in 6690, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6690)
0.0108718425 = product of:
0.021743685 = sum of:
0.021743685 = weight(_text_:science in 6690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021743685 = score(doc=6690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 6690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.021474248 = product of:
0.042948496 = sum of:
0.042948496 = weight(_text_:applications in 6690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042948496 = score(doc=6690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17659263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.2432066 = fieldWeight in 6690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In assessing information retrieval systems, it is important to know not only the precision of the retrieved set, but also to compare the number of retrieved relevant items to the total number of relevant items. For large collections, such as the TREC test collections, or the World Wide Web, it is not possible to enumerate the entire set of relevant documents. If the retrieved documents are evaluated, a variant of the statistical "capture-recapture" method can be used to estimate the total number of relevant documents, providing the several retrieval systems used are sufficiently independent. We show that the underlying signal detection model supporting such an analysis can be extended in two ways. First, assuming that there are two distinct performance characteristics (corresponding to the chance of retrieving a relevant, and retrieving a given non-relevant document), we show that if there are three or more independent systems available it is possible to estimate the number of relevant documents without actually having to decide whether each individual document is relevant. We report applications of this 3-system method to the TREC data, leading to the conclusion that the independence assumptions are not satisfied. We then extend the model to a multi-system, multi-problem model, and show that it is possible to include statistical dependencies of all orders in the model, and determine the number of relevant documents for each of the problems in the set. Application to the TREC setting will be presented
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
- Source
- Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
-
Saracevic, T.: Effects of inconsistent relevance judgments on information retrieval test results : a historical perspective (2008)
0.03
0.027798334 = product of:
0.06486278 = sum of:
0.041855413 = weight(_text_:systems in 5585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041855413 = score(doc=5585,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.339541 = fieldWeight in 5585, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5585)
0.0076875538 = product of:
0.0153751075 = sum of:
0.0153751075 = weight(_text_:science in 5585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0153751075 = score(doc=5585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5585)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.015319815 = weight(_text_:library in 5585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015319815 = score(doc=5585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 5585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5585)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The main objective of information retrieval (IR) systems is to retrieve information or information objects relevant to user requests and possible needs. In IR tests, retrieval effectiveness is established by comparing IR systems retrievals (systems relevance) with users' or user surrogates' assessments (user relevance), where user relevance is treated as the gold standard for performance evaluation. Relevance is a human notion, and establishing relevance by humans is fraught with a number of problems-inconsistency in judgment being one of them. The aim of this critical review is to explore the relationship between relevance on the one hand and testing of IR systems and procedures on the other. Critics of IR tests raised the issue of validity of the IR tests because they were based on relevance judgments that are inconsistent. This review traces and synthesizes experimental studies dealing with (1) inconsistency of relevance judgments by people, (2) effects of such inconsistency on results of IR tests and (3) reasons for retrieval failures. A historical context for these studies and for IR testing is provided including an assessment of Lancaster's (1969) evaluation of MEDLARS and its unique place in the history of IR evaluation.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'The Influence of F. W. Lancaster on Information Science and on Libraries', das als Festschrift für F.W. Lancaster deklariert ist.
- Source
- Library trends. 56(2008) no.4, S.763-783
-
Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011)
0.03
0.027055481 = product of:
0.063129455 = sum of:
0.041855413 = weight(_text_:systems in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041855413 = score(doc=4197,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.339541 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.0076875538 = product of:
0.0153751075 = sum of:
0.0153751075 = weight(_text_:science in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0153751075 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013586491 = product of:
0.027172983 = sum of:
0.027172983 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027172983 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14046472 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) provides a TREC-like platform for evaluating content-oriented XML retrieval systems. Since 2007, INEX has been using a set of precision-recall based metrics for its ad hoc tasks. The authors investigate the reliability and robustness of these focused retrieval measures, and of the INEX pooling method. They explore four specific questions: How reliable are the metrics when assessments are incomplete, or when query sets are small? What is the minimum pool/query-set size that can be used to reliably evaluate systems? Can the INEX collections be used to fairly evaluate "new" systems that did not participate in the pooling process? And, for a fixed amount of assessment effort, would this effort be better spent in thoroughly judging a few queries, or in judging many queries relatively superficially? The authors' findings validate properties of precision-recall-based metrics observed in document retrieval settings. Early precision measures are found to be more error-prone and less stable under incomplete judgments and small topic-set sizes. They also find that system rankings remain largely unaffected even when assessment effort is substantially (but systematically) reduced, and confirm that the INEX collections remain usable when evaluating nonparticipating systems. Finally, they observe that for a fixed amount of effort, judging shallow pools for many queries is better than judging deep pools for a smaller set of queries. However, when judging only a random sample of a pool, it is better to completely judge fewer topics than to partially judge many topics. This result confirms the effectiveness of pooling methods.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:20:56
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.375-394
-
Dimitroff, A.; Wolfram, D.; Volz, A.: Affective response and retrieval performance : analysis of contributing factors (1996)
0.03
0.027053287 = product of:
0.06312434 = sum of:
0.035515495 = weight(_text_:systems in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035515495 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.009225064 = product of:
0.018450128 = sum of:
0.018450128 = weight(_text_:science in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018450128 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.018383777 = weight(_text_:library in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018383777 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Describes a study which investigated the affective response of 83 subjects to 2 versions of a hypertext-based bibliographic retrieval system. The objective of the study was to determine if subjects preferred searching a hypertext information retrieval (IR) system via traditional bibliographic links or via an enhanced set of linkages between structured records. The study also examined the utility of using factor analysis to explore subjects' affective responses to searching the 2 hypertext-based IR systems; explored the effect of experience on search outcome; and compared the effect of different types of linkages within the hypertext system. Findings reveal a complex relationship between system and user that is sometimes contradictory. Searchers found the systems to be usable or unusable in different ways indicating that further researchg is needed to isolate to specific features that searchers find frustrating or not in searching structured records via a hypertext-based IR system
- Source
- Library and information science research. 18(1996) no.2, S.121-132
-
Van der Walt, H.E.A.; Brakel, P.A. van: Method for the evaluation of the retrieval effectiveness of a CD-ROM bibliographic database (1991)
0.03
0.026361046 = product of:
0.061509106 = sum of:
0.02929879 = weight(_text_:systems in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02929879 = score(doc=3114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.010762575 = product of:
0.02152515 = sum of:
0.02152515 = weight(_text_:science in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02152515 = score(doc=3114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02144774 = score(doc=3114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Addresses the problem of how potential users of CD-ROM data bases can objectively establish which version of the same data base is best suited for a specific situation. The problem was solved by applying the retrieval effectiveness of current on-line data base search systems as a standard measurement. 5 search queries from the medical sciences were presented by experienced users of MEDLINE. Search strategies were written for both DIALOG and DATA-STAR. Search results were compared to create a recall base from documents present in both on-line searches. This recall base was then used to establish the retrieval and precision of 4 CD-ROM data bases: MEDLINE, Compact Cambrdge MEDLINE, DIALOG OnDisc, Comprehensive MEDLINE/EBSCO
- Source
- African journal of library and information science. 59(1991) no.1, S.32-42
-
Davis, C.H.: From document retrieval to Web browsing : some universal concerns (1997)
0.03
0.026361046 = product of:
0.061509106 = sum of:
0.02929879 = weight(_text_:systems in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02929879 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
0.010762575 = product of:
0.02152515 = sum of:
0.02152515 = weight(_text_:science in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02152515 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02144774 = weight(_text_:library in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02144774 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10546913 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Computer based systems can produce enourmous retrieval sets even when good search logic is used. Sometimes this is desirable, more often it is not. Appropriate filters can limit search results, but they represent only a partial solution. Simple ranking techniques are needed that are both effective and easily understood by the humans doing the searching. Optimal search output, whether from a traditional database or the Internet, will result when intuitive interfaces are designed that inspire confidence while making the necessary mathematics transparent. Weighted term searching using powers of 2, a technique proposed early in the history of information retrieval, can be simplifies and used in combination with modern graphics and textual input to achieve these results
- Source
- Journal of information; communication; and library science. 3(1997) no.3, S.3-10
-
Evaluation of information retrieval systems : special topic issue (1996)
0.03
0.025566034 = product of:
0.089481115 = sum of:
0.07103099 = weight(_text_:systems in 6812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07103099 = score(doc=6812,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12327058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.57622015 = fieldWeight in 6812, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6812)
0.018450128 = product of:
0.036900256 = sum of:
0.036900256 = weight(_text_:science in 6812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036900256 = score(doc=6812,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10565929 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.04011181 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 6812, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6812)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- A special issue devoted to the topic of evaluation of information retrieval systems
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.1-105
