Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Mayr, P."
  1. Lauser, B.; Johannsen, G.; Caracciolo, C.; Hage, W.R. van; Keizer, J.; Mayr, P.: Comparing human and automatic thesaurus mapping approaches in the agricultural domain (2008) 0.06
    0.06311706 = product of:
      0.094675586 = sum of:
        0.012511344 = weight(_text_:information in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012511344 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
        0.08216424 = sum of:
          0.046960555 = weight(_text_:systems in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046960555 = score(doc=2627,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.29405114 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
          0.03520369 = weight(_text_:22 in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03520369 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization systems (KOS), like thesauri and other controlled vocabularies, are used to provide subject access to information systems across the web. Due to the heterogeneity of these systems, mapping between vocabularies becomes crucial for retrieving relevant information. However, mapping thesauri is a laborious task, and thus big efforts are being made to automate the mapping process. This paper examines two mapping approaches involving the agricultural thesaurus AGROVOC, one machine-created and one human created. We are addressing the basic question "What are the pros and cons of human and automatic mapping and how can they complement each other?" By pointing out the difficulties in specific cases or groups of cases and grouping the sample into simple and difficult types of mappings, we show the limitations of current automatic methods and come up with some basic recommendations on what approach to use when.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.02
    0.02409055 = product of:
      0.036135826 = sum of:
        0.015013612 = weight(_text_:information in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015013612 = score(doc=328,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
        0.021122215 = product of:
          0.04224443 = sum of:
            0.04224443 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04224443 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel wird ein Eyetracking-Experiment beschrieben, bei dem untersucht wurde, wann und auf Basis welcher Informationen Relevanzentscheidungen bei der themenbezogenen Dokumentenbewertung fallen und welche Faktoren auf die Relevanzentscheidung einwirken. Nach einer kurzen Einführung werden relevante Studien aufgeführt, in denen Eyetracking als Untersuchungsmethode für Interaktionsverhalten mit Ergebnislisten (Information Seeking Behavior) verwendet wurde. Nutzerverhalten wird hierbei vor allem durch unterschiedliche Aufgaben-Typen, dargestellte Informationen und durch das Ranking eines Ergebnisses beeinflusst. Durch EyetrackingUntersuchungen lassen sich Nutzer außerdem in verschiedene Klassen von Bewertungs- und Lesetypen einordnen. Diese Informationen können als implizites Feedback genutzt werden, um so die Suche zu personalisieren und um die Relevanz von Suchergebnissen ohne aktives Zutun des Users zu erhöhen. In einem explorativen Eyetracking-Experiment mit 12 Studenten der Hochschule Darmstadt werden anhand der Länge der Gesamtbewertung, Anzahl der Fixationen, Anzahl der besuchten Metadatenelemente und Länge des Scanpfades zwei typische Bewertungstypen identifiziert. Das Metadatenfeld Abstract wird im Experiment zuverlässig als wichtigste Dokumenteigenschaft für die Zuordnung von Relevanz ermittelt.
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.145-156
  3. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Cross-concordances : terminology mapping and its effectiveness for information retrieval (2008) 0.02
    0.02310364 = product of:
      0.03465546 = sum of:
        0.018387845 = weight(_text_:information in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018387845 = score(doc=2323,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
        0.016267613 = product of:
          0.032535225 = sum of:
            0.032535225 = weight(_text_:systems in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032535225 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The German Federal Ministry for Education and Research funded a major terminology mapping initiative, which found its conclusion in 2007. The task of this terminology mapping initiative was to organize, create and manage 'cross-concordances' between controlled vocabularies (thesauri, classification systems, subject heading lists) centred around the social sciences but quickly extending to other subject areas. 64 crosswalks with more than 500,000 relations were established. In the final phase of the project, a major evaluation effort to test and measure the effectiveness of the vocabulary mappings in an information system environment was conducted. The paper reports on the cross-concordance work and evaluation results.
    Content
    Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada.
  4. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.; Walter, A.-K.: Results from a German terminology mapping effort : intra- and interdisciplinary cross-concordances between controlled vocabularies (2007) 0.02
    0.01921453 = product of:
      0.028821792 = sum of:
        0.012385598 = weight(_text_:information in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012385598 = score(doc=542,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
        0.016436193 = product of:
          0.032872386 = sum of:
            0.032872386 = weight(_text_:systems in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032872386 = score(doc=542,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.20583579 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In 2004, the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research funded a major terminology mapping initiative at the GESIS Social Science Information Centre in Bonn (GESIS-IZ), which will find its conclusion this year. The task of this terminology mapping initiative was to organize, create and manage 'crossconcordances' between major controlled vocabularies (thesauri, classification systems, subject heading lists) centred around the social sciences but quickly extending to other subject areas. Cross-concordances are intellectually (manually) created crosswalks that determine equivalence, hierarchy, and association relations between terms from two controlled vocabularies. Most vocabularies have been related bilaterally, that is, there is a cross-concordance relating terms from vocabulary A to vocabulary B as well as a cross-concordance relating terms from vocabulary B to vocabulary A (bilateral relations are not necessarily symmetrical). Till August 2007, 24 controlled vocabularies from 11 disciplines will be connected with vocabulary sizes ranging from 2,000 - 17,000 terms per vocabulary. To date more than 260,000 relations are generated. A database including all vocabularies and cross-concordances was built and a 'heterogeneity service' developed, a web service, which makes the cross-concordances available for other applications. Many cross-concordances are already implemented and utilized for the German Social Science Information Portal Sowiport (www.sowiport.de), which searches bibliographical and other information resources (incl. 13 databases with 10 different vocabularies and ca. 2.5 million references).
    In the final phase of the project, a major evaluation effort is under way to test and measure the effectiveness of the vocabulary mappings in an information system environment. Actual user queries are tested in a distributed search environment, where several bibliographic databases with different controlled vocabularies are searched at the same time. Three query variations are compared to each other: a free-text search without focusing on using the controlled vocabulary or terminology mapping; a controlled vocabulary search, where terms from one vocabulary (a 'home' vocabulary thought to be familiar to the user of a particular database) are used to search all databases; and finally, a search, where controlled vocabulary terms are translated into the terms of the respective controlled vocabulary of the database. For evaluation purposes, types of cross-concordances are distinguished between intradisciplinary vocabularies (vocabularies within the social sciences) and interdisciplinary vocabularies (social sciences to other disciplines as well as other combinations). Simultaneously, an extensive quantitative analysis is conducted aimed at finding patterns in terminology mappings that can explain trends in the effectiveness of terminology mappings, particularly looking at overlapping terms, types of determined relations (equivalence, hierarchy etc.), size of participating vocabularies, etc. This project is the largest terminology mapping effort in Germany. The number and variety of controlled vocabularies targeted provide an optimal basis for insights and further research opportunities. To our knowledge, terminology mapping efforts have rarely been evaluated with stringent qualitative and quantitative measures. This research should contribute in this area. For the NKOS workshop, we plan to present an overview of the project and participating vocabularies, an introduction to the heterogeneity service and its application as well as some of the results and findings of the evaluation, which will be concluded in August.
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
  5. Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011) 0.02
    0.017922562 = product of:
      0.02688384 = sum of:
        0.010616227 = weight(_text_:information in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010616227 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
        0.016267613 = product of:
          0.032535225 = sum of:
            0.032535225 = weight(_text_:systems in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032535225 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.2037246 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is about a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of science and the usage of these insights for compensating the typical problems that arises in metadata-driven Digital Libraries. Three science model driven retrieval services are presented: co-word analysis based query expansion, re-ranking via Bradfordizing and author centrality. The services are evaluated with relevance assessments from which two important implications emerge: (1) precision values of the retrieval services are the same or better than the tf-idf retrieval baseline and (2) each service retrieved a disjoint set of documents. The different services each favor quite other - but still relevant - documents than pure term-frequency based rankings. The proposed models and derived retrieval services therefore open up new viewpoints on the scientific knowledge space and provide an alternative framework to structure scholarly information systems.
  6. Mayr, P.; Scharnhorst, A.: Scientometrics and information retrieval - weak-links revitalized (2015) 0.01
    0.010009075 = product of:
      0.030027224 = sum of:
        0.030027224 = weight(_text_:information in 1688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030027224 = score(doc=1688,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1688, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1688)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Editorial zu einem Special Issue "Combining bibliometrics and information retrieval"
  7. Mutschke, P.; Mayr, P.: Science models for search : a study on combining scholarly information retrieval and scientometrics (2015) 0.01
    0.008340896 = product of:
      0.025022687 = sum of:
        0.025022687 = weight(_text_:information in 1695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025022687 = score(doc=1695,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1695, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1695)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue "Combining bibliometrics and information retrieval"
  8. Carevic, Z.; Krichel, T.; Mayr, P.: Assessing a human mediated current awareness service (2015) 0.01
    0.008340896 = product of:
      0.025022687 = sum of:
        0.025022687 = weight(_text_:information in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025022687 = score(doc=2992,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  9. Daniel, F.; Maier, C.; Mayr, P.; Wirtz, H.-C.: ¬Die Kunden dort bedienen, wo sie sind : DigiAuskunft besteht Bewährungsprobe / Seit Anfang 2006 in Betrieb (2006) 0.01
    0.008214195 = product of:
      0.024642585 = sum of:
        0.024642585 = product of:
          0.04928517 = sum of:
            0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 5991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04928517 = score(doc=5991,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5991, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5991)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2006 21:06:22
  10. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Building a Terminology Network for Search : the KoMoHe project (2008) 0.01
    0.008214195 = product of:
      0.024642585 = sum of:
        0.024642585 = product of:
          0.04928517 = sum of:
            0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04928517 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Momeni, F.; Mayr, P.: Analyzing the research output presented at European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems workshops (2000-2015) (2016) 0.01
    0.0078267595 = product of:
      0.023480278 = sum of:
        0.023480278 = product of:
          0.046960555 = sum of:
            0.046960555 = weight(_text_:systems in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046960555 = score(doc=3106,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.29405114 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper we analyze a major part of the research output of the Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) community in the period 2000 to 2015 from a network analytical perspective. We fo- cus on the paper output presented at the European NKOS workshops in the last 15 years. Our open dataset, the "NKOS bibliography", includes 14 workshop agendas (ECDL 2000-2010, TPDL 2011-2015) and 4 special issues on NKOS (2001, 2004, 2006 and 2015) which cover 171 papers with 218 distinct authors in total. A focus of the analysis is the visualization of co-authorship networks in this interdisciplinary eld. We used standard network analytic measures like degree and betweenness centrality to de- scribe the co-authorship distribution in our NKOS dataset. We can see in our dataset that 15% (with degree=0) of authors had no co-authorship with others and 53% of them had a maximum of 3 cooperations with other authors. 32% had at least 4 co-authors for all of their papers. The NKOS co-author network in the "NKOS bibliography" is a typical co- authorship network with one relatively large component, many smaller components and many isolated co-authorships or triples.
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
  12. Mayr, P.; Walter, A.-K.: Mapping Knowledge Organization Systems (2008) 0.01
    0.0076686265 = product of:
      0.023005879 = sum of:
        0.023005879 = product of:
          0.046011757 = sum of:
            0.046011757 = weight(_text_:systems in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046011757 = score(doc=1676,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Vernetzung der Informationssysteme und Datenbanken aus dem wissenschaftlichen Fachinformationsbereich lässt bislang den Aspekt der Kompatibilität und Konkordanz zwischen kontrollierten Vokabularen (semantische Heterogenität) weitgehend unberücksichtigt. Gerade aber für den inhaltlichen Zugang sachlich heterogen erschlössener Bestände spielen für den Nutzer die semantischen Querverbindungen (Mappings /Crosskonkordanzen) zwischen den zugrunde liegenden Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) der Datenbanken eine entscheidende Rolle. Der Beitrag stellt Einsatzmöglichkeiten und Beispiele von Crosskonkordanzen (CK) im Projekt "Kompetenznetzwerk Modellbildung und Heterogenitätsbehandlung" (KoMoHe) sowie das Netz der bis dato entstandenen Terminolögie-Überstiege vor. Die am IZ entstandenen CK sollen künftig über einen Terminolögie-Service als Web Service genutzt werden, dieser wird im Beitrag exemplarisch vorgestellt.
  13. Mayr, P.; Umstätter, W.: ¬Eine bibliometrische Zeitschriftenanalyse mit Jol Scientrometrics und NfD bzw. IWP (2008) 0.01
    0.007150829 = product of:
      0.021452487 = sum of:
        0.021452487 = weight(_text_:information in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021452487 = score(doc=2302,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In der Studie sind 3.889 Datensätze analysiert worden, die im Zeitraum 1976-2004 in der Datenbank Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) im Forschungsbereich der Informetrie nachgewiesen sind und das Wachstum auf diesem Gebiet belegen. Die Studie zeigt anhand einer Bradford-Verteilung (power law) die Kernzeitschriften in diesem Feld und bestätigt auf der Basis dieses LISA-Datensatzes, dass die Gründung einer neuen Zeitschrift, "Journals of Informetrics" (JoI), 2007 etwa zur rechten Zeit erfolgte. Im Verhältnis dazu wird die Entwicklung der Zeitschrift Scientometrics betrachtet und auch die der "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) bzw. "Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis" (IWP).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.6/7, S.353-360
  14. Mayr, P.: ¬Die virtuelle Steinsuppe : kooperatives Verwalten von elektronischen Ressourcen mit Digilink (2007) 0.01
    0.0066727167 = product of:
      0.02001815 = sum of:
        0.02001815 = weight(_text_:information in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02001815 = score(doc=567,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Wa(h)re Information: 29. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag Bregenz, 19.-23.9.2006. Hrsg.: Harald Weigel
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  15. Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010) 0.01
    0.0061292816 = product of:
      0.018387845 = sum of:
        0.018387845 = weight(_text_:information in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018387845 = score(doc=4910,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    RSWK
    Dokumentationssprache / Heterogenität / Information Retrieval / Ranking / Evaluation
    Subject
    Dokumentationssprache / Heterogenität / Information Retrieval / Ranking / Evaluation
  16. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.: Reducing semantic complexity in distributed digital libraries : Treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking (2008) 0.01
    0.0051077353 = product of:
      0.015323205 = sum of:
        0.015323205 = weight(_text_:information in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015323205 = score(doc=1909,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The general science portal "vascoda" merges structured, high-quality information collections from more than 40 providers on the basis of search engine technology (FAST) and a concept which treats semantic heterogeneity between different controlled vocabularies. First experiences with the portal show some weaknesses of this approach which come out in most metadata-driven Digital Libraries (DLs) or subject specific portals. The purpose of the paper is to propose models to reduce the semantic complexity in heterogeneous DLs. The aim is to introduce value-added services (treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking) that gain a certain quality in DLs if they are combined with heterogeneity components established in the project "Competence Center Modeling and Treatment of Semantic Heterogeneity". Design/methodology/approach - Two methods, which are derived from scientometrics and network analysis, will be implemented with the objective to re-rank result sets by the following structural properties: the ranking of the results by core journals (so-called Bradfordizing) and ranking by centrality of authors in co-authorship networks. Findings - The methods, which will be implemented, focus on the query and on the result side of a search and are designed to positively influence each other. Conceptually, they will improve the search quality and guarantee that the most relevant documents in result sets will be ranked higher. Originality/value - The central impact of the paper focuses on the integration of three structural value-adding methods, which aim at reducing the semantic complexity represented in distributed DLs at several stages in the information retrieval process: query construction, search and ranking and re-ranking.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  17. Mayr, P.: DigiLink - Die dritte Generation der Linklisten (2005) 0.00
    0.0047183232 = product of:
      0.01415497 = sum of:
        0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01415497 = score(doc=3582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  18. Mayr, P.; Walter, A.-K.: Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Crosskonkordanzen (2007) 0.00
    0.0047183232 = product of:
      0.01415497 = sum of:
        0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01415497 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http://www.gesis.org/Information/Forschungsuebersichten/Tagungsberichte/Vernetzung/Mayr-Walter.pdf
  19. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.; Schaer, P.; Sure, Y.: Applying science models for search (2010) 0.00
    0.0047183232 = product of:
      0.01415497 = sum of:
        0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01415497 = score(doc=4663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  20. Mayr, P.; Tosques, F.: Webometrische Analysen mit Hilfe der Google Web APIs (2005) 0.00
    0.004128533 = product of:
      0.012385598 = sum of:
        0.012385598 = weight(_text_:information in 3189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012385598 = score(doc=3189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3189)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.1, S.41-48