Search (264 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Haas, S.W.: Natural language processing : toward large-scale, robust systems (1996) 0.09
    0.09179538 = product of:
      0.13769306 = sum of:
        0.02001815 = weight(_text_:information in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02001815 = score(doc=7415,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
        0.11767492 = sum of:
          0.061349012 = weight(_text_:systems in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061349012 = score(doc=7415,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
          0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05632591 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 31(1996), S.83-119
  2. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.08
    0.079816245 = product of:
      0.11972436 = sum of:
        0.02001815 = weight(_text_:information in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02001815 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.09970621 = sum of:
          0.0433803 = weight(_text_:systems in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0433803 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05632591 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.07
    0.07024011 = product of:
      0.105360165 = sum of:
        0.049034256 = weight(_text_:information in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049034256 = score(doc=4368,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.5375032 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
        0.05632591 = product of:
          0.11265182 = sum of:
            0.11265182 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11265182 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
    Theme
    Information
  4. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.07
    0.065914944 = product of:
      0.098872416 = sum of:
        0.010616227 = weight(_text_:information in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010616227 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
        0.08825619 = sum of:
          0.046011757 = weight(_text_:systems in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046011757 = score(doc=2548,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.04224443 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04224443 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051966466 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987) 0.06
    0.06424147 = product of:
      0.0963622 = sum of:
        0.0400363 = weight(_text_:information in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0400363 = score(doc=335,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
        0.05632591 = product of:
          0.11265182 = sum of:
            0.11265182 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11265182 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
  6. Drenth, H.; Morris, A.; Tseng, G.: Expert systems as information intermediaries (1991) 0.06
    0.05652085 = product of:
      0.084781274 = sum of:
        0.031651475 = weight(_text_:information in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031651475 = score(doc=3695,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
        0.0531298 = product of:
          0.1062596 = sum of:
            0.1062596 = weight(_text_:systems in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1062596 = score(doc=3695,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.6653617 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Points out that expert systems have great potential to enhance access to information retrieval systems as they use expertise to carry out tasks such as diagnosis and planning and make expertise available to nonexperts. Potential end users of online information retrieval systems are frequently deterred by the complexity of theses systems. Expert systems can mediate between the searcher and the information retrieval system and might be the key both to increasing and end user searching and to improving the quality of searches overall
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 26(1991), S.113-154
  7. Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008) 0.06
    0.0564239 = product of:
      0.08463585 = sum of:
        0.02830994 = weight(_text_:information in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02830994 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
        0.05632591 = product of:
          0.11265182 = sum of:
            0.11265182 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11265182 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:01:26
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42
  8. Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008) 0.06
    0.0564239 = product of:
      0.08463585 = sum of:
        0.02830994 = weight(_text_:information in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02830994 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
        0.05632591 = product of:
          0.11265182 = sum of:
            0.11265182 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11265182 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 9:30:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
  9. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.06
    0.0564239 = product of:
      0.08463585 = sum of:
        0.02830994 = weight(_text_:information in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02830994 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
        0.05632591 = product of:
          0.11265182 = sum of:
            0.11265182 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11265182 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
  10. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987) 0.06
    0.0564239 = product of:
      0.08463585 = sum of:
        0.02830994 = weight(_text_:information in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02830994 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
        0.05632591 = product of:
          0.11265182 = sum of:
            0.11265182 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11265182 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
  11. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.06
    0.0564239 = product of:
      0.08463585 = sum of:
        0.02830994 = weight(_text_:information in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02830994 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
        0.05632591 = product of:
          0.11265182 = sum of:
            0.11265182 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11265182 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  12. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.05
    0.04937091 = product of:
      0.074056365 = sum of:
        0.024771197 = weight(_text_:information in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024771197 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
        0.04928517 = product of:
          0.09857034 = sum of:
            0.09857034 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09857034 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.367-430
  13. MacFarlane, A.; Missaoui, S.; Makri, S.; Gutierrez Lopez, M.: Sender vs. recipient-orientated information systems revisited (2022) 0.05
    0.048674446 = product of:
      0.07301167 = sum of:
        0.032433107 = weight(_text_:information in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032433107 = score(doc=607,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3555249 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
        0.040578555 = product of:
          0.08115711 = sum of:
            0.08115711 = weight(_text_:systems in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08115711 = score(doc=607,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.5081784 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Belkin and Robertson (1976a) reflected on the ethical implications of theoretical research in information science and warned that there was potential for abuse of knowledge gained by undertaking such research and applying it to information systems. In particular, they identified the domains of advertising and political propaganda that posed particular problems. The purpose of this literature review is to revisit these ideas in the light of recent events in global information systems that demonstrate that their fears were justified. Design/methodology/approach The authors revisit the theory in information science that Belkin and Robertson used to build their argument, together with the discussion on ethics that resulted from this work in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The authors then review recent literature in the field of information systems, specifically information retrieval, social media and recommendation systems that highlight the problems identified by Belkin and Robertson. Findings Information science theories have been used in conjunction with empirical evidence gathered from user interactions that have been detrimental to both individuals and society. It is argued in the paper that the information science and systems communities should find ways to return control to the user wherever possible, and the ways to achieve this are considered. Research limitations/implications The ethical issues identified require a multidisciplinary approach with research in information science, computer science, information systems, business, sociology, psychology, journalism, government and politics, etc. required. This is too large a scope to deal with in a literature review, and we focus only on the design and implementation of information systems (Zimmer, 2008a) through an information science and information systems perspective. Practical implications The authors argue that information systems such as search technologies, social media applications and recommendation systems should be designed with the recipient of the information in mind (Paisley and Parker, 1965), not the sender of that information. Social implications Information systems designed ethically and with users in mind will go some way to addressing the ill effects typified by the problems for individuals and society evident in global information systems. Originality/value The authors synthesize the evidence from the literature to provide potential technological solutions to the ethical issues identified, with a set of recommendations to information systems designers and implementers.
    Theme
    Information
  14. Allen, B.: Cognitive research in information science : implications for design (1991) 0.05
    0.048659682 = product of:
      0.07298952 = sum of:
        0.035031762 = weight(_text_:information in 3681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035031762 = score(doc=3681,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3681, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3681)
        0.03795776 = product of:
          0.07591552 = sum of:
            0.07591552 = weight(_text_:systems in 3681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07591552 = score(doc=3681,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 3681, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3681)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Traces the history and development of cognitive research techniques in information science and surveys current research that relies on the cognitive aspect. Examines information systems that make use of the insights of cognitive research, including experimental and proposed systems. Examples include systems that are designed to make appropriate demands on user cognitive processing. Points out that cognitive research in information science has focused primarily on users of information systems and to a lesser extent on information intermediaries. Design initiatives deriving from this research have been directed toward developing information technology that can adapt to the knowledge abilities, and styles of individual users and that make efficient use of the knowledge base and cognitive process of groups of users
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 26(1991), S.3-37
  15. Hunter, J.: Collaborative semantic tagging and annotation systems (2009) 0.05
    0.047793493 = product of:
      0.07169024 = sum of:
        0.02830994 = weight(_text_:information in 7382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02830994 = score(doc=7382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 7382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7382)
        0.0433803 = product of:
          0.0867606 = sum of:
            0.0867606 = weight(_text_:systems in 7382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0867606 = score(doc=7382,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.5432656 = fieldWeight in 7382, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 43(2009), S.xxx-xxx
  16. Harter, S.P.; Hert, C.A.: Evaluation of information retrieval systems : approaches, issues, and methods (1997) 0.05
    0.04750651 = product of:
      0.07125977 = sum of:
        0.024771197 = weight(_text_:information in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024771197 = score(doc=2264,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
        0.046488572 = product of:
          0.092977144 = sum of:
            0.092977144 = weight(_text_:systems in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092977144 = score(doc=2264,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.58219147 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of information retrieval systems, defined as systems retrieving documents a sopposed to numerical data. Explains the classic Cranfield studies that have served as a standard for retrieval testing since the 1960s and discusses the Cranfield model and its relevance based measures of retrieval effectiveness. Details sosme of the problems with the Cranfield instruments and issues of validity and reliability, generalizability, usefulness and basic concepts. Discusses the evaluation of the Internet search engines in light of the Cranfield model, noting the very real differences between batch systems (Cranfield) and interactive systems (Internet). Because the Internet collection is not fixed, it is impossible to determine recall as a measure of retrieval effectiveness. considers future directions in evaluating information retrieval systems
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 32(1997), S.3-94
  17. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.05
    0.04546617 = product of:
      0.068199255 = sum of:
        0.0400363 = weight(_text_:information in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0400363 = score(doc=4226,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
        0.028162954 = product of:
          0.05632591 = sum of:
            0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05632591 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 30(1995), S.385-416
  18. Schamber, L.: Relevance and information behavior (1994) 0.05
    0.045416694 = product of:
      0.06812504 = sum of:
        0.03745053 = weight(_text_:information in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03745053 = score(doc=1004,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.41052482 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
        0.030674506 = product of:
          0.061349012 = sum of:
            0.061349012 = weight(_text_:systems in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061349012 = score(doc=1004,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of relevance as it relates to the behaviour of users seeking and using information rather than in evaluating the performance of information retrieval systems. Views relevance as a manifestation of human information behaviour and excludes works that view relevance only as matching or computational functions of information retrieval systems
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Information Inc.
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 29(1994), S.3-48
  19. Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994) 0.04
    0.04390007 = product of:
      0.0658501 = sum of:
        0.03064641 = weight(_text_:information in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03064641 = score(doc=209,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
        0.03520369 = product of:
          0.07040738 = sum of:
            0.07040738 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07040738 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This annotated bibliography lists materials dealing with information literacy - including instruction in the use of information resources, research, and computer skills related to retrieving, using, and evaluating information. This review, the 20th to be published in RSR, includes items in English published in 1993
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
  20. Vakkari, P.: Task-based information searching (2002) 0.04
    0.042257585 = product of:
      0.06338637 = sum of:
        0.03521004 = weight(_text_:information in 4288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03521004 = score(doc=4288,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051966466 = queryNorm
            0.38596505 = fieldWeight in 4288, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4288)
        0.028176332 = product of:
          0.056352664 = sum of:
            0.056352664 = weight(_text_:systems in 4288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056352664 = score(doc=4288,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051966466 = queryNorm
                0.35286134 = fieldWeight in 4288, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The rationale for using information systems is to find information that helps us in our daily activities, be they tasks or interests. Systems are expected to support us in searching for and identifying useful information. Although the activities and tasks performed by humans generate information needs and searching, they have attracted little attention in studies of information searching. Such studies have concentrated an search tasks rather than the activities that trigger them. It is obvious that our understanding of information searching is only partial, if we are not able to connect aspects of searching to the related task. The expected contribution of information to the task is reflected in relevance assessments of the information items found, and in the search tactics and use of the system in general. Taking the task into account seems to be a necessary condition for understanding and explaining information searching, and, by extension, for effective systems design.
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 37(2003), S.413-464

Languages

  • e 254
  • d 6
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • ru 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 235
  • b 36
  • m 18
  • s 7
  • el 3
  • r 2
  • More… Less…