-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.11
0.11432679 = product of:
0.17149018 = sum of:
0.017693711 = weight(_text_:information in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017693711 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.15379646 = sum of:
0.054225378 = weight(_text_:systems in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054225378 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.339541 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.09957108 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09957108 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Source
- Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
-
Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007)
0.09
0.087886594 = product of:
0.13182989 = sum of:
0.01415497 = weight(_text_:information in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01415497 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.11767492 = sum of:
0.061349012 = weight(_text_:systems in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061349012 = score(doc=541,freq=4.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.05632591 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05632591 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this presentation, we therefore focus on a solution for providing uniform access to Digital Libraries and other online services. In order to enable uniform query access to heterogeneous sources, we must provide metadata interoperability in a way that a query language - in this case SPARQL - can cope with the incompatibility of the metadata in various sources without changing their already existing information models.
- Content
- Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:46
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.09
0.08569823 = product of:
0.12854734 = sum of:
0.021232454 = weight(_text_:information in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021232454 = score(doc=4820,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.107314885 = sum of:
0.06507045 = weight(_text_:systems in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06507045 = score(doc=4820,freq=8.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.04224443 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04224443 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008)
0.07
0.0746632 = product of:
0.111994796 = sum of:
0.023738606 = weight(_text_:information in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023738606 = score(doc=3261,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.08825619 = sum of:
0.046011757 = weight(_text_:systems in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046011757 = score(doc=3261,freq=4.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.28811008 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.04224443 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04224443 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Ontologies improve IR systems regarding its retrieval and presentation of information, which make the task of finding information more effective, efficient, and interactive. In this paper we argue that ontologies also greatly improve the engineering of such systems. We created a framework that uses ontology to drive the process of engineering an IR system. We developed a prototype that shows how a domain specialist without knowledge in the IR field can build an IR system with interactive components. The resulting system provides support for users not only to find their information needs but also to extend their state of knowledge. This way, our approach to ontology-enabled information retrieval addresses both the engineering aspect described here and also the usability aspect described elsewhere.
- Date
- 28.11.2016 12:43:22
-
Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.07
0.072808884 = product of:
0.10921332 = sum of:
0.010616227 = weight(_text_:information in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010616227 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.098597094 = sum of:
0.056352664 = weight(_text_:systems in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056352664 = score(doc=2655,freq=6.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.35286134 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.04224443 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04224443 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.07
0.06641902 = product of:
0.09962853 = sum of:
0.012385598 = weight(_text_:information in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012385598 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.08724293 = sum of:
0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03795776 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.04928517 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04928517 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Information als Rohstoff für Innovation : Programm der Bundesregierung 1996-2000 (1996)
0.06
0.0564239 = product of:
0.08463585 = sum of:
0.02830994 = weight(_text_:information in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02830994 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.05632591 = product of:
0.11265182 = sum of:
0.11265182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11265182 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.1997 19:26:34
-
Ask me[@sk.me]: your global information guide : der Wegweiser durch die Informationswelten (1996)
0.06
0.0564239 = product of:
0.08463585 = sum of:
0.02830994 = weight(_text_:information in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02830994 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
0.05632591 = product of:
0.11265182 = sum of:
0.11265182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11265182 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 30.11.1996 13:22:37
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.05
0.04903122 = product of:
0.14709365 = sum of:
0.14709365 = sum of:
0.07668626 = weight(_text_:systems in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07668626 = score(doc=539,freq=4.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.48018348 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.07040738 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07040738 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Feinberg, M.: Hidden bias to responsible bias: an approach to information systems based on Haraway's situated knowledges (2007)
0.05
0.048659682 = product of:
0.07298952 = sum of:
0.035031762 = weight(_text_:information in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035031762 = score(doc=4142,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
0.03795776 = product of:
0.07591552 = sum of:
0.07591552 = weight(_text_:systems in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07591552 = score(doc=4142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information research. 12(2007); Supplement, S.1-13
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.05
0.04585363 = product of:
0.13756089 = sum of:
0.13756089 = product of:
0.41268265 = sum of:
0.41268265 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.41268265 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4405723 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Information retrieval research : Proceedings of the 19th Annual BCS-IRSG Colloquium on IR Research, Aberdeen, Scotland, 8-9 April 1997 (1997)
0.05
0.045416694 = product of:
0.06812504 = sum of:
0.03745053 = weight(_text_:information in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03745053 = score(doc=5393,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.41052482 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
0.030674506 = product of:
0.061349012 = sum of:
0.061349012 = weight(_text_:systems in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061349012 = score(doc=5393,freq=4.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- LCSH
- Information storage and retrieval systems / Research / Congresses
Information retrieval / Research / Congresses
- RSWK
- Information retrieval / Kongress / Aberdeen <1997>
- Subject
- Information storage and retrieval systems / Research / Congresses
Information retrieval / Research / Congresses
Information retrieval / Kongress / Aberdeen <1997>
-
Colomb, R.M.: Quality of ontologies in interoperating information systems (2002)
0.04
0.04480618 = product of:
0.067209266 = sum of:
0.024771197 = weight(_text_:information in 7858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024771197 = score(doc=7858,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 7858, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7858)
0.042438067 = product of:
0.084876135 = sum of:
0.084876135 = weight(_text_:systems in 7858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084876135 = score(doc=7858,freq=10.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.5314657 = fieldWeight in 7858, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The focus of this paper is an quality of ontologies as they relate to interoperating information systems. Quality is not a property of something but a judgment, so must be relative to some purpose, and generally involves recognition of design tradeoffs. Ontologies used for information systems interoperability have much in common with classification systems in information science, knowledge based systems, and programming languages, and inherit quality characteristics from each of these older areas. Factors peculiar to the new field lead to some additional characteristics relevant to quality, some of which are more profitably considered quality aspects not of the ontology as such, but of the environment through which the ontology is made available to its users. Suggestions are presented as to how to use these Factors in producing quality ontologies.
-
Kirk, J.: Theorising information use : managers and their work (2002)
0.04
0.04242386 = product of:
0.06363579 = sum of:
0.044656906 = weight(_text_:information in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044656906 = score(doc=560,freq=26.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.4895196 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
0.01897888 = product of:
0.03795776 = sum of:
0.03795776 = weight(_text_:systems in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03795776 = score(doc=560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23767869 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The focus of this thesis is information use. Although a key concept in information behaviour, information use has received little attention from information science researchers. Studies of other key concepts such as information need and information seeking are dominant in information behaviour research. Information use is an area of interest to information professionals who rely on research outcomes to shape their practice. There are few empirical studies of how people actually use information that might guide and refine the development of information systems, products and services.
- Theme
- Information
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.04
0.042317923 = product of:
0.06347688 = sum of:
0.021232454 = weight(_text_:information in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021232454 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.04224443 = product of:
0.08448886 = sum of:
0.08448886 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08448886 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
- Source
- Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
-
Borlund, P.: ¬The IIR evaluation model : a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems (2003)
0.04
0.0417083 = product of:
0.06256245 = sum of:
0.030027224 = weight(_text_:information in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030027224 = score(doc=922,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
0.032535225 = product of:
0.06507045 = sum of:
0.06507045 = weight(_text_:systems in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06507045 = score(doc=922,freq=2.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.4074492 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information Research. 8(2003), no.3
-
Chen, H.: Semantic research for digital libraries (1999)
0.04
0.040016677 = product of:
0.060025014 = sum of:
0.03184868 = weight(_text_:information in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03184868 = score(doc=1247,freq=18.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
0.028176332 = product of:
0.056352664 = sum of:
0.056352664 = weight(_text_:systems in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056352664 = score(doc=1247,freq=6.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.35286134 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this era of the Internet and distributed, multimedia computing, new and emerging classes of information systems applications have swept into the lives of office workers and people in general. From digital libraries, multimedia systems, geographic information systems, and collaborative computing to electronic commerce, virtual reality, and electronic video arts and games, these applications have created tremendous opportunities for information and computer science researchers and practitioners. As applications become more pervasive, pressing, and diverse, several well-known information retrieval (IR) problems have become even more urgent. Information overload, a result of the ease of information creation and transmission via the Internet and WWW, has become more troublesome (e.g., even stockbrokers and elementary school students, heavily exposed to various WWW search engines, are versed in such IR terminology as recall and precision). Significant variations in database formats and structures, the richness of information media (text, audio, and video), and an abundance of multilingual information content also have created severe information interoperability problems -- structural interoperability, media interoperability, and multilingual interoperability.
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.04
0.038698442 = product of:
0.11609532 = sum of:
0.11609532 = sum of:
0.056352664 = weight(_text_:systems in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056352664 = score(doc=1967,freq=6.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.35286134 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.059742652 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059742652 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1819777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Fang, L.: ¬A developing search service : heterogeneous resources integration and retrieval system (2004)
0.04
0.037099257 = product of:
0.055648886 = sum of:
0.01978217 = weight(_text_:information in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01978217 = score(doc=1193,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
0.035866715 = product of:
0.07173343 = sum of:
0.07173343 = weight(_text_:systems in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07173343 = score(doc=1193,freq=14.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.4491705 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article describes two approaches for searching heterogeneous resources, which are explained as they are used in two corresponding existing systems-RIRS (Resource Integration Retrieval System) and HRUSP (Heterogeneous Resource Union Search Platform). On analyzing the existing systems, a possible framework-the MUSP (Multimetadata-Based Union Search Platform) is presented. Libraries now face a dilemma. On one hand, libraries subscribe to many types of database retrieval systems that are produced by various providers. The libraries build their data and information systems independently. This results in highly heterogeneous and distributed systems at the technical level (e.g., different operating systems and user interfaces) and at the conceptual level (e.g., the same objects are named using different terms). On the other hand, end users want to access all these heterogeneous data via a union interface, without having to know the structure of each information system or the different retrieval methods used by the systems. Libraries must achieve a harmony between information providers and users. In order to bridge the gap between the service providers and the users, it would seem that all source databases would need to be rebuilt according to a uniform data structure and query language, but this seems impossible. Fortunately, however, libraries and information and technology providers are now making an effort to find a middle course that meets the requirements of both data providers and users. They are doing this through resource integration.
- Theme
- Information Gateway
-
McDonough, J.P.: Epistemic engineering : some implications of the sociology of knowledge for information systems design (1994)
0.04
0.036794424 = product of:
0.055191636 = sum of:
0.024517128 = weight(_text_:information in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024517128 = score(doc=3184,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09122598 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
0.030674506 = product of:
0.061349012 = sum of:
0.061349012 = weight(_text_:systems in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061349012 = score(doc=3184,freq=4.0), product of:
0.159702 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.051966466 = queryNorm
0.38414678 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- For digital information systems' design to continue to flourish, it would appear that we may need to incorporate a view of the social in our design efforts. While there are a variety of disciplines and viewpoints within the social sciences which might assist information system designers in an effort to achieve a wider perspective in design, the remainder of this paper will focus on one that seems particularly well-suited for this role, the sociology of knowledge
