Search (3820 results, page 1 of 191)

0.118290395 = product of:
  0.23658079 = sum of:
    0.23658079 = sum of:
      0.1823167 = weight(_text_:perception in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1823167 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.5673447 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
      0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054264087 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the change in the perception of the ADONIS project 14 years after its introduction. Outlines the original mission to use new technology to provide copies of copyright articles more effiently, and to take net efficiency gain as a usage of copyright fee. Details the present ADONIS service - its mission is the same although the manner of achieving it has changed - providing a history of the last 10 years; lists recent developments, planned developments and highlights the main problems of ADONIS to be pricing

Source

Interlending and document supply. 23(1995) no.3, S.22-25

0.118290395 = product of:
  0.23658079 = sum of:
    0.23658079 = sum of:
      0.1823167 = weight(_text_:perception in 3723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1823167 = score(doc=3723,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.5673447 = fieldWeight in 3723, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3723)
      0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 3723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054264087 = score(doc=3723,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3723, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3723)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a brief report of a study of the use patterns and perception of faculty and researchers regarding CD-ROM services at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Library, Saudi Arabia. The main objectives were: to ascertain use patterns and perceptions of CD-ROM services; and to elicit comments which would be used in developing a planning strategy to expand and enhance CD-ROM services

Date

22. 2.1999 13:10:24

0.115639344 = product of:
  0.23127869 = sum of:
    0.23127869 = sum of:
      0.19736363 = weight(_text_:perception in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19736363 = score(doc=5973,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.6141687 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
      0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033915058 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore effects of individuals' social context on their perception of a task, for better understanding of social aspects of task-based information seeking behavior. Design/methodology/approach This study took a qualitative case approach and conducted semi-structured one-on-one interviews with 12 participants. A cross-context comparative approach was chosen to identify effects of the social contexts on individuals. For comparative analysis, the research population was tenured faculty members in two different disciplines, natural sciences and humanities. The interview data were analyzed and coded using NVivo12 through an open coding process. Findings The results demonstrate that the same task type is differently perceived by individuals in different social contexts. Reasons for the different perceptions in the different contexts are associated with social factors of the disciplines, specifically social norms and practices. Originality/value This study uses a novel theoretical framework, cognitive sociology, to examine social aspects of human perception in relation to task-based information seeking behavior, which has been little understood theoretically and empirically in the field of information science.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.1035041 = product of:
  0.2070082 = sum of:
    0.2070082 = sum of:
      0.15952712 = weight(_text_:perception in 8234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15952712 = score(doc=8234,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.49642664 = fieldWeight in 8234, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8234)
      0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 8234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04748108 = score(doc=8234,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8234, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8234)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Science deals with knowledge of the material world based on objective reality, and is under constant attack by those who need magic, that is concepts based on imagination and desire. Roger Penrose in 'The emperor's new mind' attampts to look beyond objective reality to questions concerning the machinery and method of the operation of the human mind, using the theory that computers will never be able to duplicate the human experience. Shows where Penrose is wrong by reviewing the evolution of men and computers and speculating about where computers might and might not imitate human perception. Warns against the danger of passive acceptance when respected scientists venture into the occult

Source

AI magazine. 15(1994) no.1, S.19-22

0.1035041 = product of:
  0.2070082 = sum of:
    0.2070082 = sum of:
      0.15952712 = weight(_text_:perception in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15952712 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.49642664 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
      0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04748108 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

24. 1.1999 12:22:46

0.09986429 = sum of:
  0.079515256 = product of:
    0.23854576 = sum of:
      0.23854576 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23854576 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42444503 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020349033 = product of:
    0.040698066 = sum of:
      0.040698066 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040698066 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.09769001 = product of:
  0.19538002 = sum of:
    0.19538002 = product of:
      0.39076003 = sum of:
        0.39076003 = weight(_text_:perception in 3515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39076003 = score(doc=3515,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            1.215992 = fieldWeight in 3515, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3515)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Knowledge organization (KO) can be postulated as existing on a continuum between classificatory activity and perception. Studying perception and its role in the identification of concepts is critical for the advancement of KO. The purpose of this research is to advance our understanding of the role of perception in KO systems. We briefly review the role of perception in KO and some preliminary evidence about affective social tagging, which is seen as a form of everyday classification. We consider how Husserlian phenomenology might be useful for analyzing the role of perception in affective social tagging. Finally, preliminary results of an empirical study are reported.

0.09115835 = product of:
  0.1823167 = sum of:
    0.1823167 = product of:
      0.3646334 = sum of:
        0.3646334 = weight(_text_:perception in 2287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3646334 = score(doc=2287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            1.1346895 = fieldWeight in 2287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2287)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.08917837 = product of:
  0.17835674 = sum of:
    0.17835674 = product of:
      0.35671347 = sum of:
        0.35671347 = weight(_text_:perception in 3884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35671347 = score(doc=3884,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            1.1100436 = fieldWeight in 3884, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3884)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Independent work on cognitve models of visual perception and of perception of lexical items reveals a common framework underlying the 2 sets of cognitive mechanisms posited. From these 2 classes of model - one visual and the other linguistic - a unifying structure has been extracted. Presents and discusses the integrated model, and considers some general implications for the notion of unified theories of visual and linguistic perception. Demonstrates a similar patterns of interplay between serial and parallel processes as well as between top down and bottom up information. Identifies several common problems, such as the role of value parameters in perception

0.08917837 = product of:
  0.17835674 = sum of:
    0.17835674 = product of:
      0.35671347 = sum of:
        0.35671347 = weight(_text_:perception in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35671347 = score(doc=4996,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            1.1100436 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

We present the results of a study of user's perception of relevance of documents. The aim is to study experimentally how users' perception varies depending on the form that retrieved documents are presented. Documents retrieved in response to a query are presented to users in a variety of ways, from full text to a machine spoken query-biased automatically-generated summary, and the difference in users' perception of relevance is studied. The experimental results suggest that the effectiveness of advanced multimedia Information Retrieval applications may be affected by the low level of users' perception of relevance of retrieved documents

0.08322025 = sum of:
  0.06626272 = product of:
    0.19878815 = sum of:
      0.19878815 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19878815 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42444503 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.016957529 = product of:
    0.033915058 = sum of:
      0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033915058 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.080955535 = product of:
  0.16191107 = sum of:
    0.16191107 = sum of:
      0.113947935 = weight(_text_:perception in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113947935 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.35459045 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
      0.04796313 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04796313 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Previous studies of user-generated vocabularies (e.g., Golder & Huberman, 2006; Munk & Mork, 2007b; Yoon, 2009) have proposed that a primary source of tag agreement across users is due to wide-spread use of tags at the basic level of abstraction. However, an investigation of levels of abstraction in user-generated tagging vocabularies did not support this notion. This study analyzed approximately 8000 tags generated by 40 subjects. Analysis of 7617 tags assigned to 36 online resources representing four content categories (TOOL, FRUIT, CLOTHING, VEHICLE) and three resource genres (news article, blog, ecommerce) did not find statistically significant preferences in the assignment of tags at the superordinate, subordinate or basic levels of abstraction. Within the framework of Heidegger's (1953/1996) notion of handiness , observed variations in the preferred level of abstraction are both natural and phenomenological in that perception and understanding -- and thus the meaning of "things" -- arise out of the individual's contextualized experiences of engaging with objects. Operationalization of superordinate, subordinate and basic levels of abstraction using Heidegger's notion of handiness may be able to account for differences in the everyday experiences and activities of taggers, thereby leading to a better understanding of user-generated tagging vocabularies.

Date

5. 9.2014 16:22:27

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.080573365 = product of:
  0.16114673 = sum of:
    0.16114673 = product of:
      0.32229346 = sum of:
        0.32229346 = weight(_text_:perception in 3649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32229346 = score(doc=3649,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            1.0029333 = fieldWeight in 3649, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

LCSH

Visual perception

Subject

Visual perception

0.080573365 = product of:
  0.16114673 = sum of:
    0.16114673 = product of:
      0.32229346 = sum of:
        0.32229346 = weight(_text_:perception in 8018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32229346 = score(doc=8018,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            1.0029333 = fieldWeight in 8018, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8018)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes a computer program, UCIE (Understanding Cognitive Information Engineering), designed for computer user interface applications by simulating graphical perception. Reports results of an empirical study to determine the performance of the software and the user interface

0.079515256 = product of:
  0.15903051 = sum of:
    0.15903051 = product of:
      0.47709152 = sum of:
        0.47709152 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47709152 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42444503 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.07894545 = product of:
  0.1578909 = sum of:
    0.1578909 = product of:
      0.3157818 = sum of:
        0.3157818 = weight(_text_:perception in 1010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3157818 = score(doc=1010,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.9826699 = fieldWeight in 1010, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1010)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This book provides a comprehensive account of the intentionality of perceptual experience. With special emphasis on vision Searle explains how the raw phenomenology of perception sets the content and the conditions of satisfaction of experience. The central question concerns the relation between the subjective conscious perceptual field and the objective perceptual field. Everything in the objective field is either perceived or can be perceived. Nothing in the subjective field is perceived nor can be perceived precisely because the events in the subjective field consist of the perceivings, whether veridical or not, of the events in the objective field.
Searle begins by criticizing the classical theories of perception and identifies a single fallacy, what he calls the Bad Argument, as the source of nearly all of the confusions in the history of the philosophy of perception. He next justifies the claim that perceptual experiences have presentational intentionality and shows how this justifies the direct realism of his account. In the central theoretical chapters, he shows how it is possible that the raw phenomenology must necessarily determine certain form of intentionality. Searle introduces, in detail, the distinction between different levels of perception from the basic level to the higher levels and shows the internal relation between the features of the experience and the states of affairs presented by the experience. The account applies not just to language possessing human beings but to infants and conscious animals. He also discusses how the account relates to certain traditional puzzles about spectrum inversion, color and size constancy and the brain-in-the-vat thought experiments. In the final chapters he explains and refutes Disjunctivist theories of perception, explains the role of unconscious perception, and concludes by discussing traditional problems of perception such as skepticism.

Content

The Bad Argument Summary of the Theory of Intentionality Consciousness The Intentionality of Perceptual Experiences Further Developments of the Argument Against the Bad Argument How Perceptual Intentionality Works I: Basic Features, Causation, and Intentional Content How Perceptual Intentionality Works II: Extending the Analysis to Non-basic Features Disjunctivism Unconscious Perception Classical Theories of Perception

LCSH

Perception (Philosophy)

Subject

Perception (Philosophy)

0.078024715 = product of:
  0.15604943 = sum of:
    0.15604943 = sum of:
      0.12891738 = weight(_text_:perception in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12891738 = score(doc=2881,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.4011733 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
      0.027132044 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027132044 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

My keynote at the workshop "Social Tagging in Knowledge Organization" was a great opportunity to make and share new experiences. For the first time ever, I sat in my office at home and gave a live web video presentation to a conference audience elsewhere on the globe. At the same time, it was also an opportunity to premier my conceptual model "Matrix of Perception" to an interdisciplinary audience of researchers and practitioners with a variety of backgrounds - reaching from philosophy, psychology, pedagogy and computation to library science and economics. The interdisciplinary approach of the conference is also mirrored in the structure of this volume, with articles on the theoretical background, the empirical analysis and the potential applications of tagging, for instance in university libraries, e-learning, or e-commerce. As an introduction to the topic of "social tagging" I would like to draw your attention to some foundation concepts of the phenomenon I have racked my brain with for the last few month. One thing I have seen missing in recent research and system development is a focus on the variety of user perspectives in social tagging. Different people perceive tagging in complex variegated ways and use this form of knowledge organization for a variety of purposes. My analytical interest lies in understanding the personas and patterns in tagging systems and in being able to label their different perceptions. To come up with a concise picture of user expectations, needs and activities, I have broken down the perspectives on tagging into two different categories, namely "faces" and "depth". When put together, they form the "Matrix of Perception" - a nuanced view of stakeholders and their respective levels of participation.

Date

22. 6.2009 9:15:45

0.07536948 = product of:
  0.15073895 = sum of:
    0.15073895 = product of:
      0.3014779 = sum of:
        0.3014779 = weight(_text_:perception in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3014779 = score(doc=2595,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05006422 = queryNorm
            0.93815815 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to explore the theory and practice of knowledge organization and its necessary connection to human perception, and shows a solution of the potential ones. Design/methodology/approach - The author attempts to survey the problem of concept-building and extension, as well as the determination of semantics in different aspects. The purpose is to find criteria for the choice of the solution that best incorporates users into the design cycles of knowledge organization systems. Findings - It is widely agreed that cognition provides the basis for concept-building; however, at the next stage of processing there is a debate. Fundamentally, what is the connection between perception and the superior cognitive processes? The perceptual method does not separate these two but rather considers them united, with perception permeating cognition. By contrast, the linguistic method considers perception as an information-receiving system. Separate from, and following, perception, the cognitive subsystems then perform information and data processing, leading to both knowledge organization and representation. We assume by that model that top-level concepts emerge from knowledge organization and representation. This paper points obvious connection of visual imagery and the internet; perceptual access of knowledge organization and information retrieval. There are some practical and characteristic solutions for the visualization of information without demand of completeness. Research limitations/implications - Librarians need to identify those semantic characteristics which stimulate a similar conceptual image both in the mind of the librarian and in the mind of the user. Originality/value - For a fresh perspective, an understanding of perception is required as well.

0.0739315 = product of:
  0.147863 = sum of:
    0.147863 = sum of:
      0.113947935 = weight(_text_:perception in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113947935 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.35459045 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
      0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033915058 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The "Screen Design Manual" provides designers of interactive media with a practical working guide for preparing and presenting information that is suitable for both their target groups and the media they are using. It describes background information and relationships, clarifies them with the help of examples, and encourages further development of the language of digital media. In addition to the basics of the psychology of perception and learning, ergonomics, communication theory, imagery research, and aesthetics, the book also explores the design of navigation and orientation elements. Guidelines and checklists, along with the unique presentation of the book, support the application of information in practice.

Date

22. 3.2008 14:29:25

0.0739315 = product of:
  0.147863 = sum of:
    0.147863 = sum of:
      0.113947935 = weight(_text_:perception in 153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113947935 = score(doc=153,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.35459045 = fieldWeight in 153, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=153)
      0.033915058 = weight(_text_:22 in 153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033915058 = score(doc=153,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05006422 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 153, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=153)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22