Search (669 results, page 2 of 34)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Qiu, X.Y.; Srinivasan, P.; Hu, Y.: Supervised learning models to predict firm performance with annual reports : an empirical study (2014) 0.03 
    0.028033776 = product of:
  0.08410133 = sum of:
    0.08410133 = product of:
      0.16820265 = sum of:
        0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 1205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16820265 = score(doc=1205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 1205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1205)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  2. British Library / FAST/Dewey Review Group: Consultation on subject indexing and classification standards applied by the British Library (2015) 0.03 
    0.028033776 = product of:
  0.08410133 = sum of:
    0.08410133 = product of:
      0.16820265 = sum of:
        0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16820265 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    The Library is consulting with stakeholders concerning the potential impact of these proposals. No firm decisions have yet been taken regarding either of these standards. FAST 1. The British Library proposes to adopt FAST selectively to extend the scope of subject indexing of current and legacy content. 2. The British Library proposes to implement FAST as a replacement for LCSH in all current cataloguing, subject to mitigation of the risks identified above, in particular the question of sustainability. DDC 3. The British Library proposes to implement Abridged DDC selectively to extend the scope of subject indexing of current and legacy content.
  3. Arazy, O.; Gellatly, I.; Brainin, E.; Nov, O.: Motivation to share knowledge using wiki technology and the moderating effect of role perceptions (2016) 0.03 
    0.028033776 = product of:
  0.08410133 = sum of:
    0.08410133 = product of:
      0.16820265 = sum of:
        0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 3143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16820265 = score(doc=3143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 3143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3143)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    One of the key challenges for innovation and technology-mediated knowledge collaboration within organizational settings is motivating contributors to share their knowledge. Drawing upon self-determination theory, we investigate 2 forms of motivation: internally driven (autonomous motivation) and externally driven (controlled motivation). Knowledge sharing could be viewed as a required in-role activity or as discretionary extra-role behavior. In this study, we examine the moderating effect of role perceptions on the relations between each of the two motivational constructs and knowledge sharing, paying particular attention to the affordances of the enabling information technology. An analysis of survey data from a wiki-based organizational encyclopedia in a large, multinational firm reveals that when contributors' motivation is externally driven, they are more likely to share knowledge if this activity is viewed as in-role behavior. However, when contributors' motivation is internally driven, they are more likely to participate in knowledge sharing when this activity is viewed as extra-role behavior. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
  4. Sebescen, N.; Vitak, J.: Securing the human : employee security vulnerability risk in organizational settings (2017) 0.03 
    0.028033776 = product of:
  0.08410133 = sum of:
    0.08410133 = product of:
      0.16820265 = sum of:
        0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 3787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16820265 = score(doc=3787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 3787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3787)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    As organizational security breaches increase, so too does the need to fully understand the human factors that lead to these breaches and take the necessary steps to minimize threats. The present study evaluates how three sets of employee characteristics (demographic, company-specific, and skills-based) predict an employee's likelihood of becoming a security breach victim. In order to move beyond traditional evaluations of security threats, which generally consider security threats individually, analyses in this paper approach security vulnerability from a more holistic approach to analyze four risk categories concurrently: phishing, passwords, bring your own device (BYOD), and company-supplied laptops. Findings from a survey of 250 employees at a medium-sized American information technology (IT) consulting firm identify higher-risk employees across the four risk areas and provide new insights into the challenges organizations face when trying to ensure the protection of company data.
  5. Attfield, S.; Blandford, A.: Conceptual misfits in Email-based current-awareness interaction (2011) 0.02 
    0.023361482 = product of:
  0.070084445 = sum of:
    0.070084445 = product of:
      0.14016889 = sum of:
        0.14016889 = weight(_text_:firm in 4490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14016889 = score(doc=4490,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.41307074 = fieldWeight in 4490, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4490)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This research aims to identify some requirements for supporting user interactions with electronic current-awareness alert systems based on data from a professional work environment. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative data were gathered using contextual inquiry observations with 21 workers at the London office of an international law firm. The analysis uses CASSM ("Concept-based Analysis of Surface and Structural Misfits"), a usability evaluation method structured around identifying mismatches, or "misfits", between user-concepts and concepts represented within a system. Findings - Participants were frequently overwhelmed by e-mail alerts, and a key requirement is to support efficient interaction. Several misfits, which act as barriers to efficient reviewing and follow-on activities, are demonstrated. These relate to a lack of representation of key user-concepts at the interface and/or within the system, including alert items and their properties, source documents, "back-story", primary sources, content categorisations and user collections. Research limitations/implications - Given these misfits, a set of requirements is derived to improve the efficiency with which users can achieve key outcomes with current-awareness information as these occur within a professional work environment. Originality/value - The findings will be of interest to current-awareness providers. The approach is relevant to information interaction researchers interested in deriving design requirements from naturalistic studies.
  6. García, J.A.; Rodriguez-Sánchez, R.; Fdez-Valdivia, J.: Adverse selection of reviewers (2015) 0.02 
    0.023361482 = product of:
  0.070084445 = sum of:
    0.070084445 = product of:
      0.14016889 = sum of:
        0.14016889 = weight(_text_:firm in 1859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14016889 = score(doc=1859,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.41307074 = fieldWeight in 1859, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1859)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Adverse selection occurs when a firm signs a contract with a potential worker but his/her key skills are still not known at that time, which leads the employer to make a wrong decision. In this article, we study the example of adverse selection of reviewers when a potential referee whose ability is his private information faces a finite sequence of review processes for several scholarly journals, one after the other. Our editor's problem is to design a system that guarantees that each manuscript is reviewed by a referee if and only if the reviewer's ability matches the review's complexity. As is typically the case in solving problems of adverse selection in agency theory, the journal editor offers a menu of contracts to the potential referee, from which the reviewer chooses the contract that is best for him given his ability. The optimal contract will be the one that provides the right incentives to match the complexity of the review and the ability of the reviewer. The payment of contracts is made through a proportional increment of the reviewer factor, which measures the importance of reviewers to their field.
  7. Saggi, M.K.; Jain, S.: ¬A survey towards an integration of big data analytics to big insights for value-creation (2018) 0.02 
    0.023361482 = product of:
  0.070084445 = sum of:
    0.070084445 = product of:
      0.14016889 = sum of:
        0.14016889 = weight(_text_:firm in 5053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14016889 = score(doc=5053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.41307074 = fieldWeight in 5053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5053)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Big Data Analytics (BDA) is increasingly becoming a trending practice that generates an enormous amount of data and provides a new opportunity that is helpful in relevant decision-making. The developments in Big Data Analytics provide a new paradigm and solutions for big data sources, storage, and advanced analytics. The BDA provide a nuanced view of big data development, and insights on how it can truly create value for firm and customer. This article presents a comprehensive, well-informed examination, and realistic analysis of deploying big data analytics successfully in companies. It provides an overview of the architecture of BDA including six components, namely: (i) data generation, (ii) data acquisition, (iii) data storage, (iv) advanced data analytics, (v) data visualization, and (vi) decision-making for value-creation. In this paper, seven V's characteristics of BDA namely Volume, Velocity, Variety, Valence, Veracity, Variability, and Value are explored. The various big data analytics tools, techniques and technologies have been described. Furthermore, it presents a methodical analysis for the usage of Big Data Analytics in various applications such as agriculture, healthcare, cyber security, and smart city. This paper also highlights the previous research, challenges, current status, and future directions of big data analytics for various application platforms. This overview highlights three issues, namely (i) concepts, characteristics and processing paradigms of Big Data Analytics; (ii) the state-of-the-art framework for decision-making in BDA for companies to insight value-creation; and (iii) the current challenges of Big Data Analytics as well as possible future directions.
  8. Levy, S.: In the plex : how Google thinks, works, and shapes our lives (2011) 0.02 
    0.023126688 = product of:
  0.06938006 = sum of:
    0.06938006 = product of:
      0.13876012 = sum of:
        0.13876012 = weight(_text_:firm in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13876012 = score(doc=9,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.4089192 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    LCSH
    Google (Firm)
    Subject
    Google (Firm)
  9. ¬The global flow of information : legal, social, and cultural perspectives (2011) 0.02 
    0.018689185 = product of:
  0.056067556 = sum of:
    0.056067556 = product of:
      0.11213511 = sum of:
        0.11213511 = weight(_text_:firm in 61) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11213511 = score(doc=61,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.33045658 = fieldWeight in 61, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=61)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Internet has been integral to the globalization of a range of goods and production, from intellectual property and scientific research to political discourse and cultural symbols. Yet the ease with which it allows information to flow at a global level presents enormous regulatory challenges. Understanding if, when, and how the law should regulate online, international flows of information requires a firm grasp of past, present, and future patterns of information flow, and their political, economic, social, and cultural consequences.In The Global Flow of Information, specialists from law, economics, public policy, international studies, and other disciplines probe the issues that lie at the intersection of globalization, law, and technology, and pay particular attention to the wider contextual question of Internet regulation in a globalized world. While individual essays examine everything from the pharmaceutical industry to television to "information warfare" against suspected enemies of the state, all contributors address the fundamental question of whether or not the flow of information across national borders can be controlled, and what role the law should play in regulating global information flows.
  10. (2013 ff.) 0.02 
    0.016396139 = product of:
  0.049188413 = sum of:
    0.049188413 = product of:
      0.098376825 = sum of:
        0.098376825 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098376825 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  11. Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017) 0.01 
    0.014492275 = product of:
  0.043476824 = sum of:
    0.043476824 = product of:
      0.08695365 = sum of:
        0.08695365 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08695365 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
    22. 4.2017 11:58:05
  12. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.01 
    0.014492275 = product of:
  0.043476824 = sum of:
    0.043476824 = product of:
      0.08695365 = sum of:
        0.08695365 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08695365 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  13. Poscher, R.: ¬Die Zukunft der informationellen Selbstbestimmung als Recht auf Abwehr von Grundrechtsgefährdungen (2012) 0.01 
    0.014492275 = product of:
  0.043476824 = sum of:
    0.043476824 = product of:
      0.08695365 = sum of:
        0.08695365 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08695365 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 2.2018 12:06:44
    22. 2.2018 12:13:53
  14. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.01 
    0.014346621 = product of:
  0.043039862 = sum of:
    0.043039862 = product of:
      0.086079724 = sum of:
        0.086079724 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086079724 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  15. Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.01 
    0.014346621 = product of:
  0.043039862 = sum of:
    0.043039862 = product of:
      0.086079724 = sum of:
        0.086079724 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086079724 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:18:36
  16. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.01 
    0.014346621 = product of:
  0.043039862 = sum of:
    0.043039862 = product of:
      0.086079724 = sum of:
        0.086079724 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086079724 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
  17. Williamson, N.J.: Classification issues in 2011 : report (2012) 0.01 
    0.012297103 = product of:
  0.036891308 = sum of:
    0.036891308 = product of:
      0.073782615 = sum of:
        0.073782615 = weight(_text_:22 in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073782615 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:17:00
  18. Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015) 0.01 
    0.012297103 = product of:
  0.036891308 = sum of:
    0.036891308 = product of:
      0.073782615 = sum of:
        0.073782615 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073782615 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:27:22
  19. Röthler, D.: "Lehrautomaten" oder die MOOC-Vision der späten 60er Jahre (2014) 0.01 
    0.012297103 = product of:
  0.036891308 = sum of:
    0.036891308 = product of:
      0.073782615 = sum of:
        0.073782615 = weight(_text_:22 in 1552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073782615 = score(doc=1552,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1552, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1552)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 6.2018 11:04:35
  20. EndNote X7 : bibliographies made easy [= Version 17] (2013) 0.01 
    0.012297103 = product of:
  0.036891308 = sum of:
    0.036891308 = product of:
      0.073782615 = sum of:
        0.073782615 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073782615 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    17. 9.2018 18:19:22

Authors

Languages

  • e 481
  • d 180
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 579
  • el 60
  • m 47
  • s 16
  • x 12
  • r 8
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications