Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Sprachretrieval"
  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Galitsky, B.: Can many agents answer questions better than one? (2005) 0.00
    0.0033577727 = product of:
      0.023504408 = sum of:
        0.023504408 = weight(_text_:based in 3094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023504408 = score(doc=3094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11767787 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 3094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3094)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The paper addresses the issue of how online natural language question answering, based on deep semantic analysis, may compete with currently popular keyword search, open domain information retrieval systems, covering a horizontal domain. We suggest the multiagent question answering approach, where each domain is represented by an agent which tries to answer questions taking into account its specific knowledge. The meta-agent controls the cooperation between question answering agents and chooses the most relevant answer(s). We argue that multiagent question answering is optimal in terms of access to business and financial knowledge, flexibility in query phrasing, and efficiency and usability of advice. The knowledge and advice encoded in the system are initially prepared by domain experts. We analyze the commercial application of multiagent question answering and the robustness of the meta-agent. The paper suggests that a multiagent architecture is optimal when a real world question answering domain combines a number of vertical ones to form a horizontal domain.
  2. Radev, D.; Fan, W.; Qu, H.; Wu, H.; Grewal, A.: Probabilistic question answering on the Web (2005) 0.00
    0.0033577727 = product of:
      0.023504408 = sum of:
        0.023504408 = weight(_text_:based in 3455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023504408 = score(doc=3455,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11767787 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 3455, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3455)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Web-based search engines such as Google and NorthernLight return documents that are relevant to a user query, not answers to user questions. We have developed an architecture that augments existing search engines so that they support natural language question answering. The process entails five steps: query modulation, document retrieval, passage extraction, phrase extraction, and answer ranking. In this article, we describe some probabilistic approaches to the last three of these stages. We show how our techniques apply to a number of existing search engines, and we also present results contrasting three different methods for question answering. Our algorithm, probabilistic phrase reranking (PPR), uses proximity and question type features and achieves a total reciprocal document rank of .20 an the TREC8 corpus. Our techniques have been implemented as a Web-accessible system, called NSIR.