Search (276 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Fiction in libraries (1986) 0.21 
    0.20767131 = product of:
  0.72684956 = sum of:
    0.3869756 = weight(_text_:great in 7462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3869756 = score(doc=7462,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        1.7596185 = fieldWeight in 7462, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7462)
    0.339874 = product of:
      0.679748 = sum of:
        0.679748 = weight(_text_:britain in 7462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.679748 = score(doc=7462,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.29147226 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            2.332119 = fieldWeight in 7462, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    LCSH
    Libraries / Great Britain / Special collections / Fiction collections
    Public libraries / Great Britain
    Fiction in libraries / Great Britain
    PRECIS
    Great Britain / Public libraries / Stock: Fiction
    Subject
    Libraries / Great Britain / Special collections / Fiction collections
    Public libraries / Great Britain
    Fiction in libraries / Great Britain
    Great Britain / Public libraries / Stock: Fiction
  2. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.16 
    0.15508135 = product of:
  0.36185646 = sum of:
    0.05169378 = product of:
      0.15508133 = sum of:
        0.15508133 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15508133 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3311239 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15508133 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15508133 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3311239 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.15508133 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15508133 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3311239 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  3. Sweeney, R.: Dewey in Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1985) 0.12 
    0.11747664 = product of:
  0.41116822 = sum of:
    0.21890645 = weight(_text_:great in 2568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21890645 = score(doc=2568,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.99539053 = fieldWeight in 2568, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2568)
    0.19226176 = product of:
      0.3845235 = sum of:
        0.3845235 = weight(_text_:britain in 2568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3845235 = score(doc=2568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29147226 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            1.3192457 = fieldWeight in 2568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2568)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
  4. Haywood, T.: ¬The withering of public access (1989) 0.12 
    0.11747664 = product of:
  0.41116822 = sum of:
    0.21890645 = weight(_text_:great in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21890645 = score(doc=760,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.99539053 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.19226176 = product of:
      0.3845235 = sum of:
        0.3845235 = weight(_text_:britain in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3845235 = score(doc=760,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.29147226 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            1.3192457 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    LCSH
    Freedom of information / Great Britain
    PRECIS
    Great Britain / Freedom of information
    Subject
    Freedom of information / Great Britain
    Great Britain / Freedom of information
  5. Crawford, M.J.: Information broking : a new carees in information work (1988) 0.10 
    0.10383566 = product of:
  0.36342478 = sum of:
    0.1934878 = weight(_text_:great in 6083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1934878 = score(doc=6083,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.87980926 = fieldWeight in 6083, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6083)
    0.169937 = product of:
      0.339874 = sum of:
        0.339874 = weight(_text_:britain in 6083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.339874 = score(doc=6083,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29147226 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            1.1660595 = fieldWeight in 6083, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    PRECIS
    Great Britain / Information broking services
    Subject
    Great Britain / Information broking services
  6. Slack, F.: Subject searching in OPACs : a general survey of facilities available on OPACs in academic libraries in the UK (1988) 0.07 
    0.073422894 = product of:
  0.25698012 = sum of:
    0.13681653 = weight(_text_:great in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13681653 = score(doc=4241,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.62211907 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
    0.120163605 = product of:
      0.24032721 = sum of:
        0.24032721 = weight(_text_:britain in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24032721 = score(doc=4241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29147226 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            0.8245286 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die neuere Studie: Crawford, J.C. et al.: A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain in: Journal of librarianship and information science 25(1993) no.2, S.85-93)
  7. Van Slype, G.: ¬Les systèmes intégrés de gestion de l'information documentaire dans les enterprises (1989) 0.06 
    0.057500757 = product of:
  0.20125264 = sum of:
    0.02742181 = weight(_text_:based in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02742181 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11767787 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
    0.17383084 = weight(_text_:businesses in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17383084 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29628533 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.5860133 = idf(docFreq=60, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.5867008 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.5860133 = idf(docFreq=60, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Until the 1980s, the handling of documentary information in business was usually split up among 4 unrelated independent departments: the library; archives; secretarial services; and reproduction/printing. The introduction of new technology allows the integration of these operations into a single system; comprising subsystems for: production of internal documents; acquisition and storage of external documents; information retrieval; archive creation and maintenance; and circulation of information between departments, based on local computer networks. In reality, not many businesses are making use of technology available to set up such integrated systems because of the lack of common standards for equipment and software, which makes internal and external communication unreliable. This problem may be resolved in the near future, as a result of discussions now in progress at international level.
  8. Kirby, R.F.: Authority control in NOTIS (1989) 0.04 
    0.04022641 = product of:
  0.14079243 = sum of:
    0.03133921 = weight(_text_:based in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03133921 = score(doc=434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11767787 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.26631355 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
    0.10945322 = weight(_text_:great in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10945322 = score(doc=434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The NOTIS Authority Control Module is based on the MARC Format for Authorities. Because NOTIS is an integrated system, the functions of online create/edit, security, and indexing for authority records is very similar to that for bibliographic records. NOTIS also offers a great deal of flexibility in workflow for authority control.
  9. Fiderio, J.: ¬A great vision (1988) 0.04 
    0.03909044 = product of:
  0.27363306 = sum of:
    0.27363306 = weight(_text_:great in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27363306 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        1.2442381 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  10. Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986) 0.04 
    0.03519811 = product of:
  0.12319338 = sum of:
    0.02742181 = weight(_text_:based in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02742181 = score(doc=1524,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11767787 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
    0.09577157 = weight(_text_:great in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09577157 = score(doc=1524,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
  11. Palmer, J.W.: Subject authority control and syndetic structure - myth and realities : an inquiry into certain subject heading practices and some questions about their implications (1986) 0.04 
    0.03519811 = product of:
  0.12319338 = sum of:
    0.02742181 = weight(_text_:based in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02742181 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11767787 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
    0.09577157 = weight(_text_:great in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09577157 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    An examination of subject heading practices in the card catalogs of libraries in one New York State county and an analysis of selected subject headings found that only the largest libraries were able to provide any kind of subject authority control. Furthermore, not even the largest libraries were able to provide the "See Also" references upon which the Library of Congress assignment of subject headings is based. Changes in LCSH headings resulted in great confusion and a dispersal of resources in the smaller libraries. Is this situation typical of practices at other libraries in other parts of the United States? If so, the implications could be very serious. The study offers no answers, but raises important questions.
  12. Bliss, H.E.: ¬A bibliographic classification : principles and definitions (1985) 0.03 
    0.02936916 = product of:
  0.102792054 = sum of:
    0.05472661 = weight(_text_:great in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05472661 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
    0.04806544 = product of:
      0.09613088 = sum of:
        0.09613088 = weight(_text_:britain in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09613088 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29147226 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            0.32981142 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Henry Evelyn Bliss (1870-1955) devoted several decades of his life to the study of classification and the development of the Bibliographic Classification scheme while serving as a librarian in the College of the City of New York. In the course of the development of the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss developed a body of classification theory published in a number of articles and books, among which the best known are The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences (1929), Organization of Knowledge in Libraries and the Subject Approach to Books (1933; 2nd ed., 1939), and the lengthy preface to A Bibliographic Classification (Volumes 1-2, 1940; 2nd ed., 1952). In developing the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss carefully established its philosophical and theoretical basis, more so than was attempted by the makers of other classification schemes, with the possible exception of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.) and his Colon Classification. The basic principles established by Bliss for the Bibliographic Classification are: consensus, collocation of related subjects, subordination of special to general and gradation in specialty, and the relativity of classes and of classification (hence alternative location and alternative treatment). In the preface to the schedules of A Bibliographic Classification, Bliss spells out the general principles of classification as weIl as principles specifically related to his scheme. The first volume of the schedules appeared in 1940. In 1952, he issued a second edition of the volume with a rewritten preface, from which the following excerpt is taken, and with the addition of a "Concise Synopsis," which is also included here to illustrate the principles of classificatory structure. In the excerpt reprinted below, Bliss discusses the correlation between classes, concepts, and terms, as weIl as the hierarchical structure basic to his classification scheme. In his discussion of cross-classification, Bliss recognizes the "polydimensional" nature of classification and the difficulties inherent in the two-dimensional approach which is characteristic of linear classification. This is one of the earliest works in which the multidimensional nature of classification is recognized. The Bibliographic Classification did not meet with great success in the United States because the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification were already weIl ensconced in American libraries by then. Nonetheless, it attracted considerable attention in the British Commonwealth and elsewhere in the world. A committee was formed in Britain which later became the Bliss Classification Association. A faceted edition of the scheme has been in preparation under the direction of J. Mills and V. Broughton. Several parts of this new edition, entitled Bliss Bibliographic Classification, have been published.
  13. Hestenes, D.: How the brain works : the next great scientific revolution (1987) 0.03 
    0.027363308 = product of:
  0.19154315 = sum of:
    0.19154315 = weight(_text_:great in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19154315 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.87096673 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  14. Morrow, B.: IMPACT public access catalogue (1989) 0.02 
    0.0225025 = product of:
  0.07875875 = sum of:
    0.047008816 = weight(_text_:based in 4059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047008816 = score(doc=4059,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11767787 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.39947033 = fieldWeight in 4059, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4059)
    0.031749934 = product of:
      0.06349987 = sum of:
        0.06349987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06349987 = score(doc=4059,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13677022 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4059, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4059)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Reviews Auto-Graphics, Inc.'s IMPACT system: designed as a CD-ROM index of a library's data base of holdings and bibliographic information. IMPACT is based in the MARC format.
    Source
    CD-ROM librarian. 4(1989), no.1, S.22-26
  15. Horner, J.; Thirlwall, D.: Online searching and the university researcher (1988) 0.02 
    0.01954522 = product of:
  0.13681653 = sum of:
    0.13681653 = weight(_text_:great in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13681653 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.62211907 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a survey, conducted at the University of Manitoba, Canada over the winter of 1985/96, of mediated and end-use online database searching by researchers in the humanities, social sciences, sciences and technologies, and the libraries. Despite great interest and potential, few end-users were identified
  16. Bencken, K.: Auskunftsmittel der allgemeinen Auskunft : Teil A: Allgemeinenzyklopädien (1983) 0.02 
    0.01954522 = product of:
  0.13681653 = sum of:
    0.13681653 = weight(_text_:great in 8998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13681653 = score(doc=8998,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.62211907 = fieldWeight in 8998, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8998)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    Enthält die Lehreinheiten: LE1: Kriterien zur Beurteilung von Allgemeinenzyklopädien - LE2: Meyers Enzyklopädisches Lexikon - LE3: Meyers Enzyklopädisches Lexikon, Jahrbuch - LE4: Brockhaus Enzyklopädie - LE5: Das neue Fische Lexikon in Farbe - LE6-7: New Encyclopaedia Britannica - LE8: Britannica Book of the Year - LE9: La Grande Encyclopédie (Larousse) - LE10: Great Soviet Encyclopaedia
  17. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02 
    0.018752083 = product of:
  0.06563229 = sum of:
    0.039174013 = weight(_text_:based in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039174013 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11767787 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.33289194 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
    0.026458278 = product of:
      0.052916557 = sum of:
        0.052916557 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052916557 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13677022 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  18. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.02 
    0.016327482 = product of:
  0.057146184 = sum of:
    0.047885787 = weight(_text_:great in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047885787 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.21774168 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
    0.009260397 = product of:
      0.018520795 = sum of:
        0.018520795 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018520795 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13677022 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  19. Scott, D.S.: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases (1989) 0.02 
    0.015636176 = product of:
  0.10945322 = sum of:
    0.10945322 = weight(_text_:great in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10945322 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21992016 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    New forms of man-machine interaction are becoming available that have great power for the delivery of information. But the scales of speed and capacity on which the computing machines operate demand new thoughts as to how information can be stored and retrieved. The objective of the discussion in this paper is to argue for a combination of natural-language processing and subject classification to be able to meet the demands
  20. Porter, M.; Galpin, V.: Relevance feedback in a public access catalogue for a research library : Muscat at the Scott Polar Research Institute (1988) 0.02 
    0.015001667 = product of:
  0.052505832 = sum of:
    0.03133921 = weight(_text_:based in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03133921 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11767787 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03905679 = queryNorm
        0.26631355 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
    0.021166623 = product of:
      0.042333245 = sum of:
        0.042333245 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042333245 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13677022 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03905679 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the successful introduction of a sophisticated online catalogue system at the library of the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, using the Muscat program package. The system provides to both end-users and library staff a choice between boolean searching on keywords and access using relevance feedback based on free text in English, mixed with UDC classification numbers. The system is implemented on an IBM 3084 computer. Significant benefits from the application of relevance feedback are reported with 10,000 records on file.
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.1-20

Authors

Languages

  • e 225
  • d 46
  • f 3
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 230
  • m 28
  • s 9
  • r 3
  • u 3
  • d 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications